How to solve $dot{x}=|x|$











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












How to solve this differential equation $dot{x}=|x|$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • @Rahul because initial condition is not given.
    – bellcircle
    20 hours ago















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












How to solve this differential equation $dot{x}=|x|$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • @Rahul because initial condition is not given.
    – bellcircle
    20 hours ago













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











How to solve this differential equation $dot{x}=|x|$?










share|cite|improve this question















How to solve this differential equation $dot{x}=|x|$?







differential-equations analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 19 hours ago

























asked 20 hours ago









winston

395116




395116












  • @Rahul because initial condition is not given.
    – bellcircle
    20 hours ago


















  • @Rahul because initial condition is not given.
    – bellcircle
    20 hours ago
















@Rahul because initial condition is not given.
– bellcircle
20 hours ago




@Rahul because initial condition is not given.
– bellcircle
20 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













One observes that $x=0$ is the trivial solution of the given ODE.



Now find nontrivial solutions of the equation.



Using separation of variables, one gets $$frac{dot{x}}{|x|}=1.$$



Integrating both sides gives



begin{align}text{sgn}(x)log|x|=t+Cquadcdotsquadtext{(a)}end{align} for some constant $C$, where $text{sgn}(x)=begin{cases}1,&x> 0\-1,&x<0.end{cases}$



Therefore, $x(t)=begin{cases}C_1e^t,&x>0\C_2e^{-t},&x<0.end{cases}$



Now find the solution of explicit form.



From the equation, $dot{x}$ is always nonnegative, so $x$ is a continuously differentiable and nondecreasing function of $t$. This shows that $C_1$ must be positive and $C_2$ must be negative.



Since $x$ is a continuous function of $t$ and a nontrivial solution of $x$ cannot take 0 by the above observation, it follows that $x(t)=C_1e^t,C_1>0$ for all $t$ or $x(t)=C_2e^{-t},C_2<0$ for all $t$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • You first divided both sides by $|x|$ to get the following results. But how can you guarantee that you are not dividing by $0$. In other words, if you cannot guarantee that once the solution starts from a non-zero value, it will not reach $0$, then you cannot divide it by $|x|$.
    – winston
    18 hours ago










  • @winston Good question. If $dot{x}=0$, then $x=0$ at such point. Now it is obvious that there is no way to combine the distinct (local) solutions $C_1e^t,C_2e^{-t},0$ to make a continuous global solution because the first is always positive, the second always negative, the last always zero. Therefore the global solution must be one of the three.
    – bellcircle
    18 hours ago




















up vote
1
down vote













bellcircle has provided a solution to the problem. However, I would like to express the solution in a more compact form and also provide an answer using a proposition-proof style.



$(Dx)(t) = |x(t)|$ (1)



Proposition. If $I$ is an open interval in $mathbb{R}$ and $C in mathbb{R}$, then $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ is a solution of the differential equation (1) on $I$. If $x(t)$ is a solution of the differential equation (1) on an open interval $I$ in $mathbb{R}$, then there exists $C in mathbb{R}$ such that $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$.



Suppose $I$ is an open interval in $mathbb{R}$. Suppose $C in mathbb{R}$ and $x$ is such that $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$. Then $(Dx)(t)=mathsf{sgn}(C)Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$. Also, $|x(t)|=mathsf{sgn}(C)Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$. Therefore, indeed $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ is a solution of (1) on $I$.



Suppose there is a solution $x_2(t)$ of (1) on $I$ such that there is no $C in mathbb{R}$ such that $x_2(t) = Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$. Then take $T in I$. Define $A=frac{x_2(T)}{e^{mathsf{sgn}(x_2(T)) T}}$. Then $x(t) = A e^{mathsf{sgn}(A)t}$ is a solution of (1) on $I$ with $x(T)=x_2(T)$. The uniqueness of the solution of (1) on $I$ with $x(T)=x_2(T)$ follows from the Lipschitz continuity of $|cdot|$ by the Picard–Lindelöf theorem (link) and the global uniqueness theorem (e.g. link). Therefore $x_2(t) = A e^{mathsf{sgn}(A)t}$ for all $t in I$ and, thus, by contradiction, if $x(t)$ is a solution of the differential equation (1) on an open interval $I$ in $mathbb{R}$, then there exists $C in mathbb{R}$ such that $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004789%2fhow-to-solve-dotx-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    4
    down vote













    One observes that $x=0$ is the trivial solution of the given ODE.



    Now find nontrivial solutions of the equation.



    Using separation of variables, one gets $$frac{dot{x}}{|x|}=1.$$



    Integrating both sides gives



    begin{align}text{sgn}(x)log|x|=t+Cquadcdotsquadtext{(a)}end{align} for some constant $C$, where $text{sgn}(x)=begin{cases}1,&x> 0\-1,&x<0.end{cases}$



    Therefore, $x(t)=begin{cases}C_1e^t,&x>0\C_2e^{-t},&x<0.end{cases}$



    Now find the solution of explicit form.



    From the equation, $dot{x}$ is always nonnegative, so $x$ is a continuously differentiable and nondecreasing function of $t$. This shows that $C_1$ must be positive and $C_2$ must be negative.



    Since $x$ is a continuous function of $t$ and a nontrivial solution of $x$ cannot take 0 by the above observation, it follows that $x(t)=C_1e^t,C_1>0$ for all $t$ or $x(t)=C_2e^{-t},C_2<0$ for all $t$.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • You first divided both sides by $|x|$ to get the following results. But how can you guarantee that you are not dividing by $0$. In other words, if you cannot guarantee that once the solution starts from a non-zero value, it will not reach $0$, then you cannot divide it by $|x|$.
      – winston
      18 hours ago










    • @winston Good question. If $dot{x}=0$, then $x=0$ at such point. Now it is obvious that there is no way to combine the distinct (local) solutions $C_1e^t,C_2e^{-t},0$ to make a continuous global solution because the first is always positive, the second always negative, the last always zero. Therefore the global solution must be one of the three.
      – bellcircle
      18 hours ago

















    up vote
    4
    down vote













    One observes that $x=0$ is the trivial solution of the given ODE.



    Now find nontrivial solutions of the equation.



    Using separation of variables, one gets $$frac{dot{x}}{|x|}=1.$$



    Integrating both sides gives



    begin{align}text{sgn}(x)log|x|=t+Cquadcdotsquadtext{(a)}end{align} for some constant $C$, where $text{sgn}(x)=begin{cases}1,&x> 0\-1,&x<0.end{cases}$



    Therefore, $x(t)=begin{cases}C_1e^t,&x>0\C_2e^{-t},&x<0.end{cases}$



    Now find the solution of explicit form.



    From the equation, $dot{x}$ is always nonnegative, so $x$ is a continuously differentiable and nondecreasing function of $t$. This shows that $C_1$ must be positive and $C_2$ must be negative.



    Since $x$ is a continuous function of $t$ and a nontrivial solution of $x$ cannot take 0 by the above observation, it follows that $x(t)=C_1e^t,C_1>0$ for all $t$ or $x(t)=C_2e^{-t},C_2<0$ for all $t$.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • You first divided both sides by $|x|$ to get the following results. But how can you guarantee that you are not dividing by $0$. In other words, if you cannot guarantee that once the solution starts from a non-zero value, it will not reach $0$, then you cannot divide it by $|x|$.
      – winston
      18 hours ago










    • @winston Good question. If $dot{x}=0$, then $x=0$ at such point. Now it is obvious that there is no way to combine the distinct (local) solutions $C_1e^t,C_2e^{-t},0$ to make a continuous global solution because the first is always positive, the second always negative, the last always zero. Therefore the global solution must be one of the three.
      – bellcircle
      18 hours ago















    up vote
    4
    down vote










    up vote
    4
    down vote









    One observes that $x=0$ is the trivial solution of the given ODE.



    Now find nontrivial solutions of the equation.



    Using separation of variables, one gets $$frac{dot{x}}{|x|}=1.$$



    Integrating both sides gives



    begin{align}text{sgn}(x)log|x|=t+Cquadcdotsquadtext{(a)}end{align} for some constant $C$, where $text{sgn}(x)=begin{cases}1,&x> 0\-1,&x<0.end{cases}$



    Therefore, $x(t)=begin{cases}C_1e^t,&x>0\C_2e^{-t},&x<0.end{cases}$



    Now find the solution of explicit form.



    From the equation, $dot{x}$ is always nonnegative, so $x$ is a continuously differentiable and nondecreasing function of $t$. This shows that $C_1$ must be positive and $C_2$ must be negative.



    Since $x$ is a continuous function of $t$ and a nontrivial solution of $x$ cannot take 0 by the above observation, it follows that $x(t)=C_1e^t,C_1>0$ for all $t$ or $x(t)=C_2e^{-t},C_2<0$ for all $t$.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    One observes that $x=0$ is the trivial solution of the given ODE.



    Now find nontrivial solutions of the equation.



    Using separation of variables, one gets $$frac{dot{x}}{|x|}=1.$$



    Integrating both sides gives



    begin{align}text{sgn}(x)log|x|=t+Cquadcdotsquadtext{(a)}end{align} for some constant $C$, where $text{sgn}(x)=begin{cases}1,&x> 0\-1,&x<0.end{cases}$



    Therefore, $x(t)=begin{cases}C_1e^t,&x>0\C_2e^{-t},&x<0.end{cases}$



    Now find the solution of explicit form.



    From the equation, $dot{x}$ is always nonnegative, so $x$ is a continuously differentiable and nondecreasing function of $t$. This shows that $C_1$ must be positive and $C_2$ must be negative.



    Since $x$ is a continuous function of $t$ and a nontrivial solution of $x$ cannot take 0 by the above observation, it follows that $x(t)=C_1e^t,C_1>0$ for all $t$ or $x(t)=C_2e^{-t},C_2<0$ for all $t$.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 17 hours ago









    Shashi

    7,0221525




    7,0221525










    answered 19 hours ago









    bellcircle

    1,204411




    1,204411












    • You first divided both sides by $|x|$ to get the following results. But how can you guarantee that you are not dividing by $0$. In other words, if you cannot guarantee that once the solution starts from a non-zero value, it will not reach $0$, then you cannot divide it by $|x|$.
      – winston
      18 hours ago










    • @winston Good question. If $dot{x}=0$, then $x=0$ at such point. Now it is obvious that there is no way to combine the distinct (local) solutions $C_1e^t,C_2e^{-t},0$ to make a continuous global solution because the first is always positive, the second always negative, the last always zero. Therefore the global solution must be one of the three.
      – bellcircle
      18 hours ago




















    • You first divided both sides by $|x|$ to get the following results. But how can you guarantee that you are not dividing by $0$. In other words, if you cannot guarantee that once the solution starts from a non-zero value, it will not reach $0$, then you cannot divide it by $|x|$.
      – winston
      18 hours ago










    • @winston Good question. If $dot{x}=0$, then $x=0$ at such point. Now it is obvious that there is no way to combine the distinct (local) solutions $C_1e^t,C_2e^{-t},0$ to make a continuous global solution because the first is always positive, the second always negative, the last always zero. Therefore the global solution must be one of the three.
      – bellcircle
      18 hours ago


















    You first divided both sides by $|x|$ to get the following results. But how can you guarantee that you are not dividing by $0$. In other words, if you cannot guarantee that once the solution starts from a non-zero value, it will not reach $0$, then you cannot divide it by $|x|$.
    – winston
    18 hours ago




    You first divided both sides by $|x|$ to get the following results. But how can you guarantee that you are not dividing by $0$. In other words, if you cannot guarantee that once the solution starts from a non-zero value, it will not reach $0$, then you cannot divide it by $|x|$.
    – winston
    18 hours ago












    @winston Good question. If $dot{x}=0$, then $x=0$ at such point. Now it is obvious that there is no way to combine the distinct (local) solutions $C_1e^t,C_2e^{-t},0$ to make a continuous global solution because the first is always positive, the second always negative, the last always zero. Therefore the global solution must be one of the three.
    – bellcircle
    18 hours ago






    @winston Good question. If $dot{x}=0$, then $x=0$ at such point. Now it is obvious that there is no way to combine the distinct (local) solutions $C_1e^t,C_2e^{-t},0$ to make a continuous global solution because the first is always positive, the second always negative, the last always zero. Therefore the global solution must be one of the three.
    – bellcircle
    18 hours ago












    up vote
    1
    down vote













    bellcircle has provided a solution to the problem. However, I would like to express the solution in a more compact form and also provide an answer using a proposition-proof style.



    $(Dx)(t) = |x(t)|$ (1)



    Proposition. If $I$ is an open interval in $mathbb{R}$ and $C in mathbb{R}$, then $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ is a solution of the differential equation (1) on $I$. If $x(t)$ is a solution of the differential equation (1) on an open interval $I$ in $mathbb{R}$, then there exists $C in mathbb{R}$ such that $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$.



    Suppose $I$ is an open interval in $mathbb{R}$. Suppose $C in mathbb{R}$ and $x$ is such that $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$. Then $(Dx)(t)=mathsf{sgn}(C)Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$. Also, $|x(t)|=mathsf{sgn}(C)Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$. Therefore, indeed $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ is a solution of (1) on $I$.



    Suppose there is a solution $x_2(t)$ of (1) on $I$ such that there is no $C in mathbb{R}$ such that $x_2(t) = Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$. Then take $T in I$. Define $A=frac{x_2(T)}{e^{mathsf{sgn}(x_2(T)) T}}$. Then $x(t) = A e^{mathsf{sgn}(A)t}$ is a solution of (1) on $I$ with $x(T)=x_2(T)$. The uniqueness of the solution of (1) on $I$ with $x(T)=x_2(T)$ follows from the Lipschitz continuity of $|cdot|$ by the Picard–Lindelöf theorem (link) and the global uniqueness theorem (e.g. link). Therefore $x_2(t) = A e^{mathsf{sgn}(A)t}$ for all $t in I$ and, thus, by contradiction, if $x(t)$ is a solution of the differential equation (1) on an open interval $I$ in $mathbb{R}$, then there exists $C in mathbb{R}$ such that $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      bellcircle has provided a solution to the problem. However, I would like to express the solution in a more compact form and also provide an answer using a proposition-proof style.



      $(Dx)(t) = |x(t)|$ (1)



      Proposition. If $I$ is an open interval in $mathbb{R}$ and $C in mathbb{R}$, then $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ is a solution of the differential equation (1) on $I$. If $x(t)$ is a solution of the differential equation (1) on an open interval $I$ in $mathbb{R}$, then there exists $C in mathbb{R}$ such that $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$.



      Suppose $I$ is an open interval in $mathbb{R}$. Suppose $C in mathbb{R}$ and $x$ is such that $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$. Then $(Dx)(t)=mathsf{sgn}(C)Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$. Also, $|x(t)|=mathsf{sgn}(C)Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$. Therefore, indeed $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ is a solution of (1) on $I$.



      Suppose there is a solution $x_2(t)$ of (1) on $I$ such that there is no $C in mathbb{R}$ such that $x_2(t) = Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$. Then take $T in I$. Define $A=frac{x_2(T)}{e^{mathsf{sgn}(x_2(T)) T}}$. Then $x(t) = A e^{mathsf{sgn}(A)t}$ is a solution of (1) on $I$ with $x(T)=x_2(T)$. The uniqueness of the solution of (1) on $I$ with $x(T)=x_2(T)$ follows from the Lipschitz continuity of $|cdot|$ by the Picard–Lindelöf theorem (link) and the global uniqueness theorem (e.g. link). Therefore $x_2(t) = A e^{mathsf{sgn}(A)t}$ for all $t in I$ and, thus, by contradiction, if $x(t)$ is a solution of the differential equation (1) on an open interval $I$ in $mathbb{R}$, then there exists $C in mathbb{R}$ such that $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        bellcircle has provided a solution to the problem. However, I would like to express the solution in a more compact form and also provide an answer using a proposition-proof style.



        $(Dx)(t) = |x(t)|$ (1)



        Proposition. If $I$ is an open interval in $mathbb{R}$ and $C in mathbb{R}$, then $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ is a solution of the differential equation (1) on $I$. If $x(t)$ is a solution of the differential equation (1) on an open interval $I$ in $mathbb{R}$, then there exists $C in mathbb{R}$ such that $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$.



        Suppose $I$ is an open interval in $mathbb{R}$. Suppose $C in mathbb{R}$ and $x$ is such that $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$. Then $(Dx)(t)=mathsf{sgn}(C)Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$. Also, $|x(t)|=mathsf{sgn}(C)Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$. Therefore, indeed $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ is a solution of (1) on $I$.



        Suppose there is a solution $x_2(t)$ of (1) on $I$ such that there is no $C in mathbb{R}$ such that $x_2(t) = Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$. Then take $T in I$. Define $A=frac{x_2(T)}{e^{mathsf{sgn}(x_2(T)) T}}$. Then $x(t) = A e^{mathsf{sgn}(A)t}$ is a solution of (1) on $I$ with $x(T)=x_2(T)$. The uniqueness of the solution of (1) on $I$ with $x(T)=x_2(T)$ follows from the Lipschitz continuity of $|cdot|$ by the Picard–Lindelöf theorem (link) and the global uniqueness theorem (e.g. link). Therefore $x_2(t) = A e^{mathsf{sgn}(A)t}$ for all $t in I$ and, thus, by contradiction, if $x(t)$ is a solution of the differential equation (1) on an open interval $I$ in $mathbb{R}$, then there exists $C in mathbb{R}$ such that $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$






        share|cite|improve this answer














        bellcircle has provided a solution to the problem. However, I would like to express the solution in a more compact form and also provide an answer using a proposition-proof style.



        $(Dx)(t) = |x(t)|$ (1)



        Proposition. If $I$ is an open interval in $mathbb{R}$ and $C in mathbb{R}$, then $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ is a solution of the differential equation (1) on $I$. If $x(t)$ is a solution of the differential equation (1) on an open interval $I$ in $mathbb{R}$, then there exists $C in mathbb{R}$ such that $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$.



        Suppose $I$ is an open interval in $mathbb{R}$. Suppose $C in mathbb{R}$ and $x$ is such that $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$. Then $(Dx)(t)=mathsf{sgn}(C)Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$. Also, $|x(t)|=mathsf{sgn}(C)Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$. Therefore, indeed $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ is a solution of (1) on $I$.



        Suppose there is a solution $x_2(t)$ of (1) on $I$ such that there is no $C in mathbb{R}$ such that $x_2(t) = Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$. Then take $T in I$. Define $A=frac{x_2(T)}{e^{mathsf{sgn}(x_2(T)) T}}$. Then $x(t) = A e^{mathsf{sgn}(A)t}$ is a solution of (1) on $I$ with $x(T)=x_2(T)$. The uniqueness of the solution of (1) on $I$ with $x(T)=x_2(T)$ follows from the Lipschitz continuity of $|cdot|$ by the Picard–Lindelöf theorem (link) and the global uniqueness theorem (e.g. link). Therefore $x_2(t) = A e^{mathsf{sgn}(A)t}$ for all $t in I$ and, thus, by contradiction, if $x(t)$ is a solution of the differential equation (1) on an open interval $I$ in $mathbb{R}$, then there exists $C in mathbb{R}$ such that $x(t)=Ce^{mathsf{sgn}(C) t}$ for all $t in I$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 16 hours ago

























        answered 18 hours ago









        xanonec

        1485




        1485






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004789%2fhow-to-solve-dotx-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

            Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

            A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$