Proving $ A_i $ and $ A_j $ are independent events











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I toss a fair coin $ 10 $ times. $ A_i (i = 1,2,dots,9) $ is the event of the same result in the $ i $ and $ i + 1 $ toss. How do I prove that for every $ i not = j $ the events $ A_i, A_j $ are independent?



I understand that in order to prove the independent of those two events I need to prove that $$ P(A_i | A_j) = P(A_i) P(A_j) $$



I guess I can conut on the fact that $ i, i+1 $ are indepedent events because it is a fair coin. so $ P(A_i) = P(A_j) = frac{1}{2} $ because I can have whatever result I want in the first toss and then I need the same results in the second. so



$$ P(A_j|A_i) = frac{P(A_jcap A_i)}{P(A_i)} = frac{frac{1}{2}^3}{frac{1}{2}} = frac{1}{4} = P(A_i)P(A_j) $$



But what if for example $ i =1 , j = 2 $ it means I should have the same result only in the first, second and third toss and then $ P(A_j | A_i) not = P(A_i)P(A_j) $



am I correct?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • you nts that $mathsf{P}(A_icap A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)mathsf{P}(A_j)$ or $mathsf{P}(A_imid A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)$...
    – d.k.o.
    9 hours ago















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I toss a fair coin $ 10 $ times. $ A_i (i = 1,2,dots,9) $ is the event of the same result in the $ i $ and $ i + 1 $ toss. How do I prove that for every $ i not = j $ the events $ A_i, A_j $ are independent?



I understand that in order to prove the independent of those two events I need to prove that $$ P(A_i | A_j) = P(A_i) P(A_j) $$



I guess I can conut on the fact that $ i, i+1 $ are indepedent events because it is a fair coin. so $ P(A_i) = P(A_j) = frac{1}{2} $ because I can have whatever result I want in the first toss and then I need the same results in the second. so



$$ P(A_j|A_i) = frac{P(A_jcap A_i)}{P(A_i)} = frac{frac{1}{2}^3}{frac{1}{2}} = frac{1}{4} = P(A_i)P(A_j) $$



But what if for example $ i =1 , j = 2 $ it means I should have the same result only in the first, second and third toss and then $ P(A_j | A_i) not = P(A_i)P(A_j) $



am I correct?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • you nts that $mathsf{P}(A_icap A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)mathsf{P}(A_j)$ or $mathsf{P}(A_imid A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)$...
    – d.k.o.
    9 hours ago













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I toss a fair coin $ 10 $ times. $ A_i (i = 1,2,dots,9) $ is the event of the same result in the $ i $ and $ i + 1 $ toss. How do I prove that for every $ i not = j $ the events $ A_i, A_j $ are independent?



I understand that in order to prove the independent of those two events I need to prove that $$ P(A_i | A_j) = P(A_i) P(A_j) $$



I guess I can conut on the fact that $ i, i+1 $ are indepedent events because it is a fair coin. so $ P(A_i) = P(A_j) = frac{1}{2} $ because I can have whatever result I want in the first toss and then I need the same results in the second. so



$$ P(A_j|A_i) = frac{P(A_jcap A_i)}{P(A_i)} = frac{frac{1}{2}^3}{frac{1}{2}} = frac{1}{4} = P(A_i)P(A_j) $$



But what if for example $ i =1 , j = 2 $ it means I should have the same result only in the first, second and third toss and then $ P(A_j | A_i) not = P(A_i)P(A_j) $



am I correct?










share|cite|improve this question













I toss a fair coin $ 10 $ times. $ A_i (i = 1,2,dots,9) $ is the event of the same result in the $ i $ and $ i + 1 $ toss. How do I prove that for every $ i not = j $ the events $ A_i, A_j $ are independent?



I understand that in order to prove the independent of those two events I need to prove that $$ P(A_i | A_j) = P(A_i) P(A_j) $$



I guess I can conut on the fact that $ i, i+1 $ are indepedent events because it is a fair coin. so $ P(A_i) = P(A_j) = frac{1}{2} $ because I can have whatever result I want in the first toss and then I need the same results in the second. so



$$ P(A_j|A_i) = frac{P(A_jcap A_i)}{P(A_i)} = frac{frac{1}{2}^3}{frac{1}{2}} = frac{1}{4} = P(A_i)P(A_j) $$



But what if for example $ i =1 , j = 2 $ it means I should have the same result only in the first, second and third toss and then $ P(A_j | A_i) not = P(A_i)P(A_j) $



am I correct?







probability conditional-probability






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 9 hours ago









bm1125

54916




54916












  • you nts that $mathsf{P}(A_icap A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)mathsf{P}(A_j)$ or $mathsf{P}(A_imid A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)$...
    – d.k.o.
    9 hours ago


















  • you nts that $mathsf{P}(A_icap A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)mathsf{P}(A_j)$ or $mathsf{P}(A_imid A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)$...
    – d.k.o.
    9 hours ago
















you nts that $mathsf{P}(A_icap A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)mathsf{P}(A_j)$ or $mathsf{P}(A_imid A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)$...
– d.k.o.
9 hours ago




you nts that $mathsf{P}(A_icap A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)mathsf{P}(A_j)$ or $mathsf{P}(A_imid A_j)=mathsf{P}(A_i)$...
– d.k.o.
9 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










$P(A_1cap A_2)=frac 1 8 +frac 1 8=frac 1 4$ and $P(A_1)=P(A_2)=frac 1 2$ so $A_1$ and $A_2$ are independent.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Hey thanks for your answer. Can you explain just why $ P(A_1 cap A_2) = frac{1}{8} + frac{1}{8} $ I'm not sure what am I missing..
    – bm1125
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    Probability of all three heads is $frac 1 8$ and probability of all three tails is also $frac 1 8$. You have to add these to get probability of $A_1cap A_2$.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    9 hours ago




















up vote
1
down vote













Two events are independent if
begin{equation}
P(Acap B) = P(A)P(B).
end{equation}



Alterativelly if
begin{equation}
P(A| B) = P(A).
end{equation}

Also $P(A_j cap A_i) =frac{1}{4} iff i+1=j.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks for the answer, Let me make sure I understand $ P(A_j cap A_i) $ is the probability of having the same result in four tosses? Shouldn't it be $ frac{1}{2}^3 $ then? Because I can have whatever result on the first throw and then the next three throws should have the same result. What am I missing?
    – bm1125
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    I thought that $i+1 = j$, my mistake :) In general it's $frac{1}{8}$, but when $j=i+1$ then it's $frac{1}{4}$
    – vermator
    9 hours ago












  • No, you are right. I specifically asked about the case of $ i+1 = j $ . Thanks for clarifying!
    – bm1125
    9 hours ago


















up vote
1
down vote













You are asked to prove that for $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are pairwise independent.



In this answer I go for a stronger result: $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are mutually independent.



See here for the difference.





Work in probability space $(Omega,wp(Omega),P)$ where: $$Omega={H,T}^{10}={(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})mid omega_iin{H,T}text{ for every }iin{1,dots,10}}$$and $P({omega})=2^{-10}$ for every $omegainOmega$.



Let $E_iin{A_i,A_i^{complement}}$ for $i=1,dots,9$.



Every $omega=(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})in E_1capcdotscap E_9$ is completely determined by $omega_1$ so that $E_1capcdotscap E_9$ contains exactly $2$ elements of $Omega$.



So $P(E_1capcdotscap E_9)=2cdot2^{-10}=2^{-9}=P(E_1)timescdotstimes P(E_{9})$



This allows the conclusion that $A_1,dots,A_9$ are mutually independent.



Consequently $A_1,dots,A_9$ are also pairwise independent.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004699%2fproving-a-i-and-a-j-are-independent-events%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    $P(A_1cap A_2)=frac 1 8 +frac 1 8=frac 1 4$ and $P(A_1)=P(A_2)=frac 1 2$ so $A_1$ and $A_2$ are independent.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Hey thanks for your answer. Can you explain just why $ P(A_1 cap A_2) = frac{1}{8} + frac{1}{8} $ I'm not sure what am I missing..
      – bm1125
      9 hours ago






    • 1




      Probability of all three heads is $frac 1 8$ and probability of all three tails is also $frac 1 8$. You have to add these to get probability of $A_1cap A_2$.
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      9 hours ago

















    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    $P(A_1cap A_2)=frac 1 8 +frac 1 8=frac 1 4$ and $P(A_1)=P(A_2)=frac 1 2$ so $A_1$ and $A_2$ are independent.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Hey thanks for your answer. Can you explain just why $ P(A_1 cap A_2) = frac{1}{8} + frac{1}{8} $ I'm not sure what am I missing..
      – bm1125
      9 hours ago






    • 1




      Probability of all three heads is $frac 1 8$ and probability of all three tails is also $frac 1 8$. You have to add these to get probability of $A_1cap A_2$.
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      9 hours ago















    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted






    $P(A_1cap A_2)=frac 1 8 +frac 1 8=frac 1 4$ and $P(A_1)=P(A_2)=frac 1 2$ so $A_1$ and $A_2$ are independent.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    $P(A_1cap A_2)=frac 1 8 +frac 1 8=frac 1 4$ and $P(A_1)=P(A_2)=frac 1 2$ so $A_1$ and $A_2$ are independent.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 9 hours ago









    Kavi Rama Murthy

    39.9k31750




    39.9k31750












    • Hey thanks for your answer. Can you explain just why $ P(A_1 cap A_2) = frac{1}{8} + frac{1}{8} $ I'm not sure what am I missing..
      – bm1125
      9 hours ago






    • 1




      Probability of all three heads is $frac 1 8$ and probability of all three tails is also $frac 1 8$. You have to add these to get probability of $A_1cap A_2$.
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      9 hours ago




















    • Hey thanks for your answer. Can you explain just why $ P(A_1 cap A_2) = frac{1}{8} + frac{1}{8} $ I'm not sure what am I missing..
      – bm1125
      9 hours ago






    • 1




      Probability of all three heads is $frac 1 8$ and probability of all three tails is also $frac 1 8$. You have to add these to get probability of $A_1cap A_2$.
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      9 hours ago


















    Hey thanks for your answer. Can you explain just why $ P(A_1 cap A_2) = frac{1}{8} + frac{1}{8} $ I'm not sure what am I missing..
    – bm1125
    9 hours ago




    Hey thanks for your answer. Can you explain just why $ P(A_1 cap A_2) = frac{1}{8} + frac{1}{8} $ I'm not sure what am I missing..
    – bm1125
    9 hours ago




    1




    1




    Probability of all three heads is $frac 1 8$ and probability of all three tails is also $frac 1 8$. You have to add these to get probability of $A_1cap A_2$.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    9 hours ago






    Probability of all three heads is $frac 1 8$ and probability of all three tails is also $frac 1 8$. You have to add these to get probability of $A_1cap A_2$.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    9 hours ago












    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Two events are independent if
    begin{equation}
    P(Acap B) = P(A)P(B).
    end{equation}



    Alterativelly if
    begin{equation}
    P(A| B) = P(A).
    end{equation}

    Also $P(A_j cap A_i) =frac{1}{4} iff i+1=j.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Thanks for the answer, Let me make sure I understand $ P(A_j cap A_i) $ is the probability of having the same result in four tosses? Shouldn't it be $ frac{1}{2}^3 $ then? Because I can have whatever result on the first throw and then the next three throws should have the same result. What am I missing?
      – bm1125
      9 hours ago






    • 1




      I thought that $i+1 = j$, my mistake :) In general it's $frac{1}{8}$, but when $j=i+1$ then it's $frac{1}{4}$
      – vermator
      9 hours ago












    • No, you are right. I specifically asked about the case of $ i+1 = j $ . Thanks for clarifying!
      – bm1125
      9 hours ago















    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Two events are independent if
    begin{equation}
    P(Acap B) = P(A)P(B).
    end{equation}



    Alterativelly if
    begin{equation}
    P(A| B) = P(A).
    end{equation}

    Also $P(A_j cap A_i) =frac{1}{4} iff i+1=j.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Thanks for the answer, Let me make sure I understand $ P(A_j cap A_i) $ is the probability of having the same result in four tosses? Shouldn't it be $ frac{1}{2}^3 $ then? Because I can have whatever result on the first throw and then the next three throws should have the same result. What am I missing?
      – bm1125
      9 hours ago






    • 1




      I thought that $i+1 = j$, my mistake :) In general it's $frac{1}{8}$, but when $j=i+1$ then it's $frac{1}{4}$
      – vermator
      9 hours ago












    • No, you are right. I specifically asked about the case of $ i+1 = j $ . Thanks for clarifying!
      – bm1125
      9 hours ago













    up vote
    1
    down vote










    up vote
    1
    down vote









    Two events are independent if
    begin{equation}
    P(Acap B) = P(A)P(B).
    end{equation}



    Alterativelly if
    begin{equation}
    P(A| B) = P(A).
    end{equation}

    Also $P(A_j cap A_i) =frac{1}{4} iff i+1=j.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    Two events are independent if
    begin{equation}
    P(Acap B) = P(A)P(B).
    end{equation}



    Alterativelly if
    begin{equation}
    P(A| B) = P(A).
    end{equation}

    Also $P(A_j cap A_i) =frac{1}{4} iff i+1=j.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 9 hours ago

























    answered 9 hours ago









    vermator

    464




    464












    • Thanks for the answer, Let me make sure I understand $ P(A_j cap A_i) $ is the probability of having the same result in four tosses? Shouldn't it be $ frac{1}{2}^3 $ then? Because I can have whatever result on the first throw and then the next three throws should have the same result. What am I missing?
      – bm1125
      9 hours ago






    • 1




      I thought that $i+1 = j$, my mistake :) In general it's $frac{1}{8}$, but when $j=i+1$ then it's $frac{1}{4}$
      – vermator
      9 hours ago












    • No, you are right. I specifically asked about the case of $ i+1 = j $ . Thanks for clarifying!
      – bm1125
      9 hours ago


















    • Thanks for the answer, Let me make sure I understand $ P(A_j cap A_i) $ is the probability of having the same result in four tosses? Shouldn't it be $ frac{1}{2}^3 $ then? Because I can have whatever result on the first throw and then the next three throws should have the same result. What am I missing?
      – bm1125
      9 hours ago






    • 1




      I thought that $i+1 = j$, my mistake :) In general it's $frac{1}{8}$, but when $j=i+1$ then it's $frac{1}{4}$
      – vermator
      9 hours ago












    • No, you are right. I specifically asked about the case of $ i+1 = j $ . Thanks for clarifying!
      – bm1125
      9 hours ago
















    Thanks for the answer, Let me make sure I understand $ P(A_j cap A_i) $ is the probability of having the same result in four tosses? Shouldn't it be $ frac{1}{2}^3 $ then? Because I can have whatever result on the first throw and then the next three throws should have the same result. What am I missing?
    – bm1125
    9 hours ago




    Thanks for the answer, Let me make sure I understand $ P(A_j cap A_i) $ is the probability of having the same result in four tosses? Shouldn't it be $ frac{1}{2}^3 $ then? Because I can have whatever result on the first throw and then the next three throws should have the same result. What am I missing?
    – bm1125
    9 hours ago




    1




    1




    I thought that $i+1 = j$, my mistake :) In general it's $frac{1}{8}$, but when $j=i+1$ then it's $frac{1}{4}$
    – vermator
    9 hours ago






    I thought that $i+1 = j$, my mistake :) In general it's $frac{1}{8}$, but when $j=i+1$ then it's $frac{1}{4}$
    – vermator
    9 hours ago














    No, you are right. I specifically asked about the case of $ i+1 = j $ . Thanks for clarifying!
    – bm1125
    9 hours ago




    No, you are right. I specifically asked about the case of $ i+1 = j $ . Thanks for clarifying!
    – bm1125
    9 hours ago










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    You are asked to prove that for $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are pairwise independent.



    In this answer I go for a stronger result: $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are mutually independent.



    See here for the difference.





    Work in probability space $(Omega,wp(Omega),P)$ where: $$Omega={H,T}^{10}={(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})mid omega_iin{H,T}text{ for every }iin{1,dots,10}}$$and $P({omega})=2^{-10}$ for every $omegainOmega$.



    Let $E_iin{A_i,A_i^{complement}}$ for $i=1,dots,9$.



    Every $omega=(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})in E_1capcdotscap E_9$ is completely determined by $omega_1$ so that $E_1capcdotscap E_9$ contains exactly $2$ elements of $Omega$.



    So $P(E_1capcdotscap E_9)=2cdot2^{-10}=2^{-9}=P(E_1)timescdotstimes P(E_{9})$



    This allows the conclusion that $A_1,dots,A_9$ are mutually independent.



    Consequently $A_1,dots,A_9$ are also pairwise independent.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      You are asked to prove that for $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are pairwise independent.



      In this answer I go for a stronger result: $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are mutually independent.



      See here for the difference.





      Work in probability space $(Omega,wp(Omega),P)$ where: $$Omega={H,T}^{10}={(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})mid omega_iin{H,T}text{ for every }iin{1,dots,10}}$$and $P({omega})=2^{-10}$ for every $omegainOmega$.



      Let $E_iin{A_i,A_i^{complement}}$ for $i=1,dots,9$.



      Every $omega=(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})in E_1capcdotscap E_9$ is completely determined by $omega_1$ so that $E_1capcdotscap E_9$ contains exactly $2$ elements of $Omega$.



      So $P(E_1capcdotscap E_9)=2cdot2^{-10}=2^{-9}=P(E_1)timescdotstimes P(E_{9})$



      This allows the conclusion that $A_1,dots,A_9$ are mutually independent.



      Consequently $A_1,dots,A_9$ are also pairwise independent.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        You are asked to prove that for $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are pairwise independent.



        In this answer I go for a stronger result: $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are mutually independent.



        See here for the difference.





        Work in probability space $(Omega,wp(Omega),P)$ where: $$Omega={H,T}^{10}={(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})mid omega_iin{H,T}text{ for every }iin{1,dots,10}}$$and $P({omega})=2^{-10}$ for every $omegainOmega$.



        Let $E_iin{A_i,A_i^{complement}}$ for $i=1,dots,9$.



        Every $omega=(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})in E_1capcdotscap E_9$ is completely determined by $omega_1$ so that $E_1capcdotscap E_9$ contains exactly $2$ elements of $Omega$.



        So $P(E_1capcdotscap E_9)=2cdot2^{-10}=2^{-9}=P(E_1)timescdotstimes P(E_{9})$



        This allows the conclusion that $A_1,dots,A_9$ are mutually independent.



        Consequently $A_1,dots,A_9$ are also pairwise independent.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        You are asked to prove that for $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are pairwise independent.



        In this answer I go for a stronger result: $A_1,dots,A_{10}$ are mutually independent.



        See here for the difference.





        Work in probability space $(Omega,wp(Omega),P)$ where: $$Omega={H,T}^{10}={(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})mid omega_iin{H,T}text{ for every }iin{1,dots,10}}$$and $P({omega})=2^{-10}$ for every $omegainOmega$.



        Let $E_iin{A_i,A_i^{complement}}$ for $i=1,dots,9$.



        Every $omega=(omega_1,dots,omega_{10})in E_1capcdotscap E_9$ is completely determined by $omega_1$ so that $E_1capcdotscap E_9$ contains exactly $2$ elements of $Omega$.



        So $P(E_1capcdotscap E_9)=2cdot2^{-10}=2^{-9}=P(E_1)timescdotstimes P(E_{9})$



        This allows the conclusion that $A_1,dots,A_9$ are mutually independent.



        Consequently $A_1,dots,A_9$ are also pairwise independent.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 8 hours ago

























        answered 9 hours ago









        drhab

        94.2k543125




        94.2k543125






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004699%2fproving-a-i-and-a-j-are-independent-events%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

            Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

            A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$