Quadratic Flower Petal Drawing











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












I was wondering if anyone could help me with the shading of these flower petals. It is half done, but I only want the inside of the petals shaded.



This is the picture:



enter image description here



Here are my equations so far:



enter image description here



I was wondering if anyone knew what domain and range constraints I could add to make only the inside of the petal shaded.



Thanks






quadratics







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    This seems to be a question about how to use Desmos(?), which I don't think is really on-topic here, but here is one possible Desmos solution. It should also be noted that Desmos can plot implicitly defined functions.
    – Xander Henderson
    yesterday

















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












I was wondering if anyone could help me with the shading of these flower petals. It is half done, but I only want the inside of the petals shaded.



This is the picture:



enter image description here



Here are my equations so far:



enter image description here



I was wondering if anyone knew what domain and range constraints I could add to make only the inside of the petal shaded.



Thanks






quadratics







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    This seems to be a question about how to use Desmos(?), which I don't think is really on-topic here, but here is one possible Desmos solution. It should also be noted that Desmos can plot implicitly defined functions.
    – Xander Henderson
    yesterday















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1






1





I was wondering if anyone could help me with the shading of these flower petals. It is half done, but I only want the inside of the petals shaded.



This is the picture:



enter image description here



Here are my equations so far:



enter image description here



I was wondering if anyone knew what domain and range constraints I could add to make only the inside of the petal shaded.



Thanks






quadratics







share|cite|improve this question













I was wondering if anyone could help me with the shading of these flower petals. It is half done, but I only want the inside of the petals shaded.



This is the picture:



enter image description here



Here are my equations so far:



enter image description here



I was wondering if anyone knew what domain and range constraints I could add to make only the inside of the petal shaded.



Thanks






quadratics




quadratics






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked yesterday









mjj

4016




4016








  • 1




    This seems to be a question about how to use Desmos(?), which I don't think is really on-topic here, but here is one possible Desmos solution. It should also be noted that Desmos can plot implicitly defined functions.
    – Xander Henderson
    yesterday
















  • 1




    This seems to be a question about how to use Desmos(?), which I don't think is really on-topic here, but here is one possible Desmos solution. It should also be noted that Desmos can plot implicitly defined functions.
    – Xander Henderson
    yesterday










1




1




This seems to be a question about how to use Desmos(?), which I don't think is really on-topic here, but here is one possible Desmos solution. It should also be noted that Desmos can plot implicitly defined functions.
– Xander Henderson
yesterday






This seems to be a question about how to use Desmos(?), which I don't think is really on-topic here, but here is one possible Desmos solution. It should also be noted that Desmos can plot implicitly defined functions.
– Xander Henderson
yesterday












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










How about this? Its more natural to use more general restrictions than rectangular ones (I also don't know how to make desmos plot the intersection of two sets any other way) https://www.desmos.com/calculator/yzpuhh6cf2



How about this?






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks for the solution. Do you know how to alter the constraints I have for the equations above to make the shape.
    – mjj
    yesterday










  • @mjj you'll need to use more complicated restrictions, because as I said, I don't know how to make desmos plot intersections of two sets (which is what you want) any other way
    – Calvin Khor
    yesterday











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005007%2fquadratic-flower-petal-drawing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










How about this? Its more natural to use more general restrictions than rectangular ones (I also don't know how to make desmos plot the intersection of two sets any other way) https://www.desmos.com/calculator/yzpuhh6cf2



How about this?






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks for the solution. Do you know how to alter the constraints I have for the equations above to make the shape.
    – mjj
    yesterday










  • @mjj you'll need to use more complicated restrictions, because as I said, I don't know how to make desmos plot intersections of two sets (which is what you want) any other way
    – Calvin Khor
    yesterday















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










How about this? Its more natural to use more general restrictions than rectangular ones (I also don't know how to make desmos plot the intersection of two sets any other way) https://www.desmos.com/calculator/yzpuhh6cf2



How about this?






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks for the solution. Do you know how to alter the constraints I have for the equations above to make the shape.
    – mjj
    yesterday










  • @mjj you'll need to use more complicated restrictions, because as I said, I don't know how to make desmos plot intersections of two sets (which is what you want) any other way
    – Calvin Khor
    yesterday













up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






How about this? Its more natural to use more general restrictions than rectangular ones (I also don't know how to make desmos plot the intersection of two sets any other way) https://www.desmos.com/calculator/yzpuhh6cf2



How about this?






share|cite|improve this answer












How about this? Its more natural to use more general restrictions than rectangular ones (I also don't know how to make desmos plot the intersection of two sets any other way) https://www.desmos.com/calculator/yzpuhh6cf2



How about this?







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered yesterday









Calvin Khor

10.5k21436




10.5k21436












  • Thanks for the solution. Do you know how to alter the constraints I have for the equations above to make the shape.
    – mjj
    yesterday










  • @mjj you'll need to use more complicated restrictions, because as I said, I don't know how to make desmos plot intersections of two sets (which is what you want) any other way
    – Calvin Khor
    yesterday


















  • Thanks for the solution. Do you know how to alter the constraints I have for the equations above to make the shape.
    – mjj
    yesterday










  • @mjj you'll need to use more complicated restrictions, because as I said, I don't know how to make desmos plot intersections of two sets (which is what you want) any other way
    – Calvin Khor
    yesterday
















Thanks for the solution. Do you know how to alter the constraints I have for the equations above to make the shape.
– mjj
yesterday




Thanks for the solution. Do you know how to alter the constraints I have for the equations above to make the shape.
– mjj
yesterday












@mjj you'll need to use more complicated restrictions, because as I said, I don't know how to make desmos plot intersections of two sets (which is what you want) any other way
– Calvin Khor
yesterday




@mjj you'll need to use more complicated restrictions, because as I said, I don't know how to make desmos plot intersections of two sets (which is what you want) any other way
– Calvin Khor
yesterday


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005007%2fquadratic-flower-petal-drawing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Image
28 6 $begingroup$ Per the Font of Magic feature, sorcerer can use Flexible Casting to create 5th-level spell slots at level 7, even though they are not typically available until level 9. You can transform unexpended sorcery points into one spell slot as a bonus action on your turn. The Creating Spell Slots table shows the cost of creating a spell slot of [5th level is 7] If such a sorcerer levels up while still having this 5th-level spell slot, can they choose a 5th-level spell as the spell they gain upon levelling up? The Spellcasting feature states: Additionally, when you gain a level in this class, you can choose one of the sorcerer spells you know and replace it with another spell from the sorcerer spell list, which also must be of a level for which you have spell slots.
Read more

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

Image
up vote 13 down vote favorite 1 After the 2018 errata, the disintegrate spell description now reads: A creature targeted by this spell must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, the target takes 10d6 + 40 force damage. The target is disintegrated if this damage leaves it with 0 hit points. If you were to polymorph an enemy into a rat and then disintegrate it, would the enemy be disintegrated or would it just return to its original form? I know that for Druids, it’s not an instant kill anymore, but is this the case for polymorph as well? dnd-5e spells polymorph errata share | improve this question edited 18 hours ago
Read more

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$

Image
3 3 $begingroup$ Recently, I saw a construction of topological invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$ with $ngeq 2$ : $$ N=frac{1}{24pi^2}int_{S^3} d^3x epsilon^{ijk} Tr[(U^{-1}partial_{x_i}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_j}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_k}U)] , $$ where $Uin U(n)$ depends on $boldsymbol{x}=(x_1,x_2,x_3)in S^3$ , $epsilon^{ijk}$ is the Levi-Civita symbol, $i,j,k=1,2,3$ , and the duplicated indexes are summed over. It is claimed that $N$ is an integer, but why? Update 02/02/2019 I think I got an argument for $n=2$ . In this case, $U=e^{i varphi} q$ with $qin SU(2)$ . Due to the trace and the Levi-Civita symbol in $N$ , $varphi$ does not contribute to $N$ . As $Tr[q^{dagger}partial_i q]=0$ and $(q^{dagger}partial_i q)^{dagger}=-q^{dagger}partial_i q$ , $q^{dagger}partial_i q$ in geneeral has the form $q^{dagger}partia
Read more