MySQL - lock row for reading











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am using socket.io server and multiple clients are making requests to this server. Server checks a MySQL innoDB table for data and if there is some data it updates its bit/column in table and send data to requested client.



But the problem is my multiple clients are occasionally getting same data.



Reason I feel is, 2 clients make requests to server exactly same point in time and both get same MySQL table row record before it was updated by other client.






mysql socket.io innodb







share|improve this question






















  • If you use the received data in follow-up select, insert or update then you have to use FOR UPDATE or FOR SHARE within the transaction.
    – t.niese
    yesterday












  • Possible duplicate of Locking a row in a MYSQL table during a transaction
    – t.niese
    yesterday










  • How to properly use transactions and locks to ensure database integrity?
    – t.niese
    yesterday










  • @t.niese - the link you shared is something different. Those locking doesn't lock a row for reading. I want to lock read, means the row my one connection is processing should not be read by other connection.
    – Irfan DANISH
    yesterday










  • If you use FOR UPDATE then Other transactions are blocked from updating those rows, from doing SELECT ... FOR SHARE, or from reading the data in certain transaction isolation levels.. So if your isolation level is set up correctly then you can't have two transactions having a SELECT .. FOR UPDATE on the same row. So either the second transaction fails, or waits until the first FOR UPDATE finished.
    – t.niese
    23 hours ago

















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am using socket.io server and multiple clients are making requests to this server. Server checks a MySQL innoDB table for data and if there is some data it updates its bit/column in table and send data to requested client.



But the problem is my multiple clients are occasionally getting same data.



Reason I feel is, 2 clients make requests to server exactly same point in time and both get same MySQL table row record before it was updated by other client.






mysql socket.io innodb







share|improve this question






















  • If you use the received data in follow-up select, insert or update then you have to use FOR UPDATE or FOR SHARE within the transaction.
    – t.niese
    yesterday












  • Possible duplicate of Locking a row in a MYSQL table during a transaction
    – t.niese
    yesterday










  • How to properly use transactions and locks to ensure database integrity?
    – t.niese
    yesterday










  • @t.niese - the link you shared is something different. Those locking doesn't lock a row for reading. I want to lock read, means the row my one connection is processing should not be read by other connection.
    – Irfan DANISH
    yesterday










  • If you use FOR UPDATE then Other transactions are blocked from updating those rows, from doing SELECT ... FOR SHARE, or from reading the data in certain transaction isolation levels.. So if your isolation level is set up correctly then you can't have two transactions having a SELECT .. FOR UPDATE on the same row. So either the second transaction fails, or waits until the first FOR UPDATE finished.
    – t.niese
    23 hours ago















up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I am using socket.io server and multiple clients are making requests to this server. Server checks a MySQL innoDB table for data and if there is some data it updates its bit/column in table and send data to requested client.



But the problem is my multiple clients are occasionally getting same data.



Reason I feel is, 2 clients make requests to server exactly same point in time and both get same MySQL table row record before it was updated by other client.






mysql socket.io innodb







share|improve this question













I am using socket.io server and multiple clients are making requests to this server. Server checks a MySQL innoDB table for data and if there is some data it updates its bit/column in table and send data to requested client.



But the problem is my multiple clients are occasionally getting same data.



Reason I feel is, 2 clients make requests to server exactly same point in time and both get same MySQL table row record before it was updated by other client.






mysql socket.io innodb




mysql socket.io innodb






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked yesterday









Irfan DANISH

4,77783054




4,77783054












  • If you use the received data in follow-up select, insert or update then you have to use FOR UPDATE or FOR SHARE within the transaction.
    – t.niese
    yesterday












  • Possible duplicate of Locking a row in a MYSQL table during a transaction
    – t.niese
    yesterday










  • How to properly use transactions and locks to ensure database integrity?
    – t.niese
    yesterday










  • @t.niese - the link you shared is something different. Those locking doesn't lock a row for reading. I want to lock read, means the row my one connection is processing should not be read by other connection.
    – Irfan DANISH
    yesterday










  • If you use FOR UPDATE then Other transactions are blocked from updating those rows, from doing SELECT ... FOR SHARE, or from reading the data in certain transaction isolation levels.. So if your isolation level is set up correctly then you can't have two transactions having a SELECT .. FOR UPDATE on the same row. So either the second transaction fails, or waits until the first FOR UPDATE finished.
    – t.niese
    23 hours ago




















  • If you use the received data in follow-up select, insert or update then you have to use FOR UPDATE or FOR SHARE within the transaction.
    – t.niese
    yesterday












  • Possible duplicate of Locking a row in a MYSQL table during a transaction
    – t.niese
    yesterday










  • How to properly use transactions and locks to ensure database integrity?
    – t.niese
    yesterday










  • @t.niese - the link you shared is something different. Those locking doesn't lock a row for reading. I want to lock read, means the row my one connection is processing should not be read by other connection.
    – Irfan DANISH
    yesterday










  • If you use FOR UPDATE then Other transactions are blocked from updating those rows, from doing SELECT ... FOR SHARE, or from reading the data in certain transaction isolation levels.. So if your isolation level is set up correctly then you can't have two transactions having a SELECT .. FOR UPDATE on the same row. So either the second transaction fails, or waits until the first FOR UPDATE finished.
    – t.niese
    23 hours ago


















If you use the received data in follow-up select, insert or update then you have to use FOR UPDATE or FOR SHARE within the transaction.
– t.niese
yesterday






If you use the received data in follow-up select, insert or update then you have to use FOR UPDATE or FOR SHARE within the transaction.
– t.niese
yesterday














Possible duplicate of Locking a row in a MYSQL table during a transaction
– t.niese
yesterday




Possible duplicate of Locking a row in a MYSQL table during a transaction
– t.niese
yesterday












How to properly use transactions and locks to ensure database integrity?
– t.niese
yesterday




How to properly use transactions and locks to ensure database integrity?
– t.niese
yesterday












@t.niese - the link you shared is something different. Those locking doesn't lock a row for reading. I want to lock read, means the row my one connection is processing should not be read by other connection.
– Irfan DANISH
yesterday




@t.niese - the link you shared is something different. Those locking doesn't lock a row for reading. I want to lock read, means the row my one connection is processing should not be read by other connection.
– Irfan DANISH
yesterday












If you use FOR UPDATE then Other transactions are blocked from updating those rows, from doing SELECT ... FOR SHARE, or from reading the data in certain transaction isolation levels.. So if your isolation level is set up correctly then you can't have two transactions having a SELECT .. FOR UPDATE on the same row. So either the second transaction fails, or waits until the first FOR UPDATE finished.
– t.niese
23 hours ago






If you use FOR UPDATE then Other transactions are blocked from updating those rows, from doing SELECT ... FOR SHARE, or from reading the data in certain transaction isolation levels.. So if your isolation level is set up correctly then you can't have two transactions having a SELECT .. FOR UPDATE on the same row. So either the second transaction fails, or waits until the first FOR UPDATE finished.
– t.niese
23 hours ago



















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53372245%2fmysql-lock-row-for-reading%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53372245%2fmysql-lock-row-for-reading%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

Image
0 My application was working fine until I decided to go with lazy loading: So, my shared component looks like this: import { Component, Renderer2 } from '@angular/core'; export interface FormModel { captcha?: string; } @Component({ selector: 'app-layout', templateUrl: './app-layout.component.html', styleUrls: ['./app-layout.css'] }) export class FullLayoutComponent { } app-layout.component.ts I am using this component in my Another component say school-home.component.html like this: <app-layout> </app-layout> and it was working fine until I created a Module school-home.module.ts like this: import { NgModule } from '@angular/core'; import { CommonModule } from '@angular/common'; import { SchoolhomeRoutingModule ...
Read more

android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

Image
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 0 This is a simple project showing cubes on Unity, exported to android project and imported on Android studio. On maifest file it showed following warning: Expecting <uses-feature android:name="android.software.leanback" android:required="false" /> tag I have no information about it. And also on default emptyview android project does not use/mention this feature. I know it is required by TV's and such but why its not added by default? Why is this? And Should I concern about it? android unity3d ...
Read more

WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]

Image
up vote 0 down vote favorite This question already has an answer here: Image source URI requiring authorization 3 answers Add header to all* HTTP requests on a machine 1 answer first of all sorry for my english. Recently I added some security in the backend of my project, and now I need to send a validation code(apiKey) inside the headers to retrieve the images. I have a problem with ALL images in my project that I had attached in my UI. For example, before I had: <Image Height="90" Source="{Binding Video.Thumbnail}"/> Now I need to change my code to create a CUSTOM petition add the apiKey in the header:...
Read more