How to mathematically express the smallest non-outlier element in a set?
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
For example, in set $S$, what is the smallest element that is not an outlier? (An outlier being either $1.5(Q_3-Q_1)$ greater than $Q_3$ or less than $Q_1$)
statistics notation
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
For example, in set $S$, what is the smallest element that is not an outlier? (An outlier being either $1.5(Q_3-Q_1)$ greater than $Q_3$ or less than $Q_1$)
statistics notation
New contributor
3
When you write "the smallest number that is not an outlier" and provide a definition of "outlier" you have described that number mathematically. There is no "formula" for the number that will work on any data set.
– Ethan Bolker
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
For example, in set $S$, what is the smallest element that is not an outlier? (An outlier being either $1.5(Q_3-Q_1)$ greater than $Q_3$ or less than $Q_1$)
statistics notation
New contributor
For example, in set $S$, what is the smallest element that is not an outlier? (An outlier being either $1.5(Q_3-Q_1)$ greater than $Q_3$ or less than $Q_1$)
statistics notation
statistics notation
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
Tianlalu
2,589632
2,589632
New contributor
asked yesterday
uumonki
82
82
New contributor
New contributor
3
When you write "the smallest number that is not an outlier" and provide a definition of "outlier" you have described that number mathematically. There is no "formula" for the number that will work on any data set.
– Ethan Bolker
yesterday
add a comment |
3
When you write "the smallest number that is not an outlier" and provide a definition of "outlier" you have described that number mathematically. There is no "formula" for the number that will work on any data set.
– Ethan Bolker
yesterday
3
3
When you write "the smallest number that is not an outlier" and provide a definition of "outlier" you have described that number mathematically. There is no "formula" for the number that will work on any data set.
– Ethan Bolker
yesterday
When you write "the smallest number that is not an outlier" and provide a definition of "outlier" you have described that number mathematically. There is no "formula" for the number that will work on any data set.
– Ethan Bolker
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
What you are asking for is
$$
min {x in S mid x geq 2.5Q_1 - 1.5Q_3},
$$
but what you actually need is what you have already written down, as Ethan Bolker points out in the comments: a concise readable description of the element you are looking for.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
What you are asking for is
$$
min {x in S mid x geq 2.5Q_1 - 1.5Q_3},
$$
but what you actually need is what you have already written down, as Ethan Bolker points out in the comments: a concise readable description of the element you are looking for.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
What you are asking for is
$$
min {x in S mid x geq 2.5Q_1 - 1.5Q_3},
$$
but what you actually need is what you have already written down, as Ethan Bolker points out in the comments: a concise readable description of the element you are looking for.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
What you are asking for is
$$
min {x in S mid x geq 2.5Q_1 - 1.5Q_3},
$$
but what you actually need is what you have already written down, as Ethan Bolker points out in the comments: a concise readable description of the element you are looking for.
What you are asking for is
$$
min {x in S mid x geq 2.5Q_1 - 1.5Q_3},
$$
but what you actually need is what you have already written down, as Ethan Bolker points out in the comments: a concise readable description of the element you are looking for.
answered yesterday
Mees de Vries
16.4k12654
16.4k12654
add a comment |
add a comment |
uumonki is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
uumonki is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
uumonki is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
uumonki is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005087%2fhow-to-mathematically-express-the-smallest-non-outlier-element-in-a-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
When you write "the smallest number that is not an outlier" and provide a definition of "outlier" you have described that number mathematically. There is no "formula" for the number that will work on any data set.
– Ethan Bolker
yesterday