$f_*$ isomorphism $Rightarrow$ $f$ isomorphism?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Consider a Lie group endomorphism (bijective homomorphism) $f: G rightarrow G$ and its pushforward $f_*: mathcal{A} rightarrow mathcal{A}$, where $mathcal{A}$ is the Lie algebra of $G$. I have seen that if $f$ is an isomorphism (a diffeomorphism) then $f_*$ is an isomorphism.



Is the converse true? That is, given a group endomorphism $f: G rightarrow G$ with pushforward $f_*: mathcal{A} rightarrow mathcal{A}$ an algebra endomorphism, is it true that if $f_*$ is an isomorphism, the $f$ is an isomorphism too?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • It is obviously wrong if $G$ is not connected. Also, "endomorphism" doesn't mean that the map is bijective, it merely means that the domain and the target of the map are the same "space" or object.
    – Sebastian Schulz
    yesterday

















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Consider a Lie group endomorphism (bijective homomorphism) $f: G rightarrow G$ and its pushforward $f_*: mathcal{A} rightarrow mathcal{A}$, where $mathcal{A}$ is the Lie algebra of $G$. I have seen that if $f$ is an isomorphism (a diffeomorphism) then $f_*$ is an isomorphism.



Is the converse true? That is, given a group endomorphism $f: G rightarrow G$ with pushforward $f_*: mathcal{A} rightarrow mathcal{A}$ an algebra endomorphism, is it true that if $f_*$ is an isomorphism, the $f$ is an isomorphism too?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • It is obviously wrong if $G$ is not connected. Also, "endomorphism" doesn't mean that the map is bijective, it merely means that the domain and the target of the map are the same "space" or object.
    – Sebastian Schulz
    yesterday















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





Consider a Lie group endomorphism (bijective homomorphism) $f: G rightarrow G$ and its pushforward $f_*: mathcal{A} rightarrow mathcal{A}$, where $mathcal{A}$ is the Lie algebra of $G$. I have seen that if $f$ is an isomorphism (a diffeomorphism) then $f_*$ is an isomorphism.



Is the converse true? That is, given a group endomorphism $f: G rightarrow G$ with pushforward $f_*: mathcal{A} rightarrow mathcal{A}$ an algebra endomorphism, is it true that if $f_*$ is an isomorphism, the $f$ is an isomorphism too?










share|cite|improve this question













Consider a Lie group endomorphism (bijective homomorphism) $f: G rightarrow G$ and its pushforward $f_*: mathcal{A} rightarrow mathcal{A}$, where $mathcal{A}$ is the Lie algebra of $G$. I have seen that if $f$ is an isomorphism (a diffeomorphism) then $f_*$ is an isomorphism.



Is the converse true? That is, given a group endomorphism $f: G rightarrow G$ with pushforward $f_*: mathcal{A} rightarrow mathcal{A}$ an algebra endomorphism, is it true that if $f_*$ is an isomorphism, the $f$ is an isomorphism too?







group-theory lie-groups lie-algebras






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked yesterday









MBolin

787




787












  • It is obviously wrong if $G$ is not connected. Also, "endomorphism" doesn't mean that the map is bijective, it merely means that the domain and the target of the map are the same "space" or object.
    – Sebastian Schulz
    yesterday




















  • It is obviously wrong if $G$ is not connected. Also, "endomorphism" doesn't mean that the map is bijective, it merely means that the domain and the target of the map are the same "space" or object.
    – Sebastian Schulz
    yesterday


















It is obviously wrong if $G$ is not connected. Also, "endomorphism" doesn't mean that the map is bijective, it merely means that the domain and the target of the map are the same "space" or object.
– Sebastian Schulz
yesterday






It is obviously wrong if $G$ is not connected. Also, "endomorphism" doesn't mean that the map is bijective, it merely means that the domain and the target of the map are the same "space" or object.
– Sebastian Schulz
yesterday












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













As Sebastian Schulz noted, the answer is obviously no if $G$ is not connected.



Furthermore, there are other Lie groups that have isomorphic Lie algebras, but which are not isomorphic since their global properties are different. A well-known example is given by $SU(2)$ and $SO(3)$. The Lie algebras of these groups are isomorphic, but the groups themselves are not: in fact, $SU(2)$ is the double cover of $SO(3)$.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Stijn B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • He did specifically start with an endomorphism of Lie groups though (so a covering map between Lie groups with isomorphic Lie algebras is not ruled out)
    – Sebastian Schulz
    yesterday


















up vote
1
down vote













OK, here is the minimal example that I could think of for a connected Lie group. Take $G = U(1) = { z in mathbb{C} | |z| = 1 }$, it allows endomorphisms of the form $phi_n : z mapsto z^n$.



The Lie algebra of $U(1)$ is $mathbb{R}$ and the derivative of $phi_n$ is just multiplication by $n$ (which is an isomorphism unless $n=0$). However, unless $n= pm 1$, the map is not injective on the level of Lie groups, so it is not an isomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005198%2ff-isomorphism-rightarrow-f-isomorphism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    As Sebastian Schulz noted, the answer is obviously no if $G$ is not connected.



    Furthermore, there are other Lie groups that have isomorphic Lie algebras, but which are not isomorphic since their global properties are different. A well-known example is given by $SU(2)$ and $SO(3)$. The Lie algebras of these groups are isomorphic, but the groups themselves are not: in fact, $SU(2)$ is the double cover of $SO(3)$.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Stijn B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.


















    • He did specifically start with an endomorphism of Lie groups though (so a covering map between Lie groups with isomorphic Lie algebras is not ruled out)
      – Sebastian Schulz
      yesterday















    up vote
    1
    down vote













    As Sebastian Schulz noted, the answer is obviously no if $G$ is not connected.



    Furthermore, there are other Lie groups that have isomorphic Lie algebras, but which are not isomorphic since their global properties are different. A well-known example is given by $SU(2)$ and $SO(3)$. The Lie algebras of these groups are isomorphic, but the groups themselves are not: in fact, $SU(2)$ is the double cover of $SO(3)$.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Stijn B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.


















    • He did specifically start with an endomorphism of Lie groups though (so a covering map between Lie groups with isomorphic Lie algebras is not ruled out)
      – Sebastian Schulz
      yesterday













    up vote
    1
    down vote










    up vote
    1
    down vote









    As Sebastian Schulz noted, the answer is obviously no if $G$ is not connected.



    Furthermore, there are other Lie groups that have isomorphic Lie algebras, but which are not isomorphic since their global properties are different. A well-known example is given by $SU(2)$ and $SO(3)$. The Lie algebras of these groups are isomorphic, but the groups themselves are not: in fact, $SU(2)$ is the double cover of $SO(3)$.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Stijn B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    As Sebastian Schulz noted, the answer is obviously no if $G$ is not connected.



    Furthermore, there are other Lie groups that have isomorphic Lie algebras, but which are not isomorphic since their global properties are different. A well-known example is given by $SU(2)$ and $SO(3)$. The Lie algebras of these groups are isomorphic, but the groups themselves are not: in fact, $SU(2)$ is the double cover of $SO(3)$.







    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Stijn B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer






    New contributor




    Stijn B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered yesterday









    Stijn B.

    1114




    1114




    New contributor




    Stijn B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    Stijn B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    Stijn B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.












    • He did specifically start with an endomorphism of Lie groups though (so a covering map between Lie groups with isomorphic Lie algebras is not ruled out)
      – Sebastian Schulz
      yesterday


















    • He did specifically start with an endomorphism of Lie groups though (so a covering map between Lie groups with isomorphic Lie algebras is not ruled out)
      – Sebastian Schulz
      yesterday
















    He did specifically start with an endomorphism of Lie groups though (so a covering map between Lie groups with isomorphic Lie algebras is not ruled out)
    – Sebastian Schulz
    yesterday




    He did specifically start with an endomorphism of Lie groups though (so a covering map between Lie groups with isomorphic Lie algebras is not ruled out)
    – Sebastian Schulz
    yesterday










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    OK, here is the minimal example that I could think of for a connected Lie group. Take $G = U(1) = { z in mathbb{C} | |z| = 1 }$, it allows endomorphisms of the form $phi_n : z mapsto z^n$.



    The Lie algebra of $U(1)$ is $mathbb{R}$ and the derivative of $phi_n$ is just multiplication by $n$ (which is an isomorphism unless $n=0$). However, unless $n= pm 1$, the map is not injective on the level of Lie groups, so it is not an isomorphism.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      OK, here is the minimal example that I could think of for a connected Lie group. Take $G = U(1) = { z in mathbb{C} | |z| = 1 }$, it allows endomorphisms of the form $phi_n : z mapsto z^n$.



      The Lie algebra of $U(1)$ is $mathbb{R}$ and the derivative of $phi_n$ is just multiplication by $n$ (which is an isomorphism unless $n=0$). However, unless $n= pm 1$, the map is not injective on the level of Lie groups, so it is not an isomorphism.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        OK, here is the minimal example that I could think of for a connected Lie group. Take $G = U(1) = { z in mathbb{C} | |z| = 1 }$, it allows endomorphisms of the form $phi_n : z mapsto z^n$.



        The Lie algebra of $U(1)$ is $mathbb{R}$ and the derivative of $phi_n$ is just multiplication by $n$ (which is an isomorphism unless $n=0$). However, unless $n= pm 1$, the map is not injective on the level of Lie groups, so it is not an isomorphism.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        OK, here is the minimal example that I could think of for a connected Lie group. Take $G = U(1) = { z in mathbb{C} | |z| = 1 }$, it allows endomorphisms of the form $phi_n : z mapsto z^n$.



        The Lie algebra of $U(1)$ is $mathbb{R}$ and the derivative of $phi_n$ is just multiplication by $n$ (which is an isomorphism unless $n=0$). However, unless $n= pm 1$, the map is not injective on the level of Lie groups, so it is not an isomorphism.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited yesterday

























        answered yesterday









        Sebastian Schulz

        66139




        66139






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005198%2ff-isomorphism-rightarrow-f-isomorphism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

            SQL update select statement

            WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]