A function that grows faster than any function in the sequence $e^x, e^{e^x}, e^{e^{e^x}}$…












5












$begingroup$


Is there a continuous function constructed by elementary functions, or by integral formula involved only elementary functions (like Gamma function) that grows faster than any $e^{e^{e...^x}}$ ($e$ appears $n$ times)?



I ask for the answer with a single formula. Gluing continuous function together is too trivial.



The function need not to be defined on whole $mathbb{R}$, the domain $(a, infty)$ is acceptable.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you accept iterative procedures? If so The Ackermann Function generalises the series addition, multiplication, exponentiation. Likewise Knuth's Arrow Notation.
    $endgroup$
    – AlphaNumeric
    Aug 15 '16 at 11:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I suppose that applying any of the allowed operations (composition with elementasry function or integration) turns a function that is bounded by some e-tower into a function bounded by some (possibly higher) e-tower.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Aug 15 '16 at 11:59






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Perhaps an annoying example, but for any $;a>e;,;;a^{a^{aldots^x}};$ grows faster
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Aug 15 '16 at 12:01






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I suppose you mean to find a function $f$ that eventually grows faster than each function in the set ${exp^n(x)mid ninBbb N}$, where $n$ in the power denotes iteration of function.
    $endgroup$
    – edm
    Aug 15 '16 at 12:31






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I mean define $f(x) =$ $C_k$ + exp(exp(..(x)) (k iterations) on $[k, k+1]$, $C_k$ is chosen so that $f$ is continuous.
    $endgroup$
    – Pluviophile
    Aug 15 '16 at 13:32
















5












$begingroup$


Is there a continuous function constructed by elementary functions, or by integral formula involved only elementary functions (like Gamma function) that grows faster than any $e^{e^{e...^x}}$ ($e$ appears $n$ times)?



I ask for the answer with a single formula. Gluing continuous function together is too trivial.



The function need not to be defined on whole $mathbb{R}$, the domain $(a, infty)$ is acceptable.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you accept iterative procedures? If so The Ackermann Function generalises the series addition, multiplication, exponentiation. Likewise Knuth's Arrow Notation.
    $endgroup$
    – AlphaNumeric
    Aug 15 '16 at 11:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I suppose that applying any of the allowed operations (composition with elementasry function or integration) turns a function that is bounded by some e-tower into a function bounded by some (possibly higher) e-tower.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Aug 15 '16 at 11:59






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Perhaps an annoying example, but for any $;a>e;,;;a^{a^{aldots^x}};$ grows faster
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Aug 15 '16 at 12:01






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I suppose you mean to find a function $f$ that eventually grows faster than each function in the set ${exp^n(x)mid ninBbb N}$, where $n$ in the power denotes iteration of function.
    $endgroup$
    – edm
    Aug 15 '16 at 12:31






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I mean define $f(x) =$ $C_k$ + exp(exp(..(x)) (k iterations) on $[k, k+1]$, $C_k$ is chosen so that $f$ is continuous.
    $endgroup$
    – Pluviophile
    Aug 15 '16 at 13:32














5












5








5


1



$begingroup$


Is there a continuous function constructed by elementary functions, or by integral formula involved only elementary functions (like Gamma function) that grows faster than any $e^{e^{e...^x}}$ ($e$ appears $n$ times)?



I ask for the answer with a single formula. Gluing continuous function together is too trivial.



The function need not to be defined on whole $mathbb{R}$, the domain $(a, infty)$ is acceptable.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is there a continuous function constructed by elementary functions, or by integral formula involved only elementary functions (like Gamma function) that grows faster than any $e^{e^{e...^x}}$ ($e$ appears $n$ times)?



I ask for the answer with a single formula. Gluing continuous function together is too trivial.



The function need not to be defined on whole $mathbb{R}$, the domain $(a, infty)$ is acceptable.







calculus functions exponential-function elementary-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 15 '16 at 13:08







Pluviophile

















asked Aug 15 '16 at 11:50









PluviophilePluviophile

346111




346111








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you accept iterative procedures? If so The Ackermann Function generalises the series addition, multiplication, exponentiation. Likewise Knuth's Arrow Notation.
    $endgroup$
    – AlphaNumeric
    Aug 15 '16 at 11:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I suppose that applying any of the allowed operations (composition with elementasry function or integration) turns a function that is bounded by some e-tower into a function bounded by some (possibly higher) e-tower.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Aug 15 '16 at 11:59






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Perhaps an annoying example, but for any $;a>e;,;;a^{a^{aldots^x}};$ grows faster
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Aug 15 '16 at 12:01






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I suppose you mean to find a function $f$ that eventually grows faster than each function in the set ${exp^n(x)mid ninBbb N}$, where $n$ in the power denotes iteration of function.
    $endgroup$
    – edm
    Aug 15 '16 at 12:31






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I mean define $f(x) =$ $C_k$ + exp(exp(..(x)) (k iterations) on $[k, k+1]$, $C_k$ is chosen so that $f$ is continuous.
    $endgroup$
    – Pluviophile
    Aug 15 '16 at 13:32














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you accept iterative procedures? If so The Ackermann Function generalises the series addition, multiplication, exponentiation. Likewise Knuth's Arrow Notation.
    $endgroup$
    – AlphaNumeric
    Aug 15 '16 at 11:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I suppose that applying any of the allowed operations (composition with elementasry function or integration) turns a function that is bounded by some e-tower into a function bounded by some (possibly higher) e-tower.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Aug 15 '16 at 11:59






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Perhaps an annoying example, but for any $;a>e;,;;a^{a^{aldots^x}};$ grows faster
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Aug 15 '16 at 12:01






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I suppose you mean to find a function $f$ that eventually grows faster than each function in the set ${exp^n(x)mid ninBbb N}$, where $n$ in the power denotes iteration of function.
    $endgroup$
    – edm
    Aug 15 '16 at 12:31






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I mean define $f(x) =$ $C_k$ + exp(exp(..(x)) (k iterations) on $[k, k+1]$, $C_k$ is chosen so that $f$ is continuous.
    $endgroup$
    – Pluviophile
    Aug 15 '16 at 13:32








1




1




$begingroup$
Do you accept iterative procedures? If so The Ackermann Function generalises the series addition, multiplication, exponentiation. Likewise Knuth's Arrow Notation.
$endgroup$
– AlphaNumeric
Aug 15 '16 at 11:54




$begingroup$
Do you accept iterative procedures? If so The Ackermann Function generalises the series addition, multiplication, exponentiation. Likewise Knuth's Arrow Notation.
$endgroup$
– AlphaNumeric
Aug 15 '16 at 11:54




1




1




$begingroup$
I suppose that applying any of the allowed operations (composition with elementasry function or integration) turns a function that is bounded by some e-tower into a function bounded by some (possibly higher) e-tower.
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Aug 15 '16 at 11:59




$begingroup$
I suppose that applying any of the allowed operations (composition with elementasry function or integration) turns a function that is bounded by some e-tower into a function bounded by some (possibly higher) e-tower.
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Aug 15 '16 at 11:59




3




3




$begingroup$
Perhaps an annoying example, but for any $;a>e;,;;a^{a^{aldots^x}};$ grows faster
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Aug 15 '16 at 12:01




$begingroup$
Perhaps an annoying example, but for any $;a>e;,;;a^{a^{aldots^x}};$ grows faster
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Aug 15 '16 at 12:01




3




3




$begingroup$
I suppose you mean to find a function $f$ that eventually grows faster than each function in the set ${exp^n(x)mid ninBbb N}$, where $n$ in the power denotes iteration of function.
$endgroup$
– edm
Aug 15 '16 at 12:31




$begingroup$
I suppose you mean to find a function $f$ that eventually grows faster than each function in the set ${exp^n(x)mid ninBbb N}$, where $n$ in the power denotes iteration of function.
$endgroup$
– edm
Aug 15 '16 at 12:31




2




2




$begingroup$
I mean define $f(x) =$ $C_k$ + exp(exp(..(x)) (k iterations) on $[k, k+1]$, $C_k$ is chosen so that $f$ is continuous.
$endgroup$
– Pluviophile
Aug 15 '16 at 13:32




$begingroup$
I mean define $f(x) =$ $C_k$ + exp(exp(..(x)) (k iterations) on $[k, k+1]$, $C_k$ is chosen so that $f$ is continuous.
$endgroup$
– Pluviophile
Aug 15 '16 at 13:32










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

a negative answer

No, there is no such function constructed in a "natural" way, if we construe that word propertly.



Perhaps consult the literature on "transseries" ...



For example, transseries in the sense here:
G. A. Edgar, "Transseries for Beginners". Real Analysis Exchange 35 (2010) 253-310 .



The set of transseries includes real elementary functions, is closed under indefinite integration, composition, and many other operations.



But no transseries has growth rate beyond all $e^{dots e^x}$. There is an integer "exponentiality" associated with each (large, positive) transseries; for example Exercise 4.10 in:
J. van der Hoeven, Transseries and Real Differential Algebra (LNM 1888) (Springer 2006)



A (large, positive) transseries with exponentiality $n+1$ grows faster than any transseries with exponentiality ${} le n$.
And $e^{dots e^x}$ with $n$ exponentiations has exponentiality $n$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If $f$ is a power series that converges on $mathbb{R}$, do we still get a negative answer?
    $endgroup$
    – Pluviophile
    Aug 15 '16 at 14:51



















3












$begingroup$

Here is a proof that there is no such function und elementary function.



Let $A$ be a collection of functions which grow slower than the collection $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.



We know that the sum, product composition and integral of functions which grow slower than $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.



Then the set of functions which are finite iterate sums, $dots$ of functions in $A$ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $



Now, depending on or definition of elementary function, if you take $A= {1, x, exp, log, x^a }$ you should be done.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1892870%2fa-function-that-grows-faster-than-any-function-in-the-sequence-ex-eex-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    a negative answer

    No, there is no such function constructed in a "natural" way, if we construe that word propertly.



    Perhaps consult the literature on "transseries" ...



    For example, transseries in the sense here:
    G. A. Edgar, "Transseries for Beginners". Real Analysis Exchange 35 (2010) 253-310 .



    The set of transseries includes real elementary functions, is closed under indefinite integration, composition, and many other operations.



    But no transseries has growth rate beyond all $e^{dots e^x}$. There is an integer "exponentiality" associated with each (large, positive) transseries; for example Exercise 4.10 in:
    J. van der Hoeven, Transseries and Real Differential Algebra (LNM 1888) (Springer 2006)



    A (large, positive) transseries with exponentiality $n+1$ grows faster than any transseries with exponentiality ${} le n$.
    And $e^{dots e^x}$ with $n$ exponentiations has exponentiality $n$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      If $f$ is a power series that converges on $mathbb{R}$, do we still get a negative answer?
      $endgroup$
      – Pluviophile
      Aug 15 '16 at 14:51
















    2












    $begingroup$

    a negative answer

    No, there is no such function constructed in a "natural" way, if we construe that word propertly.



    Perhaps consult the literature on "transseries" ...



    For example, transseries in the sense here:
    G. A. Edgar, "Transseries for Beginners". Real Analysis Exchange 35 (2010) 253-310 .



    The set of transseries includes real elementary functions, is closed under indefinite integration, composition, and many other operations.



    But no transseries has growth rate beyond all $e^{dots e^x}$. There is an integer "exponentiality" associated with each (large, positive) transseries; for example Exercise 4.10 in:
    J. van der Hoeven, Transseries and Real Differential Algebra (LNM 1888) (Springer 2006)



    A (large, positive) transseries with exponentiality $n+1$ grows faster than any transseries with exponentiality ${} le n$.
    And $e^{dots e^x}$ with $n$ exponentiations has exponentiality $n$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      If $f$ is a power series that converges on $mathbb{R}$, do we still get a negative answer?
      $endgroup$
      – Pluviophile
      Aug 15 '16 at 14:51














    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    a negative answer

    No, there is no such function constructed in a "natural" way, if we construe that word propertly.



    Perhaps consult the literature on "transseries" ...



    For example, transseries in the sense here:
    G. A. Edgar, "Transseries for Beginners". Real Analysis Exchange 35 (2010) 253-310 .



    The set of transseries includes real elementary functions, is closed under indefinite integration, composition, and many other operations.



    But no transseries has growth rate beyond all $e^{dots e^x}$. There is an integer "exponentiality" associated with each (large, positive) transseries; for example Exercise 4.10 in:
    J. van der Hoeven, Transseries and Real Differential Algebra (LNM 1888) (Springer 2006)



    A (large, positive) transseries with exponentiality $n+1$ grows faster than any transseries with exponentiality ${} le n$.
    And $e^{dots e^x}$ with $n$ exponentiations has exponentiality $n$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    a negative answer

    No, there is no such function constructed in a "natural" way, if we construe that word propertly.



    Perhaps consult the literature on "transseries" ...



    For example, transseries in the sense here:
    G. A. Edgar, "Transseries for Beginners". Real Analysis Exchange 35 (2010) 253-310 .



    The set of transseries includes real elementary functions, is closed under indefinite integration, composition, and many other operations.



    But no transseries has growth rate beyond all $e^{dots e^x}$. There is an integer "exponentiality" associated with each (large, positive) transseries; for example Exercise 4.10 in:
    J. van der Hoeven, Transseries and Real Differential Algebra (LNM 1888) (Springer 2006)



    A (large, positive) transseries with exponentiality $n+1$ grows faster than any transseries with exponentiality ${} le n$.
    And $e^{dots e^x}$ with $n$ exponentiations has exponentiality $n$.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Aug 15 '16 at 13:52









    GEdgarGEdgar

    62.4k267171




    62.4k267171








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      If $f$ is a power series that converges on $mathbb{R}$, do we still get a negative answer?
      $endgroup$
      – Pluviophile
      Aug 15 '16 at 14:51














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      If $f$ is a power series that converges on $mathbb{R}$, do we still get a negative answer?
      $endgroup$
      – Pluviophile
      Aug 15 '16 at 14:51








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    If $f$ is a power series that converges on $mathbb{R}$, do we still get a negative answer?
    $endgroup$
    – Pluviophile
    Aug 15 '16 at 14:51




    $begingroup$
    If $f$ is a power series that converges on $mathbb{R}$, do we still get a negative answer?
    $endgroup$
    – Pluviophile
    Aug 15 '16 at 14:51











    3












    $begingroup$

    Here is a proof that there is no such function und elementary function.



    Let $A$ be a collection of functions which grow slower than the collection $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.



    We know that the sum, product composition and integral of functions which grow slower than $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.



    Then the set of functions which are finite iterate sums, $dots$ of functions in $A$ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $



    Now, depending on or definition of elementary function, if you take $A= {1, x, exp, log, x^a }$ you should be done.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      Here is a proof that there is no such function und elementary function.



      Let $A$ be a collection of functions which grow slower than the collection $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.



      We know that the sum, product composition and integral of functions which grow slower than $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.



      Then the set of functions which are finite iterate sums, $dots$ of functions in $A$ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $



      Now, depending on or definition of elementary function, if you take $A= {1, x, exp, log, x^a }$ you should be done.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        Here is a proof that there is no such function und elementary function.



        Let $A$ be a collection of functions which grow slower than the collection $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.



        We know that the sum, product composition and integral of functions which grow slower than $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.



        Then the set of functions which are finite iterate sums, $dots$ of functions in $A$ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $



        Now, depending on or definition of elementary function, if you take $A= {1, x, exp, log, x^a }$ you should be done.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Here is a proof that there is no such function und elementary function.



        Let $A$ be a collection of functions which grow slower than the collection $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.



        We know that the sum, product composition and integral of functions which grow slower than $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $.



        Then the set of functions which are finite iterate sums, $dots$ of functions in $A$ also grows slower that $e^x, e^{e^x} , dots $



        Now, depending on or definition of elementary function, if you take $A= {1, x, exp, log, x^a }$ you should be done.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 15 '16 at 13:58









        user60589user60589

        2,2971815




        2,2971815






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1892870%2fa-function-that-grows-faster-than-any-function-in-the-sequence-ex-eex-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith