Show that if $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$ converges for $zinmathbb{C}$ then $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ also...
$begingroup$
Attention: $|z|<R$ where $R$ is the radius of convergence
Show that if $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$ converges for $zinmathbb{C}$ then $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ also converges $ninmathbb{N}$
I have tried to solve this Problem for three Hours now here are my results so far but Nothing seems to work out:
I know since $|z|<R$ that the series converges absolutely.
A necessary condition for the convergence of a series is that the secuence of ist summands must be convergin to 0.
Therefore:
$lim_{krightarrow infty} |a_kz^k|=0$
Because the elements of the sequence are all positive the sequence must decrease at some Point.
That is without loss of generality that
$$|a_kz^k|geq|a_{k+1}z^{k+1}|geq|a_{k+2}z^{k+2}| geq …geq |a_{k+n}z^{k+n}|$$
Implying $frac{|a_{k+n}z^{k+n}|}{|a_kz^k|}leq 1iff frac{a_{k+n}}{a_k}leq frac{1}{z^n}$
Therefore
$sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k= sum_{k=0}^{infty} a_kfrac{a_k+n}{a_k}z^kleq sum_{k=0}^{infty} |a_kfrac{a_k+n}{a_k}z^k|leq sum_{k=0}^{infty}|a_kfrac{1}{z^n}z^k|$
And here is the Problem If I now say that
$sum_{k=0}^{infty}|a_kfrac{1}{z^n}z^k|leq sum_{k=0}^{infty}|a_kz^k|$
Then I am assuming that $|z^{k-n}|leq |z^k|iff 1<|z^n|$
Therefore this does not work generally.
Please help me.
complex-analysis power-series
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Attention: $|z|<R$ where $R$ is the radius of convergence
Show that if $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$ converges for $zinmathbb{C}$ then $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ also converges $ninmathbb{N}$
I have tried to solve this Problem for three Hours now here are my results so far but Nothing seems to work out:
I know since $|z|<R$ that the series converges absolutely.
A necessary condition for the convergence of a series is that the secuence of ist summands must be convergin to 0.
Therefore:
$lim_{krightarrow infty} |a_kz^k|=0$
Because the elements of the sequence are all positive the sequence must decrease at some Point.
That is without loss of generality that
$$|a_kz^k|geq|a_{k+1}z^{k+1}|geq|a_{k+2}z^{k+2}| geq …geq |a_{k+n}z^{k+n}|$$
Implying $frac{|a_{k+n}z^{k+n}|}{|a_kz^k|}leq 1iff frac{a_{k+n}}{a_k}leq frac{1}{z^n}$
Therefore
$sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k= sum_{k=0}^{infty} a_kfrac{a_k+n}{a_k}z^kleq sum_{k=0}^{infty} |a_kfrac{a_k+n}{a_k}z^k|leq sum_{k=0}^{infty}|a_kfrac{1}{z^n}z^k|$
And here is the Problem If I now say that
$sum_{k=0}^{infty}|a_kfrac{1}{z^n}z^k|leq sum_{k=0}^{infty}|a_kz^k|$
Then I am assuming that $|z^{k-n}|leq |z^k|iff 1<|z^n|$
Therefore this does not work generally.
Please help me.
complex-analysis power-series
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
A related question was asked recently: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3098468/….
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Feb 3 at 13:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Attention: $|z|<R$ where $R$ is the radius of convergence
Show that if $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$ converges for $zinmathbb{C}$ then $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ also converges $ninmathbb{N}$
I have tried to solve this Problem for three Hours now here are my results so far but Nothing seems to work out:
I know since $|z|<R$ that the series converges absolutely.
A necessary condition for the convergence of a series is that the secuence of ist summands must be convergin to 0.
Therefore:
$lim_{krightarrow infty} |a_kz^k|=0$
Because the elements of the sequence are all positive the sequence must decrease at some Point.
That is without loss of generality that
$$|a_kz^k|geq|a_{k+1}z^{k+1}|geq|a_{k+2}z^{k+2}| geq …geq |a_{k+n}z^{k+n}|$$
Implying $frac{|a_{k+n}z^{k+n}|}{|a_kz^k|}leq 1iff frac{a_{k+n}}{a_k}leq frac{1}{z^n}$
Therefore
$sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k= sum_{k=0}^{infty} a_kfrac{a_k+n}{a_k}z^kleq sum_{k=0}^{infty} |a_kfrac{a_k+n}{a_k}z^k|leq sum_{k=0}^{infty}|a_kfrac{1}{z^n}z^k|$
And here is the Problem If I now say that
$sum_{k=0}^{infty}|a_kfrac{1}{z^n}z^k|leq sum_{k=0}^{infty}|a_kz^k|$
Then I am assuming that $|z^{k-n}|leq |z^k|iff 1<|z^n|$
Therefore this does not work generally.
Please help me.
complex-analysis power-series
$endgroup$
Attention: $|z|<R$ where $R$ is the radius of convergence
Show that if $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$ converges for $zinmathbb{C}$ then $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ also converges $ninmathbb{N}$
I have tried to solve this Problem for three Hours now here are my results so far but Nothing seems to work out:
I know since $|z|<R$ that the series converges absolutely.
A necessary condition for the convergence of a series is that the secuence of ist summands must be convergin to 0.
Therefore:
$lim_{krightarrow infty} |a_kz^k|=0$
Because the elements of the sequence are all positive the sequence must decrease at some Point.
That is without loss of generality that
$$|a_kz^k|geq|a_{k+1}z^{k+1}|geq|a_{k+2}z^{k+2}| geq …geq |a_{k+n}z^{k+n}|$$
Implying $frac{|a_{k+n}z^{k+n}|}{|a_kz^k|}leq 1iff frac{a_{k+n}}{a_k}leq frac{1}{z^n}$
Therefore
$sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k= sum_{k=0}^{infty} a_kfrac{a_k+n}{a_k}z^kleq sum_{k=0}^{infty} |a_kfrac{a_k+n}{a_k}z^k|leq sum_{k=0}^{infty}|a_kfrac{1}{z^n}z^k|$
And here is the Problem If I now say that
$sum_{k=0}^{infty}|a_kfrac{1}{z^n}z^k|leq sum_{k=0}^{infty}|a_kz^k|$
Then I am assuming that $|z^{k-n}|leq |z^k|iff 1<|z^n|$
Therefore this does not work generally.
Please help me.
complex-analysis power-series
complex-analysis power-series
asked Feb 3 at 13:04
New2MathNew2Math
31015
31015
$begingroup$
A related question was asked recently: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3098468/….
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Feb 3 at 13:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A related question was asked recently: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3098468/….
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Feb 3 at 13:19
$begingroup$
A related question was asked recently: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3098468/….
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Feb 3 at 13:19
$begingroup$
A related question was asked recently: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3098468/….
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Feb 3 at 13:19
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$ converges absolutely so does $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$. Thus also $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ for $znot=0$, but trivially also for $z=0$. Thus the radius of converges for the power series $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ is at least that of $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$. If, on
the other hand, $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ converges absolutely so does $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$ and therefore also $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k=sum_{k=0}^{n-1
}a_kz^k+sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$. This implies that the radius of convergence of $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$ is at least that of $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$.
Thus they are equal.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't understand why $z neq 0$ Because $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}=sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^kz^n=z^nsum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$, why is it not allowed that $z$ is $0$?
$endgroup$
– New2Math
Feb 3 at 14:01
$begingroup$
The other direction is important. There we divide by $z^n$: $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k=frac1{z^n} sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$.
$endgroup$
– Jens Schwaiger
Feb 3 at 22:08
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3098537%2fshow-that-if-sum-k-0-inftya-kzk-converges-for-z-in-mathbbc-then-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$ converges absolutely so does $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$. Thus also $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ for $znot=0$, but trivially also for $z=0$. Thus the radius of converges for the power series $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ is at least that of $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$. If, on
the other hand, $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ converges absolutely so does $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$ and therefore also $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k=sum_{k=0}^{n-1
}a_kz^k+sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$. This implies that the radius of convergence of $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$ is at least that of $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$.
Thus they are equal.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't understand why $z neq 0$ Because $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}=sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^kz^n=z^nsum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$, why is it not allowed that $z$ is $0$?
$endgroup$
– New2Math
Feb 3 at 14:01
$begingroup$
The other direction is important. There we divide by $z^n$: $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k=frac1{z^n} sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$.
$endgroup$
– Jens Schwaiger
Feb 3 at 22:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$ converges absolutely so does $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$. Thus also $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ for $znot=0$, but trivially also for $z=0$. Thus the radius of converges for the power series $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ is at least that of $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$. If, on
the other hand, $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ converges absolutely so does $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$ and therefore also $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k=sum_{k=0}^{n-1
}a_kz^k+sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$. This implies that the radius of convergence of $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$ is at least that of $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$.
Thus they are equal.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't understand why $z neq 0$ Because $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}=sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^kz^n=z^nsum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$, why is it not allowed that $z$ is $0$?
$endgroup$
– New2Math
Feb 3 at 14:01
$begingroup$
The other direction is important. There we divide by $z^n$: $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k=frac1{z^n} sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$.
$endgroup$
– Jens Schwaiger
Feb 3 at 22:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$ converges absolutely so does $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$. Thus also $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ for $znot=0$, but trivially also for $z=0$. Thus the radius of converges for the power series $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ is at least that of $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$. If, on
the other hand, $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ converges absolutely so does $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$ and therefore also $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k=sum_{k=0}^{n-1
}a_kz^k+sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$. This implies that the radius of convergence of $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$ is at least that of $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$.
Thus they are equal.
$endgroup$
If $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$ converges absolutely so does $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$. Thus also $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ for $znot=0$, but trivially also for $z=0$. Thus the radius of converges for the power series $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ is at least that of $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$. If, on
the other hand, $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$ converges absolutely so does $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$ and therefore also $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k=sum_{k=0}^{n-1
}a_kz^k+sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$. This implies that the radius of convergence of $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_kz^k$ is at least that of $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$.
Thus they are equal.
answered Feb 3 at 13:34
Jens SchwaigerJens Schwaiger
1,639138
1,639138
$begingroup$
I don't understand why $z neq 0$ Because $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}=sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^kz^n=z^nsum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$, why is it not allowed that $z$ is $0$?
$endgroup$
– New2Math
Feb 3 at 14:01
$begingroup$
The other direction is important. There we divide by $z^n$: $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k=frac1{z^n} sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$.
$endgroup$
– Jens Schwaiger
Feb 3 at 22:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't understand why $z neq 0$ Because $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}=sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^kz^n=z^nsum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$, why is it not allowed that $z$ is $0$?
$endgroup$
– New2Math
Feb 3 at 14:01
$begingroup$
The other direction is important. There we divide by $z^n$: $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k=frac1{z^n} sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$.
$endgroup$
– Jens Schwaiger
Feb 3 at 22:08
$begingroup$
I don't understand why $z neq 0$ Because $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}=sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^kz^n=z^nsum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$, why is it not allowed that $z$ is $0$?
$endgroup$
– New2Math
Feb 3 at 14:01
$begingroup$
I don't understand why $z neq 0$ Because $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}=sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^kz^n=z^nsum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k$, why is it not allowed that $z$ is $0$?
$endgroup$
– New2Math
Feb 3 at 14:01
$begingroup$
The other direction is important. There we divide by $z^n$: $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k=frac1{z^n} sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$.
$endgroup$
– Jens Schwaiger
Feb 3 at 22:08
$begingroup$
The other direction is important. There we divide by $z^n$: $sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^k=frac1{z^n} sum_{k=0}^{infty}a_{k+n}z^{k+n}$.
$endgroup$
– Jens Schwaiger
Feb 3 at 22:08
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3098537%2fshow-that-if-sum-k-0-inftya-kzk-converges-for-z-in-mathbbc-then-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
A related question was asked recently: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3098468/….
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Feb 3 at 13:19