Proving $ A_i $ and $ A_j $ are independent events
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I toss a fair coin $ 10 $ times. $ A_i (i = 1,2,dots,9) $ is the event of the same result in the $ i $ and $ i + 1 $ toss. How do I prove that for every $ i not = j $ the events $ A_i, A_j $ are independent?
I understand that in order to prove the independent of those two events I need to prove that $$ P(A_i | A_j) = P(A_i) P(A_j) $$
I guess I can conut on the fact that $ i, i+1 $ are indepedent events because it is a fair coin. so $ P(A_i) = P(A_j) = frac{1}{2} $ because I can have whatever result I want in the first toss and then I need the same results in the second. so
$$ P(A_j|A_i) = frac{P(A_jcap A_i)}{P(A_i)} = frac{frac{1}{2}^3}{frac{1}{2}} = frac{1}{4} = P(A_i)P(A_j) $$
But what if for example $ i =1 , j = 2 $ it means I should have the same result only in the first, second and third toss and then $ P(A_j | A_i) not = P(A_i)P(A_j) $
am I correct?
probability conditional-probability
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I toss a fair coin $ 10 $ times. $ A_i (i = 1,2,dots,9) $ is the event of the same result in the $ i $ and $ i + 1 $ toss. How do I prove that for every $ i not = j $ the events $ A_i, A_j $ are independent?
I understand that in order to prove the independent of those two events I need to prove that $$ P(A_i | A_j) = P(A_i) P(A_j) $$
I guess I can conut on the fact that $ i, i+1 $ are indepedent events because it is a fair coin. so $ P(A_i) = P(A_j) = frac{1}{2} $ because I can have whatever result I want in the first toss and then I need the same results in the second. so
$$ P(A_j|A_i) = frac{P(A_jcap A_i)}{P(A_i)} = frac{frac{1}{2}^3}{frac{1}{2}} = frac{1}{4} = P(A_i)P(A_j) $$
But what if for example $ i =1 , j = 2 $ it means I should have the same result only in the first, second and third toss and then $ P(A_j | A_i) not = P(A_i)P(A_j) $
am I correct?
probability conditional-probability
you nts that $mathsf{P}(A_icap A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)mathsf{P}(A_j)$ or $mathsf{P}(A_imid A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)$...
– d.k.o.
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I toss a fair coin $ 10 $ times. $ A_i (i = 1,2,dots,9) $ is the event of the same result in the $ i $ and $ i + 1 $ toss. How do I prove that for every $ i not = j $ the events $ A_i, A_j $ are independent?
I understand that in order to prove the independent of those two events I need to prove that $$ P(A_i | A_j) = P(A_i) P(A_j) $$
I guess I can conut on the fact that $ i, i+1 $ are indepedent events because it is a fair coin. so $ P(A_i) = P(A_j) = frac{1}{2} $ because I can have whatever result I want in the first toss and then I need the same results in the second. so
$$ P(A_j|A_i) = frac{P(A_jcap A_i)}{P(A_i)} = frac{frac{1}{2}^3}{frac{1}{2}} = frac{1}{4} = P(A_i)P(A_j) $$
But what if for example $ i =1 , j = 2 $ it means I should have the same result only in the first, second and third toss and then $ P(A_j | A_i) not = P(A_i)P(A_j) $
am I correct?
probability conditional-probability
I toss a fair coin $ 10 $ times. $ A_i (i = 1,2,dots,9) $ is the event of the same result in the $ i $ and $ i + 1 $ toss. How do I prove that for every $ i not = j $ the events $ A_i, A_j $ are independent?
I understand that in order to prove the independent of those two events I need to prove that $$ P(A_i | A_j) = P(A_i) P(A_j) $$
I guess I can conut on the fact that $ i, i+1 $ are indepedent events because it is a fair coin. so $ P(A_i) = P(A_j) = frac{1}{2} $ because I can have whatever result I want in the first toss and then I need the same results in the second. so
$$ P(A_j|A_i) = frac{P(A_jcap A_i)}{P(A_i)} = frac{frac{1}{2}^3}{frac{1}{2}} = frac{1}{4} = P(A_i)P(A_j) $$
But what if for example $ i =1 , j = 2 $ it means I should have the same result only in the first, second and third toss and then $ P(A_j | A_i) not = P(A_i)P(A_j) $
am I correct?
probability conditional-probability
probability conditional-probability
asked 9 hours ago
bm1125
54916
54916
you nts that $mathsf{P}(A_icap A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)mathsf{P}(A_j)$ or $mathsf{P}(A_imid A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)$...
– d.k.o.
9 hours ago
add a comment |
you nts that $mathsf{P}(A_icap A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)mathsf{P}(A_j)$ or $mathsf{P}(A_imid A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)$...
– d.k.o.
9 hours ago
you nts that $mathsf{P}(A_icap A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)mathsf{P}(A_j)$ or $mathsf{P}(A_imid A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)$...
– d.k.o.
9 hours ago
you nts that $mathsf{P}(A_icap A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)mathsf{P}(A_j)$ or $mathsf{P}(A_imid A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)$...
– d.k.o.
9 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$P(A_1cap A_2)=frac 1 8 +frac 1 8=frac 1 4$ and $P(A_1)=P(A_2)=frac 1 2$ so $A_1$ and $A_2$ are independent.
Hey thanks for your answer. Can you explain just why $ P(A_1 cap A_2) = frac{1}{8} + frac{1}{8} $ I'm not sure what am I missing..
– bm1125
9 hours ago
1
Probability of all three heads is $frac 1 8$ and probability of all three tails is also $frac 1 8$. You have to add these to get probability of $A_1cap A_2$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Two events are independent if
begin{equation}
P(Acap B) = P(A)P(B).
end{equation}
Alterativelly if
begin{equation}
P(A| B) = P(A).
end{equation}
Also $P(A_j cap A_i) =frac{1}{4} iff i+1=j.
Thanks for the answer, Let me make sure I understand $ P(A_j cap A_i) $ is the probability of having the same result in four tosses? Shouldn't it be $ frac{1}{2}^3 $ then? Because I can have whatever result on the first throw and then the next three throws should have the same result. What am I missing?
– bm1125
9 hours ago
1
I thought that $i+1 = j$, my mistake :) In general it's $frac{1}{8}$, but when $j=i+1$ then it's $frac{1}{4}$
– vermator
9 hours ago
No, you are right. I specifically asked about the case of $ i+1 = j $ . Thanks for clarifying!
– bm1125
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
You are asked to prove that for $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are pairwise independent.
In this answer I go for a stronger result: $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are mutually independent.
See here for the difference.
Work in probability space $(Omega,wp(Omega),P)$ where: $$Omega={H,T}^{10}={(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})mid omega_iin{H,T}text{ for every }iin{1,dots,10}}$$and $P({omega})=2^{-10}$ for every $omegainOmega$.
Let $E_iin{A_i,A_i^{complement}}$ for $i=1,dots,9$.
Every $omega=(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})in E_1capcdotscap E_9$ is completely determined by $omega_1$ so that $E_1capcdotscap E_9$ contains exactly $2$ elements of $Omega$.
So $P(E_1capcdotscap E_9)=2cdot2^{-10}=2^{-9}=P(E_1)timescdotstimes P(E_{9})$
This allows the conclusion that $A_1,dots,A_9$ are mutually independent.
Consequently $A_1,dots,A_9$ are also pairwise independent.
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$P(A_1cap A_2)=frac 1 8 +frac 1 8=frac 1 4$ and $P(A_1)=P(A_2)=frac 1 2$ so $A_1$ and $A_2$ are independent.
Hey thanks for your answer. Can you explain just why $ P(A_1 cap A_2) = frac{1}{8} + frac{1}{8} $ I'm not sure what am I missing..
– bm1125
9 hours ago
1
Probability of all three heads is $frac 1 8$ and probability of all three tails is also $frac 1 8$. You have to add these to get probability of $A_1cap A_2$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$P(A_1cap A_2)=frac 1 8 +frac 1 8=frac 1 4$ and $P(A_1)=P(A_2)=frac 1 2$ so $A_1$ and $A_2$ are independent.
Hey thanks for your answer. Can you explain just why $ P(A_1 cap A_2) = frac{1}{8} + frac{1}{8} $ I'm not sure what am I missing..
– bm1125
9 hours ago
1
Probability of all three heads is $frac 1 8$ and probability of all three tails is also $frac 1 8$. You have to add these to get probability of $A_1cap A_2$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$P(A_1cap A_2)=frac 1 8 +frac 1 8=frac 1 4$ and $P(A_1)=P(A_2)=frac 1 2$ so $A_1$ and $A_2$ are independent.
$P(A_1cap A_2)=frac 1 8 +frac 1 8=frac 1 4$ and $P(A_1)=P(A_2)=frac 1 2$ so $A_1$ and $A_2$ are independent.
answered 9 hours ago
Kavi Rama Murthy
39.9k31750
39.9k31750
Hey thanks for your answer. Can you explain just why $ P(A_1 cap A_2) = frac{1}{8} + frac{1}{8} $ I'm not sure what am I missing..
– bm1125
9 hours ago
1
Probability of all three heads is $frac 1 8$ and probability of all three tails is also $frac 1 8$. You have to add these to get probability of $A_1cap A_2$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Hey thanks for your answer. Can you explain just why $ P(A_1 cap A_2) = frac{1}{8} + frac{1}{8} $ I'm not sure what am I missing..
– bm1125
9 hours ago
1
Probability of all three heads is $frac 1 8$ and probability of all three tails is also $frac 1 8$. You have to add these to get probability of $A_1cap A_2$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
9 hours ago
Hey thanks for your answer. Can you explain just why $ P(A_1 cap A_2) = frac{1}{8} + frac{1}{8} $ I'm not sure what am I missing..
– bm1125
9 hours ago
Hey thanks for your answer. Can you explain just why $ P(A_1 cap A_2) = frac{1}{8} + frac{1}{8} $ I'm not sure what am I missing..
– bm1125
9 hours ago
1
1
Probability of all three heads is $frac 1 8$ and probability of all three tails is also $frac 1 8$. You have to add these to get probability of $A_1cap A_2$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
9 hours ago
Probability of all three heads is $frac 1 8$ and probability of all three tails is also $frac 1 8$. You have to add these to get probability of $A_1cap A_2$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Two events are independent if
begin{equation}
P(Acap B) = P(A)P(B).
end{equation}
Alterativelly if
begin{equation}
P(A| B) = P(A).
end{equation}
Also $P(A_j cap A_i) =frac{1}{4} iff i+1=j.
Thanks for the answer, Let me make sure I understand $ P(A_j cap A_i) $ is the probability of having the same result in four tosses? Shouldn't it be $ frac{1}{2}^3 $ then? Because I can have whatever result on the first throw and then the next three throws should have the same result. What am I missing?
– bm1125
9 hours ago
1
I thought that $i+1 = j$, my mistake :) In general it's $frac{1}{8}$, but when $j=i+1$ then it's $frac{1}{4}$
– vermator
9 hours ago
No, you are right. I specifically asked about the case of $ i+1 = j $ . Thanks for clarifying!
– bm1125
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Two events are independent if
begin{equation}
P(Acap B) = P(A)P(B).
end{equation}
Alterativelly if
begin{equation}
P(A| B) = P(A).
end{equation}
Also $P(A_j cap A_i) =frac{1}{4} iff i+1=j.
Thanks for the answer, Let me make sure I understand $ P(A_j cap A_i) $ is the probability of having the same result in four tosses? Shouldn't it be $ frac{1}{2}^3 $ then? Because I can have whatever result on the first throw and then the next three throws should have the same result. What am I missing?
– bm1125
9 hours ago
1
I thought that $i+1 = j$, my mistake :) In general it's $frac{1}{8}$, but when $j=i+1$ then it's $frac{1}{4}$
– vermator
9 hours ago
No, you are right. I specifically asked about the case of $ i+1 = j $ . Thanks for clarifying!
– bm1125
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Two events are independent if
begin{equation}
P(Acap B) = P(A)P(B).
end{equation}
Alterativelly if
begin{equation}
P(A| B) = P(A).
end{equation}
Also $P(A_j cap A_i) =frac{1}{4} iff i+1=j.
Two events are independent if
begin{equation}
P(Acap B) = P(A)P(B).
end{equation}
Alterativelly if
begin{equation}
P(A| B) = P(A).
end{equation}
Also $P(A_j cap A_i) =frac{1}{4} iff i+1=j.
edited 9 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
vermator
464
464
Thanks for the answer, Let me make sure I understand $ P(A_j cap A_i) $ is the probability of having the same result in four tosses? Shouldn't it be $ frac{1}{2}^3 $ then? Because I can have whatever result on the first throw and then the next three throws should have the same result. What am I missing?
– bm1125
9 hours ago
1
I thought that $i+1 = j$, my mistake :) In general it's $frac{1}{8}$, but when $j=i+1$ then it's $frac{1}{4}$
– vermator
9 hours ago
No, you are right. I specifically asked about the case of $ i+1 = j $ . Thanks for clarifying!
– bm1125
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for the answer, Let me make sure I understand $ P(A_j cap A_i) $ is the probability of having the same result in four tosses? Shouldn't it be $ frac{1}{2}^3 $ then? Because I can have whatever result on the first throw and then the next three throws should have the same result. What am I missing?
– bm1125
9 hours ago
1
I thought that $i+1 = j$, my mistake :) In general it's $frac{1}{8}$, but when $j=i+1$ then it's $frac{1}{4}$
– vermator
9 hours ago
No, you are right. I specifically asked about the case of $ i+1 = j $ . Thanks for clarifying!
– bm1125
9 hours ago
Thanks for the answer, Let me make sure I understand $ P(A_j cap A_i) $ is the probability of having the same result in four tosses? Shouldn't it be $ frac{1}{2}^3 $ then? Because I can have whatever result on the first throw and then the next three throws should have the same result. What am I missing?
– bm1125
9 hours ago
Thanks for the answer, Let me make sure I understand $ P(A_j cap A_i) $ is the probability of having the same result in four tosses? Shouldn't it be $ frac{1}{2}^3 $ then? Because I can have whatever result on the first throw and then the next three throws should have the same result. What am I missing?
– bm1125
9 hours ago
1
1
I thought that $i+1 = j$, my mistake :) In general it's $frac{1}{8}$, but when $j=i+1$ then it's $frac{1}{4}$
– vermator
9 hours ago
I thought that $i+1 = j$, my mistake :) In general it's $frac{1}{8}$, but when $j=i+1$ then it's $frac{1}{4}$
– vermator
9 hours ago
No, you are right. I specifically asked about the case of $ i+1 = j $ . Thanks for clarifying!
– bm1125
9 hours ago
No, you are right. I specifically asked about the case of $ i+1 = j $ . Thanks for clarifying!
– bm1125
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
You are asked to prove that for $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are pairwise independent.
In this answer I go for a stronger result: $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are mutually independent.
See here for the difference.
Work in probability space $(Omega,wp(Omega),P)$ where: $$Omega={H,T}^{10}={(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})mid omega_iin{H,T}text{ for every }iin{1,dots,10}}$$and $P({omega})=2^{-10}$ for every $omegainOmega$.
Let $E_iin{A_i,A_i^{complement}}$ for $i=1,dots,9$.
Every $omega=(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})in E_1capcdotscap E_9$ is completely determined by $omega_1$ so that $E_1capcdotscap E_9$ contains exactly $2$ elements of $Omega$.
So $P(E_1capcdotscap E_9)=2cdot2^{-10}=2^{-9}=P(E_1)timescdotstimes P(E_{9})$
This allows the conclusion that $A_1,dots,A_9$ are mutually independent.
Consequently $A_1,dots,A_9$ are also pairwise independent.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
You are asked to prove that for $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are pairwise independent.
In this answer I go for a stronger result: $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are mutually independent.
See here for the difference.
Work in probability space $(Omega,wp(Omega),P)$ where: $$Omega={H,T}^{10}={(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})mid omega_iin{H,T}text{ for every }iin{1,dots,10}}$$and $P({omega})=2^{-10}$ for every $omegainOmega$.
Let $E_iin{A_i,A_i^{complement}}$ for $i=1,dots,9$.
Every $omega=(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})in E_1capcdotscap E_9$ is completely determined by $omega_1$ so that $E_1capcdotscap E_9$ contains exactly $2$ elements of $Omega$.
So $P(E_1capcdotscap E_9)=2cdot2^{-10}=2^{-9}=P(E_1)timescdotstimes P(E_{9})$
This allows the conclusion that $A_1,dots,A_9$ are mutually independent.
Consequently $A_1,dots,A_9$ are also pairwise independent.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
You are asked to prove that for $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are pairwise independent.
In this answer I go for a stronger result: $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are mutually independent.
See here for the difference.
Work in probability space $(Omega,wp(Omega),P)$ where: $$Omega={H,T}^{10}={(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})mid omega_iin{H,T}text{ for every }iin{1,dots,10}}$$and $P({omega})=2^{-10}$ for every $omegainOmega$.
Let $E_iin{A_i,A_i^{complement}}$ for $i=1,dots,9$.
Every $omega=(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})in E_1capcdotscap E_9$ is completely determined by $omega_1$ so that $E_1capcdotscap E_9$ contains exactly $2$ elements of $Omega$.
So $P(E_1capcdotscap E_9)=2cdot2^{-10}=2^{-9}=P(E_1)timescdotstimes P(E_{9})$
This allows the conclusion that $A_1,dots,A_9$ are mutually independent.
Consequently $A_1,dots,A_9$ are also pairwise independent.
You are asked to prove that for $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are pairwise independent.
In this answer I go for a stronger result: $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are mutually independent.
See here for the difference.
Work in probability space $(Omega,wp(Omega),P)$ where: $$Omega={H,T}^{10}={(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})mid omega_iin{H,T}text{ for every }iin{1,dots,10}}$$and $P({omega})=2^{-10}$ for every $omegainOmega$.
Let $E_iin{A_i,A_i^{complement}}$ for $i=1,dots,9$.
Every $omega=(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})in E_1capcdotscap E_9$ is completely determined by $omega_1$ so that $E_1capcdotscap E_9$ contains exactly $2$ elements of $Omega$.
So $P(E_1capcdotscap E_9)=2cdot2^{-10}=2^{-9}=P(E_1)timescdotstimes P(E_{9})$
This allows the conclusion that $A_1,dots,A_9$ are mutually independent.
Consequently $A_1,dots,A_9$ are also pairwise independent.
edited 8 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
drhab
94.2k543125
94.2k543125
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004699%2fproving-a-i-and-a-j-are-independent-events%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
you nts that $mathsf{P}(A_icap A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)mathsf{P}(A_j)$ or $mathsf{P}(A_imid A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)$...
– d.k.o.
9 hours ago