Minimize $x^2+6y^2+4z^2$ subject to $x+2y+z-4=0$ and $2x^2+y^2=16$












2














Minimize $x^2+6y^2+4z^2$ subject to $x+2y+z-4=0$ and $2x^2+y^2=16$



My try:



By Lagrange Multiplier method we have



$$L(x,y,z,lambda, mu)=(x^2+6y^2+4z^2)+lambda(x+2y+z-4)+mu(2x^2+y^2-16)$$



For $$L_x=0$$ we get



$$2x+lambda+4mu x=0 tag{1}$$



For $$L_y=0$$ we get



$$12y+2lambda+2mu y=0 tag{2}$$



For $$L_z=0$$ we get



$$8z+lambda=0 tag{3}$$



From $(1)$ and $(2)$ we get



$$x=frac{4 lambda}{1-2mu}$$



$$y=frac{8 lambda}{6-mu}$$



Substituting $x$ , $y$ and $z$ above in constrainst we get



$$2 frac{lambda^2}{(1-2mu)^2}+4 frac{lambda^2}{(6-mu)^2}=1 tag{4}$$



$$frac{4 lambda}{1-2mu}+frac{16 lambda}{6-mu}+frac{lambda}{8}=4 tag{5}$$



But its tedious to solve above equations for $lambda$ and $mu$



Any other approach?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • WLOG $sqrt2x=4cos t,y=4sin t, z=?$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Nov 22 '18 at 13:43










  • Good idea sir. we have $z=4-2sqrt{2} cos t-8 sin t$. To minimize $f(t)=8cos^2 t+96 sin^2 t+4left(4-2sqrt{2} cos t-8 sin t right)^2$. But this also seems lengthy
    – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
    Nov 22 '18 at 13:58












  • Try to solve equations $(4)$ and $(5)$ by setting $text{sin}(t) = frac{sqrt{2}lambda}{1-2mu}$ and $text{cos}(t) = frac{2lambda}{6-mu}$. Hence, use trigonometric identities to reduce the problem to a quadratic equation on $text{tan}(t)$.
    – Alex Silva
    Nov 22 '18 at 15:29


















2














Minimize $x^2+6y^2+4z^2$ subject to $x+2y+z-4=0$ and $2x^2+y^2=16$



My try:



By Lagrange Multiplier method we have



$$L(x,y,z,lambda, mu)=(x^2+6y^2+4z^2)+lambda(x+2y+z-4)+mu(2x^2+y^2-16)$$



For $$L_x=0$$ we get



$$2x+lambda+4mu x=0 tag{1}$$



For $$L_y=0$$ we get



$$12y+2lambda+2mu y=0 tag{2}$$



For $$L_z=0$$ we get



$$8z+lambda=0 tag{3}$$



From $(1)$ and $(2)$ we get



$$x=frac{4 lambda}{1-2mu}$$



$$y=frac{8 lambda}{6-mu}$$



Substituting $x$ , $y$ and $z$ above in constrainst we get



$$2 frac{lambda^2}{(1-2mu)^2}+4 frac{lambda^2}{(6-mu)^2}=1 tag{4}$$



$$frac{4 lambda}{1-2mu}+frac{16 lambda}{6-mu}+frac{lambda}{8}=4 tag{5}$$



But its tedious to solve above equations for $lambda$ and $mu$



Any other approach?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • WLOG $sqrt2x=4cos t,y=4sin t, z=?$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Nov 22 '18 at 13:43










  • Good idea sir. we have $z=4-2sqrt{2} cos t-8 sin t$. To minimize $f(t)=8cos^2 t+96 sin^2 t+4left(4-2sqrt{2} cos t-8 sin t right)^2$. But this also seems lengthy
    – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
    Nov 22 '18 at 13:58












  • Try to solve equations $(4)$ and $(5)$ by setting $text{sin}(t) = frac{sqrt{2}lambda}{1-2mu}$ and $text{cos}(t) = frac{2lambda}{6-mu}$. Hence, use trigonometric identities to reduce the problem to a quadratic equation on $text{tan}(t)$.
    – Alex Silva
    Nov 22 '18 at 15:29
















2












2








2


2





Minimize $x^2+6y^2+4z^2$ subject to $x+2y+z-4=0$ and $2x^2+y^2=16$



My try:



By Lagrange Multiplier method we have



$$L(x,y,z,lambda, mu)=(x^2+6y^2+4z^2)+lambda(x+2y+z-4)+mu(2x^2+y^2-16)$$



For $$L_x=0$$ we get



$$2x+lambda+4mu x=0 tag{1}$$



For $$L_y=0$$ we get



$$12y+2lambda+2mu y=0 tag{2}$$



For $$L_z=0$$ we get



$$8z+lambda=0 tag{3}$$



From $(1)$ and $(2)$ we get



$$x=frac{4 lambda}{1-2mu}$$



$$y=frac{8 lambda}{6-mu}$$



Substituting $x$ , $y$ and $z$ above in constrainst we get



$$2 frac{lambda^2}{(1-2mu)^2}+4 frac{lambda^2}{(6-mu)^2}=1 tag{4}$$



$$frac{4 lambda}{1-2mu}+frac{16 lambda}{6-mu}+frac{lambda}{8}=4 tag{5}$$



But its tedious to solve above equations for $lambda$ and $mu$



Any other approach?










share|cite|improve this question













Minimize $x^2+6y^2+4z^2$ subject to $x+2y+z-4=0$ and $2x^2+y^2=16$



My try:



By Lagrange Multiplier method we have



$$L(x,y,z,lambda, mu)=(x^2+6y^2+4z^2)+lambda(x+2y+z-4)+mu(2x^2+y^2-16)$$



For $$L_x=0$$ we get



$$2x+lambda+4mu x=0 tag{1}$$



For $$L_y=0$$ we get



$$12y+2lambda+2mu y=0 tag{2}$$



For $$L_z=0$$ we get



$$8z+lambda=0 tag{3}$$



From $(1)$ and $(2)$ we get



$$x=frac{4 lambda}{1-2mu}$$



$$y=frac{8 lambda}{6-mu}$$



Substituting $x$ , $y$ and $z$ above in constrainst we get



$$2 frac{lambda^2}{(1-2mu)^2}+4 frac{lambda^2}{(6-mu)^2}=1 tag{4}$$



$$frac{4 lambda}{1-2mu}+frac{16 lambda}{6-mu}+frac{lambda}{8}=4 tag{5}$$



But its tedious to solve above equations for $lambda$ and $mu$



Any other approach?







optimization systems-of-equations lagrange-multiplier maxima-minima






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 22 '18 at 13:37









Ekaveera Kumar SharmaEkaveera Kumar Sharma

5,54711428




5,54711428












  • WLOG $sqrt2x=4cos t,y=4sin t, z=?$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Nov 22 '18 at 13:43










  • Good idea sir. we have $z=4-2sqrt{2} cos t-8 sin t$. To minimize $f(t)=8cos^2 t+96 sin^2 t+4left(4-2sqrt{2} cos t-8 sin t right)^2$. But this also seems lengthy
    – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
    Nov 22 '18 at 13:58












  • Try to solve equations $(4)$ and $(5)$ by setting $text{sin}(t) = frac{sqrt{2}lambda}{1-2mu}$ and $text{cos}(t) = frac{2lambda}{6-mu}$. Hence, use trigonometric identities to reduce the problem to a quadratic equation on $text{tan}(t)$.
    – Alex Silva
    Nov 22 '18 at 15:29




















  • WLOG $sqrt2x=4cos t,y=4sin t, z=?$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Nov 22 '18 at 13:43










  • Good idea sir. we have $z=4-2sqrt{2} cos t-8 sin t$. To minimize $f(t)=8cos^2 t+96 sin^2 t+4left(4-2sqrt{2} cos t-8 sin t right)^2$. But this also seems lengthy
    – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
    Nov 22 '18 at 13:58












  • Try to solve equations $(4)$ and $(5)$ by setting $text{sin}(t) = frac{sqrt{2}lambda}{1-2mu}$ and $text{cos}(t) = frac{2lambda}{6-mu}$. Hence, use trigonometric identities to reduce the problem to a quadratic equation on $text{tan}(t)$.
    – Alex Silva
    Nov 22 '18 at 15:29


















WLOG $sqrt2x=4cos t,y=4sin t, z=?$
– lab bhattacharjee
Nov 22 '18 at 13:43




WLOG $sqrt2x=4cos t,y=4sin t, z=?$
– lab bhattacharjee
Nov 22 '18 at 13:43












Good idea sir. we have $z=4-2sqrt{2} cos t-8 sin t$. To minimize $f(t)=8cos^2 t+96 sin^2 t+4left(4-2sqrt{2} cos t-8 sin t right)^2$. But this also seems lengthy
– Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
Nov 22 '18 at 13:58






Good idea sir. we have $z=4-2sqrt{2} cos t-8 sin t$. To minimize $f(t)=8cos^2 t+96 sin^2 t+4left(4-2sqrt{2} cos t-8 sin t right)^2$. But this also seems lengthy
– Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
Nov 22 '18 at 13:58














Try to solve equations $(4)$ and $(5)$ by setting $text{sin}(t) = frac{sqrt{2}lambda}{1-2mu}$ and $text{cos}(t) = frac{2lambda}{6-mu}$. Hence, use trigonometric identities to reduce the problem to a quadratic equation on $text{tan}(t)$.
– Alex Silva
Nov 22 '18 at 15:29






Try to solve equations $(4)$ and $(5)$ by setting $text{sin}(t) = frac{sqrt{2}lambda}{1-2mu}$ and $text{cos}(t) = frac{2lambda}{6-mu}$. Hence, use trigonometric identities to reduce the problem to a quadratic equation on $text{tan}(t)$.
– Alex Silva
Nov 22 '18 at 15:29












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1














Hint:



Let $u=x^2+6y^2+4(4-2y-x)^2$



$iff5x^2-16(2-y)x+22y^2-16y+16-u=0$



As $x$ is real, the discriminant will be $ge0$



$$implies256(y-2)^2ge20(22y^2-16y+16-u)$$



$$implies64(y-2)^2ge5(22y^2-16y+16-u)$$



$$implies5uge46y^2-176y+176=46left(y-dfrac{44}{23}right)^2+176-46left(dfrac{44}{23}right)^2$$



Now $y^2=16-2x^2le16implies-4le yle4iff-4-dfrac{44}{23}le y-dfrac{44}{23}le4-dfrac{44}{23}$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Very nice approach
    – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
    Nov 23 '18 at 7:10



















1














Since you are assuming that $2x^2+y^2=16$, your problem is equivalent to the problem of minimizing $frac{11}2y^2+4z^2$. But then your first equation becomes $lambda+4mu x=0$, which is much simpler.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Good ,so with your idea i got $x=frac{-lambda}{4 mu}$, $y=frac{-2lambda}{2mu+11}$, $z=frac{-lambda}{8}$. But i don't think its simple enough again?
    – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
    Nov 22 '18 at 14:29



















0














With computer I get numeric solution
$$f_{min}=9.445967377367024$$
if
$$x=2.811441051354938\
y=0.4377195786259503\
z=0.3131197913931612$$

Exact values of $x,y,z$ is solutions of equations:
$$2033x^4-800x^3-13960x^2-1792x+6144=0,\
2033y^4-6016y^3-27920y^2+88064y-32768=0,\
2033z^4-19696z^3-84456z^2+176704z-46464=0.$$

We can solve these equations exact and get exact solutions.
However, there are too big expressions.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009146%2fminimize-x26y24z2-subject-to-x2yz-4-0-and-2x2y2-16%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    Hint:



    Let $u=x^2+6y^2+4(4-2y-x)^2$



    $iff5x^2-16(2-y)x+22y^2-16y+16-u=0$



    As $x$ is real, the discriminant will be $ge0$



    $$implies256(y-2)^2ge20(22y^2-16y+16-u)$$



    $$implies64(y-2)^2ge5(22y^2-16y+16-u)$$



    $$implies5uge46y^2-176y+176=46left(y-dfrac{44}{23}right)^2+176-46left(dfrac{44}{23}right)^2$$



    Now $y^2=16-2x^2le16implies-4le yle4iff-4-dfrac{44}{23}le y-dfrac{44}{23}le4-dfrac{44}{23}$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Very nice approach
      – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
      Nov 23 '18 at 7:10
















    1














    Hint:



    Let $u=x^2+6y^2+4(4-2y-x)^2$



    $iff5x^2-16(2-y)x+22y^2-16y+16-u=0$



    As $x$ is real, the discriminant will be $ge0$



    $$implies256(y-2)^2ge20(22y^2-16y+16-u)$$



    $$implies64(y-2)^2ge5(22y^2-16y+16-u)$$



    $$implies5uge46y^2-176y+176=46left(y-dfrac{44}{23}right)^2+176-46left(dfrac{44}{23}right)^2$$



    Now $y^2=16-2x^2le16implies-4le yle4iff-4-dfrac{44}{23}le y-dfrac{44}{23}le4-dfrac{44}{23}$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Very nice approach
      – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
      Nov 23 '18 at 7:10














    1












    1








    1






    Hint:



    Let $u=x^2+6y^2+4(4-2y-x)^2$



    $iff5x^2-16(2-y)x+22y^2-16y+16-u=0$



    As $x$ is real, the discriminant will be $ge0$



    $$implies256(y-2)^2ge20(22y^2-16y+16-u)$$



    $$implies64(y-2)^2ge5(22y^2-16y+16-u)$$



    $$implies5uge46y^2-176y+176=46left(y-dfrac{44}{23}right)^2+176-46left(dfrac{44}{23}right)^2$$



    Now $y^2=16-2x^2le16implies-4le yle4iff-4-dfrac{44}{23}le y-dfrac{44}{23}le4-dfrac{44}{23}$






    share|cite|improve this answer












    Hint:



    Let $u=x^2+6y^2+4(4-2y-x)^2$



    $iff5x^2-16(2-y)x+22y^2-16y+16-u=0$



    As $x$ is real, the discriminant will be $ge0$



    $$implies256(y-2)^2ge20(22y^2-16y+16-u)$$



    $$implies64(y-2)^2ge5(22y^2-16y+16-u)$$



    $$implies5uge46y^2-176y+176=46left(y-dfrac{44}{23}right)^2+176-46left(dfrac{44}{23}right)^2$$



    Now $y^2=16-2x^2le16implies-4le yle4iff-4-dfrac{44}{23}le y-dfrac{44}{23}le4-dfrac{44}{23}$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Nov 23 '18 at 6:26









    lab bhattacharjeelab bhattacharjee

    224k15156274




    224k15156274












    • Very nice approach
      – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
      Nov 23 '18 at 7:10


















    • Very nice approach
      – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
      Nov 23 '18 at 7:10
















    Very nice approach
    – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
    Nov 23 '18 at 7:10




    Very nice approach
    – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
    Nov 23 '18 at 7:10











    1














    Since you are assuming that $2x^2+y^2=16$, your problem is equivalent to the problem of minimizing $frac{11}2y^2+4z^2$. But then your first equation becomes $lambda+4mu x=0$, which is much simpler.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Good ,so with your idea i got $x=frac{-lambda}{4 mu}$, $y=frac{-2lambda}{2mu+11}$, $z=frac{-lambda}{8}$. But i don't think its simple enough again?
      – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
      Nov 22 '18 at 14:29
















    1














    Since you are assuming that $2x^2+y^2=16$, your problem is equivalent to the problem of minimizing $frac{11}2y^2+4z^2$. But then your first equation becomes $lambda+4mu x=0$, which is much simpler.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Good ,so with your idea i got $x=frac{-lambda}{4 mu}$, $y=frac{-2lambda}{2mu+11}$, $z=frac{-lambda}{8}$. But i don't think its simple enough again?
      – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
      Nov 22 '18 at 14:29














    1












    1








    1






    Since you are assuming that $2x^2+y^2=16$, your problem is equivalent to the problem of minimizing $frac{11}2y^2+4z^2$. But then your first equation becomes $lambda+4mu x=0$, which is much simpler.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    Since you are assuming that $2x^2+y^2=16$, your problem is equivalent to the problem of minimizing $frac{11}2y^2+4z^2$. But then your first equation becomes $lambda+4mu x=0$, which is much simpler.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Nov 22 '18 at 14:21

























    answered Nov 22 '18 at 13:59









    José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

    152k22123225




    152k22123225












    • Good ,so with your idea i got $x=frac{-lambda}{4 mu}$, $y=frac{-2lambda}{2mu+11}$, $z=frac{-lambda}{8}$. But i don't think its simple enough again?
      – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
      Nov 22 '18 at 14:29


















    • Good ,so with your idea i got $x=frac{-lambda}{4 mu}$, $y=frac{-2lambda}{2mu+11}$, $z=frac{-lambda}{8}$. But i don't think its simple enough again?
      – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
      Nov 22 '18 at 14:29
















    Good ,so with your idea i got $x=frac{-lambda}{4 mu}$, $y=frac{-2lambda}{2mu+11}$, $z=frac{-lambda}{8}$. But i don't think its simple enough again?
    – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
    Nov 22 '18 at 14:29




    Good ,so with your idea i got $x=frac{-lambda}{4 mu}$, $y=frac{-2lambda}{2mu+11}$, $z=frac{-lambda}{8}$. But i don't think its simple enough again?
    – Ekaveera Kumar Sharma
    Nov 22 '18 at 14:29











    0














    With computer I get numeric solution
    $$f_{min}=9.445967377367024$$
    if
    $$x=2.811441051354938\
    y=0.4377195786259503\
    z=0.3131197913931612$$

    Exact values of $x,y,z$ is solutions of equations:
    $$2033x^4-800x^3-13960x^2-1792x+6144=0,\
    2033y^4-6016y^3-27920y^2+88064y-32768=0,\
    2033z^4-19696z^3-84456z^2+176704z-46464=0.$$

    We can solve these equations exact and get exact solutions.
    However, there are too big expressions.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      0














      With computer I get numeric solution
      $$f_{min}=9.445967377367024$$
      if
      $$x=2.811441051354938\
      y=0.4377195786259503\
      z=0.3131197913931612$$

      Exact values of $x,y,z$ is solutions of equations:
      $$2033x^4-800x^3-13960x^2-1792x+6144=0,\
      2033y^4-6016y^3-27920y^2+88064y-32768=0,\
      2033z^4-19696z^3-84456z^2+176704z-46464=0.$$

      We can solve these equations exact and get exact solutions.
      However, there are too big expressions.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        With computer I get numeric solution
        $$f_{min}=9.445967377367024$$
        if
        $$x=2.811441051354938\
        y=0.4377195786259503\
        z=0.3131197913931612$$

        Exact values of $x,y,z$ is solutions of equations:
        $$2033x^4-800x^3-13960x^2-1792x+6144=0,\
        2033y^4-6016y^3-27920y^2+88064y-32768=0,\
        2033z^4-19696z^3-84456z^2+176704z-46464=0.$$

        We can solve these equations exact and get exact solutions.
        However, there are too big expressions.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        With computer I get numeric solution
        $$f_{min}=9.445967377367024$$
        if
        $$x=2.811441051354938\
        y=0.4377195786259503\
        z=0.3131197913931612$$

        Exact values of $x,y,z$ is solutions of equations:
        $$2033x^4-800x^3-13960x^2-1792x+6144=0,\
        2033y^4-6016y^3-27920y^2+88064y-32768=0,\
        2033z^4-19696z^3-84456z^2+176704z-46464=0.$$

        We can solve these equations exact and get exact solutions.
        However, there are too big expressions.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 23 '18 at 11:23









        Aleksas DomarkasAleksas Domarkas

        8546




        8546






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009146%2fminimize-x26y24z2-subject-to-x2yz-4-0-and-2x2y2-16%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter