Proof of curvature of vector and orthogonality of vector derivative to itself











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In the proof of curvature of a vector r(t) we take the first derivative of r(t) to be orthogonal to the vector itself. But isn't it true only for r(t) with constant magnitude?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Srilakshmidaran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Yes. In general $r'(t)$ is not orthogonal to $r(t)$ itself. It happens if and only if the norm of $r(t)$ is constant.
    – Dog_69
    yesterday










  • Then how do we apply it to a curvature where r(t) changes?
    – Srilakshmidaran
    yesterday










  • The general expression for the curvature is $$kappa(t)=frac{|r'(t)times r''(t)|}{|r'(t)|^3} .$$
    – Dog_69
    yesterday















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In the proof of curvature of a vector r(t) we take the first derivative of r(t) to be orthogonal to the vector itself. But isn't it true only for r(t) with constant magnitude?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Srilakshmidaran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Yes. In general $r'(t)$ is not orthogonal to $r(t)$ itself. It happens if and only if the norm of $r(t)$ is constant.
    – Dog_69
    yesterday










  • Then how do we apply it to a curvature where r(t) changes?
    – Srilakshmidaran
    yesterday










  • The general expression for the curvature is $$kappa(t)=frac{|r'(t)times r''(t)|}{|r'(t)|^3} .$$
    – Dog_69
    yesterday













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











In the proof of curvature of a vector r(t) we take the first derivative of r(t) to be orthogonal to the vector itself. But isn't it true only for r(t) with constant magnitude?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Srilakshmidaran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











In the proof of curvature of a vector r(t) we take the first derivative of r(t) to be orthogonal to the vector itself. But isn't it true only for r(t) with constant magnitude?







calculus






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Srilakshmidaran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Srilakshmidaran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




Srilakshmidaran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Srilakshmidaran

12




12




New contributor




Srilakshmidaran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Srilakshmidaran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Srilakshmidaran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Yes. In general $r'(t)$ is not orthogonal to $r(t)$ itself. It happens if and only if the norm of $r(t)$ is constant.
    – Dog_69
    yesterday










  • Then how do we apply it to a curvature where r(t) changes?
    – Srilakshmidaran
    yesterday










  • The general expression for the curvature is $$kappa(t)=frac{|r'(t)times r''(t)|}{|r'(t)|^3} .$$
    – Dog_69
    yesterday


















  • Yes. In general $r'(t)$ is not orthogonal to $r(t)$ itself. It happens if and only if the norm of $r(t)$ is constant.
    – Dog_69
    yesterday










  • Then how do we apply it to a curvature where r(t) changes?
    – Srilakshmidaran
    yesterday










  • The general expression for the curvature is $$kappa(t)=frac{|r'(t)times r''(t)|}{|r'(t)|^3} .$$
    – Dog_69
    yesterday
















Yes. In general $r'(t)$ is not orthogonal to $r(t)$ itself. It happens if and only if the norm of $r(t)$ is constant.
– Dog_69
yesterday




Yes. In general $r'(t)$ is not orthogonal to $r(t)$ itself. It happens if and only if the norm of $r(t)$ is constant.
– Dog_69
yesterday












Then how do we apply it to a curvature where r(t) changes?
– Srilakshmidaran
yesterday




Then how do we apply it to a curvature where r(t) changes?
– Srilakshmidaran
yesterday












The general expression for the curvature is $$kappa(t)=frac{|r'(t)times r''(t)|}{|r'(t)|^3} .$$
– Dog_69
yesterday




The general expression for the curvature is $$kappa(t)=frac{|r'(t)times r''(t)|}{|r'(t)|^3} .$$
– Dog_69
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













(At first, you don’t prove but define curvature instead.) Curvature deals with orthogonality, sort of: it may be defined as the normal component of the acceleration, divided by the square of the velocity.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Srilakshmidaran is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004953%2fproof-of-curvature-of-vector-and-orthogonality-of-vector-derivative-to-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    (At first, you don’t prove but define curvature instead.) Curvature deals with orthogonality, sort of: it may be defined as the normal component of the acceleration, divided by the square of the velocity.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      (At first, you don’t prove but define curvature instead.) Curvature deals with orthogonality, sort of: it may be defined as the normal component of the acceleration, divided by the square of the velocity.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        (At first, you don’t prove but define curvature instead.) Curvature deals with orthogonality, sort of: it may be defined as the normal component of the acceleration, divided by the square of the velocity.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        (At first, you don’t prove but define curvature instead.) Curvature deals with orthogonality, sort of: it may be defined as the normal component of the acceleration, divided by the square of the velocity.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        Michael Hoppe

        10.6k31733




        10.6k31733






















            Srilakshmidaran is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            Srilakshmidaran is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Srilakshmidaran is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Srilakshmidaran is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004953%2fproof-of-curvature-of-vector-and-orthogonality-of-vector-derivative-to-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

            android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

            WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]