Find the value of Given function?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let, $f(z)$ be analytics in $|z| le 1$ and $|f(z) |le 1$ with $f(0) = frac{1 +i}{sqrt 2}$ . Then find the value of $f(i) -f(1)$



I Thinks it will be $0$ by Liouville theorem.



Is Its correct ??






complex-analysis







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Since Liouville's theorem is for entire functions, I don't see how you plan to apply it here.
    – José Carlos Santos
    yesterday












  • Okkkss sir @jose Carlos santos
    – santosh
    yesterday















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let, $f(z)$ be analytics in $|z| le 1$ and $|f(z) |le 1$ with $f(0) = frac{1 +i}{sqrt 2}$ . Then find the value of $f(i) -f(1)$



I Thinks it will be $0$ by Liouville theorem.



Is Its correct ??






complex-analysis







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Since Liouville's theorem is for entire functions, I don't see how you plan to apply it here.
    – José Carlos Santos
    yesterday












  • Okkkss sir @jose Carlos santos
    – santosh
    yesterday













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Let, $f(z)$ be analytics in $|z| le 1$ and $|f(z) |le 1$ with $f(0) = frac{1 +i}{sqrt 2}$ . Then find the value of $f(i) -f(1)$



I Thinks it will be $0$ by Liouville theorem.



Is Its correct ??






complex-analysis







share|cite|improve this question















Let, $f(z)$ be analytics in $|z| le 1$ and $|f(z) |le 1$ with $f(0) = frac{1 +i}{sqrt 2}$ . Then find the value of $f(i) -f(1)$



I Thinks it will be $0$ by Liouville theorem.



Is Its correct ??






complex-analysis




complex-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Empty

8,03242358




8,03242358










asked yesterday









santosh

898




898








  • 1




    Since Liouville's theorem is for entire functions, I don't see how you plan to apply it here.
    – José Carlos Santos
    yesterday












  • Okkkss sir @jose Carlos santos
    – santosh
    yesterday














  • 1




    Since Liouville's theorem is for entire functions, I don't see how you plan to apply it here.
    – José Carlos Santos
    yesterday












  • Okkkss sir @jose Carlos santos
    – santosh
    yesterday








1




1




Since Liouville's theorem is for entire functions, I don't see how you plan to apply it here.
– José Carlos Santos
yesterday






Since Liouville's theorem is for entire functions, I don't see how you plan to apply it here.
– José Carlos Santos
yesterday














Okkkss sir @jose Carlos santos
– santosh
yesterday




Okkkss sir @jose Carlos santos
– santosh
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Hint : $|f(0)|=1$. Use Maximum Modulus Theorem, which states that "A non constant analytic function in a domain $D$ attains maximum value on it's boundary $partial D$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Then answer will be 0 na??
    – santosh
    yesterday






  • 1




    @santosh Yeah !
    – Empty
    yesterday











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005045%2ffind-the-value-of-given-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Hint : $|f(0)|=1$. Use Maximum Modulus Theorem, which states that "A non constant analytic function in a domain $D$ attains maximum value on it's boundary $partial D$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Then answer will be 0 na??
    – santosh
    yesterday






  • 1




    @santosh Yeah !
    – Empty
    yesterday















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Hint : $|f(0)|=1$. Use Maximum Modulus Theorem, which states that "A non constant analytic function in a domain $D$ attains maximum value on it's boundary $partial D$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Then answer will be 0 na??
    – santosh
    yesterday






  • 1




    @santosh Yeah !
    – Empty
    yesterday













up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






Hint : $|f(0)|=1$. Use Maximum Modulus Theorem, which states that "A non constant analytic function in a domain $D$ attains maximum value on it's boundary $partial D$.






share|cite|improve this answer














Hint : $|f(0)|=1$. Use Maximum Modulus Theorem, which states that "A non constant analytic function in a domain $D$ attains maximum value on it's boundary $partial D$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered yesterday









Empty

8,03242358




8,03242358












  • Then answer will be 0 na??
    – santosh
    yesterday






  • 1




    @santosh Yeah !
    – Empty
    yesterday


















  • Then answer will be 0 na??
    – santosh
    yesterday






  • 1




    @santosh Yeah !
    – Empty
    yesterday
















Then answer will be 0 na??
– santosh
yesterday




Then answer will be 0 na??
– santosh
yesterday




1




1




@santosh Yeah !
– Empty
yesterday




@santosh Yeah !
– Empty
yesterday


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005045%2ffind-the-value-of-given-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Image
28 6 $begingroup$ Per the Font of Magic feature, sorcerer can use Flexible Casting to create 5th-level spell slots at level 7, even though they are not typically available until level 9. You can transform unexpended sorcery points into one spell slot as a bonus action on your turn. The Creating Spell Slots table shows the cost of creating a spell slot of [5th level is 7] If such a sorcerer levels up while still having this 5th-level spell slot, can they choose a 5th-level spell as the spell they gain upon levelling up? The Spellcasting feature states: Additionally, when you gain a level in this class, you can choose one of the sorcerer spells you know and replace it with another spell from the sorcerer spell list, which also must be of a level for which you have spell slots.
Read more

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

Image
up vote 13 down vote favorite 1 After the 2018 errata, the disintegrate spell description now reads: A creature targeted by this spell must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, the target takes 10d6 + 40 force damage. The target is disintegrated if this damage leaves it with 0 hit points. If you were to polymorph an enemy into a rat and then disintegrate it, would the enemy be disintegrated or would it just return to its original form? I know that for Druids, it’s not an instant kill anymore, but is this the case for polymorph as well? dnd-5e spells polymorph errata share | improve this question edited 18 hours ago
Read more

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$

Image
3 3 $begingroup$ Recently, I saw a construction of topological invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$ with $ngeq 2$ : $$ N=frac{1}{24pi^2}int_{S^3} d^3x epsilon^{ijk} Tr[(U^{-1}partial_{x_i}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_j}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_k}U)] , $$ where $Uin U(n)$ depends on $boldsymbol{x}=(x_1,x_2,x_3)in S^3$ , $epsilon^{ijk}$ is the Levi-Civita symbol, $i,j,k=1,2,3$ , and the duplicated indexes are summed over. It is claimed that $N$ is an integer, but why? Update 02/02/2019 I think I got an argument for $n=2$ . In this case, $U=e^{i varphi} q$ with $qin SU(2)$ . Due to the trace and the Levi-Civita symbol in $N$ , $varphi$ does not contribute to $N$ . As $Tr[q^{dagger}partial_i q]=0$ and $(q^{dagger}partial_i q)^{dagger}=-q^{dagger}partial_i q$ , $q^{dagger}partial_i q$ in geneeral has the form $q^{dagger}partia
Read more