$f_*$ isomorphism $Rightarrow$ $f$ isomorphism?
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Consider a Lie group endomorphism (bijective homomorphism) $f: G rightarrow G$ and its pushforward $f_*: mathcal{A} rightarrow mathcal{A}$, where $mathcal{A}$ is the Lie algebra of $G$. I have seen that if $f$ is an isomorphism (a diffeomorphism) then $f_*$ is an isomorphism.
Is the converse true? That is, given a group endomorphism $f: G rightarrow G$ with pushforward $f_*: mathcal{A} rightarrow mathcal{A}$ an algebra endomorphism, is it true that if $f_*$ is an isomorphism, the $f$ is an isomorphism too?
group-theory lie-groups lie-algebras
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Consider a Lie group endomorphism (bijective homomorphism) $f: G rightarrow G$ and its pushforward $f_*: mathcal{A} rightarrow mathcal{A}$, where $mathcal{A}$ is the Lie algebra of $G$. I have seen that if $f$ is an isomorphism (a diffeomorphism) then $f_*$ is an isomorphism.
Is the converse true? That is, given a group endomorphism $f: G rightarrow G$ with pushforward $f_*: mathcal{A} rightarrow mathcal{A}$ an algebra endomorphism, is it true that if $f_*$ is an isomorphism, the $f$ is an isomorphism too?
group-theory lie-groups lie-algebras
It is obviously wrong if $G$ is not connected. Also, "endomorphism" doesn't mean that the map is bijective, it merely means that the domain and the target of the map are the same "space" or object.
– Sebastian Schulz
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Consider a Lie group endomorphism (bijective homomorphism) $f: G rightarrow G$ and its pushforward $f_*: mathcal{A} rightarrow mathcal{A}$, where $mathcal{A}$ is the Lie algebra of $G$. I have seen that if $f$ is an isomorphism (a diffeomorphism) then $f_*$ is an isomorphism.
Is the converse true? That is, given a group endomorphism $f: G rightarrow G$ with pushforward $f_*: mathcal{A} rightarrow mathcal{A}$ an algebra endomorphism, is it true that if $f_*$ is an isomorphism, the $f$ is an isomorphism too?
group-theory lie-groups lie-algebras
Consider a Lie group endomorphism (bijective homomorphism) $f: G rightarrow G$ and its pushforward $f_*: mathcal{A} rightarrow mathcal{A}$, where $mathcal{A}$ is the Lie algebra of $G$. I have seen that if $f$ is an isomorphism (a diffeomorphism) then $f_*$ is an isomorphism.
Is the converse true? That is, given a group endomorphism $f: G rightarrow G$ with pushforward $f_*: mathcal{A} rightarrow mathcal{A}$ an algebra endomorphism, is it true that if $f_*$ is an isomorphism, the $f$ is an isomorphism too?
group-theory lie-groups lie-algebras
group-theory lie-groups lie-algebras
asked yesterday
MBolin
787
787
It is obviously wrong if $G$ is not connected. Also, "endomorphism" doesn't mean that the map is bijective, it merely means that the domain and the target of the map are the same "space" or object.
– Sebastian Schulz
yesterday
add a comment |
It is obviously wrong if $G$ is not connected. Also, "endomorphism" doesn't mean that the map is bijective, it merely means that the domain and the target of the map are the same "space" or object.
– Sebastian Schulz
yesterday
It is obviously wrong if $G$ is not connected. Also, "endomorphism" doesn't mean that the map is bijective, it merely means that the domain and the target of the map are the same "space" or object.
– Sebastian Schulz
yesterday
It is obviously wrong if $G$ is not connected. Also, "endomorphism" doesn't mean that the map is bijective, it merely means that the domain and the target of the map are the same "space" or object.
– Sebastian Schulz
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
As Sebastian Schulz noted, the answer is obviously no if $G$ is not connected.
Furthermore, there are other Lie groups that have isomorphic Lie algebras, but which are not isomorphic since their global properties are different. A well-known example is given by $SU(2)$ and $SO(3)$. The Lie algebras of these groups are isomorphic, but the groups themselves are not: in fact, $SU(2)$ is the double cover of $SO(3)$.
New contributor
He did specifically start with an endomorphism of Lie groups though (so a covering map between Lie groups with isomorphic Lie algebras is not ruled out)
– Sebastian Schulz
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
OK, here is the minimal example that I could think of for a connected Lie group. Take $G = U(1) = { z in mathbb{C} | |z| = 1 }$, it allows endomorphisms of the form $phi_n : z mapsto z^n$.
The Lie algebra of $U(1)$ is $mathbb{R}$ and the derivative of $phi_n$ is just multiplication by $n$ (which is an isomorphism unless $n=0$). However, unless $n= pm 1$, the map is not injective on the level of Lie groups, so it is not an isomorphism.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
As Sebastian Schulz noted, the answer is obviously no if $G$ is not connected.
Furthermore, there are other Lie groups that have isomorphic Lie algebras, but which are not isomorphic since their global properties are different. A well-known example is given by $SU(2)$ and $SO(3)$. The Lie algebras of these groups are isomorphic, but the groups themselves are not: in fact, $SU(2)$ is the double cover of $SO(3)$.
New contributor
He did specifically start with an endomorphism of Lie groups though (so a covering map between Lie groups with isomorphic Lie algebras is not ruled out)
– Sebastian Schulz
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
As Sebastian Schulz noted, the answer is obviously no if $G$ is not connected.
Furthermore, there are other Lie groups that have isomorphic Lie algebras, but which are not isomorphic since their global properties are different. A well-known example is given by $SU(2)$ and $SO(3)$. The Lie algebras of these groups are isomorphic, but the groups themselves are not: in fact, $SU(2)$ is the double cover of $SO(3)$.
New contributor
He did specifically start with an endomorphism of Lie groups though (so a covering map between Lie groups with isomorphic Lie algebras is not ruled out)
– Sebastian Schulz
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
As Sebastian Schulz noted, the answer is obviously no if $G$ is not connected.
Furthermore, there are other Lie groups that have isomorphic Lie algebras, but which are not isomorphic since their global properties are different. A well-known example is given by $SU(2)$ and $SO(3)$. The Lie algebras of these groups are isomorphic, but the groups themselves are not: in fact, $SU(2)$ is the double cover of $SO(3)$.
New contributor
As Sebastian Schulz noted, the answer is obviously no if $G$ is not connected.
Furthermore, there are other Lie groups that have isomorphic Lie algebras, but which are not isomorphic since their global properties are different. A well-known example is given by $SU(2)$ and $SO(3)$. The Lie algebras of these groups are isomorphic, but the groups themselves are not: in fact, $SU(2)$ is the double cover of $SO(3)$.
New contributor
New contributor
answered yesterday
Stijn B.
1114
1114
New contributor
New contributor
He did specifically start with an endomorphism of Lie groups though (so a covering map between Lie groups with isomorphic Lie algebras is not ruled out)
– Sebastian Schulz
yesterday
add a comment |
He did specifically start with an endomorphism of Lie groups though (so a covering map between Lie groups with isomorphic Lie algebras is not ruled out)
– Sebastian Schulz
yesterday
He did specifically start with an endomorphism of Lie groups though (so a covering map between Lie groups with isomorphic Lie algebras is not ruled out)
– Sebastian Schulz
yesterday
He did specifically start with an endomorphism of Lie groups though (so a covering map between Lie groups with isomorphic Lie algebras is not ruled out)
– Sebastian Schulz
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
OK, here is the minimal example that I could think of for a connected Lie group. Take $G = U(1) = { z in mathbb{C} | |z| = 1 }$, it allows endomorphisms of the form $phi_n : z mapsto z^n$.
The Lie algebra of $U(1)$ is $mathbb{R}$ and the derivative of $phi_n$ is just multiplication by $n$ (which is an isomorphism unless $n=0$). However, unless $n= pm 1$, the map is not injective on the level of Lie groups, so it is not an isomorphism.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
OK, here is the minimal example that I could think of for a connected Lie group. Take $G = U(1) = { z in mathbb{C} | |z| = 1 }$, it allows endomorphisms of the form $phi_n : z mapsto z^n$.
The Lie algebra of $U(1)$ is $mathbb{R}$ and the derivative of $phi_n$ is just multiplication by $n$ (which is an isomorphism unless $n=0$). However, unless $n= pm 1$, the map is not injective on the level of Lie groups, so it is not an isomorphism.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
OK, here is the minimal example that I could think of for a connected Lie group. Take $G = U(1) = { z in mathbb{C} | |z| = 1 }$, it allows endomorphisms of the form $phi_n : z mapsto z^n$.
The Lie algebra of $U(1)$ is $mathbb{R}$ and the derivative of $phi_n$ is just multiplication by $n$ (which is an isomorphism unless $n=0$). However, unless $n= pm 1$, the map is not injective on the level of Lie groups, so it is not an isomorphism.
OK, here is the minimal example that I could think of for a connected Lie group. Take $G = U(1) = { z in mathbb{C} | |z| = 1 }$, it allows endomorphisms of the form $phi_n : z mapsto z^n$.
The Lie algebra of $U(1)$ is $mathbb{R}$ and the derivative of $phi_n$ is just multiplication by $n$ (which is an isomorphism unless $n=0$). However, unless $n= pm 1$, the map is not injective on the level of Lie groups, so it is not an isomorphism.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Sebastian Schulz
66139
66139
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005198%2ff-isomorphism-rightarrow-f-isomorphism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It is obviously wrong if $G$ is not connected. Also, "endomorphism" doesn't mean that the map is bijective, it merely means that the domain and the target of the map are the same "space" or object.
– Sebastian Schulz
yesterday