Without using Reimann Mapping theorem , How to argue conformal maps does not exist?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Without using Reimann Mapping theorem , How to argue conformal maps does not exist ?



1) For $mathbb C/${0}$to mathbb D$



I know first set is not simply connected .But need to argue without using RMT.

I tried to Liovellies theorem but as function is not entire, I could not applied.
I also tried reverse direction I know that any non vanishing function is of form $e^{f(z)}$ for some holomorphic function f(z).
Please suggest some natural strategy to tackle such problem?

Any Help will be appreciated






complex-analysis







share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Without using Reimann Mapping theorem , How to argue conformal maps does not exist ?



    1) For $mathbb C/${0}$to mathbb D$



    I know first set is not simply connected .But need to argue without using RMT.

    I tried to Liovellies theorem but as function is not entire, I could not applied.
    I also tried reverse direction I know that any non vanishing function is of form $e^{f(z)}$ for some holomorphic function f(z).
    Please suggest some natural strategy to tackle such problem?

    Any Help will be appreciated






    complex-analysis







    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Without using Reimann Mapping theorem , How to argue conformal maps does not exist ?



      1) For $mathbb C/${0}$to mathbb D$



      I know first set is not simply connected .But need to argue without using RMT.

      I tried to Liovellies theorem but as function is not entire, I could not applied.
      I also tried reverse direction I know that any non vanishing function is of form $e^{f(z)}$ for some holomorphic function f(z).
      Please suggest some natural strategy to tackle such problem?

      Any Help will be appreciated






      complex-analysis







      share|cite|improve this question















      Without using Reimann Mapping theorem , How to argue conformal maps does not exist ?



      1) For $mathbb C/${0}$to mathbb D$



      I know first set is not simply connected .But need to argue without using RMT.

      I tried to Liovellies theorem but as function is not entire, I could not applied.
      I also tried reverse direction I know that any non vanishing function is of form $e^{f(z)}$ for some holomorphic function f(z).
      Please suggest some natural strategy to tackle such problem?

      Any Help will be appreciated






      complex-analysis




      complex-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 22 hours ago

























      asked 22 hours ago









      Shubham

      1,2161518




      1,2161518






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Let $f : mathbb C setminus {0} to mathbb D$ holomorphic. Then $0$ is an isolated singularity of $f$ and $f$ is bounded. Hence, $0$ is a removable singularity of $f$. Therefore there is a entire function $g$ such that $f(z)=g(z)$ for all $z ne 0$. Then $g$ is bounded and by Liouville $g$ is constant. Thus $f$ is constant.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            You can extend such a map to the whole $mathbb{C}$ by the classification of singularities. So you get a contradiction from Louville's Theorem.






            share|cite|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Dante Grevino is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.

























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              If a conformal map existed then it would be invertible, under which function the image of $mathbb D$ would have to be simply connected.






              share|cite|improve this answer





















                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                });
                });
                }, "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                 

                draft saved


                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004818%2fwithout-using-reimann-mapping-theorem-how-to-argue-conformal-maps-does-not-exi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes








                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted










                Let $f : mathbb C setminus {0} to mathbb D$ holomorphic. Then $0$ is an isolated singularity of $f$ and $f$ is bounded. Hence, $0$ is a removable singularity of $f$. Therefore there is a entire function $g$ such that $f(z)=g(z)$ for all $z ne 0$. Then $g$ is bounded and by Liouville $g$ is constant. Thus $f$ is constant.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote



                  accepted










                  Let $f : mathbb C setminus {0} to mathbb D$ holomorphic. Then $0$ is an isolated singularity of $f$ and $f$ is bounded. Hence, $0$ is a removable singularity of $f$. Therefore there is a entire function $g$ such that $f(z)=g(z)$ for all $z ne 0$. Then $g$ is bounded and by Liouville $g$ is constant. Thus $f$ is constant.






                  share|cite|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote



                    accepted







                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote



                    accepted






                    Let $f : mathbb C setminus {0} to mathbb D$ holomorphic. Then $0$ is an isolated singularity of $f$ and $f$ is bounded. Hence, $0$ is a removable singularity of $f$. Therefore there is a entire function $g$ such that $f(z)=g(z)$ for all $z ne 0$. Then $g$ is bounded and by Liouville $g$ is constant. Thus $f$ is constant.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    Let $f : mathbb C setminus {0} to mathbb D$ holomorphic. Then $0$ is an isolated singularity of $f$ and $f$ is bounded. Hence, $0$ is a removable singularity of $f$. Therefore there is a entire function $g$ such that $f(z)=g(z)$ for all $z ne 0$. Then $g$ is bounded and by Liouville $g$ is constant. Thus $f$ is constant.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 22 hours ago









                    Fred

                    41.9k1642




                    41.9k1642






















                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        You can extend such a map to the whole $mathbb{C}$ by the classification of singularities. So you get a contradiction from Louville's Theorem.






                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        Dante Grevino is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          You can extend such a map to the whole $mathbb{C}$ by the classification of singularities. So you get a contradiction from Louville's Theorem.






                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          New contributor




                          Dante Grevino is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote









                            You can extend such a map to the whole $mathbb{C}$ by the classification of singularities. So you get a contradiction from Louville's Theorem.






                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            New contributor




                            Dante Grevino is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            You can extend such a map to the whole $mathbb{C}$ by the classification of singularities. So you get a contradiction from Louville's Theorem.







                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            New contributor




                            Dante Grevino is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer






                            New contributor




                            Dante Grevino is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            answered 22 hours ago









                            Dante Grevino

                            1463




                            1463




                            New contributor




                            Dante Grevino is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.





                            New contributor





                            Dante Grevino is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






                            Dante Grevino is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote













                                If a conformal map existed then it would be invertible, under which function the image of $mathbb D$ would have to be simply connected.






                                share|cite|improve this answer

























                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  If a conformal map existed then it would be invertible, under which function the image of $mathbb D$ would have to be simply connected.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer























                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote










                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote









                                    If a conformal map existed then it would be invertible, under which function the image of $mathbb D$ would have to be simply connected.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    If a conformal map existed then it would be invertible, under which function the image of $mathbb D$ would have to be simply connected.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered 22 hours ago









                                    Richard Martin

                                    1,2588




                                    1,2588






























                                         

                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded



















































                                         


                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004818%2fwithout-using-reimann-mapping-theorem-how-to-argue-conformal-maps-does-not-exi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                                        Image
                                        .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 0 This is a simple project showing cubes on Unity, exported to android project and imported on Android studio. On maifest file it showed following warning: Expecting <uses-feature android:name="android.software.leanback" android:required="false" /> tag I have no information about it. And also on default emptyview android project does not use/mention this feature. I know it is required by TV's and such but why its not added by default? Why is this? And Should I concern about it? android unity3d
                                        Read more

                                        SQL update select statement

                                        Image
                                        0 I'm trying to update an entry in my database (postgresql). I'm having a problem with updating the query: INSERT INTO prices (price, product_id) SELECT product_price, commn_id FROM products_temp as prod WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM prices od WHERE prod.commn_id = od.product_id) OR prod.product_price != ( SELECT price FROM prices as p WHERE p.product_id = prod.commn_id order by p.end desc LIMIT 1 ) Query works fine when i delete: OR prod.product_price != ( SELECT price FROM prices as p WHERE p.product_id = prod.commn_id order by p.end desc LIMIT 1 ) So it seems to me that it's looping through this operation. My question is, how can I fix it? sql postgresql
                                        Read more

                                        'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

                                        Image
                                        0 My application was working fine until I decided to go with lazy loading: So, my shared component looks like this: import { Component, Renderer2 } from '@angular/core'; export interface FormModel { captcha?: string; } @Component({ selector: 'app-layout', templateUrl: './app-layout.component.html', styleUrls: ['./app-layout.css'] }) export class FullLayoutComponent { } app-layout.component.ts I am using this component in my Another component say school-home.component.html like this: <app-layout> </app-layout> and it was working fine until I created a Module school-home.module.ts like this: import { NgModule } from '@angular/core'; import { CommonModule } from '@angular/common'; import { SchoolhomeRoutingModule
                                        Read more