A function that grows faster than any function in the sequence $e^x, e^{e^x}, e^{e^{e^x}}$…
$begingroup$
Is there a continuous function constructed by elementary functions, or by integral formula involved only elementary functions (like Gamma function) that grows faster than any $e^{e^{e...^x}}$ ($e$ appears $n$ times)?
I ask for the answer with a single formula. Gluing continuous function together is too trivial.
The function need not to be defined on whole $mathbb{R}$, the domain $(a, infty)$ is acceptable.
calculus functions exponential-function elementary-functions
$endgroup$
|
show 13 more comments
$begingroup$
Is there a continuous function constructed by elementary functions, or by integral formula involved only elementary functions (like Gamma function) that grows faster than any $e^{e^{e...^x}}$ ($e$ appears $n$ times)?
I ask for the answer with a single formula. Gluing continuous function together is too trivial.
The function need not to be defined on whole $mathbb{R}$, the domain $(a, infty)$ is acceptable.
calculus functions exponential-function elementary-functions
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Do you accept iterative procedures? If so The Ackermann Function generalises the series addition, multiplication, exponentiation. Likewise Knuth's Arrow Notation.
$endgroup$
– AlphaNumeric
Aug 15 '16 at 11:54
1
$begingroup$
I suppose that applying any of the allowed operations (composition with elementasry function or integration) turns a function that is bounded by some e-tower into a function bounded by some (possibly higher) e-tower.
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Aug 15 '16 at 11:59
3
$begingroup$
Perhaps an annoying example, but for any $;a>e;,;;a^{a^{aldots^x}};$ grows faster
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Aug 15 '16 at 12:01
3
$begingroup$
I suppose you mean to find a function $f$ that eventually grows faster than each function in the set ${exp^n(x)mid ninBbb N}$, where $n$ in the power denotes iteration of function.
$endgroup$
– edm
Aug 15 '16 at 12:31
2
$begingroup$
I mean define $f(x) =$ $C_k$ + exp(exp(..(x)) (k iterations) on $[k, k+1]$, $C_k$ is chosen so that $f$ is continuous.
$endgroup$
– Pluviophile
Aug 15 '16 at 13:32
|
show 13 more comments
$begingroup$
Is there a continuous function constructed by elementary functions, or by integral formula involved only elementary functions (like Gamma function) that grows faster than any $e^{e^{e...^x}}$ ($e$ appears $n$ times)?
I ask for the answer with a single formula. Gluing continuous function together is too trivial.
The function need not to be defined on whole $mathbb{R}$, the domain $(a, infty)$ is acceptable.
calculus functions exponential-function elementary-functions
$endgroup$
Is there a continuous function constructed by elementary functions, or by integral formula involved only elementary functions (like Gamma function) that grows faster than any $e^{e^{e...^x}}$ ($e$ appears $n$ times)?
I ask for the answer with a single formula. Gluing continuous function together is too trivial.
The function need not to be defined on whole $mathbb{R}$, the domain $(a, infty)$ is acceptable.
calculus functions exponential-function elementary-functions
calculus functions exponential-function elementary-functions
edited Aug 15 '16 at 13:08
Pluviophile
asked Aug 15 '16 at 11:50
PluviophilePluviophile
346111
346111
1
$begingroup$
Do you accept iterative procedures? If so The Ackermann Function generalises the series addition, multiplication, exponentiation. Likewise Knuth's Arrow Notation.
$endgroup$
– AlphaNumeric
Aug 15 '16 at 11:54
1
$begingroup$
I suppose that applying any of the allowed operations (composition with elementasry function or integration) turns a function that is bounded by some e-tower into a function bounded by some (possibly higher) e-tower.
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Aug 15 '16 at 11:59
3
$begingroup$
Perhaps an annoying example, but for any $;a>e;,;;a^{a^{aldots^x}};$ grows faster
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Aug 15 '16 at 12:01
3
$begingroup$
I suppose you mean to find a function $f$ that eventually grows faster than each function in the set ${exp^n(x)mid ninBbb N}$, where $n$ in the power denotes iteration of function.
$endgroup$
– edm
Aug 15 '16 at 12:31
2
$begingroup$
I mean define $f(x) =$ $C_k$ + exp(exp(..(x)) (k iterations) on $[k, k+1]$, $C_k$ is chosen so that $f$ is continuous.
$endgroup$
– Pluviophile
Aug 15 '16 at 13:32
|
show 13 more comments
1
$begingroup$
Do you accept iterative procedures? If so The Ackermann Function generalises the series addition, multiplication, exponentiation. Likewise Knuth's Arrow Notation.
$endgroup$
– AlphaNumeric
Aug 15 '16 at 11:54
1
$begingroup$
I suppose that applying any of the allowed operations (composition with elementasry function or integration) turns a function that is bounded by some e-tower into a function bounded by some (possibly higher) e-tower.
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Aug 15 '16 at 11:59
3
$begingroup$
Perhaps an annoying example, but for any $;a>e;,;;a^{a^{aldots^x}};$ grows faster
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Aug 15 '16 at 12:01
3
$begingroup$
I suppose you mean to find a function $f$ that eventually grows faster than each function in the set ${exp^n(x)mid ninBbb N}$, where $n$ in the power denotes iteration of function.
$endgroup$
– edm
Aug 15 '16 at 12:31
2
$begingroup$
I mean define $f(x) =$ $C_k$ + exp(exp(..(x)) (k iterations) on $[k, k+1]$, $C_k$ is chosen so that $f$ is continuous.
$endgroup$
– Pluviophile
Aug 15 '16 at 13:32
1
1
$begingroup$
Do you accept iterative procedures? If so The Ackermann Function generalises the series addition, multiplication, exponentiation. Likewise Knuth's Arrow Notation.
$endgroup$
– AlphaNumeric
Aug 15 '16 at 11:54
$begingroup$
Do you accept iterative procedures? If so The Ackermann Function generalises the series addition, multiplication, exponentiation. Likewise Knuth's Arrow Notation.
$endgroup$
– AlphaNumeric
Aug 15 '16 at 11:54
1
1
$begingroup$
I suppose that applying any of the allowed operations (composition with elementasry function or integration) turns a function that is bounded by some e-tower into a function bounded by some (possibly higher) e-tower.
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Aug 15 '16 at 11:59
$begingroup$
I suppose that applying any of the allowed operations (composition with elementasry function or integration) turns a function that is bounded by some e-tower into a function bounded by some (possibly higher) e-tower.
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Aug 15 '16 at 11:59
3
3
$begingroup$
Perhaps an annoying example, but for any $;a>e;,;;a^{a^{aldots^x}};$ grows faster
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Aug 15 '16 at 12:01
$begingroup$
Perhaps an annoying example, but for any $;a>e;,;;a^{a^{aldots^x}};$ grows faster
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Aug 15 '16 at 12:01
3
3
$begingroup$
I suppose you mean to find a function $f$ that eventually grows faster than each function in the set ${exp^n(x)mid ninBbb N}$, where $n$ in the power denotes iteration of function.
$endgroup$
– edm
Aug 15 '16 at 12:31
$begingroup$
I suppose you mean to find a function $f$ that eventually grows faster than each function in the set ${exp^n(x)mid ninBbb N}$, where $n$ in the power denotes iteration of function.
$endgroup$
– edm
Aug 15 '16 at 12:31
2
2
$begingroup$
I mean define $f(x) =$ $C_k$ + exp(exp(..(x)) (k iterations) on $[k, k+1]$, $C_k$ is chosen so that $f$ is continuous.
$endgroup$
– Pluviophile
Aug 15 '16 at 13:32
$begingroup$
I mean define $f(x) =$ $C_k$ + exp(exp(..(x)) (k iterations) on $[k, k+1]$, $C_k$ is chosen so that $f$ is continuous.
$endgroup$
– Pluviophile
Aug 15 '16 at 13:32
|
show 13 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
a negative answer
No, there is no such function constructed in a "natural" way, if we construe that word propertly.
Perhaps consult the literature on "transseries" ...
For example, transseries in the sense here:
G. A. Edgar, "Transseries for Beginners". Real Analysis Exchange 35 (2010) 253-310 .
The set of transseries includes real elementary functions, is closed under indefinite integration, composition, and many other operations.
But no transseries has growth rate beyond all $e^{dots e^x}$. There is an integer "exponentiality" associated with each (large, positive) transseries; for example Exercise 4.10 in:
J. van der Hoeven, Transseries and Real Differential Algebra (LNM 1888) (Springer 2006)
A (large, positive) transseries with exponentiality $n+1$ grows faster than any transseries with exponentiality ${} le n$.
And $e^{dots e^x}$ with $n$ exponentiations has exponentiality $n$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
If $f$ is a power series that converges on $mathbb{R}$, do we still get a negative answer?
$endgroup$
– Pluviophile
Aug 15 '16 at 14:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a proof that there is no such function und elementary function.
Let $A$ be a collection of functions which grow slower than the collection $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.
We know that the sum, product composition and integral of functions which grow slower than $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.
Then the set of functions which are finite iterate sums, $dots$ of functions in $A$ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $
Now, depending on or definition of elementary function, if you take $A= {1, x, exp, log, x^a }$ you should be done.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1892870%2fa-function-that-grows-faster-than-any-function-in-the-sequence-ex-eex-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
a negative answer
No, there is no such function constructed in a "natural" way, if we construe that word propertly.
Perhaps consult the literature on "transseries" ...
For example, transseries in the sense here:
G. A. Edgar, "Transseries for Beginners". Real Analysis Exchange 35 (2010) 253-310 .
The set of transseries includes real elementary functions, is closed under indefinite integration, composition, and many other operations.
But no transseries has growth rate beyond all $e^{dots e^x}$. There is an integer "exponentiality" associated with each (large, positive) transseries; for example Exercise 4.10 in:
J. van der Hoeven, Transseries and Real Differential Algebra (LNM 1888) (Springer 2006)
A (large, positive) transseries with exponentiality $n+1$ grows faster than any transseries with exponentiality ${} le n$.
And $e^{dots e^x}$ with $n$ exponentiations has exponentiality $n$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
If $f$ is a power series that converges on $mathbb{R}$, do we still get a negative answer?
$endgroup$
– Pluviophile
Aug 15 '16 at 14:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
a negative answer
No, there is no such function constructed in a "natural" way, if we construe that word propertly.
Perhaps consult the literature on "transseries" ...
For example, transseries in the sense here:
G. A. Edgar, "Transseries for Beginners". Real Analysis Exchange 35 (2010) 253-310 .
The set of transseries includes real elementary functions, is closed under indefinite integration, composition, and many other operations.
But no transseries has growth rate beyond all $e^{dots e^x}$. There is an integer "exponentiality" associated with each (large, positive) transseries; for example Exercise 4.10 in:
J. van der Hoeven, Transseries and Real Differential Algebra (LNM 1888) (Springer 2006)
A (large, positive) transseries with exponentiality $n+1$ grows faster than any transseries with exponentiality ${} le n$.
And $e^{dots e^x}$ with $n$ exponentiations has exponentiality $n$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
If $f$ is a power series that converges on $mathbb{R}$, do we still get a negative answer?
$endgroup$
– Pluviophile
Aug 15 '16 at 14:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
a negative answer
No, there is no such function constructed in a "natural" way, if we construe that word propertly.
Perhaps consult the literature on "transseries" ...
For example, transseries in the sense here:
G. A. Edgar, "Transseries for Beginners". Real Analysis Exchange 35 (2010) 253-310 .
The set of transseries includes real elementary functions, is closed under indefinite integration, composition, and many other operations.
But no transseries has growth rate beyond all $e^{dots e^x}$. There is an integer "exponentiality" associated with each (large, positive) transseries; for example Exercise 4.10 in:
J. van der Hoeven, Transseries and Real Differential Algebra (LNM 1888) (Springer 2006)
A (large, positive) transseries with exponentiality $n+1$ grows faster than any transseries with exponentiality ${} le n$.
And $e^{dots e^x}$ with $n$ exponentiations has exponentiality $n$.
$endgroup$
a negative answer
No, there is no such function constructed in a "natural" way, if we construe that word propertly.
Perhaps consult the literature on "transseries" ...
For example, transseries in the sense here:
G. A. Edgar, "Transseries for Beginners". Real Analysis Exchange 35 (2010) 253-310 .
The set of transseries includes real elementary functions, is closed under indefinite integration, composition, and many other operations.
But no transseries has growth rate beyond all $e^{dots e^x}$. There is an integer "exponentiality" associated with each (large, positive) transseries; for example Exercise 4.10 in:
J. van der Hoeven, Transseries and Real Differential Algebra (LNM 1888) (Springer 2006)
A (large, positive) transseries with exponentiality $n+1$ grows faster than any transseries with exponentiality ${} le n$.
And $e^{dots e^x}$ with $n$ exponentiations has exponentiality $n$.
answered Aug 15 '16 at 13:52
GEdgarGEdgar
62.4k267171
62.4k267171
1
$begingroup$
If $f$ is a power series that converges on $mathbb{R}$, do we still get a negative answer?
$endgroup$
– Pluviophile
Aug 15 '16 at 14:51
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
If $f$ is a power series that converges on $mathbb{R}$, do we still get a negative answer?
$endgroup$
– Pluviophile
Aug 15 '16 at 14:51
1
1
$begingroup$
If $f$ is a power series that converges on $mathbb{R}$, do we still get a negative answer?
$endgroup$
– Pluviophile
Aug 15 '16 at 14:51
$begingroup$
If $f$ is a power series that converges on $mathbb{R}$, do we still get a negative answer?
$endgroup$
– Pluviophile
Aug 15 '16 at 14:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a proof that there is no such function und elementary function.
Let $A$ be a collection of functions which grow slower than the collection $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.
We know that the sum, product composition and integral of functions which grow slower than $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.
Then the set of functions which are finite iterate sums, $dots$ of functions in $A$ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $
Now, depending on or definition of elementary function, if you take $A= {1, x, exp, log, x^a }$ you should be done.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a proof that there is no such function und elementary function.
Let $A$ be a collection of functions which grow slower than the collection $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.
We know that the sum, product composition and integral of functions which grow slower than $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.
Then the set of functions which are finite iterate sums, $dots$ of functions in $A$ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $
Now, depending on or definition of elementary function, if you take $A= {1, x, exp, log, x^a }$ you should be done.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a proof that there is no such function und elementary function.
Let $A$ be a collection of functions which grow slower than the collection $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.
We know that the sum, product composition and integral of functions which grow slower than $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.
Then the set of functions which are finite iterate sums, $dots$ of functions in $A$ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $
Now, depending on or definition of elementary function, if you take $A= {1, x, exp, log, x^a }$ you should be done.
$endgroup$
Here is a proof that there is no such function und elementary function.
Let $A$ be a collection of functions which grow slower than the collection $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.
We know that the sum, product composition and integral of functions which grow slower than $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.
Then the set of functions which are finite iterate sums, $dots$ of functions in $A$ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $
Now, depending on or definition of elementary function, if you take $A= {1, x, exp, log, x^a }$ you should be done.
answered Aug 15 '16 at 13:58
user60589user60589
2,2971815
2,2971815
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1892870%2fa-function-that-grows-faster-than-any-function-in-the-sequence-ex-eex-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Do you accept iterative procedures? If so The Ackermann Function generalises the series addition, multiplication, exponentiation. Likewise Knuth's Arrow Notation.
$endgroup$
– AlphaNumeric
Aug 15 '16 at 11:54
1
$begingroup$
I suppose that applying any of the allowed operations (composition with elementasry function or integration) turns a function that is bounded by some e-tower into a function bounded by some (possibly higher) e-tower.
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Aug 15 '16 at 11:59
3
$begingroup$
Perhaps an annoying example, but for any $;a>e;,;;a^{a^{aldots^x}};$ grows faster
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Aug 15 '16 at 12:01
3
$begingroup$
I suppose you mean to find a function $f$ that eventually grows faster than each function in the set ${exp^n(x)mid ninBbb N}$, where $n$ in the power denotes iteration of function.
$endgroup$
– edm
Aug 15 '16 at 12:31
2
$begingroup$
I mean define $f(x) =$ $C_k$ + exp(exp(..(x)) (k iterations) on $[k, k+1]$, $C_k$ is chosen so that $f$ is continuous.
$endgroup$
– Pluviophile
Aug 15 '16 at 13:32