Prove or disprove that every finite $sigma$-algebra on $Omega$ is generated by a finite partition of $Omega$.












0












$begingroup$



Prove or disprove that every finite $sigma$-algebra on $Omega$ is generated by a finite partition of $Omega$.




I have a feeling this must be true, but I could not do more than the following:



Being $Sigma$ a finite $sigma$-algebra on $Omega$, I defined a set $S$ as the set of intersections of two arbitrary sets in $Sigma$, but I don't know if there is a partition $P$ which is a subset of $S$ and if there is, if the $sigma$-algebra generated by $P$ is $Sigma$. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.



And if the fact that every finite $sigma$-algebra can be generated by a finite partition is false, what conditions do the finite $sigma$-algebra need to have in order for it to be true?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$



    Prove or disprove that every finite $sigma$-algebra on $Omega$ is generated by a finite partition of $Omega$.




    I have a feeling this must be true, but I could not do more than the following:



    Being $Sigma$ a finite $sigma$-algebra on $Omega$, I defined a set $S$ as the set of intersections of two arbitrary sets in $Sigma$, but I don't know if there is a partition $P$ which is a subset of $S$ and if there is, if the $sigma$-algebra generated by $P$ is $Sigma$. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.



    And if the fact that every finite $sigma$-algebra can be generated by a finite partition is false, what conditions do the finite $sigma$-algebra need to have in order for it to be true?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      Prove or disprove that every finite $sigma$-algebra on $Omega$ is generated by a finite partition of $Omega$.




      I have a feeling this must be true, but I could not do more than the following:



      Being $Sigma$ a finite $sigma$-algebra on $Omega$, I defined a set $S$ as the set of intersections of two arbitrary sets in $Sigma$, but I don't know if there is a partition $P$ which is a subset of $S$ and if there is, if the $sigma$-algebra generated by $P$ is $Sigma$. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.



      And if the fact that every finite $sigma$-algebra can be generated by a finite partition is false, what conditions do the finite $sigma$-algebra need to have in order for it to be true?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$





      Prove or disprove that every finite $sigma$-algebra on $Omega$ is generated by a finite partition of $Omega$.




      I have a feeling this must be true, but I could not do more than the following:



      Being $Sigma$ a finite $sigma$-algebra on $Omega$, I defined a set $S$ as the set of intersections of two arbitrary sets in $Sigma$, but I don't know if there is a partition $P$ which is a subset of $S$ and if there is, if the $sigma$-algebra generated by $P$ is $Sigma$. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.



      And if the fact that every finite $sigma$-algebra can be generated by a finite partition is false, what conditions do the finite $sigma$-algebra need to have in order for it to be true?







      measure-theory set-partition






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 7 at 23:27









      GarmekainGarmekain

      1,345720




      1,345720






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Intersection of just two sets from the sigma algebra won't suffice. Let $mathcal A ={A_1,A_2,cdots,A_n}$ be a finite sigma algebra. Verify the following facts: sets of the form $B_1cap B_2capcdots cap B_n$ where $B_i$ is either $A_i$ or $A_i^{c}$ for each $i$ are disjoint. Though many of them may be empty, their union is $Omega$. Also prove that each $A_j$ is a union of those sets of the above form where $B_j=A_j$. Now you can easily verify that the partition we have constructed generates the sigma algebra $mathcal A$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I don't understand the second condition to be verified. What do you mean by saying that each $A_j$ is a union of sets with said form where $B_j=A_j$, Does that mean that each $A_j$ is the union of sets with form $A_1capcdotscap A_n$?
            $endgroup$
            – Garmekain
            Jan 8 at 0:24






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @G Consider $A_1$. Now look at all sets of the form $A_1cap B_2cap B_3cap cdotscap B_n$ where $B_2=A_2$ or $B_2=A_2^{c}$,...,$B_n=A_n$ or$B_n=A_n^{c}$. The union of these sets is $A_1$.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Jan 8 at 0:40













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065633%2fprove-or-disprove-that-every-finite-sigma-algebra-on-omega-is-generated-by%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          Intersection of just two sets from the sigma algebra won't suffice. Let $mathcal A ={A_1,A_2,cdots,A_n}$ be a finite sigma algebra. Verify the following facts: sets of the form $B_1cap B_2capcdots cap B_n$ where $B_i$ is either $A_i$ or $A_i^{c}$ for each $i$ are disjoint. Though many of them may be empty, their union is $Omega$. Also prove that each $A_j$ is a union of those sets of the above form where $B_j=A_j$. Now you can easily verify that the partition we have constructed generates the sigma algebra $mathcal A$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I don't understand the second condition to be verified. What do you mean by saying that each $A_j$ is a union of sets with said form where $B_j=A_j$, Does that mean that each $A_j$ is the union of sets with form $A_1capcdotscap A_n$?
            $endgroup$
            – Garmekain
            Jan 8 at 0:24






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @G Consider $A_1$. Now look at all sets of the form $A_1cap B_2cap B_3cap cdotscap B_n$ where $B_2=A_2$ or $B_2=A_2^{c}$,...,$B_n=A_n$ or$B_n=A_n^{c}$. The union of these sets is $A_1$.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Jan 8 at 0:40


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Intersection of just two sets from the sigma algebra won't suffice. Let $mathcal A ={A_1,A_2,cdots,A_n}$ be a finite sigma algebra. Verify the following facts: sets of the form $B_1cap B_2capcdots cap B_n$ where $B_i$ is either $A_i$ or $A_i^{c}$ for each $i$ are disjoint. Though many of them may be empty, their union is $Omega$. Also prove that each $A_j$ is a union of those sets of the above form where $B_j=A_j$. Now you can easily verify that the partition we have constructed generates the sigma algebra $mathcal A$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I don't understand the second condition to be verified. What do you mean by saying that each $A_j$ is a union of sets with said form where $B_j=A_j$, Does that mean that each $A_j$ is the union of sets with form $A_1capcdotscap A_n$?
            $endgroup$
            – Garmekain
            Jan 8 at 0:24






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @G Consider $A_1$. Now look at all sets of the form $A_1cap B_2cap B_3cap cdotscap B_n$ where $B_2=A_2$ or $B_2=A_2^{c}$,...,$B_n=A_n$ or$B_n=A_n^{c}$. The union of these sets is $A_1$.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Jan 8 at 0:40
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Intersection of just two sets from the sigma algebra won't suffice. Let $mathcal A ={A_1,A_2,cdots,A_n}$ be a finite sigma algebra. Verify the following facts: sets of the form $B_1cap B_2capcdots cap B_n$ where $B_i$ is either $A_i$ or $A_i^{c}$ for each $i$ are disjoint. Though many of them may be empty, their union is $Omega$. Also prove that each $A_j$ is a union of those sets of the above form where $B_j=A_j$. Now you can easily verify that the partition we have constructed generates the sigma algebra $mathcal A$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Intersection of just two sets from the sigma algebra won't suffice. Let $mathcal A ={A_1,A_2,cdots,A_n}$ be a finite sigma algebra. Verify the following facts: sets of the form $B_1cap B_2capcdots cap B_n$ where $B_i$ is either $A_i$ or $A_i^{c}$ for each $i$ are disjoint. Though many of them may be empty, their union is $Omega$. Also prove that each $A_j$ is a union of those sets of the above form where $B_j=A_j$. Now you can easily verify that the partition we have constructed generates the sigma algebra $mathcal A$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 7 at 23:49









          Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

          56.6k42159




          56.6k42159












          • $begingroup$
            I don't understand the second condition to be verified. What do you mean by saying that each $A_j$ is a union of sets with said form where $B_j=A_j$, Does that mean that each $A_j$ is the union of sets with form $A_1capcdotscap A_n$?
            $endgroup$
            – Garmekain
            Jan 8 at 0:24






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @G Consider $A_1$. Now look at all sets of the form $A_1cap B_2cap B_3cap cdotscap B_n$ where $B_2=A_2$ or $B_2=A_2^{c}$,...,$B_n=A_n$ or$B_n=A_n^{c}$. The union of these sets is $A_1$.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Jan 8 at 0:40




















          • $begingroup$
            I don't understand the second condition to be verified. What do you mean by saying that each $A_j$ is a union of sets with said form where $B_j=A_j$, Does that mean that each $A_j$ is the union of sets with form $A_1capcdotscap A_n$?
            $endgroup$
            – Garmekain
            Jan 8 at 0:24






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @G Consider $A_1$. Now look at all sets of the form $A_1cap B_2cap B_3cap cdotscap B_n$ where $B_2=A_2$ or $B_2=A_2^{c}$,...,$B_n=A_n$ or$B_n=A_n^{c}$. The union of these sets is $A_1$.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Jan 8 at 0:40


















          $begingroup$
          I don't understand the second condition to be verified. What do you mean by saying that each $A_j$ is a union of sets with said form where $B_j=A_j$, Does that mean that each $A_j$ is the union of sets with form $A_1capcdotscap A_n$?
          $endgroup$
          – Garmekain
          Jan 8 at 0:24




          $begingroup$
          I don't understand the second condition to be verified. What do you mean by saying that each $A_j$ is a union of sets with said form where $B_j=A_j$, Does that mean that each $A_j$ is the union of sets with form $A_1capcdotscap A_n$?
          $endgroup$
          – Garmekain
          Jan 8 at 0:24




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @G Consider $A_1$. Now look at all sets of the form $A_1cap B_2cap B_3cap cdotscap B_n$ where $B_2=A_2$ or $B_2=A_2^{c}$,...,$B_n=A_n$ or$B_n=A_n^{c}$. The union of these sets is $A_1$.
          $endgroup$
          – Kavi Rama Murthy
          Jan 8 at 0:40






          $begingroup$
          @G Consider $A_1$. Now look at all sets of the form $A_1cap B_2cap B_3cap cdotscap B_n$ where $B_2=A_2$ or $B_2=A_2^{c}$,...,$B_n=A_n$ or$B_n=A_n^{c}$. The union of these sets is $A_1$.
          $endgroup$
          – Kavi Rama Murthy
          Jan 8 at 0:40




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065633%2fprove-or-disprove-that-every-finite-sigma-algebra-on-omega-is-generated-by%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

          in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith