Mixing
Inverse fourier transform of this phase shift system
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
$$H(Omega)=begin{cases}exp(-j pi/2) ,;&Omega >0 \
exp(jpi/2) ,;&Omega<0.end{cases}$$
How can I find the inverse fourier transform of this $(h(t))$ using fourier properties?
Fourier Transform Used:
$$X(Omega)equivint_{-infty}^{infty}x(t),e^{-jOmega t},dt.$$
fourier-transform signal-processing
edited yesterday
Adrian Keister
4,56751933
asked yesterday
Prestyy
434
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
$$H(Omega)=begin{cases}exp(-j pi/2) ,;&Omega >0 \
exp(jpi/2) ,;&Omega<0.end{cases}$$
How can I find the inverse fourier transform of this $(h(t))$ using fourier properties?
Fourier Transform Used:
$$X(Omega)equivint_{-infty}^{infty}x(t),e^{-jOmega t},dt.$$
fourier-transform signal-processing
edited yesterday
Adrian Keister
4,56751933
asked yesterday
Prestyy
434
1
Is this a piece-wise defined function?
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
@AdrianKeister yeah i had an issue with the format
– Prestyy
yesterday
1
Ok, there's a better way to typeset: use thecasesenvironment.
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
Which definition of the Fourier Transform and Fourier Inverse Transform are you using? (There are at least three, maybe more.)
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
1
@Prestyy: I'm sorry, but that's not what I was asking. You need to type up the exact formula for the Fourier Transform that you're using, and add that to your question body. There are at least three different ways of handling the constants that multiply the integrals in the definitions.
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
$$H(Omega)=begin{cases}exp(-j pi/2) ,;&Omega >0 \
exp(jpi/2) ,;&Omega<0.end{cases}$$
How can I find the inverse fourier transform of this $(h(t))$ using fourier properties?
Fourier Transform Used:
$$X(Omega)equivint_{-infty}^{infty}x(t),e^{-jOmega t},dt.$$
fourier-transform signal-processing
edited yesterday
Adrian Keister
4,56751933
asked yesterday
Prestyy
434
$$H(Omega)=begin{cases}exp(-j pi/2) ,;&Omega >0 \
exp(jpi/2) ,;&Omega<0.end{cases}$$
How can I find the inverse fourier transform of this $(h(t))$ using fourier properties?
Fourier Transform Used:
$$X(Omega)equivint_{-infty}^{infty}x(t),e^{-jOmega t},dt.$$
fourier-transform signal-processing
fourier-transform signal-processing
edited yesterday
Adrian Keister
4,56751933
asked yesterday
Prestyy
434
edited yesterday
Adrian Keister
4,56751933
asked yesterday
Prestyy
434
edited yesterday
Adrian Keister
4,56751933
edited yesterday
Adrian Keister
4,56751933
edited yesterday
Adrian Keister
4,56751933
4,56751933
asked yesterday
Prestyy
434
asked yesterday
Prestyy
434
asked yesterday
Prestyy
434
434
1
Is this a piece-wise defined function?
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
@AdrianKeister yeah i had an issue with the format
– Prestyy
yesterday
1
Ok, there's a better way to typeset: use thecasesenvironment.
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
Which definition of the Fourier Transform and Fourier Inverse Transform are you using? (There are at least three, maybe more.)
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
1
@Prestyy: I'm sorry, but that's not what I was asking. You need to type up the exact formula for the Fourier Transform that you're using, and add that to your question body. There are at least three different ways of handling the constants that multiply the integrals in the definitions.
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
1
Is this a piece-wise defined function?
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
@AdrianKeister yeah i had an issue with the format
– Prestyy
yesterday
1
Ok, there's a better way to typeset: use thecasesenvironment.
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
Which definition of the Fourier Transform and Fourier Inverse Transform are you using? (There are at least three, maybe more.)
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
1
@Prestyy: I'm sorry, but that's not what I was asking. You need to type up the exact formula for the Fourier Transform that you're using, and add that to your question body. There are at least three different ways of handling the constants that multiply the integrals in the definitions.
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
1
1
Is this a piece-wise defined function?
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
Is this a piece-wise defined function?
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
@AdrianKeister yeah i had an issue with the format
– Prestyy
yesterday
@AdrianKeister yeah i had an issue with the format
– Prestyy
yesterday
1
1
Ok, there's a better way to typeset: use the
cases environment.– Adrian Keister
yesterday
Ok, there's a better way to typeset: use the
cases environment.– Adrian Keister
yesterday
Which definition of the Fourier Transform and Fourier Inverse Transform are you using? (There are at least three, maybe more.)
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
Which definition of the Fourier Transform and Fourier Inverse Transform are you using? (There are at least three, maybe more.)
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
1
1
@Prestyy: I'm sorry, but that's not what I was asking. You need to type up the exact formula for the Fourier Transform that you're using, and add that to your question body. There are at least three different ways of handling the constants that multiply the integrals in the definitions.
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
@Prestyy: I'm sorry, but that's not what I was asking. You need to type up the exact formula for the Fourier Transform that you're using, and add that to your question body. There are at least three different ways of handling the constants that multiply the integrals in the definitions.
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First, to simplify notation a bit, we notice that, since $e^{jpi/2}=j,$ it follows that
$$H(Omega)=-joperatorname{sgn}(Omega). $$
In looking at the wiki table of Fourier Transforms, in the non-unitary, angular frequency column (which corresponds to the definition you're using), we see that the tricky part here is to note that
$$mathcal{F}^{-1}(-jpioperatorname{sgn}(Omega))=frac1t,$$
so that
$$mathcal{F}^{-1}(-joperatorname{sgn}(Omega))=frac{1}{pi t},$$
since the Inverse Fourier Transform is linear.
However, this does not take into account the situation in which $t=0$. Technically, your $H(Omega)$ is undefined there, unless you made a typo in your definition and one of the inequalities is non-strict.
answered yesterday
Adrian Keister
4,56751933
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First, to simplify notation a bit, we notice that, since $e^{jpi/2}=j,$ it follows that
$$H(Omega)=-joperatorname{sgn}(Omega). $$
In looking at the wiki table of Fourier Transforms, in the non-unitary, angular frequency column (which corresponds to the definition you're using), we see that the tricky part here is to note that
$$mathcal{F}^{-1}(-jpioperatorname{sgn}(Omega))=frac1t,$$
so that
$$mathcal{F}^{-1}(-joperatorname{sgn}(Omega))=frac{1}{pi t},$$
since the Inverse Fourier Transform is linear.
However, this does not take into account the situation in which $t=0$. Technically, your $H(Omega)$ is undefined there, unless you made a typo in your definition and one of the inequalities is non-strict.
answered yesterday
Adrian Keister
4,56751933
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First, to simplify notation a bit, we notice that, since $e^{jpi/2}=j,$ it follows that
$$H(Omega)=-joperatorname{sgn}(Omega). $$
In looking at the wiki table of Fourier Transforms, in the non-unitary, angular frequency column (which corresponds to the definition you're using), we see that the tricky part here is to note that
$$mathcal{F}^{-1}(-jpioperatorname{sgn}(Omega))=frac1t,$$
so that
$$mathcal{F}^{-1}(-joperatorname{sgn}(Omega))=frac{1}{pi t},$$
since the Inverse Fourier Transform is linear.
However, this does not take into account the situation in which $t=0$. Technically, your $H(Omega)$ is undefined there, unless you made a typo in your definition and one of the inequalities is non-strict.
answered yesterday
Adrian Keister
4,56751933
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First, to simplify notation a bit, we notice that, since $e^{jpi/2}=j,$ it follows that
$$H(Omega)=-joperatorname{sgn}(Omega). $$
In looking at the wiki table of Fourier Transforms, in the non-unitary, angular frequency column (which corresponds to the definition you're using), we see that the tricky part here is to note that
$$mathcal{F}^{-1}(-jpioperatorname{sgn}(Omega))=frac1t,$$
so that
$$mathcal{F}^{-1}(-joperatorname{sgn}(Omega))=frac{1}{pi t},$$
since the Inverse Fourier Transform is linear.
However, this does not take into account the situation in which $t=0$. Technically, your $H(Omega)$ is undefined there, unless you made a typo in your definition and one of the inequalities is non-strict.
answered yesterday
Adrian Keister
4,56751933
First, to simplify notation a bit, we notice that, since $e^{jpi/2}=j,$ it follows that
$$H(Omega)=-joperatorname{sgn}(Omega). $$
In looking at the wiki table of Fourier Transforms, in the non-unitary, angular frequency column (which corresponds to the definition you're using), we see that the tricky part here is to note that
$$mathcal{F}^{-1}(-jpioperatorname{sgn}(Omega))=frac1t,$$
so that
$$mathcal{F}^{-1}(-joperatorname{sgn}(Omega))=frac{1}{pi t},$$
since the Inverse Fourier Transform is linear.
However, this does not take into account the situation in which $t=0$. Technically, your $H(Omega)$ is undefined there, unless you made a typo in your definition and one of the inequalities is non-strict.
answered yesterday
Adrian Keister
4,56751933
answered yesterday
Adrian Keister
4,56751933
answered yesterday
Adrian Keister
4,56751933
answered yesterday
Adrian Keister
4,56751933
4,56751933
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005107%2finverse-fourier-transform-of-this-phase-shift-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Is this a piece-wise defined function?
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
@AdrianKeister yeah i had an issue with the format
– Prestyy
yesterday
1
Ok, there's a better way to typeset: use the
casesenvironment.– Adrian Keister
yesterday
Which definition of the Fourier Transform and Fourier Inverse Transform are you using? (There are at least three, maybe more.)
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
1
@Prestyy: I'm sorry, but that's not what I was asking. You need to type up the exact formula for the Fourier Transform that you're using, and add that to your question body. There are at least three different ways of handling the constants that multiply the integrals in the definitions.
– Adrian Keister
yesterday