Contour Integrantion of a exponential function












0












$begingroup$


I am trying to evaluate an integral of type



$$ I = int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{e^{ikx}P(x)}{Q(x)} ,dx$$
where





  1. $P(x), Q(x)$ are polynomials;


  2. $Q(x)$ has no zeros on the real line;

  3. $mathoperator{Order}(P(x)) + 2 > mathoperator{Order}(Q(x)).$


Now according to theory, If I want the contribution of the curved portion of the contour to be zero I have to choose a semi-circular contour lying on top of the Real axis if $k > 0,$ and choose a semi-circular contour lying below the Real axis if $k < 0.$ These contours are shown below:



Upper Semicircle



Fig 1: Upper Semi-Circular Contour ( for k > 0 )



Lower Semicircle



Fig 2: Lower semicircular contour ( for k < 0 )



Now to prove that the curved section of the contour does not contribute I need to compute an ML estimate.Now let c = $left|kright|$.Regardless of which countour we pick in each of the cases:



Case 1 ( k > 0 ) :



$$
left| int_{gamma _R} f(z) dz right| leq ML
$$



$$
left| int_{gamma _R} f(z) dz right| leq
lim_{R - > infty} left [
frac{left|e^{icz}right|
left| P(z) right|}
{left| Q(z) right|} right] * pi R
$$



Case 2 ( k < 0 ) :



$$
left| int_{gamma _R} f(z) dz right| leq ML
$$



$$
left| int_{gamma _R} f(z) dz right| leq
lim_{R - > infty} left [
frac{left|e^{-icz}right|
left| P(z) right|}
{left| Q(z) right|} right] * pi R
$$



Where $z = Re^{itheta}$ in both cases.Which seems to imply that the choice of contour does not matter because $|e^{icx}|$ =
$|e^{-icx}|$ = 1, so the two ML estimates will always go to the same value.How is this reasoning wrong? Is there a special reason why the ML estimate over the curved portion will only go to zero if I pick the appropriate semi-circular contour?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I am trying to evaluate an integral of type



    $$ I = int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{e^{ikx}P(x)}{Q(x)} ,dx$$
    where





    1. $P(x), Q(x)$ are polynomials;


    2. $Q(x)$ has no zeros on the real line;

    3. $mathoperator{Order}(P(x)) + 2 > mathoperator{Order}(Q(x)).$


    Now according to theory, If I want the contribution of the curved portion of the contour to be zero I have to choose a semi-circular contour lying on top of the Real axis if $k > 0,$ and choose a semi-circular contour lying below the Real axis if $k < 0.$ These contours are shown below:



    Upper Semicircle



    Fig 1: Upper Semi-Circular Contour ( for k > 0 )



    Lower Semicircle



    Fig 2: Lower semicircular contour ( for k < 0 )



    Now to prove that the curved section of the contour does not contribute I need to compute an ML estimate.Now let c = $left|kright|$.Regardless of which countour we pick in each of the cases:



    Case 1 ( k > 0 ) :



    $$
    left| int_{gamma _R} f(z) dz right| leq ML
    $$



    $$
    left| int_{gamma _R} f(z) dz right| leq
    lim_{R - > infty} left [
    frac{left|e^{icz}right|
    left| P(z) right|}
    {left| Q(z) right|} right] * pi R
    $$



    Case 2 ( k < 0 ) :



    $$
    left| int_{gamma _R} f(z) dz right| leq ML
    $$



    $$
    left| int_{gamma _R} f(z) dz right| leq
    lim_{R - > infty} left [
    frac{left|e^{-icz}right|
    left| P(z) right|}
    {left| Q(z) right|} right] * pi R
    $$



    Where $z = Re^{itheta}$ in both cases.Which seems to imply that the choice of contour does not matter because $|e^{icx}|$ =
    $|e^{-icx}|$ = 1, so the two ML estimates will always go to the same value.How is this reasoning wrong? Is there a special reason why the ML estimate over the curved portion will only go to zero if I pick the appropriate semi-circular contour?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I am trying to evaluate an integral of type



      $$ I = int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{e^{ikx}P(x)}{Q(x)} ,dx$$
      where





      1. $P(x), Q(x)$ are polynomials;


      2. $Q(x)$ has no zeros on the real line;

      3. $mathoperator{Order}(P(x)) + 2 > mathoperator{Order}(Q(x)).$


      Now according to theory, If I want the contribution of the curved portion of the contour to be zero I have to choose a semi-circular contour lying on top of the Real axis if $k > 0,$ and choose a semi-circular contour lying below the Real axis if $k < 0.$ These contours are shown below:



      Upper Semicircle



      Fig 1: Upper Semi-Circular Contour ( for k > 0 )



      Lower Semicircle



      Fig 2: Lower semicircular contour ( for k < 0 )



      Now to prove that the curved section of the contour does not contribute I need to compute an ML estimate.Now let c = $left|kright|$.Regardless of which countour we pick in each of the cases:



      Case 1 ( k > 0 ) :



      $$
      left| int_{gamma _R} f(z) dz right| leq ML
      $$



      $$
      left| int_{gamma _R} f(z) dz right| leq
      lim_{R - > infty} left [
      frac{left|e^{icz}right|
      left| P(z) right|}
      {left| Q(z) right|} right] * pi R
      $$



      Case 2 ( k < 0 ) :



      $$
      left| int_{gamma _R} f(z) dz right| leq ML
      $$



      $$
      left| int_{gamma _R} f(z) dz right| leq
      lim_{R - > infty} left [
      frac{left|e^{-icz}right|
      left| P(z) right|}
      {left| Q(z) right|} right] * pi R
      $$



      Where $z = Re^{itheta}$ in both cases.Which seems to imply that the choice of contour does not matter because $|e^{icx}|$ =
      $|e^{-icx}|$ = 1, so the two ML estimates will always go to the same value.How is this reasoning wrong? Is there a special reason why the ML estimate over the curved portion will only go to zero if I pick the appropriate semi-circular contour?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am trying to evaluate an integral of type



      $$ I = int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{e^{ikx}P(x)}{Q(x)} ,dx$$
      where





      1. $P(x), Q(x)$ are polynomials;


      2. $Q(x)$ has no zeros on the real line;

      3. $mathoperator{Order}(P(x)) + 2 > mathoperator{Order}(Q(x)).$


      Now according to theory, If I want the contribution of the curved portion of the contour to be zero I have to choose a semi-circular contour lying on top of the Real axis if $k > 0,$ and choose a semi-circular contour lying below the Real axis if $k < 0.$ These contours are shown below:



      Upper Semicircle



      Fig 1: Upper Semi-Circular Contour ( for k > 0 )



      Lower Semicircle



      Fig 2: Lower semicircular contour ( for k < 0 )



      Now to prove that the curved section of the contour does not contribute I need to compute an ML estimate.Now let c = $left|kright|$.Regardless of which countour we pick in each of the cases:



      Case 1 ( k > 0 ) :



      $$
      left| int_{gamma _R} f(z) dz right| leq ML
      $$



      $$
      left| int_{gamma _R} f(z) dz right| leq
      lim_{R - > infty} left [
      frac{left|e^{icz}right|
      left| P(z) right|}
      {left| Q(z) right|} right] * pi R
      $$



      Case 2 ( k < 0 ) :



      $$
      left| int_{gamma _R} f(z) dz right| leq ML
      $$



      $$
      left| int_{gamma _R} f(z) dz right| leq
      lim_{R - > infty} left [
      frac{left|e^{-icz}right|
      left| P(z) right|}
      {left| Q(z) right|} right] * pi R
      $$



      Where $z = Re^{itheta}$ in both cases.Which seems to imply that the choice of contour does not matter because $|e^{icx}|$ =
      $|e^{-icx}|$ = 1, so the two ML estimates will always go to the same value.How is this reasoning wrong? Is there a special reason why the ML estimate over the curved portion will only go to zero if I pick the appropriate semi-circular contour?







      integration complex-analysis complex-integration






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 12 at 14:15









      amWhy

      1




      1










      asked Mar 16 '14 at 17:19









      KillaKemKillaKem

      2751416




      2751416






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Assuming $k$ is real : $|exp(ikz)|=|exp(ik(x+iy))|=exp(-ky)$. This expression is less than $1$ if $k>0$ and $y>0$ or if $k<0$ and $y<0$. Thus you want to use a semicircle in the upper halfplane when $k>0$ and a semicricle in the lower halfplane when $k<0$.



          If $k$ is not real, your integral won't converge.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f714454%2fcontour-integrantion-of-a-exponential-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            Assuming $k$ is real : $|exp(ikz)|=|exp(ik(x+iy))|=exp(-ky)$. This expression is less than $1$ if $k>0$ and $y>0$ or if $k<0$ and $y<0$. Thus you want to use a semicircle in the upper halfplane when $k>0$ and a semicricle in the lower halfplane when $k<0$.



            If $k$ is not real, your integral won't converge.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              Assuming $k$ is real : $|exp(ikz)|=|exp(ik(x+iy))|=exp(-ky)$. This expression is less than $1$ if $k>0$ and $y>0$ or if $k<0$ and $y<0$. Thus you want to use a semicircle in the upper halfplane when $k>0$ and a semicricle in the lower halfplane when $k<0$.



              If $k$ is not real, your integral won't converge.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Assuming $k$ is real : $|exp(ikz)|=|exp(ik(x+iy))|=exp(-ky)$. This expression is less than $1$ if $k>0$ and $y>0$ or if $k<0$ and $y<0$. Thus you want to use a semicircle in the upper halfplane when $k>0$ and a semicricle in the lower halfplane when $k<0$.



                If $k$ is not real, your integral won't converge.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Assuming $k$ is real : $|exp(ikz)|=|exp(ik(x+iy))|=exp(-ky)$. This expression is less than $1$ if $k>0$ and $y>0$ or if $k<0$ and $y<0$. Thus you want to use a semicircle in the upper halfplane when $k>0$ and a semicricle in the lower halfplane when $k<0$.



                If $k$ is not real, your integral won't converge.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 16 '14 at 18:24









                mrfmrf

                37.4k54685




                37.4k54685






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f714454%2fcontour-integrantion-of-a-exponential-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                    Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

                    A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$