how to choose the sabstitution for Euler's integrals?
I currently have, and have to calculate the Gamma function:
$$int_2^4 sqrt[4]{(x-2)(4-x)^3},mathbb{d}x$$
As per definition gamma function is:
$$int_0^1t^{z-1}e^{-t},mathbb{d}t$$
Do I understand correctly that first of all we have to reduce the lower and upper boundaries so they must be $0$ and $1$ respectivly?
To make lower boundory zero we have to substract $2$ and to make upper boundary 1 we have to also devide substitution by $2$ (as we have already had substrected $2$ and $2$ is left). As a result:
$$begin{array}{|c|} t = frac{x-2}{2} \ dt = frac{1}{2} dx \
x = 4t +2 end{array}$$
Substituting this into the integral will give us the Gamma function, and relationship between Gamma and Beta functions are clear, but I spent quite lot amount of time to understand what substitution is needed (and I am not sure if this one I used was right), so my question is:
What (if any) is the way to find out what substitution should be used in Euler's integral?
calculus definite-integrals gamma-function substitution
add a comment |
I currently have, and have to calculate the Gamma function:
$$int_2^4 sqrt[4]{(x-2)(4-x)^3},mathbb{d}x$$
As per definition gamma function is:
$$int_0^1t^{z-1}e^{-t},mathbb{d}t$$
Do I understand correctly that first of all we have to reduce the lower and upper boundaries so they must be $0$ and $1$ respectivly?
To make lower boundory zero we have to substract $2$ and to make upper boundary 1 we have to also devide substitution by $2$ (as we have already had substrected $2$ and $2$ is left). As a result:
$$begin{array}{|c|} t = frac{x-2}{2} \ dt = frac{1}{2} dx \
x = 4t +2 end{array}$$
Substituting this into the integral will give us the Gamma function, and relationship between Gamma and Beta functions are clear, but I spent quite lot amount of time to understand what substitution is needed (and I am not sure if this one I used was right), so my question is:
What (if any) is the way to find out what substitution should be used in Euler's integral?
calculus definite-integrals gamma-function substitution
add a comment |
I currently have, and have to calculate the Gamma function:
$$int_2^4 sqrt[4]{(x-2)(4-x)^3},mathbb{d}x$$
As per definition gamma function is:
$$int_0^1t^{z-1}e^{-t},mathbb{d}t$$
Do I understand correctly that first of all we have to reduce the lower and upper boundaries so they must be $0$ and $1$ respectivly?
To make lower boundory zero we have to substract $2$ and to make upper boundary 1 we have to also devide substitution by $2$ (as we have already had substrected $2$ and $2$ is left). As a result:
$$begin{array}{|c|} t = frac{x-2}{2} \ dt = frac{1}{2} dx \
x = 4t +2 end{array}$$
Substituting this into the integral will give us the Gamma function, and relationship between Gamma and Beta functions are clear, but I spent quite lot amount of time to understand what substitution is needed (and I am not sure if this one I used was right), so my question is:
What (if any) is the way to find out what substitution should be used in Euler's integral?
calculus definite-integrals gamma-function substitution
I currently have, and have to calculate the Gamma function:
$$int_2^4 sqrt[4]{(x-2)(4-x)^3},mathbb{d}x$$
As per definition gamma function is:
$$int_0^1t^{z-1}e^{-t},mathbb{d}t$$
Do I understand correctly that first of all we have to reduce the lower and upper boundaries so they must be $0$ and $1$ respectivly?
To make lower boundory zero we have to substract $2$ and to make upper boundary 1 we have to also devide substitution by $2$ (as we have already had substrected $2$ and $2$ is left). As a result:
$$begin{array}{|c|} t = frac{x-2}{2} \ dt = frac{1}{2} dx \
x = 4t +2 end{array}$$
Substituting this into the integral will give us the Gamma function, and relationship between Gamma and Beta functions are clear, but I spent quite lot amount of time to understand what substitution is needed (and I am not sure if this one I used was right), so my question is:
What (if any) is the way to find out what substitution should be used in Euler's integral?
calculus definite-integrals gamma-function substitution
calculus definite-integrals gamma-function substitution
edited Nov 22 '18 at 13:51
M.Mass
asked Nov 22 '18 at 13:46
M.MassM.Mass
1,8643923
1,8643923
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
As a side note, the upper bound of your second integral should be $infty$ to get the $Gamma$ function.
A hint. Fubini's theorem is useful here. You can writebegin{align}
Gamma(x)Gamma(y) &= int_{0}^infty e^{-u} u^{x-1},du cdotint_{0}^infty e^{-v} v^{y-1},dv \[6pt]
&=int_{0}^inftyint_{0}^infty e^{-u-v} u^{x-1}v^{y-1},du ,dv,
end{align}
then by the change of variable $u=zt$, $v=z(1-t)$ one obtains
begin{align}
Gamma(x)Gamma(y) &= int_{0}^inftyint_{0}^1 e^{-z} (zt)^{x-1}(z(1-t))^{y-1}z,dt ,dz \[6pt]
&= int_{0}^infty e^{-z}z^{x+y-1} ,dzcdotbbox[5px,border:1px solid blue]{int_{0}^1t^{x-1}(1-t)^{y-1},dt}\
&=Gamma(x+y),{rm{B}}(x,y),
end{align}
as expected.
But how to apply this for my specific case then?
– M.Mass
Nov 22 '18 at 16:28
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009161%2fhow-to-choose-the-sabstitution-for-eulers-integrals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As a side note, the upper bound of your second integral should be $infty$ to get the $Gamma$ function.
A hint. Fubini's theorem is useful here. You can writebegin{align}
Gamma(x)Gamma(y) &= int_{0}^infty e^{-u} u^{x-1},du cdotint_{0}^infty e^{-v} v^{y-1},dv \[6pt]
&=int_{0}^inftyint_{0}^infty e^{-u-v} u^{x-1}v^{y-1},du ,dv,
end{align}
then by the change of variable $u=zt$, $v=z(1-t)$ one obtains
begin{align}
Gamma(x)Gamma(y) &= int_{0}^inftyint_{0}^1 e^{-z} (zt)^{x-1}(z(1-t))^{y-1}z,dt ,dz \[6pt]
&= int_{0}^infty e^{-z}z^{x+y-1} ,dzcdotbbox[5px,border:1px solid blue]{int_{0}^1t^{x-1}(1-t)^{y-1},dt}\
&=Gamma(x+y),{rm{B}}(x,y),
end{align}
as expected.
But how to apply this for my specific case then?
– M.Mass
Nov 22 '18 at 16:28
add a comment |
As a side note, the upper bound of your second integral should be $infty$ to get the $Gamma$ function.
A hint. Fubini's theorem is useful here. You can writebegin{align}
Gamma(x)Gamma(y) &= int_{0}^infty e^{-u} u^{x-1},du cdotint_{0}^infty e^{-v} v^{y-1},dv \[6pt]
&=int_{0}^inftyint_{0}^infty e^{-u-v} u^{x-1}v^{y-1},du ,dv,
end{align}
then by the change of variable $u=zt$, $v=z(1-t)$ one obtains
begin{align}
Gamma(x)Gamma(y) &= int_{0}^inftyint_{0}^1 e^{-z} (zt)^{x-1}(z(1-t))^{y-1}z,dt ,dz \[6pt]
&= int_{0}^infty e^{-z}z^{x+y-1} ,dzcdotbbox[5px,border:1px solid blue]{int_{0}^1t^{x-1}(1-t)^{y-1},dt}\
&=Gamma(x+y),{rm{B}}(x,y),
end{align}
as expected.
But how to apply this for my specific case then?
– M.Mass
Nov 22 '18 at 16:28
add a comment |
As a side note, the upper bound of your second integral should be $infty$ to get the $Gamma$ function.
A hint. Fubini's theorem is useful here. You can writebegin{align}
Gamma(x)Gamma(y) &= int_{0}^infty e^{-u} u^{x-1},du cdotint_{0}^infty e^{-v} v^{y-1},dv \[6pt]
&=int_{0}^inftyint_{0}^infty e^{-u-v} u^{x-1}v^{y-1},du ,dv,
end{align}
then by the change of variable $u=zt$, $v=z(1-t)$ one obtains
begin{align}
Gamma(x)Gamma(y) &= int_{0}^inftyint_{0}^1 e^{-z} (zt)^{x-1}(z(1-t))^{y-1}z,dt ,dz \[6pt]
&= int_{0}^infty e^{-z}z^{x+y-1} ,dzcdotbbox[5px,border:1px solid blue]{int_{0}^1t^{x-1}(1-t)^{y-1},dt}\
&=Gamma(x+y),{rm{B}}(x,y),
end{align}
as expected.
As a side note, the upper bound of your second integral should be $infty$ to get the $Gamma$ function.
A hint. Fubini's theorem is useful here. You can writebegin{align}
Gamma(x)Gamma(y) &= int_{0}^infty e^{-u} u^{x-1},du cdotint_{0}^infty e^{-v} v^{y-1},dv \[6pt]
&=int_{0}^inftyint_{0}^infty e^{-u-v} u^{x-1}v^{y-1},du ,dv,
end{align}
then by the change of variable $u=zt$, $v=z(1-t)$ one obtains
begin{align}
Gamma(x)Gamma(y) &= int_{0}^inftyint_{0}^1 e^{-z} (zt)^{x-1}(z(1-t))^{y-1}z,dt ,dz \[6pt]
&= int_{0}^infty e^{-z}z^{x+y-1} ,dzcdotbbox[5px,border:1px solid blue]{int_{0}^1t^{x-1}(1-t)^{y-1},dt}\
&=Gamma(x+y),{rm{B}}(x,y),
end{align}
as expected.
edited Nov 22 '18 at 14:12
answered Nov 22 '18 at 14:01
Dan KentDan Kent
237
237
But how to apply this for my specific case then?
– M.Mass
Nov 22 '18 at 16:28
add a comment |
But how to apply this for my specific case then?
– M.Mass
Nov 22 '18 at 16:28
But how to apply this for my specific case then?
– M.Mass
Nov 22 '18 at 16:28
But how to apply this for my specific case then?
– M.Mass
Nov 22 '18 at 16:28
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009161%2fhow-to-choose-the-sabstitution-for-eulers-integrals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown