Lie algebra generated by elements of the symmetric group $S_N$
For an arbitrary group $G$, the group algebra $mathbb{C}(G)$ is defined as the set of all formal linear combinations of the elements of $G$: $mathbb{C}(G)={c_1g_1+c_2g_2+ldots+c_n g_n|c_iin mathbb{C},g_iin G}$. Multiplication in $mathbb{C}(G)$ is induced by the group multiplication of $G$ and extends to $mathbb{C}(G)$ by linearity. In a similar fashion, we can define a "group Lie algebra" $mathfrak{L}(G)={c_1g_1+c_2g_2+ldots+c_n g_n|c_iin mathbb{C},g_iin G}$, which is the same as $mathbb{C}(G)$ as a linear vector space, but in $mathfrak{L}(G)$ only the Lie bracket $[,]:mathfrak{L}(G)times mathfrak{L}(G)to mathfrak{L}(G)$ is defined, to be the commutator in $mathbb{C}(G)$, i.e. $[l_1,l_2]=l_1cdot l_2-l_2cdot l_1$, where "$cdot$" is the multiplication in $mathbb{C}(G)$. My problem is to determine the structure of the Lie algebra $mathfrak{L}(G)$ for the symmetric group $G=S_N$.
Let us take $S_3$ as an example. Since $|S_3|=6$, the group algebra $mathbb{C}(S_3)$ of $S_3$ is 6-dimensional, spanned by ${1,P_{12},P_{23},P_{13},P_{12}P_{23},P_{23}P_{12}}$. It is easy to see that ${1,I,I^2}$ are central elements (i.e. commute with everything in $mathbb{C}(S_3)$), where $I=P_{12}+P_{23}+P_{13}$. The 3-dimensional subspace orthogonal to these central elements is spanned by ${P_{12}-P_{23},P_{12}-P_{13},[P_{12},P_{23}]}$, which forms an $mathfrak{su}(2)$ Lie algebra, their relation to the spin generators are
$$P_{12}-P_{23}=sqrt{6}(s_x-s_y),~~P_{12}-P_{13}=sqrt{6}(s_x-s_z),~~[P_{12},P_{23}]=2i(s_x+s_y+s_z),$$
where $[s_i,s_j]=iepsilon_{ijk}s_k$. Therefore we conclude that $mathfrak{L}(S_3)=mathfrak{u}(1)^3oplus mathfrak{su}(2)$.
But when trying to determine the structure of $mathfrak{L}(S_N)$ for arbitrary $N$, this kind of brute force calculation seems hopeless. I don't even know the structure of $mathfrak{L}(S_4)$. For large $N$, I want to know this: if $mathfrak{L}(S_N)$ is a direct sum of simple Lie algebras, let $d_N$ be the dimension of its largest irreducible(simple) component (e.g. $d_3=3$). Does $d_N$ grow algebraically fast or exponentially fast with $N$?
Any hints, suggestions, or relevant references will be welcomed. Thanks.
abstract-algebra permutations lie-algebras symmetric-groups
add a comment |
For an arbitrary group $G$, the group algebra $mathbb{C}(G)$ is defined as the set of all formal linear combinations of the elements of $G$: $mathbb{C}(G)={c_1g_1+c_2g_2+ldots+c_n g_n|c_iin mathbb{C},g_iin G}$. Multiplication in $mathbb{C}(G)$ is induced by the group multiplication of $G$ and extends to $mathbb{C}(G)$ by linearity. In a similar fashion, we can define a "group Lie algebra" $mathfrak{L}(G)={c_1g_1+c_2g_2+ldots+c_n g_n|c_iin mathbb{C},g_iin G}$, which is the same as $mathbb{C}(G)$ as a linear vector space, but in $mathfrak{L}(G)$ only the Lie bracket $[,]:mathfrak{L}(G)times mathfrak{L}(G)to mathfrak{L}(G)$ is defined, to be the commutator in $mathbb{C}(G)$, i.e. $[l_1,l_2]=l_1cdot l_2-l_2cdot l_1$, where "$cdot$" is the multiplication in $mathbb{C}(G)$. My problem is to determine the structure of the Lie algebra $mathfrak{L}(G)$ for the symmetric group $G=S_N$.
Let us take $S_3$ as an example. Since $|S_3|=6$, the group algebra $mathbb{C}(S_3)$ of $S_3$ is 6-dimensional, spanned by ${1,P_{12},P_{23},P_{13},P_{12}P_{23},P_{23}P_{12}}$. It is easy to see that ${1,I,I^2}$ are central elements (i.e. commute with everything in $mathbb{C}(S_3)$), where $I=P_{12}+P_{23}+P_{13}$. The 3-dimensional subspace orthogonal to these central elements is spanned by ${P_{12}-P_{23},P_{12}-P_{13},[P_{12},P_{23}]}$, which forms an $mathfrak{su}(2)$ Lie algebra, their relation to the spin generators are
$$P_{12}-P_{23}=sqrt{6}(s_x-s_y),~~P_{12}-P_{13}=sqrt{6}(s_x-s_z),~~[P_{12},P_{23}]=2i(s_x+s_y+s_z),$$
where $[s_i,s_j]=iepsilon_{ijk}s_k$. Therefore we conclude that $mathfrak{L}(S_3)=mathfrak{u}(1)^3oplus mathfrak{su}(2)$.
But when trying to determine the structure of $mathfrak{L}(S_N)$ for arbitrary $N$, this kind of brute force calculation seems hopeless. I don't even know the structure of $mathfrak{L}(S_4)$. For large $N$, I want to know this: if $mathfrak{L}(S_N)$ is a direct sum of simple Lie algebras, let $d_N$ be the dimension of its largest irreducible(simple) component (e.g. $d_3=3$). Does $d_N$ grow algebraically fast or exponentially fast with $N$?
Any hints, suggestions, or relevant references will be welcomed. Thanks.
abstract-algebra permutations lie-algebras symmetric-groups
The center of the group algebra has dimension equal to the number of conjugacy classes of the group. This might be helpful to compute one component but I do not know a general method to compute the rest of the components.
– Sheel Stueber
Nov 20 '18 at 3:14
add a comment |
For an arbitrary group $G$, the group algebra $mathbb{C}(G)$ is defined as the set of all formal linear combinations of the elements of $G$: $mathbb{C}(G)={c_1g_1+c_2g_2+ldots+c_n g_n|c_iin mathbb{C},g_iin G}$. Multiplication in $mathbb{C}(G)$ is induced by the group multiplication of $G$ and extends to $mathbb{C}(G)$ by linearity. In a similar fashion, we can define a "group Lie algebra" $mathfrak{L}(G)={c_1g_1+c_2g_2+ldots+c_n g_n|c_iin mathbb{C},g_iin G}$, which is the same as $mathbb{C}(G)$ as a linear vector space, but in $mathfrak{L}(G)$ only the Lie bracket $[,]:mathfrak{L}(G)times mathfrak{L}(G)to mathfrak{L}(G)$ is defined, to be the commutator in $mathbb{C}(G)$, i.e. $[l_1,l_2]=l_1cdot l_2-l_2cdot l_1$, where "$cdot$" is the multiplication in $mathbb{C}(G)$. My problem is to determine the structure of the Lie algebra $mathfrak{L}(G)$ for the symmetric group $G=S_N$.
Let us take $S_3$ as an example. Since $|S_3|=6$, the group algebra $mathbb{C}(S_3)$ of $S_3$ is 6-dimensional, spanned by ${1,P_{12},P_{23},P_{13},P_{12}P_{23},P_{23}P_{12}}$. It is easy to see that ${1,I,I^2}$ are central elements (i.e. commute with everything in $mathbb{C}(S_3)$), where $I=P_{12}+P_{23}+P_{13}$. The 3-dimensional subspace orthogonal to these central elements is spanned by ${P_{12}-P_{23},P_{12}-P_{13},[P_{12},P_{23}]}$, which forms an $mathfrak{su}(2)$ Lie algebra, their relation to the spin generators are
$$P_{12}-P_{23}=sqrt{6}(s_x-s_y),~~P_{12}-P_{13}=sqrt{6}(s_x-s_z),~~[P_{12},P_{23}]=2i(s_x+s_y+s_z),$$
where $[s_i,s_j]=iepsilon_{ijk}s_k$. Therefore we conclude that $mathfrak{L}(S_3)=mathfrak{u}(1)^3oplus mathfrak{su}(2)$.
But when trying to determine the structure of $mathfrak{L}(S_N)$ for arbitrary $N$, this kind of brute force calculation seems hopeless. I don't even know the structure of $mathfrak{L}(S_4)$. For large $N$, I want to know this: if $mathfrak{L}(S_N)$ is a direct sum of simple Lie algebras, let $d_N$ be the dimension of its largest irreducible(simple) component (e.g. $d_3=3$). Does $d_N$ grow algebraically fast or exponentially fast with $N$?
Any hints, suggestions, or relevant references will be welcomed. Thanks.
abstract-algebra permutations lie-algebras symmetric-groups
For an arbitrary group $G$, the group algebra $mathbb{C}(G)$ is defined as the set of all formal linear combinations of the elements of $G$: $mathbb{C}(G)={c_1g_1+c_2g_2+ldots+c_n g_n|c_iin mathbb{C},g_iin G}$. Multiplication in $mathbb{C}(G)$ is induced by the group multiplication of $G$ and extends to $mathbb{C}(G)$ by linearity. In a similar fashion, we can define a "group Lie algebra" $mathfrak{L}(G)={c_1g_1+c_2g_2+ldots+c_n g_n|c_iin mathbb{C},g_iin G}$, which is the same as $mathbb{C}(G)$ as a linear vector space, but in $mathfrak{L}(G)$ only the Lie bracket $[,]:mathfrak{L}(G)times mathfrak{L}(G)to mathfrak{L}(G)$ is defined, to be the commutator in $mathbb{C}(G)$, i.e. $[l_1,l_2]=l_1cdot l_2-l_2cdot l_1$, where "$cdot$" is the multiplication in $mathbb{C}(G)$. My problem is to determine the structure of the Lie algebra $mathfrak{L}(G)$ for the symmetric group $G=S_N$.
Let us take $S_3$ as an example. Since $|S_3|=6$, the group algebra $mathbb{C}(S_3)$ of $S_3$ is 6-dimensional, spanned by ${1,P_{12},P_{23},P_{13},P_{12}P_{23},P_{23}P_{12}}$. It is easy to see that ${1,I,I^2}$ are central elements (i.e. commute with everything in $mathbb{C}(S_3)$), where $I=P_{12}+P_{23}+P_{13}$. The 3-dimensional subspace orthogonal to these central elements is spanned by ${P_{12}-P_{23},P_{12}-P_{13},[P_{12},P_{23}]}$, which forms an $mathfrak{su}(2)$ Lie algebra, their relation to the spin generators are
$$P_{12}-P_{23}=sqrt{6}(s_x-s_y),~~P_{12}-P_{13}=sqrt{6}(s_x-s_z),~~[P_{12},P_{23}]=2i(s_x+s_y+s_z),$$
where $[s_i,s_j]=iepsilon_{ijk}s_k$. Therefore we conclude that $mathfrak{L}(S_3)=mathfrak{u}(1)^3oplus mathfrak{su}(2)$.
But when trying to determine the structure of $mathfrak{L}(S_N)$ for arbitrary $N$, this kind of brute force calculation seems hopeless. I don't even know the structure of $mathfrak{L}(S_4)$. For large $N$, I want to know this: if $mathfrak{L}(S_N)$ is a direct sum of simple Lie algebras, let $d_N$ be the dimension of its largest irreducible(simple) component (e.g. $d_3=3$). Does $d_N$ grow algebraically fast or exponentially fast with $N$?
Any hints, suggestions, or relevant references will be welcomed. Thanks.
abstract-algebra permutations lie-algebras symmetric-groups
abstract-algebra permutations lie-algebras symmetric-groups
asked Nov 20 '18 at 3:06


Lagrenge
1208
1208
The center of the group algebra has dimension equal to the number of conjugacy classes of the group. This might be helpful to compute one component but I do not know a general method to compute the rest of the components.
– Sheel Stueber
Nov 20 '18 at 3:14
add a comment |
The center of the group algebra has dimension equal to the number of conjugacy classes of the group. This might be helpful to compute one component but I do not know a general method to compute the rest of the components.
– Sheel Stueber
Nov 20 '18 at 3:14
The center of the group algebra has dimension equal to the number of conjugacy classes of the group. This might be helpful to compute one component but I do not know a general method to compute the rest of the components.
– Sheel Stueber
Nov 20 '18 at 3:14
The center of the group algebra has dimension equal to the number of conjugacy classes of the group. This might be helpful to compute one component but I do not know a general method to compute the rest of the components.
– Sheel Stueber
Nov 20 '18 at 3:14
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$newcommand{fru}{mathfrak{u}}
newcommand{frsu}{mathfrak{su}}
newcommand{frgl}{mathfrak{gl}}
newcommand{frsl}{mathfrak{sl}}
newcommand{frL}{mathfrak{L}}
newcommand{End}{operatorname{End}}
newcommand{KG}{Kleft[Gright]}
newcommand{CC}{mathbb{C}}
newcommand{LG}{mathfrak{L}left(Gright)}$
Yes. For each $N geq 0$, we have $frLleft(S_Nright) cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) oplus fruleft(1right) right)$, where the direct sum is over all partitions $lambda$ of $N$, and where $V_lambda$ denotes the Specht module corresponding to the partition $lambda$.
But this isn't really specific to the symmetric groups. More generally, we can answer this question for any finite group $G$ if we know its representation theory.
So let $G$ be a finite group, and let $K$ be a field of characteristic $0$ over which $G$ splits. (It is sufficient, but not necessary, to take $K = CC$.)
For each $K$-algebra $A$, we let $A^-$ be the Lie algebra on the $K$-vector space $A$ whose Lie bracket is the commutator of $A$. Thus, what you call $frLleft(Gright)$ is just $left(CCleft[Gright]right)^-$.
Since the field $K$ has characteristic $0$, we have
begin{equation}
frglleft(mright) cong K^- oplus frslleft(mright)
label{darij1.eq.gl-sl}
tag{1}
end{equation}
(an isomorphism of $K$-Lie algebras) for each positive integer $m$.
Let $V_i$ (with $i$ running over some finite indexing set $I$) be all irreducible representations of $G$ over $K$ (up to isomorphism, without repetitions). Theorem 4.1.1 (ii) in Pavel Etingof, Oleg Golberg, Sebastian Hensel, Tiankai Liu, Alex Schwendner, Dmitry Vaintrob, and Elena Yudovina, Introduction to representation theory, Student Mathematical Library #59, AMS 2011 shows that $KG cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} End left(V_iright)$ as $K$-algebras. Thus,
begin{align}
left(KGright)^-
&cong left(bigopluslimits_{i in I} End left(V_iright)right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} underbrace{left(End left(V_iright)right)^-}_{= frglleft(V_iright) cong frglleft(dim V_iright) } \
&cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} underbrace{frglleft(dim V_iright) }_{substack{cong K^- oplus frslleft(dim V_i right) \ text{(by eqref{darij1.eq.gl-sl})}}}
cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} left( K^- oplus frslleft(dim V_i right) right) .
label{darij1.eq.gen-form}
tag{2}
end{align}
When $G$ is the symmetric group $S_N$, we can take $I$ to be the set of all partitions $lambda$ of $N$ (this is a well-known fact from the representation theory of symmetric group; see, e.g., §5.12 in op. cit.), and the corresponding irreducible representations $V_lambda$ are the so-called Specht modules. For each partition $lambda$ of $N$, the dimension $dim V_lambda$ has a nice expression called the hook-length formula (§5.17 in op. cit.), and there is a basis of $V_lambda$ indexed by the standard tableaux of shape $lambda$ (see, e.g., Mark Wildon, Representation theory of the symmetric group, 2014).
In light of this, eqref{darij1.eq.gen-form} (applied to $G = S_N$) becomes
begin{align}
left(Kleft[S_Nright] right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( K^- oplus frslleft(dim V_lambda right) right) .
end{align}
When $K = CC$, this further rewrites as
begin{align}
left(CC left[S_Nright]right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( underbrace{CC^-}_{cong fruleft(1right)} oplus underbrace{frslleft(dim V_lambda right)}_{cong frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright)} right)
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( fruleft(1right) oplus frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) right) .
end{align}
Thus,
begin{align}
frLleft(S_Nright)
= left(CC left[S_Nright]right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( fruleft(1right) oplus frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) right)
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) oplus fruleft(1right) right) .
end{align}
This is exactly my claim.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005883%2flie-algebra-generated-by-elements-of-the-symmetric-group-s-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$newcommand{fru}{mathfrak{u}}
newcommand{frsu}{mathfrak{su}}
newcommand{frgl}{mathfrak{gl}}
newcommand{frsl}{mathfrak{sl}}
newcommand{frL}{mathfrak{L}}
newcommand{End}{operatorname{End}}
newcommand{KG}{Kleft[Gright]}
newcommand{CC}{mathbb{C}}
newcommand{LG}{mathfrak{L}left(Gright)}$
Yes. For each $N geq 0$, we have $frLleft(S_Nright) cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) oplus fruleft(1right) right)$, where the direct sum is over all partitions $lambda$ of $N$, and where $V_lambda$ denotes the Specht module corresponding to the partition $lambda$.
But this isn't really specific to the symmetric groups. More generally, we can answer this question for any finite group $G$ if we know its representation theory.
So let $G$ be a finite group, and let $K$ be a field of characteristic $0$ over which $G$ splits. (It is sufficient, but not necessary, to take $K = CC$.)
For each $K$-algebra $A$, we let $A^-$ be the Lie algebra on the $K$-vector space $A$ whose Lie bracket is the commutator of $A$. Thus, what you call $frLleft(Gright)$ is just $left(CCleft[Gright]right)^-$.
Since the field $K$ has characteristic $0$, we have
begin{equation}
frglleft(mright) cong K^- oplus frslleft(mright)
label{darij1.eq.gl-sl}
tag{1}
end{equation}
(an isomorphism of $K$-Lie algebras) for each positive integer $m$.
Let $V_i$ (with $i$ running over some finite indexing set $I$) be all irreducible representations of $G$ over $K$ (up to isomorphism, without repetitions). Theorem 4.1.1 (ii) in Pavel Etingof, Oleg Golberg, Sebastian Hensel, Tiankai Liu, Alex Schwendner, Dmitry Vaintrob, and Elena Yudovina, Introduction to representation theory, Student Mathematical Library #59, AMS 2011 shows that $KG cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} End left(V_iright)$ as $K$-algebras. Thus,
begin{align}
left(KGright)^-
&cong left(bigopluslimits_{i in I} End left(V_iright)right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} underbrace{left(End left(V_iright)right)^-}_{= frglleft(V_iright) cong frglleft(dim V_iright) } \
&cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} underbrace{frglleft(dim V_iright) }_{substack{cong K^- oplus frslleft(dim V_i right) \ text{(by eqref{darij1.eq.gl-sl})}}}
cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} left( K^- oplus frslleft(dim V_i right) right) .
label{darij1.eq.gen-form}
tag{2}
end{align}
When $G$ is the symmetric group $S_N$, we can take $I$ to be the set of all partitions $lambda$ of $N$ (this is a well-known fact from the representation theory of symmetric group; see, e.g., §5.12 in op. cit.), and the corresponding irreducible representations $V_lambda$ are the so-called Specht modules. For each partition $lambda$ of $N$, the dimension $dim V_lambda$ has a nice expression called the hook-length formula (§5.17 in op. cit.), and there is a basis of $V_lambda$ indexed by the standard tableaux of shape $lambda$ (see, e.g., Mark Wildon, Representation theory of the symmetric group, 2014).
In light of this, eqref{darij1.eq.gen-form} (applied to $G = S_N$) becomes
begin{align}
left(Kleft[S_Nright] right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( K^- oplus frslleft(dim V_lambda right) right) .
end{align}
When $K = CC$, this further rewrites as
begin{align}
left(CC left[S_Nright]right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( underbrace{CC^-}_{cong fruleft(1right)} oplus underbrace{frslleft(dim V_lambda right)}_{cong frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright)} right)
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( fruleft(1right) oplus frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) right) .
end{align}
Thus,
begin{align}
frLleft(S_Nright)
= left(CC left[S_Nright]right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( fruleft(1right) oplus frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) right)
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) oplus fruleft(1right) right) .
end{align}
This is exactly my claim.
add a comment |
$newcommand{fru}{mathfrak{u}}
newcommand{frsu}{mathfrak{su}}
newcommand{frgl}{mathfrak{gl}}
newcommand{frsl}{mathfrak{sl}}
newcommand{frL}{mathfrak{L}}
newcommand{End}{operatorname{End}}
newcommand{KG}{Kleft[Gright]}
newcommand{CC}{mathbb{C}}
newcommand{LG}{mathfrak{L}left(Gright)}$
Yes. For each $N geq 0$, we have $frLleft(S_Nright) cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) oplus fruleft(1right) right)$, where the direct sum is over all partitions $lambda$ of $N$, and where $V_lambda$ denotes the Specht module corresponding to the partition $lambda$.
But this isn't really specific to the symmetric groups. More generally, we can answer this question for any finite group $G$ if we know its representation theory.
So let $G$ be a finite group, and let $K$ be a field of characteristic $0$ over which $G$ splits. (It is sufficient, but not necessary, to take $K = CC$.)
For each $K$-algebra $A$, we let $A^-$ be the Lie algebra on the $K$-vector space $A$ whose Lie bracket is the commutator of $A$. Thus, what you call $frLleft(Gright)$ is just $left(CCleft[Gright]right)^-$.
Since the field $K$ has characteristic $0$, we have
begin{equation}
frglleft(mright) cong K^- oplus frslleft(mright)
label{darij1.eq.gl-sl}
tag{1}
end{equation}
(an isomorphism of $K$-Lie algebras) for each positive integer $m$.
Let $V_i$ (with $i$ running over some finite indexing set $I$) be all irreducible representations of $G$ over $K$ (up to isomorphism, without repetitions). Theorem 4.1.1 (ii) in Pavel Etingof, Oleg Golberg, Sebastian Hensel, Tiankai Liu, Alex Schwendner, Dmitry Vaintrob, and Elena Yudovina, Introduction to representation theory, Student Mathematical Library #59, AMS 2011 shows that $KG cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} End left(V_iright)$ as $K$-algebras. Thus,
begin{align}
left(KGright)^-
&cong left(bigopluslimits_{i in I} End left(V_iright)right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} underbrace{left(End left(V_iright)right)^-}_{= frglleft(V_iright) cong frglleft(dim V_iright) } \
&cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} underbrace{frglleft(dim V_iright) }_{substack{cong K^- oplus frslleft(dim V_i right) \ text{(by eqref{darij1.eq.gl-sl})}}}
cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} left( K^- oplus frslleft(dim V_i right) right) .
label{darij1.eq.gen-form}
tag{2}
end{align}
When $G$ is the symmetric group $S_N$, we can take $I$ to be the set of all partitions $lambda$ of $N$ (this is a well-known fact from the representation theory of symmetric group; see, e.g., §5.12 in op. cit.), and the corresponding irreducible representations $V_lambda$ are the so-called Specht modules. For each partition $lambda$ of $N$, the dimension $dim V_lambda$ has a nice expression called the hook-length formula (§5.17 in op. cit.), and there is a basis of $V_lambda$ indexed by the standard tableaux of shape $lambda$ (see, e.g., Mark Wildon, Representation theory of the symmetric group, 2014).
In light of this, eqref{darij1.eq.gen-form} (applied to $G = S_N$) becomes
begin{align}
left(Kleft[S_Nright] right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( K^- oplus frslleft(dim V_lambda right) right) .
end{align}
When $K = CC$, this further rewrites as
begin{align}
left(CC left[S_Nright]right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( underbrace{CC^-}_{cong fruleft(1right)} oplus underbrace{frslleft(dim V_lambda right)}_{cong frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright)} right)
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( fruleft(1right) oplus frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) right) .
end{align}
Thus,
begin{align}
frLleft(S_Nright)
= left(CC left[S_Nright]right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( fruleft(1right) oplus frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) right)
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) oplus fruleft(1right) right) .
end{align}
This is exactly my claim.
add a comment |
$newcommand{fru}{mathfrak{u}}
newcommand{frsu}{mathfrak{su}}
newcommand{frgl}{mathfrak{gl}}
newcommand{frsl}{mathfrak{sl}}
newcommand{frL}{mathfrak{L}}
newcommand{End}{operatorname{End}}
newcommand{KG}{Kleft[Gright]}
newcommand{CC}{mathbb{C}}
newcommand{LG}{mathfrak{L}left(Gright)}$
Yes. For each $N geq 0$, we have $frLleft(S_Nright) cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) oplus fruleft(1right) right)$, where the direct sum is over all partitions $lambda$ of $N$, and where $V_lambda$ denotes the Specht module corresponding to the partition $lambda$.
But this isn't really specific to the symmetric groups. More generally, we can answer this question for any finite group $G$ if we know its representation theory.
So let $G$ be a finite group, and let $K$ be a field of characteristic $0$ over which $G$ splits. (It is sufficient, but not necessary, to take $K = CC$.)
For each $K$-algebra $A$, we let $A^-$ be the Lie algebra on the $K$-vector space $A$ whose Lie bracket is the commutator of $A$. Thus, what you call $frLleft(Gright)$ is just $left(CCleft[Gright]right)^-$.
Since the field $K$ has characteristic $0$, we have
begin{equation}
frglleft(mright) cong K^- oplus frslleft(mright)
label{darij1.eq.gl-sl}
tag{1}
end{equation}
(an isomorphism of $K$-Lie algebras) for each positive integer $m$.
Let $V_i$ (with $i$ running over some finite indexing set $I$) be all irreducible representations of $G$ over $K$ (up to isomorphism, without repetitions). Theorem 4.1.1 (ii) in Pavel Etingof, Oleg Golberg, Sebastian Hensel, Tiankai Liu, Alex Schwendner, Dmitry Vaintrob, and Elena Yudovina, Introduction to representation theory, Student Mathematical Library #59, AMS 2011 shows that $KG cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} End left(V_iright)$ as $K$-algebras. Thus,
begin{align}
left(KGright)^-
&cong left(bigopluslimits_{i in I} End left(V_iright)right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} underbrace{left(End left(V_iright)right)^-}_{= frglleft(V_iright) cong frglleft(dim V_iright) } \
&cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} underbrace{frglleft(dim V_iright) }_{substack{cong K^- oplus frslleft(dim V_i right) \ text{(by eqref{darij1.eq.gl-sl})}}}
cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} left( K^- oplus frslleft(dim V_i right) right) .
label{darij1.eq.gen-form}
tag{2}
end{align}
When $G$ is the symmetric group $S_N$, we can take $I$ to be the set of all partitions $lambda$ of $N$ (this is a well-known fact from the representation theory of symmetric group; see, e.g., §5.12 in op. cit.), and the corresponding irreducible representations $V_lambda$ are the so-called Specht modules. For each partition $lambda$ of $N$, the dimension $dim V_lambda$ has a nice expression called the hook-length formula (§5.17 in op. cit.), and there is a basis of $V_lambda$ indexed by the standard tableaux of shape $lambda$ (see, e.g., Mark Wildon, Representation theory of the symmetric group, 2014).
In light of this, eqref{darij1.eq.gen-form} (applied to $G = S_N$) becomes
begin{align}
left(Kleft[S_Nright] right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( K^- oplus frslleft(dim V_lambda right) right) .
end{align}
When $K = CC$, this further rewrites as
begin{align}
left(CC left[S_Nright]right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( underbrace{CC^-}_{cong fruleft(1right)} oplus underbrace{frslleft(dim V_lambda right)}_{cong frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright)} right)
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( fruleft(1right) oplus frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) right) .
end{align}
Thus,
begin{align}
frLleft(S_Nright)
= left(CC left[S_Nright]right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( fruleft(1right) oplus frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) right)
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) oplus fruleft(1right) right) .
end{align}
This is exactly my claim.
$newcommand{fru}{mathfrak{u}}
newcommand{frsu}{mathfrak{su}}
newcommand{frgl}{mathfrak{gl}}
newcommand{frsl}{mathfrak{sl}}
newcommand{frL}{mathfrak{L}}
newcommand{End}{operatorname{End}}
newcommand{KG}{Kleft[Gright]}
newcommand{CC}{mathbb{C}}
newcommand{LG}{mathfrak{L}left(Gright)}$
Yes. For each $N geq 0$, we have $frLleft(S_Nright) cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) oplus fruleft(1right) right)$, where the direct sum is over all partitions $lambda$ of $N$, and where $V_lambda$ denotes the Specht module corresponding to the partition $lambda$.
But this isn't really specific to the symmetric groups. More generally, we can answer this question for any finite group $G$ if we know its representation theory.
So let $G$ be a finite group, and let $K$ be a field of characteristic $0$ over which $G$ splits. (It is sufficient, but not necessary, to take $K = CC$.)
For each $K$-algebra $A$, we let $A^-$ be the Lie algebra on the $K$-vector space $A$ whose Lie bracket is the commutator of $A$. Thus, what you call $frLleft(Gright)$ is just $left(CCleft[Gright]right)^-$.
Since the field $K$ has characteristic $0$, we have
begin{equation}
frglleft(mright) cong K^- oplus frslleft(mright)
label{darij1.eq.gl-sl}
tag{1}
end{equation}
(an isomorphism of $K$-Lie algebras) for each positive integer $m$.
Let $V_i$ (with $i$ running over some finite indexing set $I$) be all irreducible representations of $G$ over $K$ (up to isomorphism, without repetitions). Theorem 4.1.1 (ii) in Pavel Etingof, Oleg Golberg, Sebastian Hensel, Tiankai Liu, Alex Schwendner, Dmitry Vaintrob, and Elena Yudovina, Introduction to representation theory, Student Mathematical Library #59, AMS 2011 shows that $KG cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} End left(V_iright)$ as $K$-algebras. Thus,
begin{align}
left(KGright)^-
&cong left(bigopluslimits_{i in I} End left(V_iright)right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} underbrace{left(End left(V_iright)right)^-}_{= frglleft(V_iright) cong frglleft(dim V_iright) } \
&cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} underbrace{frglleft(dim V_iright) }_{substack{cong K^- oplus frslleft(dim V_i right) \ text{(by eqref{darij1.eq.gl-sl})}}}
cong bigopluslimits_{i in I} left( K^- oplus frslleft(dim V_i right) right) .
label{darij1.eq.gen-form}
tag{2}
end{align}
When $G$ is the symmetric group $S_N$, we can take $I$ to be the set of all partitions $lambda$ of $N$ (this is a well-known fact from the representation theory of symmetric group; see, e.g., §5.12 in op. cit.), and the corresponding irreducible representations $V_lambda$ are the so-called Specht modules. For each partition $lambda$ of $N$, the dimension $dim V_lambda$ has a nice expression called the hook-length formula (§5.17 in op. cit.), and there is a basis of $V_lambda$ indexed by the standard tableaux of shape $lambda$ (see, e.g., Mark Wildon, Representation theory of the symmetric group, 2014).
In light of this, eqref{darij1.eq.gen-form} (applied to $G = S_N$) becomes
begin{align}
left(Kleft[S_Nright] right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( K^- oplus frslleft(dim V_lambda right) right) .
end{align}
When $K = CC$, this further rewrites as
begin{align}
left(CC left[S_Nright]right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( underbrace{CC^-}_{cong fruleft(1right)} oplus underbrace{frslleft(dim V_lambda right)}_{cong frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright)} right)
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( fruleft(1right) oplus frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) right) .
end{align}
Thus,
begin{align}
frLleft(S_Nright)
= left(CC left[S_Nright]right)^-
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( fruleft(1right) oplus frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) right)
cong bigopluslimits_{lambda vdash N} left( frsuleft(dim V_lambdaright) oplus fruleft(1right) right) .
end{align}
This is exactly my claim.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 3:35
darij grinberg
10.2k33062
10.2k33062
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005883%2flie-algebra-generated-by-elements-of-the-symmetric-group-s-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The center of the group algebra has dimension equal to the number of conjugacy classes of the group. This might be helpful to compute one component but I do not know a general method to compute the rest of the components.
– Sheel Stueber
Nov 20 '18 at 3:14