Is it always possible to fit these pieces in a square?











up vote
8
down vote

favorite
2












Consider all possible pairs of squares that can fit in a row of length $n$ where every square has a width of 1. If I have a large square of width $n$, can all such pairs of squares fit in the large square simultaneously?
It's hard to explain without an example so here is the case when $n=4$:



enter image description here



To the left are all the pairs of squares and to the right is a way for them to fit in the $n$ by $n$ square. Note that the pairs are not allowed to be moved horizontally but can be moved vertically.



It becomes a little harder but still possible when $n=5$:



enter image description here



What I'm interested in is the general case. Is it possible to fit all pairs in the square for any $n$?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Pazzaz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • What does "all possible pieces (disconnected or connected) of width 2 and height of 1 that could fit in the square" mean? Can you show us how to generate the pieces for a given square?
    – John Douma
    2 days ago












  • @JohnDouma Well a piece here simply consists of choosing two squares in a single row of length n. So the total number of pieces will be (n choose 2).
    – Pazzaz
    2 days ago






  • 1




    I think you have to specify the problem more accurately. A triangle can have width $2$ and height $1$, for example, and that seems to be different from what you mean (and that is without thinking about figures which are not convex). I think you mean figures constructed of two $1times 1$ squares in a particular kind of configuration (as in your comment). And these sub-figures need not be connected. I do think your intended question is interesting, and worth asking, but the way you have asked it is misleading.
    – Mark Bennet
    2 days ago










  • @MarkBennet I agree, I did leave out some important parts. I've edited the question some, it should be more clear now.
    – Pazzaz
    2 days ago










  • Well, if possible, there will always be $n^2-2binom n2=n$ leftover spaces.
    – YiFan
    2 days ago















up vote
8
down vote

favorite
2












Consider all possible pairs of squares that can fit in a row of length $n$ where every square has a width of 1. If I have a large square of width $n$, can all such pairs of squares fit in the large square simultaneously?
It's hard to explain without an example so here is the case when $n=4$:



enter image description here



To the left are all the pairs of squares and to the right is a way for them to fit in the $n$ by $n$ square. Note that the pairs are not allowed to be moved horizontally but can be moved vertically.



It becomes a little harder but still possible when $n=5$:



enter image description here



What I'm interested in is the general case. Is it possible to fit all pairs in the square for any $n$?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Pazzaz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • What does "all possible pieces (disconnected or connected) of width 2 and height of 1 that could fit in the square" mean? Can you show us how to generate the pieces for a given square?
    – John Douma
    2 days ago












  • @JohnDouma Well a piece here simply consists of choosing two squares in a single row of length n. So the total number of pieces will be (n choose 2).
    – Pazzaz
    2 days ago






  • 1




    I think you have to specify the problem more accurately. A triangle can have width $2$ and height $1$, for example, and that seems to be different from what you mean (and that is without thinking about figures which are not convex). I think you mean figures constructed of two $1times 1$ squares in a particular kind of configuration (as in your comment). And these sub-figures need not be connected. I do think your intended question is interesting, and worth asking, but the way you have asked it is misleading.
    – Mark Bennet
    2 days ago










  • @MarkBennet I agree, I did leave out some important parts. I've edited the question some, it should be more clear now.
    – Pazzaz
    2 days ago










  • Well, if possible, there will always be $n^2-2binom n2=n$ leftover spaces.
    – YiFan
    2 days ago













up vote
8
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
8
down vote

favorite
2






2





Consider all possible pairs of squares that can fit in a row of length $n$ where every square has a width of 1. If I have a large square of width $n$, can all such pairs of squares fit in the large square simultaneously?
It's hard to explain without an example so here is the case when $n=4$:



enter image description here



To the left are all the pairs of squares and to the right is a way for them to fit in the $n$ by $n$ square. Note that the pairs are not allowed to be moved horizontally but can be moved vertically.



It becomes a little harder but still possible when $n=5$:



enter image description here



What I'm interested in is the general case. Is it possible to fit all pairs in the square for any $n$?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Pazzaz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Consider all possible pairs of squares that can fit in a row of length $n$ where every square has a width of 1. If I have a large square of width $n$, can all such pairs of squares fit in the large square simultaneously?
It's hard to explain without an example so here is the case when $n=4$:



enter image description here



To the left are all the pairs of squares and to the right is a way for them to fit in the $n$ by $n$ square. Note that the pairs are not allowed to be moved horizontally but can be moved vertically.



It becomes a little harder but still possible when $n=5$:



enter image description here



What I'm interested in is the general case. Is it possible to fit all pairs in the square for any $n$?







recreational-mathematics






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Pazzaz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Pazzaz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Jens

3,5672828




3,5672828






New contributor




Pazzaz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









Pazzaz

435




435




New contributor




Pazzaz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Pazzaz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Pazzaz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • What does "all possible pieces (disconnected or connected) of width 2 and height of 1 that could fit in the square" mean? Can you show us how to generate the pieces for a given square?
    – John Douma
    2 days ago












  • @JohnDouma Well a piece here simply consists of choosing two squares in a single row of length n. So the total number of pieces will be (n choose 2).
    – Pazzaz
    2 days ago






  • 1




    I think you have to specify the problem more accurately. A triangle can have width $2$ and height $1$, for example, and that seems to be different from what you mean (and that is without thinking about figures which are not convex). I think you mean figures constructed of two $1times 1$ squares in a particular kind of configuration (as in your comment). And these sub-figures need not be connected. I do think your intended question is interesting, and worth asking, but the way you have asked it is misleading.
    – Mark Bennet
    2 days ago










  • @MarkBennet I agree, I did leave out some important parts. I've edited the question some, it should be more clear now.
    – Pazzaz
    2 days ago










  • Well, if possible, there will always be $n^2-2binom n2=n$ leftover spaces.
    – YiFan
    2 days ago


















  • What does "all possible pieces (disconnected or connected) of width 2 and height of 1 that could fit in the square" mean? Can you show us how to generate the pieces for a given square?
    – John Douma
    2 days ago












  • @JohnDouma Well a piece here simply consists of choosing two squares in a single row of length n. So the total number of pieces will be (n choose 2).
    – Pazzaz
    2 days ago






  • 1




    I think you have to specify the problem more accurately. A triangle can have width $2$ and height $1$, for example, and that seems to be different from what you mean (and that is without thinking about figures which are not convex). I think you mean figures constructed of two $1times 1$ squares in a particular kind of configuration (as in your comment). And these sub-figures need not be connected. I do think your intended question is interesting, and worth asking, but the way you have asked it is misleading.
    – Mark Bennet
    2 days ago










  • @MarkBennet I agree, I did leave out some important parts. I've edited the question some, it should be more clear now.
    – Pazzaz
    2 days ago










  • Well, if possible, there will always be $n^2-2binom n2=n$ leftover spaces.
    – YiFan
    2 days ago
















What does "all possible pieces (disconnected or connected) of width 2 and height of 1 that could fit in the square" mean? Can you show us how to generate the pieces for a given square?
– John Douma
2 days ago






What does "all possible pieces (disconnected or connected) of width 2 and height of 1 that could fit in the square" mean? Can you show us how to generate the pieces for a given square?
– John Douma
2 days ago














@JohnDouma Well a piece here simply consists of choosing two squares in a single row of length n. So the total number of pieces will be (n choose 2).
– Pazzaz
2 days ago




@JohnDouma Well a piece here simply consists of choosing two squares in a single row of length n. So the total number of pieces will be (n choose 2).
– Pazzaz
2 days ago




1




1




I think you have to specify the problem more accurately. A triangle can have width $2$ and height $1$, for example, and that seems to be different from what you mean (and that is without thinking about figures which are not convex). I think you mean figures constructed of two $1times 1$ squares in a particular kind of configuration (as in your comment). And these sub-figures need not be connected. I do think your intended question is interesting, and worth asking, but the way you have asked it is misleading.
– Mark Bennet
2 days ago




I think you have to specify the problem more accurately. A triangle can have width $2$ and height $1$, for example, and that seems to be different from what you mean (and that is without thinking about figures which are not convex). I think you mean figures constructed of two $1times 1$ squares in a particular kind of configuration (as in your comment). And these sub-figures need not be connected. I do think your intended question is interesting, and worth asking, but the way you have asked it is misleading.
– Mark Bennet
2 days ago












@MarkBennet I agree, I did leave out some important parts. I've edited the question some, it should be more clear now.
– Pazzaz
2 days ago




@MarkBennet I agree, I did leave out some important parts. I've edited the question some, it should be more clear now.
– Pazzaz
2 days ago












Well, if possible, there will always be $n^2-2binom n2=n$ leftover spaces.
– YiFan
2 days ago




Well, if possible, there will always be $n^2-2binom n2=n$ leftover spaces.
– YiFan
2 days ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote



accepted










It is always possible, we can place the $binom{n}{2}$ pairs in a $n times n$ square when $n$ is odd and in a $(n-1) times n$ rectangle when $n$ is even.



This problem is equivalent to the edge coloring problem for complete graph $K_n$. Look at wiki for the geometric intuition underlying following construction.





Let $[n]$ be a short hand for ${ 0, ldots, n-1 }$.



Index the set of possible pairs by $(i,j) in [n]^2$ with $i < j$.

Label rows and columns of the large square using numbers from $[n]$.



When $n$ is odd, place the pair $(i,j)$ at row $k$ of the large square where $i + j equiv k pmod n$.



If two pairs $(i_1,j_1)$, $(i_2,j_2)$ on same row intersect, then
one of the following happens
$$i_1 = i_2 lor i_1 = j_2lor j_1 = i_2 lor j_1 = j_2$$
Since $i_1 + j_1 equiv i_2 + j_2 pmod n$, we find
$$(i_1,j_1) = (i_2,j_2) pmod n lor (i_1,j_1) = (j_2,i_2) pmod n$$



Since $i_1,i_2,j_1,j_2 in [n]$ and $i_1 < j_1$, $i_2 < j_2$, we can rule out the second case. From this, we can deduce distinct pairs on some row are disjoint. This generate
a desired packing of the $binom{n}{2}$ pairs into a $n times n$ square.



When $n$ is even, $n - 1$ is odd.



Place those pair $(i,j) in [n-1]^2$ into row $k$ where $i + j equiv k pmod {n-1}$.
Notice




  • For each row $i in [n-1]$, the slot at column $2i pmod {n - 1}$ and $n-1$ is unused.

  • For any column $j in [n-1]$, one and only slot at row $i in [n-1]$ is unused.


For those pair $(i,j) in [n]^2 setminus [n-1]^2$ with $i < j$, we have $j = n$.
We can place the pair on row $k$ where $2k = i pmod {n-1}$. This will fill all the unused slots in the first $n-1$ rows and generate a desired packing of the $binom{n}{2}$ pairs into a $(n-1) times n$ rectangle.






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    For 7×7, we have the following. X is an empty space, A through U are the 21 pairs of squares. For example, D D in the second row indicates that the {1,3} pair is used in that row, while the X in the seventh position means that spot is left empty.



    A A B B C X C



    D E D E F F X



    G H X I H I G



    J K K J X L L



    X M N O O M N



    P X Q R Q P R



    S T U X S U T
    .






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 1




      It looks like for odd n, the empty spots are all in different columns. In other words, by rearranging the rows you can create a blank diagonal.
      – Pazzaz
      2 days ago











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Pazzaz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004135%2fis-it-always-possible-to-fit-these-pieces-in-a-square%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted










    It is always possible, we can place the $binom{n}{2}$ pairs in a $n times n$ square when $n$ is odd and in a $(n-1) times n$ rectangle when $n$ is even.



    This problem is equivalent to the edge coloring problem for complete graph $K_n$. Look at wiki for the geometric intuition underlying following construction.





    Let $[n]$ be a short hand for ${ 0, ldots, n-1 }$.



    Index the set of possible pairs by $(i,j) in [n]^2$ with $i < j$.

    Label rows and columns of the large square using numbers from $[n]$.



    When $n$ is odd, place the pair $(i,j)$ at row $k$ of the large square where $i + j equiv k pmod n$.



    If two pairs $(i_1,j_1)$, $(i_2,j_2)$ on same row intersect, then
    one of the following happens
    $$i_1 = i_2 lor i_1 = j_2lor j_1 = i_2 lor j_1 = j_2$$
    Since $i_1 + j_1 equiv i_2 + j_2 pmod n$, we find
    $$(i_1,j_1) = (i_2,j_2) pmod n lor (i_1,j_1) = (j_2,i_2) pmod n$$



    Since $i_1,i_2,j_1,j_2 in [n]$ and $i_1 < j_1$, $i_2 < j_2$, we can rule out the second case. From this, we can deduce distinct pairs on some row are disjoint. This generate
    a desired packing of the $binom{n}{2}$ pairs into a $n times n$ square.



    When $n$ is even, $n - 1$ is odd.



    Place those pair $(i,j) in [n-1]^2$ into row $k$ where $i + j equiv k pmod {n-1}$.
    Notice




    • For each row $i in [n-1]$, the slot at column $2i pmod {n - 1}$ and $n-1$ is unused.

    • For any column $j in [n-1]$, one and only slot at row $i in [n-1]$ is unused.


    For those pair $(i,j) in [n]^2 setminus [n-1]^2$ with $i < j$, we have $j = n$.
    We can place the pair on row $k$ where $2k = i pmod {n-1}$. This will fill all the unused slots in the first $n-1$ rows and generate a desired packing of the $binom{n}{2}$ pairs into a $(n-1) times n$ rectangle.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      5
      down vote



      accepted










      It is always possible, we can place the $binom{n}{2}$ pairs in a $n times n$ square when $n$ is odd and in a $(n-1) times n$ rectangle when $n$ is even.



      This problem is equivalent to the edge coloring problem for complete graph $K_n$. Look at wiki for the geometric intuition underlying following construction.





      Let $[n]$ be a short hand for ${ 0, ldots, n-1 }$.



      Index the set of possible pairs by $(i,j) in [n]^2$ with $i < j$.

      Label rows and columns of the large square using numbers from $[n]$.



      When $n$ is odd, place the pair $(i,j)$ at row $k$ of the large square where $i + j equiv k pmod n$.



      If two pairs $(i_1,j_1)$, $(i_2,j_2)$ on same row intersect, then
      one of the following happens
      $$i_1 = i_2 lor i_1 = j_2lor j_1 = i_2 lor j_1 = j_2$$
      Since $i_1 + j_1 equiv i_2 + j_2 pmod n$, we find
      $$(i_1,j_1) = (i_2,j_2) pmod n lor (i_1,j_1) = (j_2,i_2) pmod n$$



      Since $i_1,i_2,j_1,j_2 in [n]$ and $i_1 < j_1$, $i_2 < j_2$, we can rule out the second case. From this, we can deduce distinct pairs on some row are disjoint. This generate
      a desired packing of the $binom{n}{2}$ pairs into a $n times n$ square.



      When $n$ is even, $n - 1$ is odd.



      Place those pair $(i,j) in [n-1]^2$ into row $k$ where $i + j equiv k pmod {n-1}$.
      Notice




      • For each row $i in [n-1]$, the slot at column $2i pmod {n - 1}$ and $n-1$ is unused.

      • For any column $j in [n-1]$, one and only slot at row $i in [n-1]$ is unused.


      For those pair $(i,j) in [n]^2 setminus [n-1]^2$ with $i < j$, we have $j = n$.
      We can place the pair on row $k$ where $2k = i pmod {n-1}$. This will fill all the unused slots in the first $n-1$ rows and generate a desired packing of the $binom{n}{2}$ pairs into a $(n-1) times n$ rectangle.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        5
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        5
        down vote



        accepted






        It is always possible, we can place the $binom{n}{2}$ pairs in a $n times n$ square when $n$ is odd and in a $(n-1) times n$ rectangle when $n$ is even.



        This problem is equivalent to the edge coloring problem for complete graph $K_n$. Look at wiki for the geometric intuition underlying following construction.





        Let $[n]$ be a short hand for ${ 0, ldots, n-1 }$.



        Index the set of possible pairs by $(i,j) in [n]^2$ with $i < j$.

        Label rows and columns of the large square using numbers from $[n]$.



        When $n$ is odd, place the pair $(i,j)$ at row $k$ of the large square where $i + j equiv k pmod n$.



        If two pairs $(i_1,j_1)$, $(i_2,j_2)$ on same row intersect, then
        one of the following happens
        $$i_1 = i_2 lor i_1 = j_2lor j_1 = i_2 lor j_1 = j_2$$
        Since $i_1 + j_1 equiv i_2 + j_2 pmod n$, we find
        $$(i_1,j_1) = (i_2,j_2) pmod n lor (i_1,j_1) = (j_2,i_2) pmod n$$



        Since $i_1,i_2,j_1,j_2 in [n]$ and $i_1 < j_1$, $i_2 < j_2$, we can rule out the second case. From this, we can deduce distinct pairs on some row are disjoint. This generate
        a desired packing of the $binom{n}{2}$ pairs into a $n times n$ square.



        When $n$ is even, $n - 1$ is odd.



        Place those pair $(i,j) in [n-1]^2$ into row $k$ where $i + j equiv k pmod {n-1}$.
        Notice




        • For each row $i in [n-1]$, the slot at column $2i pmod {n - 1}$ and $n-1$ is unused.

        • For any column $j in [n-1]$, one and only slot at row $i in [n-1]$ is unused.


        For those pair $(i,j) in [n]^2 setminus [n-1]^2$ with $i < j$, we have $j = n$.
        We can place the pair on row $k$ where $2k = i pmod {n-1}$. This will fill all the unused slots in the first $n-1$ rows and generate a desired packing of the $binom{n}{2}$ pairs into a $(n-1) times n$ rectangle.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        It is always possible, we can place the $binom{n}{2}$ pairs in a $n times n$ square when $n$ is odd and in a $(n-1) times n$ rectangle when $n$ is even.



        This problem is equivalent to the edge coloring problem for complete graph $K_n$. Look at wiki for the geometric intuition underlying following construction.





        Let $[n]$ be a short hand for ${ 0, ldots, n-1 }$.



        Index the set of possible pairs by $(i,j) in [n]^2$ with $i < j$.

        Label rows and columns of the large square using numbers from $[n]$.



        When $n$ is odd, place the pair $(i,j)$ at row $k$ of the large square where $i + j equiv k pmod n$.



        If two pairs $(i_1,j_1)$, $(i_2,j_2)$ on same row intersect, then
        one of the following happens
        $$i_1 = i_2 lor i_1 = j_2lor j_1 = i_2 lor j_1 = j_2$$
        Since $i_1 + j_1 equiv i_2 + j_2 pmod n$, we find
        $$(i_1,j_1) = (i_2,j_2) pmod n lor (i_1,j_1) = (j_2,i_2) pmod n$$



        Since $i_1,i_2,j_1,j_2 in [n]$ and $i_1 < j_1$, $i_2 < j_2$, we can rule out the second case. From this, we can deduce distinct pairs on some row are disjoint. This generate
        a desired packing of the $binom{n}{2}$ pairs into a $n times n$ square.



        When $n$ is even, $n - 1$ is odd.



        Place those pair $(i,j) in [n-1]^2$ into row $k$ where $i + j equiv k pmod {n-1}$.
        Notice




        • For each row $i in [n-1]$, the slot at column $2i pmod {n - 1}$ and $n-1$ is unused.

        • For any column $j in [n-1]$, one and only slot at row $i in [n-1]$ is unused.


        For those pair $(i,j) in [n]^2 setminus [n-1]^2$ with $i < j$, we have $j = n$.
        We can place the pair on row $k$ where $2k = i pmod {n-1}$. This will fill all the unused slots in the first $n-1$ rows and generate a desired packing of the $binom{n}{2}$ pairs into a $(n-1) times n$ rectangle.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited yesterday

























        answered yesterday









        achille hui

        93.4k5127251




        93.4k5127251






















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            For 7×7, we have the following. X is an empty space, A through U are the 21 pairs of squares. For example, D D in the second row indicates that the {1,3} pair is used in that row, while the X in the seventh position means that spot is left empty.



            A A B B C X C



            D E D E F F X



            G H X I H I G



            J K K J X L L



            X M N O O M N



            P X Q R Q P R



            S T U X S U T
            .






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              It looks like for odd n, the empty spots are all in different columns. In other words, by rearranging the rows you can create a blank diagonal.
              – Pazzaz
              2 days ago















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            For 7×7, we have the following. X is an empty space, A through U are the 21 pairs of squares. For example, D D in the second row indicates that the {1,3} pair is used in that row, while the X in the seventh position means that spot is left empty.



            A A B B C X C



            D E D E F F X



            G H X I H I G



            J K K J X L L



            X M N O O M N



            P X Q R Q P R



            S T U X S U T
            .






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              It looks like for odd n, the empty spots are all in different columns. In other words, by rearranging the rows you can create a blank diagonal.
              – Pazzaz
              2 days ago













            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            For 7×7, we have the following. X is an empty space, A through U are the 21 pairs of squares. For example, D D in the second row indicates that the {1,3} pair is used in that row, while the X in the seventh position means that spot is left empty.



            A A B B C X C



            D E D E F F X



            G H X I H I G



            J K K J X L L



            X M N O O M N



            P X Q R Q P R



            S T U X S U T
            .






            share|cite|improve this answer














            For 7×7, we have the following. X is an empty space, A through U are the 21 pairs of squares. For example, D D in the second row indicates that the {1,3} pair is used in that row, while the X in the seventh position means that spot is left empty.



            A A B B C X C



            D E D E F F X



            G H X I H I G



            J K K J X L L



            X M N O O M N



            P X Q R Q P R



            S T U X S U T
            .







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 2 days ago

























            answered 2 days ago









            Oscar Lanzi

            11.6k11935




            11.6k11935








            • 1




              It looks like for odd n, the empty spots are all in different columns. In other words, by rearranging the rows you can create a blank diagonal.
              – Pazzaz
              2 days ago














            • 1




              It looks like for odd n, the empty spots are all in different columns. In other words, by rearranging the rows you can create a blank diagonal.
              – Pazzaz
              2 days ago








            1




            1




            It looks like for odd n, the empty spots are all in different columns. In other words, by rearranging the rows you can create a blank diagonal.
            – Pazzaz
            2 days ago




            It looks like for odd n, the empty spots are all in different columns. In other words, by rearranging the rows you can create a blank diagonal.
            – Pazzaz
            2 days ago










            Pazzaz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            Pazzaz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Pazzaz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Pazzaz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004135%2fis-it-always-possible-to-fit-these-pieces-in-a-square%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

            android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

            WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]