Solutions of $cos(ax^c + bx) = 0$











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












As per title, I would like to find the zeros of
$$ f(x) = cos(ax^c + bx)$$
where $0leq x leq K$, $a in mathbb R$, $b in mathbb R$, and $c in (0, 2]$.



I have that
$$
f(x) = 0 Leftrightarrow ax^c + bx = pi left(n - frac{1}{2} right)
$$

Now, since I am not aware of any analytical methods (except for the cases $c=1$, $c=2$, obviously) for solving equations like
$$
ax^c + bx - pi left(n - frac{1}{2} right) = 0
$$

the only method I can think of is to solve this last equation numerically for each choice of $n$ until the solutions reach outside $[0, K]$. Am I correct in assuming there is not a more efficient method? I have considered various things like series expansions, transformations of the variables etc, but without any luck.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    As per title, I would like to find the zeros of
    $$ f(x) = cos(ax^c + bx)$$
    where $0leq x leq K$, $a in mathbb R$, $b in mathbb R$, and $c in (0, 2]$.



    I have that
    $$
    f(x) = 0 Leftrightarrow ax^c + bx = pi left(n - frac{1}{2} right)
    $$

    Now, since I am not aware of any analytical methods (except for the cases $c=1$, $c=2$, obviously) for solving equations like
    $$
    ax^c + bx - pi left(n - frac{1}{2} right) = 0
    $$

    the only method I can think of is to solve this last equation numerically for each choice of $n$ until the solutions reach outside $[0, K]$. Am I correct in assuming there is not a more efficient method? I have considered various things like series expansions, transformations of the variables etc, but without any luck.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      As per title, I would like to find the zeros of
      $$ f(x) = cos(ax^c + bx)$$
      where $0leq x leq K$, $a in mathbb R$, $b in mathbb R$, and $c in (0, 2]$.



      I have that
      $$
      f(x) = 0 Leftrightarrow ax^c + bx = pi left(n - frac{1}{2} right)
      $$

      Now, since I am not aware of any analytical methods (except for the cases $c=1$, $c=2$, obviously) for solving equations like
      $$
      ax^c + bx - pi left(n - frac{1}{2} right) = 0
      $$

      the only method I can think of is to solve this last equation numerically for each choice of $n$ until the solutions reach outside $[0, K]$. Am I correct in assuming there is not a more efficient method? I have considered various things like series expansions, transformations of the variables etc, but without any luck.










      share|cite|improve this question















      As per title, I would like to find the zeros of
      $$ f(x) = cos(ax^c + bx)$$
      where $0leq x leq K$, $a in mathbb R$, $b in mathbb R$, and $c in (0, 2]$.



      I have that
      $$
      f(x) = 0 Leftrightarrow ax^c + bx = pi left(n - frac{1}{2} right)
      $$

      Now, since I am not aware of any analytical methods (except for the cases $c=1$, $c=2$, obviously) for solving equations like
      $$
      ax^c + bx - pi left(n - frac{1}{2} right) = 0
      $$

      the only method I can think of is to solve this last equation numerically for each choice of $n$ until the solutions reach outside $[0, K]$. Am I correct in assuming there is not a more efficient method? I have considered various things like series expansions, transformations of the variables etc, but without any luck.







      roots






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited yesterday

























      asked yesterday









      Slug Pue

      2,14911020




      2,14911020






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          I think that your strategy is a proper one. This can be seen by exploiting some simple cases beyond the trivial ones with $c=1,2$. E.g., let us consider the cases $c=frac{1}{2},frac{1}{3},frac{1}{5}$. So,
          $$
          asqrt{x}+bx-pileft(n-frac{1}{2}right)=0
          $$

          that can be solved with the substitution $x=y^2$ and $xge 0$. You will have an elementary solution. The same can be done for $c=frac{1}{3}$, provided you will use the Cardano formula. Things worsens for $c=frac{1}{5}$. Here you can only find a solution by numerical methods. In this case you will have to solve the equation
          $$
          by^5+ay-pileft(n-frac{1}{2}right)=0
          $$

          with no elementary solution.



          Therefore, aside from very simple particular solutions, you will generally find elementarily unsolvable algebraic equations whose only solution is numerical.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005124%2fsolutions-of-cosaxc-bx-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote













            I think that your strategy is a proper one. This can be seen by exploiting some simple cases beyond the trivial ones with $c=1,2$. E.g., let us consider the cases $c=frac{1}{2},frac{1}{3},frac{1}{5}$. So,
            $$
            asqrt{x}+bx-pileft(n-frac{1}{2}right)=0
            $$

            that can be solved with the substitution $x=y^2$ and $xge 0$. You will have an elementary solution. The same can be done for $c=frac{1}{3}$, provided you will use the Cardano formula. Things worsens for $c=frac{1}{5}$. Here you can only find a solution by numerical methods. In this case you will have to solve the equation
            $$
            by^5+ay-pileft(n-frac{1}{2}right)=0
            $$

            with no elementary solution.



            Therefore, aside from very simple particular solutions, you will generally find elementarily unsolvable algebraic equations whose only solution is numerical.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              I think that your strategy is a proper one. This can be seen by exploiting some simple cases beyond the trivial ones with $c=1,2$. E.g., let us consider the cases $c=frac{1}{2},frac{1}{3},frac{1}{5}$. So,
              $$
              asqrt{x}+bx-pileft(n-frac{1}{2}right)=0
              $$

              that can be solved with the substitution $x=y^2$ and $xge 0$. You will have an elementary solution. The same can be done for $c=frac{1}{3}$, provided you will use the Cardano formula. Things worsens for $c=frac{1}{5}$. Here you can only find a solution by numerical methods. In this case you will have to solve the equation
              $$
              by^5+ay-pileft(n-frac{1}{2}right)=0
              $$

              with no elementary solution.



              Therefore, aside from very simple particular solutions, you will generally find elementarily unsolvable algebraic equations whose only solution is numerical.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                I think that your strategy is a proper one. This can be seen by exploiting some simple cases beyond the trivial ones with $c=1,2$. E.g., let us consider the cases $c=frac{1}{2},frac{1}{3},frac{1}{5}$. So,
                $$
                asqrt{x}+bx-pileft(n-frac{1}{2}right)=0
                $$

                that can be solved with the substitution $x=y^2$ and $xge 0$. You will have an elementary solution. The same can be done for $c=frac{1}{3}$, provided you will use the Cardano formula. Things worsens for $c=frac{1}{5}$. Here you can only find a solution by numerical methods. In this case you will have to solve the equation
                $$
                by^5+ay-pileft(n-frac{1}{2}right)=0
                $$

                with no elementary solution.



                Therefore, aside from very simple particular solutions, you will generally find elementarily unsolvable algebraic equations whose only solution is numerical.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                I think that your strategy is a proper one. This can be seen by exploiting some simple cases beyond the trivial ones with $c=1,2$. E.g., let us consider the cases $c=frac{1}{2},frac{1}{3},frac{1}{5}$. So,
                $$
                asqrt{x}+bx-pileft(n-frac{1}{2}right)=0
                $$

                that can be solved with the substitution $x=y^2$ and $xge 0$. You will have an elementary solution. The same can be done for $c=frac{1}{3}$, provided you will use the Cardano formula. Things worsens for $c=frac{1}{5}$. Here you can only find a solution by numerical methods. In this case you will have to solve the equation
                $$
                by^5+ay-pileft(n-frac{1}{2}right)=0
                $$

                with no elementary solution.



                Therefore, aside from very simple particular solutions, you will generally find elementarily unsolvable algebraic equations whose only solution is numerical.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 23 hours ago









                Jon

                4,31511022




                4,31511022






























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005124%2fsolutions-of-cosaxc-bx-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                    ts Property 'filter' does not exist on type '{}'

                    mat-slide-toggle shouldn't change it's state when I click cancel in confirmation window