gitflow pulling and work with remote branch











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm using gitflow, and I changed of computer, my feature called 'migration' is showed like remote branch



git branch -a

* develop

  master

  remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/develop

  remotes/origin/develop

  remotes/origin/feature/migration


what is the right way to pull that branch, and complete the work, then do commits and push. I was using gitkraken, but i feel have bugs when you are in complex scenaries and with more than one features open, do the things very automatically in the wrong way.






git







share|improve this question






















  • Possible duplicate of How do I check out a remote Git branch?
    – fredrik
    yesterday










  • the answer duplicate is confuse
    – DDave
    yesterday










  • the duplicate answer is very confused, i need only a clear answer
    – DDave
    yesterday















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm using gitflow, and I changed of computer, my feature called 'migration' is showed like remote branch



git branch -a

* develop

  master

  remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/develop

  remotes/origin/develop

  remotes/origin/feature/migration


what is the right way to pull that branch, and complete the work, then do commits and push. I was using gitkraken, but i feel have bugs when you are in complex scenaries and with more than one features open, do the things very automatically in the wrong way.






git







share|improve this question






















  • Possible duplicate of How do I check out a remote Git branch?
    – fredrik
    yesterday










  • the answer duplicate is confuse
    – DDave
    yesterday










  • the duplicate answer is very confused, i need only a clear answer
    – DDave
    yesterday













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I'm using gitflow, and I changed of computer, my feature called 'migration' is showed like remote branch



git branch -a

* develop

  master

  remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/develop

  remotes/origin/develop

  remotes/origin/feature/migration


what is the right way to pull that branch, and complete the work, then do commits and push. I was using gitkraken, but i feel have bugs when you are in complex scenaries and with more than one features open, do the things very automatically in the wrong way.






git







share|improve this question













I'm using gitflow, and I changed of computer, my feature called 'migration' is showed like remote branch



git branch -a

* develop

  master

  remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/develop

  remotes/origin/develop

  remotes/origin/feature/migration


what is the right way to pull that branch, and complete the work, then do commits and push. I was using gitkraken, but i feel have bugs when you are in complex scenaries and with more than one features open, do the things very automatically in the wrong way.






git




git






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked yesterday









DDave

372315




372315












  • Possible duplicate of How do I check out a remote Git branch?
    – fredrik
    yesterday










  • the answer duplicate is confuse
    – DDave
    yesterday










  • the duplicate answer is very confused, i need only a clear answer
    – DDave
    yesterday


















  • Possible duplicate of How do I check out a remote Git branch?
    – fredrik
    yesterday










  • the answer duplicate is confuse
    – DDave
    yesterday










  • the duplicate answer is very confused, i need only a clear answer
    – DDave
    yesterday
















Possible duplicate of How do I check out a remote Git branch?
– fredrik
yesterday




Possible duplicate of How do I check out a remote Git branch?
– fredrik
yesterday












the answer duplicate is confuse
– DDave
yesterday




the answer duplicate is confuse
– DDave
yesterday












the duplicate answer is very confused, i need only a clear answer
– DDave
yesterday




the duplicate answer is very confused, i need only a clear answer
– DDave
yesterday












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










Just git checkout feature/migration and it will create the branch locally then set up upstream.



You'll be able to work on it as usual, make changes, add, commit and push without additional steps.






share|improve this answer





















  • accort to duplicate question link, is not secure if there is more one remote branch, there is not better use the complete name ? something like: git checkout remotes/origin/feature/migration , so i'm sure ?
    – DDave
    yesterday










  • No, if you do that you won't create a local counterpart for the remote branch. You seem afraid of something but I can't figure out what.
    – RomainValeri
    yesterday













Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53372439%2fgitflow-pulling-and-work-with-remote-branch%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote



accepted










Just git checkout feature/migration and it will create the branch locally then set up upstream.



You'll be able to work on it as usual, make changes, add, commit and push without additional steps.






share|improve this answer





















  • accort to duplicate question link, is not secure if there is more one remote branch, there is not better use the complete name ? something like: git checkout remotes/origin/feature/migration , so i'm sure ?
    – DDave
    yesterday










  • No, if you do that you won't create a local counterpart for the remote branch. You seem afraid of something but I can't figure out what.
    – RomainValeri
    yesterday

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










Just git checkout feature/migration and it will create the branch locally then set up upstream.



You'll be able to work on it as usual, make changes, add, commit and push without additional steps.






share|improve this answer





















  • accort to duplicate question link, is not secure if there is more one remote branch, there is not better use the complete name ? something like: git checkout remotes/origin/feature/migration , so i'm sure ?
    – DDave
    yesterday










  • No, if you do that you won't create a local counterpart for the remote branch. You seem afraid of something but I can't figure out what.
    – RomainValeri
    yesterday















up vote
0
down vote



accepted







up vote
0
down vote



accepted






Just git checkout feature/migration and it will create the branch locally then set up upstream.



You'll be able to work on it as usual, make changes, add, commit and push without additional steps.






share|improve this answer












Just git checkout feature/migration and it will create the branch locally then set up upstream.



You'll be able to work on it as usual, make changes, add, commit and push without additional steps.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









RomainValeri

1,19911024




1,19911024












  • accort to duplicate question link, is not secure if there is more one remote branch, there is not better use the complete name ? something like: git checkout remotes/origin/feature/migration , so i'm sure ?
    – DDave
    yesterday










  • No, if you do that you won't create a local counterpart for the remote branch. You seem afraid of something but I can't figure out what.
    – RomainValeri
    yesterday




















  • accort to duplicate question link, is not secure if there is more one remote branch, there is not better use the complete name ? something like: git checkout remotes/origin/feature/migration , so i'm sure ?
    – DDave
    yesterday










  • No, if you do that you won't create a local counterpart for the remote branch. You seem afraid of something but I can't figure out what.
    – RomainValeri
    yesterday


















accort to duplicate question link, is not secure if there is more one remote branch, there is not better use the complete name ? something like: git checkout remotes/origin/feature/migration , so i'm sure ?
– DDave
yesterday




accort to duplicate question link, is not secure if there is more one remote branch, there is not better use the complete name ? something like: git checkout remotes/origin/feature/migration , so i'm sure ?
– DDave
yesterday












No, if you do that you won't create a local counterpart for the remote branch. You seem afraid of something but I can't figure out what.
– RomainValeri
yesterday






No, if you do that you won't create a local counterpart for the remote branch. You seem afraid of something but I can't figure out what.
– RomainValeri
yesterday




















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53372439%2fgitflow-pulling-and-work-with-remote-branch%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Image
28 6 $begingroup$ Per the Font of Magic feature, sorcerer can use Flexible Casting to create 5th-level spell slots at level 7, even though they are not typically available until level 9. You can transform unexpended sorcery points into one spell slot as a bonus action on your turn. The Creating Spell Slots table shows the cost of creating a spell slot of [5th level is 7] If such a sorcerer levels up while still having this 5th-level spell slot, can they choose a 5th-level spell as the spell they gain upon levelling up? The Spellcasting feature states: Additionally, when you gain a level in this class, you can choose one of the sorcerer spells you know and replace it with another spell from the sorcerer spell list, which also must be of a level for which you have spell slots.
Read more

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

Image
up vote 13 down vote favorite 1 After the 2018 errata, the disintegrate spell description now reads: A creature targeted by this spell must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, the target takes 10d6 + 40 force damage. The target is disintegrated if this damage leaves it with 0 hit points. If you were to polymorph an enemy into a rat and then disintegrate it, would the enemy be disintegrated or would it just return to its original form? I know that for Druids, it’s not an instant kill anymore, but is this the case for polymorph as well? dnd-5e spells polymorph errata share | improve this question edited 18 hours ago
Read more

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$

Image
3 3 $begingroup$ Recently, I saw a construction of topological invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$ with $ngeq 2$ : $$ N=frac{1}{24pi^2}int_{S^3} d^3x epsilon^{ijk} Tr[(U^{-1}partial_{x_i}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_j}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_k}U)] , $$ where $Uin U(n)$ depends on $boldsymbol{x}=(x_1,x_2,x_3)in S^3$ , $epsilon^{ijk}$ is the Levi-Civita symbol, $i,j,k=1,2,3$ , and the duplicated indexes are summed over. It is claimed that $N$ is an integer, but why? Update 02/02/2019 I think I got an argument for $n=2$ . In this case, $U=e^{i varphi} q$ with $qin SU(2)$ . Due to the trace and the Levi-Civita symbol in $N$ , $varphi$ does not contribute to $N$ . As $Tr[q^{dagger}partial_i q]=0$ and $(q^{dagger}partial_i q)^{dagger}=-q^{dagger}partial_i q$ , $q^{dagger}partial_i q$ in geneeral has the form $q^{dagger}partia
Read more