How to check if sum of some contiguous subarray is equal to N?












3














So say I have a list sequences such as this.



I want to remove all sequences where its total sum = N and/or it has a contiguous subarray with sum = N.



For example, if N = 4, then (1,1,2) is not valid since its total is 4. (1,1,3) is also not valid since the (1,3) is also 4. (1,3,1) is also not valid for the same reason.



lst = [ 
(1,1,1), (1,1,2), (1,1,3),
(1,2,1), (1,2,2), (1,2,3),
(1,3,1), (1,3,2), (1,3,3),
(2,1,1), (2,1,2), (2,1,3),
(2,2,1), (2,2,2), (2,2,3),
(2,3,1), (2,3,2), (2,3,3),
(3,1,1), (3,1,2), (3,1,3),
(3,2,1), (3,2,2), (3,2,3),
(3,3,1), (3,3,2), (3,3,3)
]


What are some ways to do this?



I'm currently trying to see if I'm able to remove sequences whose total is not necessarily a multiple of N but not its contiguous subarrays, but I'm unsuccessful



   for elements in list(product(range(1,n), repeat=n-1)):
lst.append(elements)
for val in lst:
if np.cumsum(val).any() %n != 0:
lst2.append(val) # append value to a filtered list









share|improve this question
























  • Is it guaranteed that the numbers in your little sequences like (1,1,3) are nonnegative? Also, what is the maximum length of these "little" sequences?
    – eozd
    Nov 19 '18 at 18:52












  • Yes, they are guaranteed to be negative and the maximum length is N-1.
    – Thegreatfoo
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:05










  • You mean they are guaranteed to be nonnegative? If so, there is a very efficient linear time solution given by Neb. @Thegreatfoo So, I think it is also worth mentioning in the question how big N can be and what are the negativity conditions on the elements.
    – eozd
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:07












  • *Non-negative, my mistake. Also the range of N in this case is 2 <= n <= 1000)
    – Thegreatfoo
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:13
















3














So say I have a list sequences such as this.



I want to remove all sequences where its total sum = N and/or it has a contiguous subarray with sum = N.



For example, if N = 4, then (1,1,2) is not valid since its total is 4. (1,1,3) is also not valid since the (1,3) is also 4. (1,3,1) is also not valid for the same reason.



lst = [ 
(1,1,1), (1,1,2), (1,1,3),
(1,2,1), (1,2,2), (1,2,3),
(1,3,1), (1,3,2), (1,3,3),
(2,1,1), (2,1,2), (2,1,3),
(2,2,1), (2,2,2), (2,2,3),
(2,3,1), (2,3,2), (2,3,3),
(3,1,1), (3,1,2), (3,1,3),
(3,2,1), (3,2,2), (3,2,3),
(3,3,1), (3,3,2), (3,3,3)
]


What are some ways to do this?



I'm currently trying to see if I'm able to remove sequences whose total is not necessarily a multiple of N but not its contiguous subarrays, but I'm unsuccessful



   for elements in list(product(range(1,n), repeat=n-1)):
lst.append(elements)
for val in lst:
if np.cumsum(val).any() %n != 0:
lst2.append(val) # append value to a filtered list









share|improve this question
























  • Is it guaranteed that the numbers in your little sequences like (1,1,3) are nonnegative? Also, what is the maximum length of these "little" sequences?
    – eozd
    Nov 19 '18 at 18:52












  • Yes, they are guaranteed to be negative and the maximum length is N-1.
    – Thegreatfoo
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:05










  • You mean they are guaranteed to be nonnegative? If so, there is a very efficient linear time solution given by Neb. @Thegreatfoo So, I think it is also worth mentioning in the question how big N can be and what are the negativity conditions on the elements.
    – eozd
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:07












  • *Non-negative, my mistake. Also the range of N in this case is 2 <= n <= 1000)
    – Thegreatfoo
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:13














3












3








3







So say I have a list sequences such as this.



I want to remove all sequences where its total sum = N and/or it has a contiguous subarray with sum = N.



For example, if N = 4, then (1,1,2) is not valid since its total is 4. (1,1,3) is also not valid since the (1,3) is also 4. (1,3,1) is also not valid for the same reason.



lst = [ 
(1,1,1), (1,1,2), (1,1,3),
(1,2,1), (1,2,2), (1,2,3),
(1,3,1), (1,3,2), (1,3,3),
(2,1,1), (2,1,2), (2,1,3),
(2,2,1), (2,2,2), (2,2,3),
(2,3,1), (2,3,2), (2,3,3),
(3,1,1), (3,1,2), (3,1,3),
(3,2,1), (3,2,2), (3,2,3),
(3,3,1), (3,3,2), (3,3,3)
]


What are some ways to do this?



I'm currently trying to see if I'm able to remove sequences whose total is not necessarily a multiple of N but not its contiguous subarrays, but I'm unsuccessful



   for elements in list(product(range(1,n), repeat=n-1)):
lst.append(elements)
for val in lst:
if np.cumsum(val).any() %n != 0:
lst2.append(val) # append value to a filtered list









share|improve this question















So say I have a list sequences such as this.



I want to remove all sequences where its total sum = N and/or it has a contiguous subarray with sum = N.



For example, if N = 4, then (1,1,2) is not valid since its total is 4. (1,1,3) is also not valid since the (1,3) is also 4. (1,3,1) is also not valid for the same reason.



lst = [ 
(1,1,1), (1,1,2), (1,1,3),
(1,2,1), (1,2,2), (1,2,3),
(1,3,1), (1,3,2), (1,3,3),
(2,1,1), (2,1,2), (2,1,3),
(2,2,1), (2,2,2), (2,2,3),
(2,3,1), (2,3,2), (2,3,3),
(3,1,1), (3,1,2), (3,1,3),
(3,2,1), (3,2,2), (3,2,3),
(3,3,1), (3,3,2), (3,3,3)
]


What are some ways to do this?



I'm currently trying to see if I'm able to remove sequences whose total is not necessarily a multiple of N but not its contiguous subarrays, but I'm unsuccessful



   for elements in list(product(range(1,n), repeat=n-1)):
lst.append(elements)
for val in lst:
if np.cumsum(val).any() %n != 0:
lst2.append(val) # append value to a filtered list






python python-3.x






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 19 '18 at 20:15









eozd

8941515




8941515










asked Nov 19 '18 at 18:19









ThegreatfooThegreatfoo

385




385












  • Is it guaranteed that the numbers in your little sequences like (1,1,3) are nonnegative? Also, what is the maximum length of these "little" sequences?
    – eozd
    Nov 19 '18 at 18:52












  • Yes, they are guaranteed to be negative and the maximum length is N-1.
    – Thegreatfoo
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:05










  • You mean they are guaranteed to be nonnegative? If so, there is a very efficient linear time solution given by Neb. @Thegreatfoo So, I think it is also worth mentioning in the question how big N can be and what are the negativity conditions on the elements.
    – eozd
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:07












  • *Non-negative, my mistake. Also the range of N in this case is 2 <= n <= 1000)
    – Thegreatfoo
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:13


















  • Is it guaranteed that the numbers in your little sequences like (1,1,3) are nonnegative? Also, what is the maximum length of these "little" sequences?
    – eozd
    Nov 19 '18 at 18:52












  • Yes, they are guaranteed to be negative and the maximum length is N-1.
    – Thegreatfoo
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:05










  • You mean they are guaranteed to be nonnegative? If so, there is a very efficient linear time solution given by Neb. @Thegreatfoo So, I think it is also worth mentioning in the question how big N can be and what are the negativity conditions on the elements.
    – eozd
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:07












  • *Non-negative, my mistake. Also the range of N in this case is 2 <= n <= 1000)
    – Thegreatfoo
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:13
















Is it guaranteed that the numbers in your little sequences like (1,1,3) are nonnegative? Also, what is the maximum length of these "little" sequences?
– eozd
Nov 19 '18 at 18:52






Is it guaranteed that the numbers in your little sequences like (1,1,3) are nonnegative? Also, what is the maximum length of these "little" sequences?
– eozd
Nov 19 '18 at 18:52














Yes, they are guaranteed to be negative and the maximum length is N-1.
– Thegreatfoo
Nov 19 '18 at 19:05




Yes, they are guaranteed to be negative and the maximum length is N-1.
– Thegreatfoo
Nov 19 '18 at 19:05












You mean they are guaranteed to be nonnegative? If so, there is a very efficient linear time solution given by Neb. @Thegreatfoo So, I think it is also worth mentioning in the question how big N can be and what are the negativity conditions on the elements.
– eozd
Nov 19 '18 at 19:07






You mean they are guaranteed to be nonnegative? If so, there is a very efficient linear time solution given by Neb. @Thegreatfoo So, I think it is also worth mentioning in the question how big N can be and what are the negativity conditions on the elements.
– eozd
Nov 19 '18 at 19:07














*Non-negative, my mistake. Also the range of N in this case is 2 <= n <= 1000)
– Thegreatfoo
Nov 19 '18 at 19:13




*Non-negative, my mistake. Also the range of N in this case is 2 <= n <= 1000)
– Thegreatfoo
Nov 19 '18 at 19:13












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














You can use itertools.combinations to generate all combinations of slice indices to test for sums of subsequences:



from itertools import combinations
[t for t in lst if not any(sum(t[l:h+1]) == 4 for l, h in combinations(range(len(t)), 2))]


This returns:



[(1, 1, 1), (1, 2, 3), (2, 3, 2), (2, 3, 3), (3, 2, 1), (3, 2, 3), (3, 3, 2), (3, 3, 3)]





share|improve this answer





















  • If max length is N-1, the OP may need it to generalize to any N
    – Brian Cohan
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:16






  • 1




    Thank you, your solution worked!
    – Thegreatfoo
    Nov 19 '18 at 20:29



















2














You can split your problem into two subproblems:





  1. The elements in your list sum up to N. Then you can simply test:



    if sum(myList) == N:
    # do fancy stuff



  2. The elements in your list do not sum up to N. In this case, there might be a subsequence that sum up to N. To find it, let's define two pointers, l and r. Their name stand for left and right and will define the boundaries of your subsequence. Then, the solution is the following:



    r = 1
    l = 0
    while r <= len(myList):
    sum_ = sum(myList[l:r])
    if sum_ < 4:
    r += 1
    elif sum_ > 4:
    l += 1
    else:
    # do fancy stuff and exit from the loop
    break


    It works as follows. First you initialize l and r so that you consider the subsequence consisting of only the first element of myList. Then, you sum the element of the subsequence and if the sum is lower than N, you enlarge the subsequence by adding 1 to r. If it is greater than N, then you restrict the subsequence by adding 1 to l.






Note thanks to eozd:



The above algorithm works only if the elemnent of the list are non-negative.






share|improve this answer























  • The second algorithm works only if the elements in the sequence are nonnegative. I think it is worth mentioning.
    – eozd
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:05










  • You are right, I assumed they were all non-negative because of the example given by the OP
    – Neb
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:06











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53380515%2fhow-to-check-if-sum-of-some-contiguous-subarray-is-equal-to-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














You can use itertools.combinations to generate all combinations of slice indices to test for sums of subsequences:



from itertools import combinations
[t for t in lst if not any(sum(t[l:h+1]) == 4 for l, h in combinations(range(len(t)), 2))]


This returns:



[(1, 1, 1), (1, 2, 3), (2, 3, 2), (2, 3, 3), (3, 2, 1), (3, 2, 3), (3, 3, 2), (3, 3, 3)]





share|improve this answer





















  • If max length is N-1, the OP may need it to generalize to any N
    – Brian Cohan
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:16






  • 1




    Thank you, your solution worked!
    – Thegreatfoo
    Nov 19 '18 at 20:29
















2














You can use itertools.combinations to generate all combinations of slice indices to test for sums of subsequences:



from itertools import combinations
[t for t in lst if not any(sum(t[l:h+1]) == 4 for l, h in combinations(range(len(t)), 2))]


This returns:



[(1, 1, 1), (1, 2, 3), (2, 3, 2), (2, 3, 3), (3, 2, 1), (3, 2, 3), (3, 3, 2), (3, 3, 3)]





share|improve this answer





















  • If max length is N-1, the OP may need it to generalize to any N
    – Brian Cohan
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:16






  • 1




    Thank you, your solution worked!
    – Thegreatfoo
    Nov 19 '18 at 20:29














2












2








2






You can use itertools.combinations to generate all combinations of slice indices to test for sums of subsequences:



from itertools import combinations
[t for t in lst if not any(sum(t[l:h+1]) == 4 for l, h in combinations(range(len(t)), 2))]


This returns:



[(1, 1, 1), (1, 2, 3), (2, 3, 2), (2, 3, 3), (3, 2, 1), (3, 2, 3), (3, 3, 2), (3, 3, 3)]





share|improve this answer












You can use itertools.combinations to generate all combinations of slice indices to test for sums of subsequences:



from itertools import combinations
[t for t in lst if not any(sum(t[l:h+1]) == 4 for l, h in combinations(range(len(t)), 2))]


This returns:



[(1, 1, 1), (1, 2, 3), (2, 3, 2), (2, 3, 3), (3, 2, 1), (3, 2, 3), (3, 3, 2), (3, 3, 3)]






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 19 '18 at 19:06









blhsingblhsing

28.7k41336




28.7k41336












  • If max length is N-1, the OP may need it to generalize to any N
    – Brian Cohan
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:16






  • 1




    Thank you, your solution worked!
    – Thegreatfoo
    Nov 19 '18 at 20:29


















  • If max length is N-1, the OP may need it to generalize to any N
    – Brian Cohan
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:16






  • 1




    Thank you, your solution worked!
    – Thegreatfoo
    Nov 19 '18 at 20:29
















If max length is N-1, the OP may need it to generalize to any N
– Brian Cohan
Nov 19 '18 at 19:16




If max length is N-1, the OP may need it to generalize to any N
– Brian Cohan
Nov 19 '18 at 19:16




1




1




Thank you, your solution worked!
– Thegreatfoo
Nov 19 '18 at 20:29




Thank you, your solution worked!
– Thegreatfoo
Nov 19 '18 at 20:29













2














You can split your problem into two subproblems:





  1. The elements in your list sum up to N. Then you can simply test:



    if sum(myList) == N:
    # do fancy stuff



  2. The elements in your list do not sum up to N. In this case, there might be a subsequence that sum up to N. To find it, let's define two pointers, l and r. Their name stand for left and right and will define the boundaries of your subsequence. Then, the solution is the following:



    r = 1
    l = 0
    while r <= len(myList):
    sum_ = sum(myList[l:r])
    if sum_ < 4:
    r += 1
    elif sum_ > 4:
    l += 1
    else:
    # do fancy stuff and exit from the loop
    break


    It works as follows. First you initialize l and r so that you consider the subsequence consisting of only the first element of myList. Then, you sum the element of the subsequence and if the sum is lower than N, you enlarge the subsequence by adding 1 to r. If it is greater than N, then you restrict the subsequence by adding 1 to l.






Note thanks to eozd:



The above algorithm works only if the elemnent of the list are non-negative.






share|improve this answer























  • The second algorithm works only if the elements in the sequence are nonnegative. I think it is worth mentioning.
    – eozd
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:05










  • You are right, I assumed they were all non-negative because of the example given by the OP
    – Neb
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:06
















2














You can split your problem into two subproblems:





  1. The elements in your list sum up to N. Then you can simply test:



    if sum(myList) == N:
    # do fancy stuff



  2. The elements in your list do not sum up to N. In this case, there might be a subsequence that sum up to N. To find it, let's define two pointers, l and r. Their name stand for left and right and will define the boundaries of your subsequence. Then, the solution is the following:



    r = 1
    l = 0
    while r <= len(myList):
    sum_ = sum(myList[l:r])
    if sum_ < 4:
    r += 1
    elif sum_ > 4:
    l += 1
    else:
    # do fancy stuff and exit from the loop
    break


    It works as follows. First you initialize l and r so that you consider the subsequence consisting of only the first element of myList. Then, you sum the element of the subsequence and if the sum is lower than N, you enlarge the subsequence by adding 1 to r. If it is greater than N, then you restrict the subsequence by adding 1 to l.






Note thanks to eozd:



The above algorithm works only if the elemnent of the list are non-negative.






share|improve this answer























  • The second algorithm works only if the elements in the sequence are nonnegative. I think it is worth mentioning.
    – eozd
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:05










  • You are right, I assumed they were all non-negative because of the example given by the OP
    – Neb
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:06














2












2








2






You can split your problem into two subproblems:





  1. The elements in your list sum up to N. Then you can simply test:



    if sum(myList) == N:
    # do fancy stuff



  2. The elements in your list do not sum up to N. In this case, there might be a subsequence that sum up to N. To find it, let's define two pointers, l and r. Their name stand for left and right and will define the boundaries of your subsequence. Then, the solution is the following:



    r = 1
    l = 0
    while r <= len(myList):
    sum_ = sum(myList[l:r])
    if sum_ < 4:
    r += 1
    elif sum_ > 4:
    l += 1
    else:
    # do fancy stuff and exit from the loop
    break


    It works as follows. First you initialize l and r so that you consider the subsequence consisting of only the first element of myList. Then, you sum the element of the subsequence and if the sum is lower than N, you enlarge the subsequence by adding 1 to r. If it is greater than N, then you restrict the subsequence by adding 1 to l.






Note thanks to eozd:



The above algorithm works only if the elemnent of the list are non-negative.






share|improve this answer














You can split your problem into two subproblems:





  1. The elements in your list sum up to N. Then you can simply test:



    if sum(myList) == N:
    # do fancy stuff



  2. The elements in your list do not sum up to N. In this case, there might be a subsequence that sum up to N. To find it, let's define two pointers, l and r. Their name stand for left and right and will define the boundaries of your subsequence. Then, the solution is the following:



    r = 1
    l = 0
    while r <= len(myList):
    sum_ = sum(myList[l:r])
    if sum_ < 4:
    r += 1
    elif sum_ > 4:
    l += 1
    else:
    # do fancy stuff and exit from the loop
    break


    It works as follows. First you initialize l and r so that you consider the subsequence consisting of only the first element of myList. Then, you sum the element of the subsequence and if the sum is lower than N, you enlarge the subsequence by adding 1 to r. If it is greater than N, then you restrict the subsequence by adding 1 to l.






Note thanks to eozd:



The above algorithm works only if the elemnent of the list are non-negative.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 19 '18 at 19:07

























answered Nov 19 '18 at 18:58









NebNeb

1,246517




1,246517












  • The second algorithm works only if the elements in the sequence are nonnegative. I think it is worth mentioning.
    – eozd
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:05










  • You are right, I assumed they were all non-negative because of the example given by the OP
    – Neb
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:06


















  • The second algorithm works only if the elements in the sequence are nonnegative. I think it is worth mentioning.
    – eozd
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:05










  • You are right, I assumed they were all non-negative because of the example given by the OP
    – Neb
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:06
















The second algorithm works only if the elements in the sequence are nonnegative. I think it is worth mentioning.
– eozd
Nov 19 '18 at 19:05




The second algorithm works only if the elements in the sequence are nonnegative. I think it is worth mentioning.
– eozd
Nov 19 '18 at 19:05












You are right, I assumed they were all non-negative because of the example given by the OP
– Neb
Nov 19 '18 at 19:06




You are right, I assumed they were all non-negative because of the example given by the OP
– Neb
Nov 19 '18 at 19:06


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53380515%2fhow-to-check-if-sum-of-some-contiguous-subarray-is-equal-to-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

ts Property 'filter' does not exist on type '{}'

mat-slide-toggle shouldn't change it's state when I click cancel in confirmation window