If the images of vectors are linearly dependent, then they are linearly dependent [duplicate]
This question already has an answer here:
Can linearly independent vectors have linearly dependent images?
2 answers
I know that if the images of vectors are linearly independent, then the vectors are linearly independent. But will the statement still hold if we change independent to dependent? I tried testing with common linear transformations and so far the case holds. Are there any counter examples to it?
linear-algebra linear-transformations
marked as duplicate by Chinnapparaj R, Lord Shark the Unknown, Kelvin Lois, José Carlos Santos
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Nov 22 '18 at 8:28
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
Can linearly independent vectors have linearly dependent images?
2 answers
I know that if the images of vectors are linearly independent, then the vectors are linearly independent. But will the statement still hold if we change independent to dependent? I tried testing with common linear transformations and so far the case holds. Are there any counter examples to it?
linear-algebra linear-transformations
marked as duplicate by Chinnapparaj R, Lord Shark the Unknown, Kelvin Lois, José Carlos Santos
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Nov 22 '18 at 8:28
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
3
Try a projection.
– Ramiro de la Vega
Nov 21 '18 at 19:43
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
Can linearly independent vectors have linearly dependent images?
2 answers
I know that if the images of vectors are linearly independent, then the vectors are linearly independent. But will the statement still hold if we change independent to dependent? I tried testing with common linear transformations and so far the case holds. Are there any counter examples to it?
linear-algebra linear-transformations
This question already has an answer here:
Can linearly independent vectors have linearly dependent images?
2 answers
I know that if the images of vectors are linearly independent, then the vectors are linearly independent. But will the statement still hold if we change independent to dependent? I tried testing with common linear transformations and so far the case holds. Are there any counter examples to it?
This question already has an answer here:
Can linearly independent vectors have linearly dependent images?
2 answers
linear-algebra linear-transformations
linear-algebra linear-transformations
asked Nov 21 '18 at 19:39
user161872user161872
1
1
marked as duplicate by Chinnapparaj R, Lord Shark the Unknown, Kelvin Lois, José Carlos Santos
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Nov 22 '18 at 8:28
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Chinnapparaj R, Lord Shark the Unknown, Kelvin Lois, José Carlos Santos
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Nov 22 '18 at 8:28
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
3
Try a projection.
– Ramiro de la Vega
Nov 21 '18 at 19:43
add a comment |
3
Try a projection.
– Ramiro de la Vega
Nov 21 '18 at 19:43
3
3
Try a projection.
– Ramiro de la Vega
Nov 21 '18 at 19:43
Try a projection.
– Ramiro de la Vega
Nov 21 '18 at 19:43
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
No. Take $f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$ given by $f(x)=0$. Then ${f(1)} = {0}$ is linearly dependent, but ${1}$ is linearly independent.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No. Take $f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$ given by $f(x)=0$. Then ${f(1)} = {0}$ is linearly dependent, but ${1}$ is linearly independent.
add a comment |
No. Take $f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$ given by $f(x)=0$. Then ${f(1)} = {0}$ is linearly dependent, but ${1}$ is linearly independent.
add a comment |
No. Take $f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$ given by $f(x)=0$. Then ${f(1)} = {0}$ is linearly dependent, but ${1}$ is linearly independent.
No. Take $f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$ given by $f(x)=0$. Then ${f(1)} = {0}$ is linearly dependent, but ${1}$ is linearly independent.
answered Nov 21 '18 at 19:43
FedericoFederico
4,829514
4,829514
add a comment |
add a comment |
3
Try a projection.
– Ramiro de la Vega
Nov 21 '18 at 19:43