What happened to Nicolas Flamel's wife in The Crimes of Grindelwald?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
7
down vote

favorite












From Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone:




There have been many reports of the Philosopher's Stone over the centuries,
but the only Stone currently in existence belongs to Mr. Nicolas Flamel,
the noted alchemist and opera lover. Mr. Flamel, who celebrated his six
hundred and sixty-fifth birthday last year, enjoys a quiet life in Devon
with his wife, Perenelle (six hundred and fifty-eight).




Yet in Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, he clearly lives alone.



What happened to his wife?






harry-potter fantastic-beasts the-crimes-of-grindelwald







share|improve this question




















  • 5




    He clearly lives alone? What makes you say that? Just because we don’t see Perenelle in the two minutes Nicolas is there doesn’t mean she doesn’t live there. She may be at the market, or just upstairs resting.
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    10 hours ago










  • As @JanusBahsJacquet says, I don’t see that he clearly lives alone. Just because his wife isn’t on screen doesn’t mean she’s not around.
    – Notts90
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    @Edlothiad care to answer scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/198871/…?
    – TheAsh
    7 hours ago

















up vote
7
down vote

favorite












From Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone:




There have been many reports of the Philosopher's Stone over the centuries,
but the only Stone currently in existence belongs to Mr. Nicolas Flamel,
the noted alchemist and opera lover. Mr. Flamel, who celebrated his six
hundred and sixty-fifth birthday last year, enjoys a quiet life in Devon
with his wife, Perenelle (six hundred and fifty-eight).




Yet in Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, he clearly lives alone.



What happened to his wife?






harry-potter fantastic-beasts the-crimes-of-grindelwald







share|improve this question




















  • 5




    He clearly lives alone? What makes you say that? Just because we don’t see Perenelle in the two minutes Nicolas is there doesn’t mean she doesn’t live there. She may be at the market, or just upstairs resting.
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    10 hours ago










  • As @JanusBahsJacquet says, I don’t see that he clearly lives alone. Just because his wife isn’t on screen doesn’t mean she’s not around.
    – Notts90
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    @Edlothiad care to answer scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/198871/…?
    – TheAsh
    7 hours ago













up vote
7
down vote

favorite









up vote
7
down vote

favorite











From Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone:




There have been many reports of the Philosopher's Stone over the centuries,
but the only Stone currently in existence belongs to Mr. Nicolas Flamel,
the noted alchemist and opera lover. Mr. Flamel, who celebrated his six
hundred and sixty-fifth birthday last year, enjoys a quiet life in Devon
with his wife, Perenelle (six hundred and fifty-eight).




Yet in Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, he clearly lives alone.



What happened to his wife?






harry-potter fantastic-beasts the-crimes-of-grindelwald







share|improve this question















From Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone:




There have been many reports of the Philosopher's Stone over the centuries,
but the only Stone currently in existence belongs to Mr. Nicolas Flamel,
the noted alchemist and opera lover. Mr. Flamel, who celebrated his six
hundred and sixty-fifth birthday last year, enjoys a quiet life in Devon
with his wife, Perenelle (six hundred and fifty-eight).




Yet in Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, he clearly lives alone.



What happened to his wife?






harry-potter fantastic-beasts the-crimes-of-grindelwald




harry-potter fantastic-beasts the-crimes-of-grindelwald






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









SQB

25.3k24136238




25.3k24136238










asked 21 hours ago









TheAsh

8,808444108




8,808444108








  • 5




    He clearly lives alone? What makes you say that? Just because we don’t see Perenelle in the two minutes Nicolas is there doesn’t mean she doesn’t live there. She may be at the market, or just upstairs resting.
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    10 hours ago










  • As @JanusBahsJacquet says, I don’t see that he clearly lives alone. Just because his wife isn’t on screen doesn’t mean she’s not around.
    – Notts90
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    @Edlothiad care to answer scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/198871/…?
    – TheAsh
    7 hours ago














  • 5




    He clearly lives alone? What makes you say that? Just because we don’t see Perenelle in the two minutes Nicolas is there doesn’t mean she doesn’t live there. She may be at the market, or just upstairs resting.
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    10 hours ago










  • As @JanusBahsJacquet says, I don’t see that he clearly lives alone. Just because his wife isn’t on screen doesn’t mean she’s not around.
    – Notts90
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    @Edlothiad care to answer scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/198871/…?
    – TheAsh
    7 hours ago








5




5




He clearly lives alone? What makes you say that? Just because we don’t see Perenelle in the two minutes Nicolas is there doesn’t mean she doesn’t live there. She may be at the market, or just upstairs resting.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
10 hours ago




He clearly lives alone? What makes you say that? Just because we don’t see Perenelle in the two minutes Nicolas is there doesn’t mean she doesn’t live there. She may be at the market, or just upstairs resting.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
10 hours ago












As @JanusBahsJacquet says, I don’t see that he clearly lives alone. Just because his wife isn’t on screen doesn’t mean she’s not around.
– Notts90
8 hours ago




As @JanusBahsJacquet says, I don’t see that he clearly lives alone. Just because his wife isn’t on screen doesn’t mean she’s not around.
– Notts90
8 hours ago




1




1




@Edlothiad care to answer scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/198871/…?
– TheAsh
7 hours ago




@Edlothiad care to answer scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/198871/…?
– TheAsh
7 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
27
down vote













Based on what we know about Flamel (loves opera, has a residence in Devon at some point), it's certainly possible that this house in Central Paris is a pied-à-terre, a small house that he and his wife keep for the purposes of visiting the city and where Flamel can conduct his alchemical experiments without disturbing his neighbours.




FLAMEL: I’m afraid we keep no food in the house.



The Crimes of Grindelwald - Original Screenplay




That being the case, his wife is presumably still in Devon. Dumbledore told him to drop by to make the place ready to receive visitors in an emergency, hence his arrival.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    20
    down vote













    Flamel says ‘we keep no food’, the ‘we’ possibly refers to his wife.



    Those Flamel’s wife is never shown or mentioned in Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, at one point Flamel tells Jacob that ‘we keep no food in the house’, which implies that there’s more that one person living in the house, otherwise it’d make more sense for him to use the pronoun ‘I’.




    A figure appears behind JACOB. Six-hundred-year-old NICOLAS FLAMEL stands at the entrance to his alchemist’s studio.



    FLAMEL

    I’m afraid we keep no food in the house.
    - Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (The Original Screenplay)




    It’s possible that this means his wife does live there, but just isn’t seen there for some reason.






    share|improve this answer





















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "186"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198868%2fwhat-happened-to-nicolas-flamels-wife-in-the-crimes-of-grindelwald%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      27
      down vote













      Based on what we know about Flamel (loves opera, has a residence in Devon at some point), it's certainly possible that this house in Central Paris is a pied-à-terre, a small house that he and his wife keep for the purposes of visiting the city and where Flamel can conduct his alchemical experiments without disturbing his neighbours.




      FLAMEL: I’m afraid we keep no food in the house.



      The Crimes of Grindelwald - Original Screenplay




      That being the case, his wife is presumably still in Devon. Dumbledore told him to drop by to make the place ready to receive visitors in an emergency, hence his arrival.






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        27
        down vote













        Based on what we know about Flamel (loves opera, has a residence in Devon at some point), it's certainly possible that this house in Central Paris is a pied-à-terre, a small house that he and his wife keep for the purposes of visiting the city and where Flamel can conduct his alchemical experiments without disturbing his neighbours.




        FLAMEL: I’m afraid we keep no food in the house.



        The Crimes of Grindelwald - Original Screenplay




        That being the case, his wife is presumably still in Devon. Dumbledore told him to drop by to make the place ready to receive visitors in an emergency, hence his arrival.






        share|improve this answer























          up vote
          27
          down vote










          up vote
          27
          down vote









          Based on what we know about Flamel (loves opera, has a residence in Devon at some point), it's certainly possible that this house in Central Paris is a pied-à-terre, a small house that he and his wife keep for the purposes of visiting the city and where Flamel can conduct his alchemical experiments without disturbing his neighbours.




          FLAMEL: I’m afraid we keep no food in the house.



          The Crimes of Grindelwald - Original Screenplay




          That being the case, his wife is presumably still in Devon. Dumbledore told him to drop by to make the place ready to receive visitors in an emergency, hence his arrival.






          share|improve this answer












          Based on what we know about Flamel (loves opera, has a residence in Devon at some point), it's certainly possible that this house in Central Paris is a pied-à-terre, a small house that he and his wife keep for the purposes of visiting the city and where Flamel can conduct his alchemical experiments without disturbing his neighbours.




          FLAMEL: I’m afraid we keep no food in the house.



          The Crimes of Grindelwald - Original Screenplay




          That being the case, his wife is presumably still in Devon. Dumbledore told him to drop by to make the place ready to receive visitors in an emergency, hence his arrival.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 21 hours ago









          Valorum

          387k10028143046




          387k10028143046
























              up vote
              20
              down vote













              Flamel says ‘we keep no food’, the ‘we’ possibly refers to his wife.



              Those Flamel’s wife is never shown or mentioned in Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, at one point Flamel tells Jacob that ‘we keep no food in the house’, which implies that there’s more that one person living in the house, otherwise it’d make more sense for him to use the pronoun ‘I’.




              A figure appears behind JACOB. Six-hundred-year-old NICOLAS FLAMEL stands at the entrance to his alchemist’s studio.



              FLAMEL

              I’m afraid we keep no food in the house.
              - Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (The Original Screenplay)




              It’s possible that this means his wife does live there, but just isn’t seen there for some reason.






              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                20
                down vote













                Flamel says ‘we keep no food’, the ‘we’ possibly refers to his wife.



                Those Flamel’s wife is never shown or mentioned in Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, at one point Flamel tells Jacob that ‘we keep no food in the house’, which implies that there’s more that one person living in the house, otherwise it’d make more sense for him to use the pronoun ‘I’.




                A figure appears behind JACOB. Six-hundred-year-old NICOLAS FLAMEL stands at the entrance to his alchemist’s studio.



                FLAMEL

                I’m afraid we keep no food in the house.
                - Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (The Original Screenplay)




                It’s possible that this means his wife does live there, but just isn’t seen there for some reason.






                share|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  20
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  20
                  down vote









                  Flamel says ‘we keep no food’, the ‘we’ possibly refers to his wife.



                  Those Flamel’s wife is never shown or mentioned in Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, at one point Flamel tells Jacob that ‘we keep no food in the house’, which implies that there’s more that one person living in the house, otherwise it’d make more sense for him to use the pronoun ‘I’.




                  A figure appears behind JACOB. Six-hundred-year-old NICOLAS FLAMEL stands at the entrance to his alchemist’s studio.



                  FLAMEL

                  I’m afraid we keep no food in the house.
                  - Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (The Original Screenplay)




                  It’s possible that this means his wife does live there, but just isn’t seen there for some reason.






                  share|improve this answer












                  Flamel says ‘we keep no food’, the ‘we’ possibly refers to his wife.



                  Those Flamel’s wife is never shown or mentioned in Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, at one point Flamel tells Jacob that ‘we keep no food in the house’, which implies that there’s more that one person living in the house, otherwise it’d make more sense for him to use the pronoun ‘I’.




                  A figure appears behind JACOB. Six-hundred-year-old NICOLAS FLAMEL stands at the entrance to his alchemist’s studio.



                  FLAMEL

                  I’m afraid we keep no food in the house.
                  - Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (The Original Screenplay)




                  It’s possible that this means his wife does live there, but just isn’t seen there for some reason.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 21 hours ago









                  Bellatrix

                  65.2k11294331




                  65.2k11294331






























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded



















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198868%2fwhat-happened-to-nicolas-flamels-wife-in-the-crimes-of-grindelwald%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                      Image
                      28 6 $begingroup$ Per the Font of Magic feature, sorcerer can use Flexible Casting to create 5th-level spell slots at level 7, even though they are not typically available until level 9. You can transform unexpended sorcery points into one spell slot as a bonus action on your turn. The Creating Spell Slots table shows the cost of creating a spell slot of [5th level is 7] If such a sorcerer levels up while still having this 5th-level spell slot, can they choose a 5th-level spell as the spell they gain upon levelling up? The Spellcasting feature states: Additionally, when you gain a level in this class, you can choose one of the sorcerer spells you know and replace it with another spell from the sorcerer spell list, which also must be of a level for which you have spell slots.
                      Read more

                      Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

                      Image
                      up vote 13 down vote favorite 1 After the 2018 errata, the disintegrate spell description now reads: A creature targeted by this spell must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, the target takes 10d6 + 40 force damage. The target is disintegrated if this damage leaves it with 0 hit points. If you were to polymorph an enemy into a rat and then disintegrate it, would the enemy be disintegrated or would it just return to its original form? I know that for Druids, it’s not an instant kill anymore, but is this the case for polymorph as well? dnd-5e spells polymorph errata share | improve this question edited 18 hours ago
                      Read more

                      A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$

                      Image
                      3 3 $begingroup$ Recently, I saw a construction of topological invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$ with $ngeq 2$ : $$ N=frac{1}{24pi^2}int_{S^3} d^3x epsilon^{ijk} Tr[(U^{-1}partial_{x_i}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_j}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_k}U)] , $$ where $Uin U(n)$ depends on $boldsymbol{x}=(x_1,x_2,x_3)in S^3$ , $epsilon^{ijk}$ is the Levi-Civita symbol, $i,j,k=1,2,3$ , and the duplicated indexes are summed over. It is claimed that $N$ is an integer, but why? Update 02/02/2019 I think I got an argument for $n=2$ . In this case, $U=e^{i varphi} q$ with $qin SU(2)$ . Due to the trace and the Levi-Civita symbol in $N$ , $varphi$ does not contribute to $N$ . As $Tr[q^{dagger}partial_i q]=0$ and $(q^{dagger}partial_i q)^{dagger}=-q^{dagger}partial_i q$ , $q^{dagger}partial_i q$ in geneeral has the form $q^{dagger}partia
                      Read more