A group of order 30 has at most 7 subgroups of order 5












4












$begingroup$



Show that a group of order 30 has at most 7 subgroups of order 5.




This should be a basic question (from an introductory algebra course), but I got no clue... Please help!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Each subgroup of order 5 will contain the identity element & 4 other elements. These four elements had better be different to four other elements in a different subgroup. Now count the elements.
    $endgroup$
    – Donald Splutterwit
    Feb 20 '17 at 13:57
















4












$begingroup$



Show that a group of order 30 has at most 7 subgroups of order 5.




This should be a basic question (from an introductory algebra course), but I got no clue... Please help!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Each subgroup of order 5 will contain the identity element & 4 other elements. These four elements had better be different to four other elements in a different subgroup. Now count the elements.
    $endgroup$
    – Donald Splutterwit
    Feb 20 '17 at 13:57














4












4








4





$begingroup$



Show that a group of order 30 has at most 7 subgroups of order 5.




This should be a basic question (from an introductory algebra course), but I got no clue... Please help!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Show that a group of order 30 has at most 7 subgroups of order 5.




This should be a basic question (from an introductory algebra course), but I got no clue... Please help!







abstract-algebra group-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 13 at 19:22









Matt Samuel

38.4k63768




38.4k63768










asked Feb 20 '17 at 13:54









A. ChuA. Chu

7,01593284




7,01593284








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Each subgroup of order 5 will contain the identity element & 4 other elements. These four elements had better be different to four other elements in a different subgroup. Now count the elements.
    $endgroup$
    – Donald Splutterwit
    Feb 20 '17 at 13:57














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Each subgroup of order 5 will contain the identity element & 4 other elements. These four elements had better be different to four other elements in a different subgroup. Now count the elements.
    $endgroup$
    – Donald Splutterwit
    Feb 20 '17 at 13:57








1




1




$begingroup$
Each subgroup of order 5 will contain the identity element & 4 other elements. These four elements had better be different to four other elements in a different subgroup. Now count the elements.
$endgroup$
– Donald Splutterwit
Feb 20 '17 at 13:57




$begingroup$
Each subgroup of order 5 will contain the identity element & 4 other elements. These four elements had better be different to four other elements in a different subgroup. Now count the elements.
$endgroup$
– Donald Splutterwit
Feb 20 '17 at 13:57










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

It's going to have fewer than $7$, but proving that requires some tools it doesn't sound like you have.



Two distinct subgroups of order $5$ intersect only in the identity (by Lagrange's theorem). This means no two will share any nonidentity elements. Thus if there are $m$ subgroups of order $5$, you can calculate exactly how many elements are in their union. This can't be more than $30$, the order of the group.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your answer. Just curious, can you tell me more about "It's going to have fewer than 7"?
    $endgroup$
    – A. Chu
    Feb 20 '17 at 14:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylow_theorems @JASON
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Feb 20 '17 at 14:50



















7












$begingroup$

The intersection of two subgroups is itself a subgroup. Lagrange's Theorem therefore implies that the intersection of two subgroups of order $5$ must have order $1$ or $5$. Therefore, two distinct subgroups of order $5$ must intersect only at the identity element.



If there are $k$ distinct subgroups of order $5$, then there are $1+4k$ distinct elements in those subgroups, which must be at most the order of the group.





Using this GAP code



for G in AllSmallGroups(30) do
S:=Set(List(G,g->Group(g)));
Print(StructureDescription(G)," ",Number(S,H->Size(H)=5),"n");
od;


We can check that every group of order $30$ actually has a unique subgroup of order $5$. These groups are $C_5 times S_3$, $C_3 times D_{10}$, $D_{30}$, and $C_{30}$. (See also Groups of order 30.)






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    Apply Sylow theorem,
    $$30 = 2 times 3 times 5.$$
    No. Of Sylow 5 sub-groups $= 1 mod 5$ and divides 6, i.e. 1 or 6



    So, max 6 subgroups of order 5 is possible.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Your answer is quite hard to understand. I've edited it to include some MathJax, but it could use some additional work. Writing in complete sentences would be a good start.
      $endgroup$
      – Xander Henderson
      Aug 13 '18 at 19:58











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2152948%2fa-group-of-order-30-has-at-most-7-subgroups-of-order-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7












    $begingroup$

    It's going to have fewer than $7$, but proving that requires some tools it doesn't sound like you have.



    Two distinct subgroups of order $5$ intersect only in the identity (by Lagrange's theorem). This means no two will share any nonidentity elements. Thus if there are $m$ subgroups of order $5$, you can calculate exactly how many elements are in their union. This can't be more than $30$, the order of the group.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thank you for your answer. Just curious, can you tell me more about "It's going to have fewer than 7"?
      $endgroup$
      – A. Chu
      Feb 20 '17 at 14:46






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylow_theorems @JASON
      $endgroup$
      – Matt Samuel
      Feb 20 '17 at 14:50
















    7












    $begingroup$

    It's going to have fewer than $7$, but proving that requires some tools it doesn't sound like you have.



    Two distinct subgroups of order $5$ intersect only in the identity (by Lagrange's theorem). This means no two will share any nonidentity elements. Thus if there are $m$ subgroups of order $5$, you can calculate exactly how many elements are in their union. This can't be more than $30$, the order of the group.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thank you for your answer. Just curious, can you tell me more about "It's going to have fewer than 7"?
      $endgroup$
      – A. Chu
      Feb 20 '17 at 14:46






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylow_theorems @JASON
      $endgroup$
      – Matt Samuel
      Feb 20 '17 at 14:50














    7












    7








    7





    $begingroup$

    It's going to have fewer than $7$, but proving that requires some tools it doesn't sound like you have.



    Two distinct subgroups of order $5$ intersect only in the identity (by Lagrange's theorem). This means no two will share any nonidentity elements. Thus if there are $m$ subgroups of order $5$, you can calculate exactly how many elements are in their union. This can't be more than $30$, the order of the group.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    It's going to have fewer than $7$, but proving that requires some tools it doesn't sound like you have.



    Two distinct subgroups of order $5$ intersect only in the identity (by Lagrange's theorem). This means no two will share any nonidentity elements. Thus if there are $m$ subgroups of order $5$, you can calculate exactly how many elements are in their union. This can't be more than $30$, the order of the group.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Feb 20 '17 at 13:59









    Matt SamuelMatt Samuel

    38.4k63768




    38.4k63768












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you for your answer. Just curious, can you tell me more about "It's going to have fewer than 7"?
      $endgroup$
      – A. Chu
      Feb 20 '17 at 14:46






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylow_theorems @JASON
      $endgroup$
      – Matt Samuel
      Feb 20 '17 at 14:50


















    • $begingroup$
      Thank you for your answer. Just curious, can you tell me more about "It's going to have fewer than 7"?
      $endgroup$
      – A. Chu
      Feb 20 '17 at 14:46






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylow_theorems @JASON
      $endgroup$
      – Matt Samuel
      Feb 20 '17 at 14:50
















    $begingroup$
    Thank you for your answer. Just curious, can you tell me more about "It's going to have fewer than 7"?
    $endgroup$
    – A. Chu
    Feb 20 '17 at 14:46




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for your answer. Just curious, can you tell me more about "It's going to have fewer than 7"?
    $endgroup$
    – A. Chu
    Feb 20 '17 at 14:46




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylow_theorems @JASON
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Feb 20 '17 at 14:50




    $begingroup$
    en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylow_theorems @JASON
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Feb 20 '17 at 14:50











    7












    $begingroup$

    The intersection of two subgroups is itself a subgroup. Lagrange's Theorem therefore implies that the intersection of two subgroups of order $5$ must have order $1$ or $5$. Therefore, two distinct subgroups of order $5$ must intersect only at the identity element.



    If there are $k$ distinct subgroups of order $5$, then there are $1+4k$ distinct elements in those subgroups, which must be at most the order of the group.





    Using this GAP code



    for G in AllSmallGroups(30) do
    S:=Set(List(G,g->Group(g)));
    Print(StructureDescription(G)," ",Number(S,H->Size(H)=5),"n");
    od;


    We can check that every group of order $30$ actually has a unique subgroup of order $5$. These groups are $C_5 times S_3$, $C_3 times D_{10}$, $D_{30}$, and $C_{30}$. (See also Groups of order 30.)






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      7












      $begingroup$

      The intersection of two subgroups is itself a subgroup. Lagrange's Theorem therefore implies that the intersection of two subgroups of order $5$ must have order $1$ or $5$. Therefore, two distinct subgroups of order $5$ must intersect only at the identity element.



      If there are $k$ distinct subgroups of order $5$, then there are $1+4k$ distinct elements in those subgroups, which must be at most the order of the group.





      Using this GAP code



      for G in AllSmallGroups(30) do
      S:=Set(List(G,g->Group(g)));
      Print(StructureDescription(G)," ",Number(S,H->Size(H)=5),"n");
      od;


      We can check that every group of order $30$ actually has a unique subgroup of order $5$. These groups are $C_5 times S_3$, $C_3 times D_{10}$, $D_{30}$, and $C_{30}$. (See also Groups of order 30.)






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        7












        7








        7





        $begingroup$

        The intersection of two subgroups is itself a subgroup. Lagrange's Theorem therefore implies that the intersection of two subgroups of order $5$ must have order $1$ or $5$. Therefore, two distinct subgroups of order $5$ must intersect only at the identity element.



        If there are $k$ distinct subgroups of order $5$, then there are $1+4k$ distinct elements in those subgroups, which must be at most the order of the group.





        Using this GAP code



        for G in AllSmallGroups(30) do
        S:=Set(List(G,g->Group(g)));
        Print(StructureDescription(G)," ",Number(S,H->Size(H)=5),"n");
        od;


        We can check that every group of order $30$ actually has a unique subgroup of order $5$. These groups are $C_5 times S_3$, $C_3 times D_{10}$, $D_{30}$, and $C_{30}$. (See also Groups of order 30.)






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The intersection of two subgroups is itself a subgroup. Lagrange's Theorem therefore implies that the intersection of two subgroups of order $5$ must have order $1$ or $5$. Therefore, two distinct subgroups of order $5$ must intersect only at the identity element.



        If there are $k$ distinct subgroups of order $5$, then there are $1+4k$ distinct elements in those subgroups, which must be at most the order of the group.





        Using this GAP code



        for G in AllSmallGroups(30) do
        S:=Set(List(G,g->Group(g)));
        Print(StructureDescription(G)," ",Number(S,H->Size(H)=5),"n");
        od;


        We can check that every group of order $30$ actually has a unique subgroup of order $5$. These groups are $C_5 times S_3$, $C_3 times D_{10}$, $D_{30}$, and $C_{30}$. (See also Groups of order 30.)







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Feb 20 '17 at 14:16

























        answered Feb 20 '17 at 13:59









        Rebecca J. StonesRebecca J. Stones

        21k22781




        21k22781























            0












            $begingroup$

            Apply Sylow theorem,
            $$30 = 2 times 3 times 5.$$
            No. Of Sylow 5 sub-groups $= 1 mod 5$ and divides 6, i.e. 1 or 6



            So, max 6 subgroups of order 5 is possible.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Your answer is quite hard to understand. I've edited it to include some MathJax, but it could use some additional work. Writing in complete sentences would be a good start.
              $endgroup$
              – Xander Henderson
              Aug 13 '18 at 19:58
















            0












            $begingroup$

            Apply Sylow theorem,
            $$30 = 2 times 3 times 5.$$
            No. Of Sylow 5 sub-groups $= 1 mod 5$ and divides 6, i.e. 1 or 6



            So, max 6 subgroups of order 5 is possible.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Your answer is quite hard to understand. I've edited it to include some MathJax, but it could use some additional work. Writing in complete sentences would be a good start.
              $endgroup$
              – Xander Henderson
              Aug 13 '18 at 19:58














            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Apply Sylow theorem,
            $$30 = 2 times 3 times 5.$$
            No. Of Sylow 5 sub-groups $= 1 mod 5$ and divides 6, i.e. 1 or 6



            So, max 6 subgroups of order 5 is possible.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Apply Sylow theorem,
            $$30 = 2 times 3 times 5.$$
            No. Of Sylow 5 sub-groups $= 1 mod 5$ and divides 6, i.e. 1 or 6



            So, max 6 subgroups of order 5 is possible.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Aug 13 '18 at 19:58









            Xander Henderson

            14.4k103554




            14.4k103554










            answered Aug 13 '18 at 19:27









            uttam sumanuttam suman

            1




            1












            • $begingroup$
              Your answer is quite hard to understand. I've edited it to include some MathJax, but it could use some additional work. Writing in complete sentences would be a good start.
              $endgroup$
              – Xander Henderson
              Aug 13 '18 at 19:58


















            • $begingroup$
              Your answer is quite hard to understand. I've edited it to include some MathJax, but it could use some additional work. Writing in complete sentences would be a good start.
              $endgroup$
              – Xander Henderson
              Aug 13 '18 at 19:58
















            $begingroup$
            Your answer is quite hard to understand. I've edited it to include some MathJax, but it could use some additional work. Writing in complete sentences would be a good start.
            $endgroup$
            – Xander Henderson
            Aug 13 '18 at 19:58




            $begingroup$
            Your answer is quite hard to understand. I've edited it to include some MathJax, but it could use some additional work. Writing in complete sentences would be a good start.
            $endgroup$
            – Xander Henderson
            Aug 13 '18 at 19:58


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2152948%2fa-group-of-order-30-has-at-most-7-subgroups-of-order-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

            Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

            A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$