Missing titlebar on javafx app, with OpenJFX











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm currently building an application with OpenJDK 11 and OpenJFX. It compiles just fine, and starts, but there is no titlebar, and if i click close to the edge of the app, it registers as a click on whatever window is behind it.



I am using intelliJ idea, and it took a while to figure out how to even use openjfx with it, anyhow, here's the system details:



running elementary OS 5.0 Juno (based off of Ubuntu 18.04, everything is GTK)
IntelliJ Idea (Community) 2018 installed as a snap.
OpenJFX sdk downloaded from here: OpenJFX from Gluon



I've just made a new javaFX app, and added the dir /javafx-sdk-11.0.1/lib/ to external libraries, and then went to run -> edit configurations and added vm options --module-path <path>/javafx-sdk-11.0.1/lib --add-modules=javafx.controls,javafx.fxml,javafx.base



controller and everything seems to work, but the resulting window looks like this: JavaFX no border or Titlebar



Does someone know just what i'm doing wrong here?






java javafx openjfx







share|improve this question


















  • 3




    Can you try with -Djdk.gtk.version=2? See possibly related question.
    – José Pereda
    yesterday















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm currently building an application with OpenJDK 11 and OpenJFX. It compiles just fine, and starts, but there is no titlebar, and if i click close to the edge of the app, it registers as a click on whatever window is behind it.



I am using intelliJ idea, and it took a while to figure out how to even use openjfx with it, anyhow, here's the system details:



running elementary OS 5.0 Juno (based off of Ubuntu 18.04, everything is GTK)
IntelliJ Idea (Community) 2018 installed as a snap.
OpenJFX sdk downloaded from here: OpenJFX from Gluon



I've just made a new javaFX app, and added the dir /javafx-sdk-11.0.1/lib/ to external libraries, and then went to run -> edit configurations and added vm options --module-path <path>/javafx-sdk-11.0.1/lib --add-modules=javafx.controls,javafx.fxml,javafx.base



controller and everything seems to work, but the resulting window looks like this: JavaFX no border or Titlebar



Does someone know just what i'm doing wrong here?






java javafx openjfx







share|improve this question


















  • 3




    Can you try with -Djdk.gtk.version=2? See possibly related question.
    – José Pereda
    yesterday













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I'm currently building an application with OpenJDK 11 and OpenJFX. It compiles just fine, and starts, but there is no titlebar, and if i click close to the edge of the app, it registers as a click on whatever window is behind it.



I am using intelliJ idea, and it took a while to figure out how to even use openjfx with it, anyhow, here's the system details:



running elementary OS 5.0 Juno (based off of Ubuntu 18.04, everything is GTK)
IntelliJ Idea (Community) 2018 installed as a snap.
OpenJFX sdk downloaded from here: OpenJFX from Gluon



I've just made a new javaFX app, and added the dir /javafx-sdk-11.0.1/lib/ to external libraries, and then went to run -> edit configurations and added vm options --module-path <path>/javafx-sdk-11.0.1/lib --add-modules=javafx.controls,javafx.fxml,javafx.base



controller and everything seems to work, but the resulting window looks like this: JavaFX no border or Titlebar



Does someone know just what i'm doing wrong here?






java javafx openjfx







share|improve this question













I'm currently building an application with OpenJDK 11 and OpenJFX. It compiles just fine, and starts, but there is no titlebar, and if i click close to the edge of the app, it registers as a click on whatever window is behind it.



I am using intelliJ idea, and it took a while to figure out how to even use openjfx with it, anyhow, here's the system details:



running elementary OS 5.0 Juno (based off of Ubuntu 18.04, everything is GTK)
IntelliJ Idea (Community) 2018 installed as a snap.
OpenJFX sdk downloaded from here: OpenJFX from Gluon



I've just made a new javaFX app, and added the dir /javafx-sdk-11.0.1/lib/ to external libraries, and then went to run -> edit configurations and added vm options --module-path <path>/javafx-sdk-11.0.1/lib --add-modules=javafx.controls,javafx.fxml,javafx.base



controller and everything seems to work, but the resulting window looks like this: JavaFX no border or Titlebar



Does someone know just what i'm doing wrong here?






java javafx openjfx




java javafx openjfx






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked yesterday









user3801839

6101619




6101619








  • 3




    Can you try with -Djdk.gtk.version=2? See possibly related question.
    – José Pereda
    yesterday














  • 3




    Can you try with -Djdk.gtk.version=2? See possibly related question.
    – José Pereda
    yesterday








3




3




Can you try with -Djdk.gtk.version=2? See possibly related question.
– José Pereda
yesterday




Can you try with -Djdk.gtk.version=2? See possibly related question.
– José Pereda
yesterday












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













Thanks to José Pereda



It was exactly that which fixed it. See the question he linked for details: problems with gtk3 and javafx



Anyhow, in intelliJ it's solved by going to Run -> Configurations and adding -Djdk.gtk.version=2 to the 'VM Options'






share|improve this answer





















  • You can file a bug for this issue as well: github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues
    – José Pereda
    yesterday











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53372200%2fmissing-titlebar-on-javafx-app-with-openjfx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote













Thanks to José Pereda



It was exactly that which fixed it. See the question he linked for details: problems with gtk3 and javafx



Anyhow, in intelliJ it's solved by going to Run -> Configurations and adding -Djdk.gtk.version=2 to the 'VM Options'






share|improve this answer





















  • You can file a bug for this issue as well: github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues
    – José Pereda
    yesterday















up vote
0
down vote













Thanks to José Pereda



It was exactly that which fixed it. See the question he linked for details: problems with gtk3 and javafx



Anyhow, in intelliJ it's solved by going to Run -> Configurations and adding -Djdk.gtk.version=2 to the 'VM Options'






share|improve this answer





















  • You can file a bug for this issue as well: github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues
    – José Pereda
    yesterday













up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









Thanks to José Pereda



It was exactly that which fixed it. See the question he linked for details: problems with gtk3 and javafx



Anyhow, in intelliJ it's solved by going to Run -> Configurations and adding -Djdk.gtk.version=2 to the 'VM Options'






share|improve this answer












Thanks to José Pereda



It was exactly that which fixed it. See the question he linked for details: problems with gtk3 and javafx



Anyhow, in intelliJ it's solved by going to Run -> Configurations and adding -Djdk.gtk.version=2 to the 'VM Options'







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









user3801839

6101619




6101619












  • You can file a bug for this issue as well: github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues
    – José Pereda
    yesterday


















  • You can file a bug for this issue as well: github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues
    – José Pereda
    yesterday
















You can file a bug for this issue as well: github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues
– José Pereda
yesterday




You can file a bug for this issue as well: github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues
– José Pereda
yesterday


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53372200%2fmissing-titlebar-on-javafx-app-with-openjfx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Image
28 6 $begingroup$ Per the Font of Magic feature, sorcerer can use Flexible Casting to create 5th-level spell slots at level 7, even though they are not typically available until level 9. You can transform unexpended sorcery points into one spell slot as a bonus action on your turn. The Creating Spell Slots table shows the cost of creating a spell slot of [5th level is 7] If such a sorcerer levels up while still having this 5th-level spell slot, can they choose a 5th-level spell as the spell they gain upon levelling up? The Spellcasting feature states: Additionally, when you gain a level in this class, you can choose one of the sorcerer spells you know and replace it with another spell from the sorcerer spell list, which also must be of a level for which you have spell slots.
Read more

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

Image
up vote 13 down vote favorite 1 After the 2018 errata, the disintegrate spell description now reads: A creature targeted by this spell must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, the target takes 10d6 + 40 force damage. The target is disintegrated if this damage leaves it with 0 hit points. If you were to polymorph an enemy into a rat and then disintegrate it, would the enemy be disintegrated or would it just return to its original form? I know that for Druids, it’s not an instant kill anymore, but is this the case for polymorph as well? dnd-5e spells polymorph errata share | improve this question edited 18 hours ago
Read more

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$

Image
3 3 $begingroup$ Recently, I saw a construction of topological invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$ with $ngeq 2$ : $$ N=frac{1}{24pi^2}int_{S^3} d^3x epsilon^{ijk} Tr[(U^{-1}partial_{x_i}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_j}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_k}U)] , $$ where $Uin U(n)$ depends on $boldsymbol{x}=(x_1,x_2,x_3)in S^3$ , $epsilon^{ijk}$ is the Levi-Civita symbol, $i,j,k=1,2,3$ , and the duplicated indexes are summed over. It is claimed that $N$ is an integer, but why? Update 02/02/2019 I think I got an argument for $n=2$ . In this case, $U=e^{i varphi} q$ with $qin SU(2)$ . Due to the trace and the Levi-Civita symbol in $N$ , $varphi$ does not contribute to $N$ . As $Tr[q^{dagger}partial_i q]=0$ and $(q^{dagger}partial_i q)^{dagger}=-q^{dagger}partial_i q$ , $q^{dagger}partial_i q$ in geneeral has the form $q^{dagger}partia
Read more