Why aren't these eigenvectors orthogonal?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
As far as I know, the matrix: $$M = begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 & isqrt{3} \ 0 & 2 & 0 \ -isqrt{3} & 0 & 3 end{pmatrix} $$
Is hermitian with eigenvalues: $lambda_1 = 0, lambda_2 = 2, lambda_3 = 4$.
And corresponding eigenvectors:
$V_{lambda_1 = 0} = begin{pmatrix}-isqrt{3} \ 0 \ 1end{pmatrix} $,
$V_{lambda_2 = 2} = begin{pmatrix}0\ 1 \ 0end{pmatrix} $,
$V_{lambda_3 = 4} = begin{pmatrix}dfrac{i}{sqrt{3}}\ 0 \ 1end{pmatrix} $
Since these are eigenvectors of distinct eigenvalues they should be orthogonal but the first and third are not orthogonal.
Why is this?
eigenvalues-eigenvectors
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
As far as I know, the matrix: $$M = begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 & isqrt{3} \ 0 & 2 & 0 \ -isqrt{3} & 0 & 3 end{pmatrix} $$
Is hermitian with eigenvalues: $lambda_1 = 0, lambda_2 = 2, lambda_3 = 4$.
And corresponding eigenvectors:
$V_{lambda_1 = 0} = begin{pmatrix}-isqrt{3} \ 0 \ 1end{pmatrix} $,
$V_{lambda_2 = 2} = begin{pmatrix}0\ 1 \ 0end{pmatrix} $,
$V_{lambda_3 = 4} = begin{pmatrix}dfrac{i}{sqrt{3}}\ 0 \ 1end{pmatrix} $
Since these are eigenvectors of distinct eigenvalues they should be orthogonal but the first and third are not orthogonal.
Why is this?
eigenvalues-eigenvectors
1
Maybe they are hermitian orthogonal.
– Charlie Frohman
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
As far as I know, the matrix: $$M = begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 & isqrt{3} \ 0 & 2 & 0 \ -isqrt{3} & 0 & 3 end{pmatrix} $$
Is hermitian with eigenvalues: $lambda_1 = 0, lambda_2 = 2, lambda_3 = 4$.
And corresponding eigenvectors:
$V_{lambda_1 = 0} = begin{pmatrix}-isqrt{3} \ 0 \ 1end{pmatrix} $,
$V_{lambda_2 = 2} = begin{pmatrix}0\ 1 \ 0end{pmatrix} $,
$V_{lambda_3 = 4} = begin{pmatrix}dfrac{i}{sqrt{3}}\ 0 \ 1end{pmatrix} $
Since these are eigenvectors of distinct eigenvalues they should be orthogonal but the first and third are not orthogonal.
Why is this?
eigenvalues-eigenvectors
As far as I know, the matrix: $$M = begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 & isqrt{3} \ 0 & 2 & 0 \ -isqrt{3} & 0 & 3 end{pmatrix} $$
Is hermitian with eigenvalues: $lambda_1 = 0, lambda_2 = 2, lambda_3 = 4$.
And corresponding eigenvectors:
$V_{lambda_1 = 0} = begin{pmatrix}-isqrt{3} \ 0 \ 1end{pmatrix} $,
$V_{lambda_2 = 2} = begin{pmatrix}0\ 1 \ 0end{pmatrix} $,
$V_{lambda_3 = 4} = begin{pmatrix}dfrac{i}{sqrt{3}}\ 0 \ 1end{pmatrix} $
Since these are eigenvectors of distinct eigenvalues they should be orthogonal but the first and third are not orthogonal.
Why is this?
eigenvalues-eigenvectors
eigenvalues-eigenvectors
asked yesterday
Rzmwood
61
61
1
Maybe they are hermitian orthogonal.
– Charlie Frohman
yesterday
add a comment |
1
Maybe they are hermitian orthogonal.
– Charlie Frohman
yesterday
1
1
Maybe they are hermitian orthogonal.
– Charlie Frohman
yesterday
Maybe they are hermitian orthogonal.
– Charlie Frohman
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
They are orthogonal. begin{align}V_0^HV_2&=0\ V_2^HV_4&=0\ V_0^HV_4&=begin{pmatrix}isqrt3&0&1end{pmatrix}cdotbegin{pmatrix}frac i{sqrt3}\ 0\ 1end{pmatrix}=0end{align}
I did not check that the original eigenvectors are OK, but there is a sign difference in the top term of your vertical vector.
– Andrei
yesterday
@Andrei Like the one you do when you take the Hermitian of something?
– Saucy O'Path
yesterday
Ah! Thank you so much
– Rzmwood
yesterday
@SaucyO'Path thanks. I somehow missed that.
– Andrei
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
They are orthogonal. begin{align}V_0^HV_2&=0\ V_2^HV_4&=0\ V_0^HV_4&=begin{pmatrix}isqrt3&0&1end{pmatrix}cdotbegin{pmatrix}frac i{sqrt3}\ 0\ 1end{pmatrix}=0end{align}
I did not check that the original eigenvectors are OK, but there is a sign difference in the top term of your vertical vector.
– Andrei
yesterday
@Andrei Like the one you do when you take the Hermitian of something?
– Saucy O'Path
yesterday
Ah! Thank you so much
– Rzmwood
yesterday
@SaucyO'Path thanks. I somehow missed that.
– Andrei
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
They are orthogonal. begin{align}V_0^HV_2&=0\ V_2^HV_4&=0\ V_0^HV_4&=begin{pmatrix}isqrt3&0&1end{pmatrix}cdotbegin{pmatrix}frac i{sqrt3}\ 0\ 1end{pmatrix}=0end{align}
I did not check that the original eigenvectors are OK, but there is a sign difference in the top term of your vertical vector.
– Andrei
yesterday
@Andrei Like the one you do when you take the Hermitian of something?
– Saucy O'Path
yesterday
Ah! Thank you so much
– Rzmwood
yesterday
@SaucyO'Path thanks. I somehow missed that.
– Andrei
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
They are orthogonal. begin{align}V_0^HV_2&=0\ V_2^HV_4&=0\ V_0^HV_4&=begin{pmatrix}isqrt3&0&1end{pmatrix}cdotbegin{pmatrix}frac i{sqrt3}\ 0\ 1end{pmatrix}=0end{align}
They are orthogonal. begin{align}V_0^HV_2&=0\ V_2^HV_4&=0\ V_0^HV_4&=begin{pmatrix}isqrt3&0&1end{pmatrix}cdotbegin{pmatrix}frac i{sqrt3}\ 0\ 1end{pmatrix}=0end{align}
answered yesterday
Saucy O'Path
5,4571425
5,4571425
I did not check that the original eigenvectors are OK, but there is a sign difference in the top term of your vertical vector.
– Andrei
yesterday
@Andrei Like the one you do when you take the Hermitian of something?
– Saucy O'Path
yesterday
Ah! Thank you so much
– Rzmwood
yesterday
@SaucyO'Path thanks. I somehow missed that.
– Andrei
yesterday
add a comment |
I did not check that the original eigenvectors are OK, but there is a sign difference in the top term of your vertical vector.
– Andrei
yesterday
@Andrei Like the one you do when you take the Hermitian of something?
– Saucy O'Path
yesterday
Ah! Thank you so much
– Rzmwood
yesterday
@SaucyO'Path thanks. I somehow missed that.
– Andrei
yesterday
I did not check that the original eigenvectors are OK, but there is a sign difference in the top term of your vertical vector.
– Andrei
yesterday
I did not check that the original eigenvectors are OK, but there is a sign difference in the top term of your vertical vector.
– Andrei
yesterday
@Andrei Like the one you do when you take the Hermitian of something?
– Saucy O'Path
yesterday
@Andrei Like the one you do when you take the Hermitian of something?
– Saucy O'Path
yesterday
Ah! Thank you so much
– Rzmwood
yesterday
Ah! Thank you so much
– Rzmwood
yesterday
@SaucyO'Path thanks. I somehow missed that.
– Andrei
yesterday
@SaucyO'Path thanks. I somehow missed that.
– Andrei
yesterday
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005173%2fwhy-arent-these-eigenvectors-orthogonal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Maybe they are hermitian orthogonal.
– Charlie Frohman
yesterday