Mixing
Finding the position vector of the midpoint of a line formed by the difference of two vectors
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
The question I need help addressing has to do with part iv)
The solution is as follows:
This is the vector equation of a line. From what I gather, the solution has the following logical forethought:
- The vector equation of a line allows us to find the position vector of any point on a given line, which is usually specified by the difference between two points. For example, in $r = a + t(b-a)$, due to the way adding vectors works, when we impose vector $vec a$ and $vec {b-a}$ and create the resultant vector, it will still be a position vector on that line. This means the scalar t can be used to find us the position of any point on that line.
- In the case of (iv), we need to find the midpoint of line $overline {PQ}$. We can find any point on line $overline {PQ}$ by finding $vec P - vec Q$ and applying $r_x = r_1 + t(vec P - vec Q)$ to find any given point on the line given the scalar. If we set constant $t$ to $frac {1}{2}$, shouldn't that then give us $X$ in the graphic?
However, I take issue with the solution, primarily the graphic. My qualms with this solution:
- The two vectors both have the same $x$ coordinate, but seemed to be separated in the graphic. In fact, given their coordinates, their positions in this graphic don't make sense to me.
- I don't understand why $r_1, r_2$ and $ a$ in the graphic are halved in size.
- If I want to find a point on $overline {PQ}$ that is 3 units from X, what value of $t$ do I set?
Please do let me know if any of my logical forethoughts were incorrect, and why, and if you have any answers to my qualms stated above, especially the "3 units away from X" one.
EDIT: It also seems I need to use $r_x = r_1 + t(vec Q - vec P)$ instead of $r_x = r_1 + t(vec P - vec Q)$ to get the right answer? Why is that? Why is it $r = a + t(b-a)$ instead of $r = a + t(a-b)$?
vector-spaces vectors vector-analysis
asked May 12 '17 at 1:17
sangstar
808214
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
The question I need help addressing has to do with part iv)
The solution is as follows:
This is the vector equation of a line. From what I gather, the solution has the following logical forethought:
- The vector equation of a line allows us to find the position vector of any point on a given line, which is usually specified by the difference between two points. For example, in $r = a + t(b-a)$, due to the way adding vectors works, when we impose vector $vec a$ and $vec {b-a}$ and create the resultant vector, it will still be a position vector on that line. This means the scalar t can be used to find us the position of any point on that line.
- In the case of (iv), we need to find the midpoint of line $overline {PQ}$. We can find any point on line $overline {PQ}$ by finding $vec P - vec Q$ and applying $r_x = r_1 + t(vec P - vec Q)$ to find any given point on the line given the scalar. If we set constant $t$ to $frac {1}{2}$, shouldn't that then give us $X$ in the graphic?
However, I take issue with the solution, primarily the graphic. My qualms with this solution:
- The two vectors both have the same $x$ coordinate, but seemed to be separated in the graphic. In fact, given their coordinates, their positions in this graphic don't make sense to me.
- I don't understand why $r_1, r_2$ and $ a$ in the graphic are halved in size.
- If I want to find a point on $overline {PQ}$ that is 3 units from X, what value of $t$ do I set?
Please do let me know if any of my logical forethoughts were incorrect, and why, and if you have any answers to my qualms stated above, especially the "3 units away from X" one.
EDIT: It also seems I need to use $r_x = r_1 + t(vec Q - vec P)$ instead of $r_x = r_1 + t(vec P - vec Q)$ to get the right answer? Why is that? Why is it $r = a + t(b-a)$ instead of $r = a + t(a-b)$?
vector-spaces vectors vector-analysis
asked May 12 '17 at 1:17
sangstar
808214
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
The question I need help addressing has to do with part iv)
The solution is as follows:
This is the vector equation of a line. From what I gather, the solution has the following logical forethought:
- The vector equation of a line allows us to find the position vector of any point on a given line, which is usually specified by the difference between two points. For example, in $r = a + t(b-a)$, due to the way adding vectors works, when we impose vector $vec a$ and $vec {b-a}$ and create the resultant vector, it will still be a position vector on that line. This means the scalar t can be used to find us the position of any point on that line.
- In the case of (iv), we need to find the midpoint of line $overline {PQ}$. We can find any point on line $overline {PQ}$ by finding $vec P - vec Q$ and applying $r_x = r_1 + t(vec P - vec Q)$ to find any given point on the line given the scalar. If we set constant $t$ to $frac {1}{2}$, shouldn't that then give us $X$ in the graphic?
However, I take issue with the solution, primarily the graphic. My qualms with this solution:
- The two vectors both have the same $x$ coordinate, but seemed to be separated in the graphic. In fact, given their coordinates, their positions in this graphic don't make sense to me.
- I don't understand why $r_1, r_2$ and $ a$ in the graphic are halved in size.
- If I want to find a point on $overline {PQ}$ that is 3 units from X, what value of $t$ do I set?
Please do let me know if any of my logical forethoughts were incorrect, and why, and if you have any answers to my qualms stated above, especially the "3 units away from X" one.
EDIT: It also seems I need to use $r_x = r_1 + t(vec Q - vec P)$ instead of $r_x = r_1 + t(vec P - vec Q)$ to get the right answer? Why is that? Why is it $r = a + t(b-a)$ instead of $r = a + t(a-b)$?
vector-spaces vectors vector-analysis
asked May 12 '17 at 1:17
sangstar
808214
The question I need help addressing has to do with part iv)
The solution is as follows:
This is the vector equation of a line. From what I gather, the solution has the following logical forethought:
- The vector equation of a line allows us to find the position vector of any point on a given line, which is usually specified by the difference between two points. For example, in $r = a + t(b-a)$, due to the way adding vectors works, when we impose vector $vec a$ and $vec {b-a}$ and create the resultant vector, it will still be a position vector on that line. This means the scalar t can be used to find us the position of any point on that line.
- In the case of (iv), we need to find the midpoint of line $overline {PQ}$. We can find any point on line $overline {PQ}$ by finding $vec P - vec Q$ and applying $r_x = r_1 + t(vec P - vec Q)$ to find any given point on the line given the scalar. If we set constant $t$ to $frac {1}{2}$, shouldn't that then give us $X$ in the graphic?
However, I take issue with the solution, primarily the graphic. My qualms with this solution:
- The two vectors both have the same $x$ coordinate, but seemed to be separated in the graphic. In fact, given their coordinates, their positions in this graphic don't make sense to me.
- I don't understand why $r_1, r_2$ and $ a$ in the graphic are halved in size.
- If I want to find a point on $overline {PQ}$ that is 3 units from X, what value of $t$ do I set?
Please do let me know if any of my logical forethoughts were incorrect, and why, and if you have any answers to my qualms stated above, especially the "3 units away from X" one.
EDIT: It also seems I need to use $r_x = r_1 + t(vec Q - vec P)$ instead of $r_x = r_1 + t(vec P - vec Q)$ to get the right answer? Why is that? Why is it $r = a + t(b-a)$ instead of $r = a + t(a-b)$?
vector-spaces vectors vector-analysis
vector-spaces vectors vector-analysis
asked May 12 '17 at 1:17
sangstar
808214
asked May 12 '17 at 1:17
sangstar
808214
edited May 12 '17 at 1:27
asked May 12 '17 at 1:17
sangstar
808214
asked May 12 '17 at 1:17
sangstar
808214
asked May 12 '17 at 1:17
sangstar
808214
808214
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
A line described by $(1-t)P+tQ$, where the parameter $t$ is taken from the interval $[0,1]$ gives at $t=frac{1}{2}$ the middle point you had as the answer.
answered May 12 '17 at 1:49
janmarqz
6,14241630
Yep: ${{bf P} + {bf Q} over 2}$.
– David G. Stork
May 12 '17 at 1:51
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
A line described by $(1-t)P+tQ$, where the parameter $t$ is taken from the interval $[0,1]$ gives at $t=frac{1}{2}$ the middle point you had as the answer.
answered May 12 '17 at 1:49
janmarqz
6,14241630
Yep: ${{bf P} + {bf Q} over 2}$.
– David G. Stork
May 12 '17 at 1:51
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
A line described by $(1-t)P+tQ$, where the parameter $t$ is taken from the interval $[0,1]$ gives at $t=frac{1}{2}$ the middle point you had as the answer.
answered May 12 '17 at 1:49
janmarqz
6,14241630
Yep: ${{bf P} + {bf Q} over 2}$.
– David G. Stork
May 12 '17 at 1:51
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
A line described by $(1-t)P+tQ$, where the parameter $t$ is taken from the interval $[0,1]$ gives at $t=frac{1}{2}$ the middle point you had as the answer.
answered May 12 '17 at 1:49
janmarqz
6,14241630
A line described by $(1-t)P+tQ$, where the parameter $t$ is taken from the interval $[0,1]$ gives at $t=frac{1}{2}$ the middle point you had as the answer.
answered May 12 '17 at 1:49
janmarqz
6,14241630
answered May 12 '17 at 1:49
janmarqz
6,14241630
answered May 12 '17 at 1:49
janmarqz
6,14241630
answered May 12 '17 at 1:49
janmarqz
6,14241630
6,14241630
Yep: ${{bf P} + {bf Q} over 2}$.
– David G. Stork
May 12 '17 at 1:51
add a comment |
Yep: ${{bf P} + {bf Q} over 2}$.
– David G. Stork
May 12 '17 at 1:51
Yep: ${{bf P} + {bf Q} over 2}$.
– David G. Stork
May 12 '17 at 1:51
Yep: ${{bf P} + {bf Q} over 2}$.
– David G. Stork
May 12 '17 at 1:51
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2277271%2ffinding-the-position-vector-of-the-midpoint-of-a-line-formed-by-the-difference-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
