Mixing
In a saturated solution, why is there ongoing dissolution and crystallisation?
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
I was studying equilibrium, and had this question..
In a saturated solution with sugar dissolved, why is there a constant process of dissolving and crystallising? What I mean by this is, why don't the already dissolved sugar just stay that way, and the excess undissolved sugar stay that way? As I thought this would seem easier, and neater (?), wouldn't it??
Is it because the undissolved sugar is still in water, and that means it will want to dissolve, but since the solvent has reached maximum amount of solutes it has to kick some sugar out and hence there is a process of crystalisation??
I am sorry for a rather stupid question... But any explanation is much, much appreciated...
equilibrium
asked yesterday
Brian Kum
444
New contributor
Brian Kum is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
I was studying equilibrium, and had this question..
In a saturated solution with sugar dissolved, why is there a constant process of dissolving and crystallising? What I mean by this is, why don't the already dissolved sugar just stay that way, and the excess undissolved sugar stay that way? As I thought this would seem easier, and neater (?), wouldn't it??
Is it because the undissolved sugar is still in water, and that means it will want to dissolve, but since the solvent has reached maximum amount of solutes it has to kick some sugar out and hence there is a process of crystalisation??
I am sorry for a rather stupid question... But any explanation is much, much appreciated...
equilibrium
asked yesterday
Brian Kum
444
New contributor
Brian Kum is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
What could cause one of the processes to stop? How would having a lot of dissolved sugar cause sugar to not dissolve, or lots of crystals cause crystallization to stop?
– Acccumulation
yesterday
Neater, until you tag the sugar water with radioactive isotope and put untagged sugar crystal in there, and is shocked when you find tagged molecule in the crystal a few minute later.
– user3528438
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
I was studying equilibrium, and had this question..
In a saturated solution with sugar dissolved, why is there a constant process of dissolving and crystallising? What I mean by this is, why don't the already dissolved sugar just stay that way, and the excess undissolved sugar stay that way? As I thought this would seem easier, and neater (?), wouldn't it??
Is it because the undissolved sugar is still in water, and that means it will want to dissolve, but since the solvent has reached maximum amount of solutes it has to kick some sugar out and hence there is a process of crystalisation??
I am sorry for a rather stupid question... But any explanation is much, much appreciated...
equilibrium
asked yesterday
Brian Kum
444
New contributor
Brian Kum is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I was studying equilibrium, and had this question..
In a saturated solution with sugar dissolved, why is there a constant process of dissolving and crystallising? What I mean by this is, why don't the already dissolved sugar just stay that way, and the excess undissolved sugar stay that way? As I thought this would seem easier, and neater (?), wouldn't it??
Is it because the undissolved sugar is still in water, and that means it will want to dissolve, but since the solvent has reached maximum amount of solutes it has to kick some sugar out and hence there is a process of crystalisation??
I am sorry for a rather stupid question... But any explanation is much, much appreciated...
equilibrium
equilibrium
asked yesterday
Brian Kum
444
New contributor
Brian Kum is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
Brian Kum
444
New contributor
Brian Kum is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
Brian Kum
444
New contributor
Brian Kum is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
Brian Kum
444
asked yesterday
Brian Kum
444
444
New contributor
Brian Kum is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Brian Kum is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Brian Kum is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
What could cause one of the processes to stop? How would having a lot of dissolved sugar cause sugar to not dissolve, or lots of crystals cause crystallization to stop?
– Acccumulation
yesterday
Neater, until you tag the sugar water with radioactive isotope and put untagged sugar crystal in there, and is shocked when you find tagged molecule in the crystal a few minute later.
– user3528438
yesterday
add a comment |
1
What could cause one of the processes to stop? How would having a lot of dissolved sugar cause sugar to not dissolve, or lots of crystals cause crystallization to stop?
– Acccumulation
yesterday
Neater, until you tag the sugar water with radioactive isotope and put untagged sugar crystal in there, and is shocked when you find tagged molecule in the crystal a few minute later.
– user3528438
yesterday
1
1
What could cause one of the processes to stop? How would having a lot of dissolved sugar cause sugar to not dissolve, or lots of crystals cause crystallization to stop?
– Acccumulation
yesterday
What could cause one of the processes to stop? How would having a lot of dissolved sugar cause sugar to not dissolve, or lots of crystals cause crystallization to stop?
– Acccumulation
yesterday
Neater, until you tag the sugar water with radioactive isotope and put untagged sugar crystal in there, and is shocked when you find tagged molecule in the crystal a few minute later.
– user3528438
yesterday
Neater, until you tag the sugar water with radioactive isotope and put untagged sugar crystal in there, and is shocked when you find tagged molecule in the crystal a few minute later.
– user3528438
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
Because equilibrium is dynamic not static
There are many things in the world of chemistry which could be simpler but are not. Equilibrium is one of them.
There are few chemical processes where equilibrium is equivalent to the situation where everything just stops. Equilibrium normally occurs when the rates of processes going forward are the same as the rates going backward, not when things stop happening. In this case the rate of dissolution is the same as the rate of crystallisation.
On a molecular level things are very dynamic. Molecules in the solution are hitting crystals all the time. Molecules in the crystal are vibrating and being hit by molecules of the solvent: sometimes the molecules in the crystal have enough energy to escape from the crystal and go into solution. Equilibrium is the point where those two reactions have equal rates, not where all the activity stops.
We know this is true in real solutions from several experiments. We can, for example, label the molecules in the crystal with radioactive versions of one of their atoms (eg carbon 14). Even if we start with a saturated non-radioactive solution and add radioactive crystals of the same compound, the radioactivity will spread to the solution (see this question Proof of Dynamic Nature of Equilibrium).
The key thing is that all equilibria in chemistry are dynamic. The major difference in many cases is how dynamic. Some happen very slowly, others very quickly. But the position of the equilibrium only has a weak relationship to the speed of the equilibrium.
answered yesterday
matt_black
17.4k249105
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
Because equilibrium is dynamic not static
There are many things in the world of chemistry which could be simpler but are not. Equilibrium is one of them.
There are few chemical processes where equilibrium is equivalent to the situation where everything just stops. Equilibrium normally occurs when the rates of processes going forward are the same as the rates going backward, not when things stop happening. In this case the rate of dissolution is the same as the rate of crystallisation.
On a molecular level things are very dynamic. Molecules in the solution are hitting crystals all the time. Molecules in the crystal are vibrating and being hit by molecules of the solvent: sometimes the molecules in the crystal have enough energy to escape from the crystal and go into solution. Equilibrium is the point where those two reactions have equal rates, not where all the activity stops.
We know this is true in real solutions from several experiments. We can, for example, label the molecules in the crystal with radioactive versions of one of their atoms (eg carbon 14). Even if we start with a saturated non-radioactive solution and add radioactive crystals of the same compound, the radioactivity will spread to the solution (see this question Proof of Dynamic Nature of Equilibrium).
The key thing is that all equilibria in chemistry are dynamic. The major difference in many cases is how dynamic. Some happen very slowly, others very quickly. But the position of the equilibrium only has a weak relationship to the speed of the equilibrium.
answered yesterday
matt_black
17.4k249105
add a comment |
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
Because equilibrium is dynamic not static
There are many things in the world of chemistry which could be simpler but are not. Equilibrium is one of them.
There are few chemical processes where equilibrium is equivalent to the situation where everything just stops. Equilibrium normally occurs when the rates of processes going forward are the same as the rates going backward, not when things stop happening. In this case the rate of dissolution is the same as the rate of crystallisation.
On a molecular level things are very dynamic. Molecules in the solution are hitting crystals all the time. Molecules in the crystal are vibrating and being hit by molecules of the solvent: sometimes the molecules in the crystal have enough energy to escape from the crystal and go into solution. Equilibrium is the point where those two reactions have equal rates, not where all the activity stops.
We know this is true in real solutions from several experiments. We can, for example, label the molecules in the crystal with radioactive versions of one of their atoms (eg carbon 14). Even if we start with a saturated non-radioactive solution and add radioactive crystals of the same compound, the radioactivity will spread to the solution (see this question Proof of Dynamic Nature of Equilibrium).
The key thing is that all equilibria in chemistry are dynamic. The major difference in many cases is how dynamic. Some happen very slowly, others very quickly. But the position of the equilibrium only has a weak relationship to the speed of the equilibrium.
answered yesterday
matt_black
17.4k249105
add a comment |
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
Because equilibrium is dynamic not static
There are many things in the world of chemistry which could be simpler but are not. Equilibrium is one of them.
There are few chemical processes where equilibrium is equivalent to the situation where everything just stops. Equilibrium normally occurs when the rates of processes going forward are the same as the rates going backward, not when things stop happening. In this case the rate of dissolution is the same as the rate of crystallisation.
On a molecular level things are very dynamic. Molecules in the solution are hitting crystals all the time. Molecules in the crystal are vibrating and being hit by molecules of the solvent: sometimes the molecules in the crystal have enough energy to escape from the crystal and go into solution. Equilibrium is the point where those two reactions have equal rates, not where all the activity stops.
We know this is true in real solutions from several experiments. We can, for example, label the molecules in the crystal with radioactive versions of one of their atoms (eg carbon 14). Even if we start with a saturated non-radioactive solution and add radioactive crystals of the same compound, the radioactivity will spread to the solution (see this question Proof of Dynamic Nature of Equilibrium).
The key thing is that all equilibria in chemistry are dynamic. The major difference in many cases is how dynamic. Some happen very slowly, others very quickly. But the position of the equilibrium only has a weak relationship to the speed of the equilibrium.
answered yesterday
matt_black
17.4k249105
Because equilibrium is dynamic not static
There are many things in the world of chemistry which could be simpler but are not. Equilibrium is one of them.
There are few chemical processes where equilibrium is equivalent to the situation where everything just stops. Equilibrium normally occurs when the rates of processes going forward are the same as the rates going backward, not when things stop happening. In this case the rate of dissolution is the same as the rate of crystallisation.
On a molecular level things are very dynamic. Molecules in the solution are hitting crystals all the time. Molecules in the crystal are vibrating and being hit by molecules of the solvent: sometimes the molecules in the crystal have enough energy to escape from the crystal and go into solution. Equilibrium is the point where those two reactions have equal rates, not where all the activity stops.
We know this is true in real solutions from several experiments. We can, for example, label the molecules in the crystal with radioactive versions of one of their atoms (eg carbon 14). Even if we start with a saturated non-radioactive solution and add radioactive crystals of the same compound, the radioactivity will spread to the solution (see this question Proof of Dynamic Nature of Equilibrium).
The key thing is that all equilibria in chemistry are dynamic. The major difference in many cases is how dynamic. Some happen very slowly, others very quickly. But the position of the equilibrium only has a weak relationship to the speed of the equilibrium.
answered yesterday
matt_black
17.4k249105
answered yesterday
matt_black
17.4k249105
answered yesterday
matt_black
17.4k249105
answered yesterday
matt_black
17.4k249105
17.4k249105
add a comment |
add a comment |
Brian Kum is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Brian Kum is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Brian Kum is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Brian Kum is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104545%2fin-a-saturated-solution-why-is-there-ongoing-dissolution-and-crystallisation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
What could cause one of the processes to stop? How would having a lot of dissolved sugar cause sugar to not dissolve, or lots of crystals cause crystallization to stop?
– Acccumulation
yesterday
Neater, until you tag the sugar water with radioactive isotope and put untagged sugar crystal in there, and is shocked when you find tagged molecule in the crystal a few minute later.
– user3528438
yesterday