The total probability as sums of conditional probabilities
Suppose I have 2 events $C_1$ and $C_2$ so that $C_1$, $C_2$, $C_1'$ and $C_2'$ partition the probability space. Let the event I'm interested in be denoted by $X$. $C_1$ and $C_2$ and their complements (denoted as $C_1'$ and $C_2'$) are conditionally independent given $X$. The probability of $X$ is given by,
$$P(X)=P(X,C_1,C_2)+P(X,C_1',C_2)+P(X,C_1,C_2')+P(X,C_1',C_2')$$
This, in turn, is (I think) given by,
$$P(X|C_1)P(C_1)P(C_2|X)+P(X|C_1')P(C_1')P(C_2|X)+P(X|C_1)P(C_1)P(C_2'|X)+P(X|C_1')P(C_1')P(C_2'|X)$$
Have I done this correctly? I'll accept your answer if you can say yes or no, and refer to the relevant rules I've invoked/ failed to invoke.
probability probability-theory
|
show 1 more comment
Suppose I have 2 events $C_1$ and $C_2$ so that $C_1$, $C_2$, $C_1'$ and $C_2'$ partition the probability space. Let the event I'm interested in be denoted by $X$. $C_1$ and $C_2$ and their complements (denoted as $C_1'$ and $C_2'$) are conditionally independent given $X$. The probability of $X$ is given by,
$$P(X)=P(X,C_1,C_2)+P(X,C_1',C_2)+P(X,C_1,C_2')+P(X,C_1',C_2')$$
This, in turn, is (I think) given by,
$$P(X|C_1)P(C_1)P(C_2|X)+P(X|C_1')P(C_1')P(C_2|X)+P(X|C_1)P(C_1)P(C_2'|X)+P(X|C_1')P(C_1')P(C_2'|X)$$
Have I done this correctly? I'll accept your answer if you can say yes or no, and refer to the relevant rules I've invoked/ failed to invoke.
probability probability-theory
Are you denoting complements with $´$?
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:18
Yes I am! Will clarify this.
– user617643
Nov 20 '18 at 23:19
Something is fishy, if $E$ is any event, then any other no null event $F$ will be such that either $E cap F$ or else $E' cap F$ is not null. So, $C_1, C_2, C_1'$ and $C_2'$ cannot be a partition.
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:23
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
– user617643
Nov 20 '18 at 23:33
You can't have two events such that these two and their complements form a partition of the space. That is impossible.
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:35
|
show 1 more comment
Suppose I have 2 events $C_1$ and $C_2$ so that $C_1$, $C_2$, $C_1'$ and $C_2'$ partition the probability space. Let the event I'm interested in be denoted by $X$. $C_1$ and $C_2$ and their complements (denoted as $C_1'$ and $C_2'$) are conditionally independent given $X$. The probability of $X$ is given by,
$$P(X)=P(X,C_1,C_2)+P(X,C_1',C_2)+P(X,C_1,C_2')+P(X,C_1',C_2')$$
This, in turn, is (I think) given by,
$$P(X|C_1)P(C_1)P(C_2|X)+P(X|C_1')P(C_1')P(C_2|X)+P(X|C_1)P(C_1)P(C_2'|X)+P(X|C_1')P(C_1')P(C_2'|X)$$
Have I done this correctly? I'll accept your answer if you can say yes or no, and refer to the relevant rules I've invoked/ failed to invoke.
probability probability-theory
Suppose I have 2 events $C_1$ and $C_2$ so that $C_1$, $C_2$, $C_1'$ and $C_2'$ partition the probability space. Let the event I'm interested in be denoted by $X$. $C_1$ and $C_2$ and their complements (denoted as $C_1'$ and $C_2'$) are conditionally independent given $X$. The probability of $X$ is given by,
$$P(X)=P(X,C_1,C_2)+P(X,C_1',C_2)+P(X,C_1,C_2')+P(X,C_1',C_2')$$
This, in turn, is (I think) given by,
$$P(X|C_1)P(C_1)P(C_2|X)+P(X|C_1')P(C_1')P(C_2|X)+P(X|C_1)P(C_1)P(C_2'|X)+P(X|C_1')P(C_1')P(C_2'|X)$$
Have I done this correctly? I'll accept your answer if you can say yes or no, and refer to the relevant rules I've invoked/ failed to invoke.
probability probability-theory
probability probability-theory
edited Nov 20 '18 at 23:33
asked Nov 20 '18 at 22:57
user617643
226
226
Are you denoting complements with $´$?
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:18
Yes I am! Will clarify this.
– user617643
Nov 20 '18 at 23:19
Something is fishy, if $E$ is any event, then any other no null event $F$ will be such that either $E cap F$ or else $E' cap F$ is not null. So, $C_1, C_2, C_1'$ and $C_2'$ cannot be a partition.
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:23
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
– user617643
Nov 20 '18 at 23:33
You can't have two events such that these two and their complements form a partition of the space. That is impossible.
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:35
|
show 1 more comment
Are you denoting complements with $´$?
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:18
Yes I am! Will clarify this.
– user617643
Nov 20 '18 at 23:19
Something is fishy, if $E$ is any event, then any other no null event $F$ will be such that either $E cap F$ or else $E' cap F$ is not null. So, $C_1, C_2, C_1'$ and $C_2'$ cannot be a partition.
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:23
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
– user617643
Nov 20 '18 at 23:33
You can't have two events such that these two and their complements form a partition of the space. That is impossible.
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:35
Are you denoting complements with $´$?
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:18
Are you denoting complements with $´$?
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:18
Yes I am! Will clarify this.
– user617643
Nov 20 '18 at 23:19
Yes I am! Will clarify this.
– user617643
Nov 20 '18 at 23:19
Something is fishy, if $E$ is any event, then any other no null event $F$ will be such that either $E cap F$ or else $E' cap F$ is not null. So, $C_1, C_2, C_1'$ and $C_2'$ cannot be a partition.
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:23
Something is fishy, if $E$ is any event, then any other no null event $F$ will be such that either $E cap F$ or else $E' cap F$ is not null. So, $C_1, C_2, C_1'$ and $C_2'$ cannot be a partition.
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:23
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
– user617643
Nov 20 '18 at 23:33
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
– user617643
Nov 20 '18 at 23:33
You can't have two events such that these two and their complements form a partition of the space. That is impossible.
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:35
You can't have two events such that these two and their complements form a partition of the space. That is impossible.
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:35
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Firstly the partition you require is ${C_1cap C_2, C_1cap C_2', C_1'cap C_2,C_1'cap C_2'}$, the pairwise intersections of the two events or their complements (excluding the empty intersections; assuming all four shown are non-empty).
Secondly, take more care when expanding conditionals; let's do it one step at a time.
$begin{align}mathsf P(X) &= mathsf P(X,C_1,C_2)+mathsf P(X,C_1,C_2')+mathsf P(X,C_1',C_2)+mathsf P(X,C_1',C_2')\[2ex] &= {mathsf P(C_1, C_2)mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2)+ mathsf P(C_1,C_2')mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2')+mathsf P(C_1',C_2)mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2)+mathsf P(C_1',C_2'mid C_1')mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2')}\[2ex] &= {mathsf P(C_1)mathsf P(C_2mid C_1)mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2)+ mathsf P(C_1)mathsf P(C_2'mid C_1)mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2')+mathsf P(C_1')mathsf P(C_2mid C_1')mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2)+mathsf P(C_1')mathsf P(C_2'mid C_1')mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2')}end{align}$
Thanks Graham. Could you take a look at my other question, where I elaborate on how I got my expression.
– user617643
Nov 21 '18 at 19:55
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007019%2fthe-total-probability-as-sums-of-conditional-probabilities%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Firstly the partition you require is ${C_1cap C_2, C_1cap C_2', C_1'cap C_2,C_1'cap C_2'}$, the pairwise intersections of the two events or their complements (excluding the empty intersections; assuming all four shown are non-empty).
Secondly, take more care when expanding conditionals; let's do it one step at a time.
$begin{align}mathsf P(X) &= mathsf P(X,C_1,C_2)+mathsf P(X,C_1,C_2')+mathsf P(X,C_1',C_2)+mathsf P(X,C_1',C_2')\[2ex] &= {mathsf P(C_1, C_2)mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2)+ mathsf P(C_1,C_2')mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2')+mathsf P(C_1',C_2)mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2)+mathsf P(C_1',C_2'mid C_1')mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2')}\[2ex] &= {mathsf P(C_1)mathsf P(C_2mid C_1)mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2)+ mathsf P(C_1)mathsf P(C_2'mid C_1)mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2')+mathsf P(C_1')mathsf P(C_2mid C_1')mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2)+mathsf P(C_1')mathsf P(C_2'mid C_1')mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2')}end{align}$
Thanks Graham. Could you take a look at my other question, where I elaborate on how I got my expression.
– user617643
Nov 21 '18 at 19:55
add a comment |
Firstly the partition you require is ${C_1cap C_2, C_1cap C_2', C_1'cap C_2,C_1'cap C_2'}$, the pairwise intersections of the two events or their complements (excluding the empty intersections; assuming all four shown are non-empty).
Secondly, take more care when expanding conditionals; let's do it one step at a time.
$begin{align}mathsf P(X) &= mathsf P(X,C_1,C_2)+mathsf P(X,C_1,C_2')+mathsf P(X,C_1',C_2)+mathsf P(X,C_1',C_2')\[2ex] &= {mathsf P(C_1, C_2)mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2)+ mathsf P(C_1,C_2')mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2')+mathsf P(C_1',C_2)mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2)+mathsf P(C_1',C_2'mid C_1')mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2')}\[2ex] &= {mathsf P(C_1)mathsf P(C_2mid C_1)mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2)+ mathsf P(C_1)mathsf P(C_2'mid C_1)mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2')+mathsf P(C_1')mathsf P(C_2mid C_1')mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2)+mathsf P(C_1')mathsf P(C_2'mid C_1')mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2')}end{align}$
Thanks Graham. Could you take a look at my other question, where I elaborate on how I got my expression.
– user617643
Nov 21 '18 at 19:55
add a comment |
Firstly the partition you require is ${C_1cap C_2, C_1cap C_2', C_1'cap C_2,C_1'cap C_2'}$, the pairwise intersections of the two events or their complements (excluding the empty intersections; assuming all four shown are non-empty).
Secondly, take more care when expanding conditionals; let's do it one step at a time.
$begin{align}mathsf P(X) &= mathsf P(X,C_1,C_2)+mathsf P(X,C_1,C_2')+mathsf P(X,C_1',C_2)+mathsf P(X,C_1',C_2')\[2ex] &= {mathsf P(C_1, C_2)mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2)+ mathsf P(C_1,C_2')mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2')+mathsf P(C_1',C_2)mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2)+mathsf P(C_1',C_2'mid C_1')mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2')}\[2ex] &= {mathsf P(C_1)mathsf P(C_2mid C_1)mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2)+ mathsf P(C_1)mathsf P(C_2'mid C_1)mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2')+mathsf P(C_1')mathsf P(C_2mid C_1')mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2)+mathsf P(C_1')mathsf P(C_2'mid C_1')mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2')}end{align}$
Firstly the partition you require is ${C_1cap C_2, C_1cap C_2', C_1'cap C_2,C_1'cap C_2'}$, the pairwise intersections of the two events or their complements (excluding the empty intersections; assuming all four shown are non-empty).
Secondly, take more care when expanding conditionals; let's do it one step at a time.
$begin{align}mathsf P(X) &= mathsf P(X,C_1,C_2)+mathsf P(X,C_1,C_2')+mathsf P(X,C_1',C_2)+mathsf P(X,C_1',C_2')\[2ex] &= {mathsf P(C_1, C_2)mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2)+ mathsf P(C_1,C_2')mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2')+mathsf P(C_1',C_2)mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2)+mathsf P(C_1',C_2'mid C_1')mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2')}\[2ex] &= {mathsf P(C_1)mathsf P(C_2mid C_1)mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2)+ mathsf P(C_1)mathsf P(C_2'mid C_1)mathsf P(Xmid C_1,C_2')+mathsf P(C_1')mathsf P(C_2mid C_1')mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2)+mathsf P(C_1')mathsf P(C_2'mid C_1')mathsf P(Xmid C_1',C_2')}end{align}$
edited Nov 20 '18 at 23:51
answered Nov 20 '18 at 23:41


Graham Kemp
84.7k43378
84.7k43378
Thanks Graham. Could you take a look at my other question, where I elaborate on how I got my expression.
– user617643
Nov 21 '18 at 19:55
add a comment |
Thanks Graham. Could you take a look at my other question, where I elaborate on how I got my expression.
– user617643
Nov 21 '18 at 19:55
Thanks Graham. Could you take a look at my other question, where I elaborate on how I got my expression.
– user617643
Nov 21 '18 at 19:55
Thanks Graham. Could you take a look at my other question, where I elaborate on how I got my expression.
– user617643
Nov 21 '18 at 19:55
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007019%2fthe-total-probability-as-sums-of-conditional-probabilities%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Are you denoting complements with $´$?
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:18
Yes I am! Will clarify this.
– user617643
Nov 20 '18 at 23:19
Something is fishy, if $E$ is any event, then any other no null event $F$ will be such that either $E cap F$ or else $E' cap F$ is not null. So, $C_1, C_2, C_1'$ and $C_2'$ cannot be a partition.
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:23
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
– user617643
Nov 20 '18 at 23:33
You can't have two events such that these two and their complements form a partition of the space. That is impossible.
– Will M.
Nov 20 '18 at 23:35