Constructing all non-isomorphic Hamiltonian graphs on n vertices











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I've recently been taking a combinatorics class and have become interested in Hamiltonian graphs.



This OEIS entry lists the number of Hamiltonian graphs on $n$ vertices up to $n =12$. However, I am having difficulty finding how these numbers were found. Is it naive to expect an algorithm which actually constructs all the hamiltonian graphs (at least for $n$ not too large) to exist?



Thanks.






graph-theory







share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I've recently been taking a combinatorics class and have become interested in Hamiltonian graphs.



    This OEIS entry lists the number of Hamiltonian graphs on $n$ vertices up to $n =12$. However, I am having difficulty finding how these numbers were found. Is it naive to expect an algorithm which actually constructs all the hamiltonian graphs (at least for $n$ not too large) to exist?



    Thanks.






    graph-theory







    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I've recently been taking a combinatorics class and have become interested in Hamiltonian graphs.



      This OEIS entry lists the number of Hamiltonian graphs on $n$ vertices up to $n =12$. However, I am having difficulty finding how these numbers were found. Is it naive to expect an algorithm which actually constructs all the hamiltonian graphs (at least for $n$ not too large) to exist?



      Thanks.






      graph-theory







      share|cite|improve this question















      I've recently been taking a combinatorics class and have become interested in Hamiltonian graphs.



      This OEIS entry lists the number of Hamiltonian graphs on $n$ vertices up to $n =12$. However, I am having difficulty finding how these numbers were found. Is it naive to expect an algorithm which actually constructs all the hamiltonian graphs (at least for $n$ not too large) to exist?



      Thanks.






      graph-theory




      graph-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 22 hours ago

























      asked 22 hours ago









      Tom Holt

      8711714




      8711714






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          I expect by constructing all graphs, probably using Brendan McKay’s program “geng” and extracting the Hamiltonian ones. Needs quite a few computer cores to do n=12, and I wouldn’t try 13.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            The 'filter' approach of generating all non-isomorphic graphs on $n$ vertices is the simplest possibility.



            The OEIS entry references McKay (1996), but I can't see a paper in this list : https://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/publications.html for Hamiltonian graphs (only _hypo_hamiltonian graphs).



            Presumably a more efficient approach than filtering would be to extend a Hamiltonian graph on $n$ vertices to one on $n + 1$ vertices, but maybe that is not possible.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • There are plenty of ways to do a non-filtering search: for $n=12$ you could start with a 12-cycle and then add edges one at a time, thereby creating a list of all the hamiltonian graphs on 12 edges, 13 edges, 14 edges and so on. The isomorph rejection would need to be smart though.
              – Gordon Royle
              7 hours ago











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004840%2fconstructing-all-non-isomorphic-hamiltonian-graphs-on-n-vertices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote













            I expect by constructing all graphs, probably using Brendan McKay’s program “geng” and extracting the Hamiltonian ones. Needs quite a few computer cores to do n=12, and I wouldn’t try 13.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              I expect by constructing all graphs, probably using Brendan McKay’s program “geng” and extracting the Hamiltonian ones. Needs quite a few computer cores to do n=12, and I wouldn’t try 13.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                I expect by constructing all graphs, probably using Brendan McKay’s program “geng” and extracting the Hamiltonian ones. Needs quite a few computer cores to do n=12, and I wouldn’t try 13.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                I expect by constructing all graphs, probably using Brendan McKay’s program “geng” and extracting the Hamiltonian ones. Needs quite a few computer cores to do n=12, and I wouldn’t try 13.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 22 hours ago









                Gordon Royle

                459310




                459310






















                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote













                    The 'filter' approach of generating all non-isomorphic graphs on $n$ vertices is the simplest possibility.



                    The OEIS entry references McKay (1996), but I can't see a paper in this list : https://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/publications.html for Hamiltonian graphs (only _hypo_hamiltonian graphs).



                    Presumably a more efficient approach than filtering would be to extend a Hamiltonian graph on $n$ vertices to one on $n + 1$ vertices, but maybe that is not possible.






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • There are plenty of ways to do a non-filtering search: for $n=12$ you could start with a 12-cycle and then add edges one at a time, thereby creating a list of all the hamiltonian graphs on 12 edges, 13 edges, 14 edges and so on. The isomorph rejection would need to be smart though.
                      – Gordon Royle
                      7 hours ago















                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote













                    The 'filter' approach of generating all non-isomorphic graphs on $n$ vertices is the simplest possibility.



                    The OEIS entry references McKay (1996), but I can't see a paper in this list : https://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/publications.html for Hamiltonian graphs (only _hypo_hamiltonian graphs).



                    Presumably a more efficient approach than filtering would be to extend a Hamiltonian graph on $n$ vertices to one on $n + 1$ vertices, but maybe that is not possible.






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • There are plenty of ways to do a non-filtering search: for $n=12$ you could start with a 12-cycle and then add edges one at a time, thereby creating a list of all the hamiltonian graphs on 12 edges, 13 edges, 14 edges and so on. The isomorph rejection would need to be smart though.
                      – Gordon Royle
                      7 hours ago













                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote









                    The 'filter' approach of generating all non-isomorphic graphs on $n$ vertices is the simplest possibility.



                    The OEIS entry references McKay (1996), but I can't see a paper in this list : https://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/publications.html for Hamiltonian graphs (only _hypo_hamiltonian graphs).



                    Presumably a more efficient approach than filtering would be to extend a Hamiltonian graph on $n$ vertices to one on $n + 1$ vertices, but maybe that is not possible.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    The 'filter' approach of generating all non-isomorphic graphs on $n$ vertices is the simplest possibility.



                    The OEIS entry references McKay (1996), but I can't see a paper in this list : https://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/publications.html for Hamiltonian graphs (only _hypo_hamiltonian graphs).



                    Presumably a more efficient approach than filtering would be to extend a Hamiltonian graph on $n$ vertices to one on $n + 1$ vertices, but maybe that is not possible.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 21 hours ago









                    gilleain

                    8741713




                    8741713












                    • There are plenty of ways to do a non-filtering search: for $n=12$ you could start with a 12-cycle and then add edges one at a time, thereby creating a list of all the hamiltonian graphs on 12 edges, 13 edges, 14 edges and so on. The isomorph rejection would need to be smart though.
                      – Gordon Royle
                      7 hours ago


















                    • There are plenty of ways to do a non-filtering search: for $n=12$ you could start with a 12-cycle and then add edges one at a time, thereby creating a list of all the hamiltonian graphs on 12 edges, 13 edges, 14 edges and so on. The isomorph rejection would need to be smart though.
                      – Gordon Royle
                      7 hours ago
















                    There are plenty of ways to do a non-filtering search: for $n=12$ you could start with a 12-cycle and then add edges one at a time, thereby creating a list of all the hamiltonian graphs on 12 edges, 13 edges, 14 edges and so on. The isomorph rejection would need to be smart though.
                    – Gordon Royle
                    7 hours ago




                    There are plenty of ways to do a non-filtering search: for $n=12$ you could start with a 12-cycle and then add edges one at a time, thereby creating a list of all the hamiltonian graphs on 12 edges, 13 edges, 14 edges and so on. The isomorph rejection would need to be smart though.
                    – Gordon Royle
                    7 hours ago


















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004840%2fconstructing-all-non-isomorphic-hamiltonian-graphs-on-n-vertices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                    Image
                    28 6 $begingroup$ Per the Font of Magic feature, sorcerer can use Flexible Casting to create 5th-level spell slots at level 7, even though they are not typically available until level 9. You can transform unexpended sorcery points into one spell slot as a bonus action on your turn. The Creating Spell Slots table shows the cost of creating a spell slot of [5th level is 7] If such a sorcerer levels up while still having this 5th-level spell slot, can they choose a 5th-level spell as the spell they gain upon levelling up? The Spellcasting feature states: Additionally, when you gain a level in this class, you can choose one of the sorcerer spells you know and replace it with another spell from the sorcerer spell list, which also must be of a level for which you have spell slots.
                    Read more

                    Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

                    Image
                    up vote 13 down vote favorite 1 After the 2018 errata, the disintegrate spell description now reads: A creature targeted by this spell must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, the target takes 10d6 + 40 force damage. The target is disintegrated if this damage leaves it with 0 hit points. If you were to polymorph an enemy into a rat and then disintegrate it, would the enemy be disintegrated or would it just return to its original form? I know that for Druids, it’s not an instant kill anymore, but is this the case for polymorph as well? dnd-5e spells polymorph errata share | improve this question edited 18 hours ago
                    Read more

                    A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$

                    Image
                    3 3 $begingroup$ Recently, I saw a construction of topological invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$ with $ngeq 2$ : $$ N=frac{1}{24pi^2}int_{S^3} d^3x epsilon^{ijk} Tr[(U^{-1}partial_{x_i}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_j}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_k}U)] , $$ where $Uin U(n)$ depends on $boldsymbol{x}=(x_1,x_2,x_3)in S^3$ , $epsilon^{ijk}$ is the Levi-Civita symbol, $i,j,k=1,2,3$ , and the duplicated indexes are summed over. It is claimed that $N$ is an integer, but why? Update 02/02/2019 I think I got an argument for $n=2$ . In this case, $U=e^{i varphi} q$ with $qin SU(2)$ . Due to the trace and the Levi-Civita symbol in $N$ , $varphi$ does not contribute to $N$ . As $Tr[q^{dagger}partial_i q]=0$ and $(q^{dagger}partial_i q)^{dagger}=-q^{dagger}partial_i q$ , $q^{dagger}partial_i q$ in geneeral has the form $q^{dagger}partia
                    Read more