I can't solve a cyclic redundancy check












0












$begingroup$


In my book there's an example of how to do a cyclic redundancy check with regular numbers. I've tried to complete the exercise with binary numbers but without success. In the book the given polynomial equals $x^{14}+x^{12}+x^8+x^7+x^5$ and the used generator polynomial is $x^5+x^4+x^2+1$. The result of the question was $x^3+x^2+x$.



The professor included in his powerpoint that 010100011010000 is the starting message en that the remainder in binary should be 01110. The rest was up to us.



I've practiced with different binary messages and I could complete those but I got stuck on this one.



Here's what i've tried so far. When I try to convert the given polynomial into a message it has one zero more. Also my remainder is 00001 and not 01110. I wrote a program to do the calculations for me to see if i made any errors and looked online for a tool that could do it for me but both give me the same result:00001.
Whatever I do I can't seem to get the right result.
Thanks in advance guys.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    In my book there's an example of how to do a cyclic redundancy check with regular numbers. I've tried to complete the exercise with binary numbers but without success. In the book the given polynomial equals $x^{14}+x^{12}+x^8+x^7+x^5$ and the used generator polynomial is $x^5+x^4+x^2+1$. The result of the question was $x^3+x^2+x$.



    The professor included in his powerpoint that 010100011010000 is the starting message en that the remainder in binary should be 01110. The rest was up to us.



    I've practiced with different binary messages and I could complete those but I got stuck on this one.



    Here's what i've tried so far. When I try to convert the given polynomial into a message it has one zero more. Also my remainder is 00001 and not 01110. I wrote a program to do the calculations for me to see if i made any errors and looked online for a tool that could do it for me but both give me the same result:00001.
    Whatever I do I can't seem to get the right result.
    Thanks in advance guys.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      In my book there's an example of how to do a cyclic redundancy check with regular numbers. I've tried to complete the exercise with binary numbers but without success. In the book the given polynomial equals $x^{14}+x^{12}+x^8+x^7+x^5$ and the used generator polynomial is $x^5+x^4+x^2+1$. The result of the question was $x^3+x^2+x$.



      The professor included in his powerpoint that 010100011010000 is the starting message en that the remainder in binary should be 01110. The rest was up to us.



      I've practiced with different binary messages and I could complete those but I got stuck on this one.



      Here's what i've tried so far. When I try to convert the given polynomial into a message it has one zero more. Also my remainder is 00001 and not 01110. I wrote a program to do the calculations for me to see if i made any errors and looked online for a tool that could do it for me but both give me the same result:00001.
      Whatever I do I can't seem to get the right result.
      Thanks in advance guys.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      In my book there's an example of how to do a cyclic redundancy check with regular numbers. I've tried to complete the exercise with binary numbers but without success. In the book the given polynomial equals $x^{14}+x^{12}+x^8+x^7+x^5$ and the used generator polynomial is $x^5+x^4+x^2+1$. The result of the question was $x^3+x^2+x$.



      The professor included in his powerpoint that 010100011010000 is the starting message en that the remainder in binary should be 01110. The rest was up to us.



      I've practiced with different binary messages and I could complete those but I got stuck on this one.



      Here's what i've tried so far. When I try to convert the given polynomial into a message it has one zero more. Also my remainder is 00001 and not 01110. I wrote a program to do the calculations for me to see if i made any errors and looked online for a tool that could do it for me but both give me the same result:00001.
      Whatever I do I can't seem to get the right result.
      Thanks in advance guys.







      coding-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 4 at 8:20









      Wuestenfux

      4,2161413




      4,2161413










      asked Jan 3 at 22:53









      Zwarte KopZwarte Kop

      11




      11






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Well, the polynomial division of $x^{14}+x^{12}+x^8+x^7+x^5$ by $x^5+x^4+x^2+1$ yields the remainder $x^3+x^2+x$ where the polynomials are defined over $GF(2)$.
          I've checked this using SINGULAR:




          ring r = 2, (x), lp;



          poly f = x14+x12+x8+x7+x5;



          ideal i = x5+x4+x2+1;



          reduce(f,i);




          x3+x2+x






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ok yes those were the instructions of the question. Can you also explain why when I use any online tool it gives a different answer for binary? Here's an example: Binary form: 010100011010000 divided by 110101 x13+x11+x7+x6+x4 x5+x4+x2+1 Binary form (added zeros): 01010001101000000000 divided by 110101 Result is 011010101100101 Remainder is 00001
            $endgroup$
            – Zwarte Kop
            Jan 4 at 13:13












          • $begingroup$
            What its the example?
            $endgroup$
            – Wuestenfux
            Jan 4 at 13:14










          • $begingroup$
            Example added. Sorry for the formatting I can't press enter without actually posting a comment. I realize the polynomal provided in my comment above is not the same as the one from the instructions but I used the string of bits that my professor included in the powerpoint. When I convert the polynomal into bits myself I also get a wrong answer: x^14+x^12+x^8+x^7+x^5. becomes 101000110100000 and the generator is 110101 the online tool I used gives 00010 or x^1. The tool is located at: asecuritysite.com/comms/crc_div
            $endgroup$
            – Zwarte Kop
            Jan 4 at 13:18












          • $begingroup$
            I know it's not relevant to this question but I just wanted to mention that the previous answer didn't listen, said the same (wrong?) thing fifteen times, even when I said every source I could find disagreed with him (wikipedia, online tools that do the calculations for you, youtube videos) and then finally deleted his answer (and his account??). 10/10 answer- IGN I'll mail my professor and If he responds I will post the answer here.
            $endgroup$
            – Zwarte Kop
            Jan 5 at 19:18











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061116%2fi-cant-solve-a-cyclic-redundancy-check%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          Well, the polynomial division of $x^{14}+x^{12}+x^8+x^7+x^5$ by $x^5+x^4+x^2+1$ yields the remainder $x^3+x^2+x$ where the polynomials are defined over $GF(2)$.
          I've checked this using SINGULAR:




          ring r = 2, (x), lp;



          poly f = x14+x12+x8+x7+x5;



          ideal i = x5+x4+x2+1;



          reduce(f,i);




          x3+x2+x






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ok yes those were the instructions of the question. Can you also explain why when I use any online tool it gives a different answer for binary? Here's an example: Binary form: 010100011010000 divided by 110101 x13+x11+x7+x6+x4 x5+x4+x2+1 Binary form (added zeros): 01010001101000000000 divided by 110101 Result is 011010101100101 Remainder is 00001
            $endgroup$
            – Zwarte Kop
            Jan 4 at 13:13












          • $begingroup$
            What its the example?
            $endgroup$
            – Wuestenfux
            Jan 4 at 13:14










          • $begingroup$
            Example added. Sorry for the formatting I can't press enter without actually posting a comment. I realize the polynomal provided in my comment above is not the same as the one from the instructions but I used the string of bits that my professor included in the powerpoint. When I convert the polynomal into bits myself I also get a wrong answer: x^14+x^12+x^8+x^7+x^5. becomes 101000110100000 and the generator is 110101 the online tool I used gives 00010 or x^1. The tool is located at: asecuritysite.com/comms/crc_div
            $endgroup$
            – Zwarte Kop
            Jan 4 at 13:18












          • $begingroup$
            I know it's not relevant to this question but I just wanted to mention that the previous answer didn't listen, said the same (wrong?) thing fifteen times, even when I said every source I could find disagreed with him (wikipedia, online tools that do the calculations for you, youtube videos) and then finally deleted his answer (and his account??). 10/10 answer- IGN I'll mail my professor and If he responds I will post the answer here.
            $endgroup$
            – Zwarte Kop
            Jan 5 at 19:18
















          0












          $begingroup$

          Well, the polynomial division of $x^{14}+x^{12}+x^8+x^7+x^5$ by $x^5+x^4+x^2+1$ yields the remainder $x^3+x^2+x$ where the polynomials are defined over $GF(2)$.
          I've checked this using SINGULAR:




          ring r = 2, (x), lp;



          poly f = x14+x12+x8+x7+x5;



          ideal i = x5+x4+x2+1;



          reduce(f,i);




          x3+x2+x






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ok yes those were the instructions of the question. Can you also explain why when I use any online tool it gives a different answer for binary? Here's an example: Binary form: 010100011010000 divided by 110101 x13+x11+x7+x6+x4 x5+x4+x2+1 Binary form (added zeros): 01010001101000000000 divided by 110101 Result is 011010101100101 Remainder is 00001
            $endgroup$
            – Zwarte Kop
            Jan 4 at 13:13












          • $begingroup$
            What its the example?
            $endgroup$
            – Wuestenfux
            Jan 4 at 13:14










          • $begingroup$
            Example added. Sorry for the formatting I can't press enter without actually posting a comment. I realize the polynomal provided in my comment above is not the same as the one from the instructions but I used the string of bits that my professor included in the powerpoint. When I convert the polynomal into bits myself I also get a wrong answer: x^14+x^12+x^8+x^7+x^5. becomes 101000110100000 and the generator is 110101 the online tool I used gives 00010 or x^1. The tool is located at: asecuritysite.com/comms/crc_div
            $endgroup$
            – Zwarte Kop
            Jan 4 at 13:18












          • $begingroup$
            I know it's not relevant to this question but I just wanted to mention that the previous answer didn't listen, said the same (wrong?) thing fifteen times, even when I said every source I could find disagreed with him (wikipedia, online tools that do the calculations for you, youtube videos) and then finally deleted his answer (and his account??). 10/10 answer- IGN I'll mail my professor and If he responds I will post the answer here.
            $endgroup$
            – Zwarte Kop
            Jan 5 at 19:18














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          Well, the polynomial division of $x^{14}+x^{12}+x^8+x^7+x^5$ by $x^5+x^4+x^2+1$ yields the remainder $x^3+x^2+x$ where the polynomials are defined over $GF(2)$.
          I've checked this using SINGULAR:




          ring r = 2, (x), lp;



          poly f = x14+x12+x8+x7+x5;



          ideal i = x5+x4+x2+1;



          reduce(f,i);




          x3+x2+x






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Well, the polynomial division of $x^{14}+x^{12}+x^8+x^7+x^5$ by $x^5+x^4+x^2+1$ yields the remainder $x^3+x^2+x$ where the polynomials are defined over $GF(2)$.
          I've checked this using SINGULAR:




          ring r = 2, (x), lp;



          poly f = x14+x12+x8+x7+x5;



          ideal i = x5+x4+x2+1;



          reduce(f,i);




          x3+x2+x







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 4 at 8:32









          WuestenfuxWuestenfux

          4,2161413




          4,2161413












          • $begingroup$
            Ok yes those were the instructions of the question. Can you also explain why when I use any online tool it gives a different answer for binary? Here's an example: Binary form: 010100011010000 divided by 110101 x13+x11+x7+x6+x4 x5+x4+x2+1 Binary form (added zeros): 01010001101000000000 divided by 110101 Result is 011010101100101 Remainder is 00001
            $endgroup$
            – Zwarte Kop
            Jan 4 at 13:13












          • $begingroup$
            What its the example?
            $endgroup$
            – Wuestenfux
            Jan 4 at 13:14










          • $begingroup$
            Example added. Sorry for the formatting I can't press enter without actually posting a comment. I realize the polynomal provided in my comment above is not the same as the one from the instructions but I used the string of bits that my professor included in the powerpoint. When I convert the polynomal into bits myself I also get a wrong answer: x^14+x^12+x^8+x^7+x^5. becomes 101000110100000 and the generator is 110101 the online tool I used gives 00010 or x^1. The tool is located at: asecuritysite.com/comms/crc_div
            $endgroup$
            – Zwarte Kop
            Jan 4 at 13:18












          • $begingroup$
            I know it's not relevant to this question but I just wanted to mention that the previous answer didn't listen, said the same (wrong?) thing fifteen times, even when I said every source I could find disagreed with him (wikipedia, online tools that do the calculations for you, youtube videos) and then finally deleted his answer (and his account??). 10/10 answer- IGN I'll mail my professor and If he responds I will post the answer here.
            $endgroup$
            – Zwarte Kop
            Jan 5 at 19:18


















          • $begingroup$
            Ok yes those were the instructions of the question. Can you also explain why when I use any online tool it gives a different answer for binary? Here's an example: Binary form: 010100011010000 divided by 110101 x13+x11+x7+x6+x4 x5+x4+x2+1 Binary form (added zeros): 01010001101000000000 divided by 110101 Result is 011010101100101 Remainder is 00001
            $endgroup$
            – Zwarte Kop
            Jan 4 at 13:13












          • $begingroup$
            What its the example?
            $endgroup$
            – Wuestenfux
            Jan 4 at 13:14










          • $begingroup$
            Example added. Sorry for the formatting I can't press enter without actually posting a comment. I realize the polynomal provided in my comment above is not the same as the one from the instructions but I used the string of bits that my professor included in the powerpoint. When I convert the polynomal into bits myself I also get a wrong answer: x^14+x^12+x^8+x^7+x^5. becomes 101000110100000 and the generator is 110101 the online tool I used gives 00010 or x^1. The tool is located at: asecuritysite.com/comms/crc_div
            $endgroup$
            – Zwarte Kop
            Jan 4 at 13:18












          • $begingroup$
            I know it's not relevant to this question but I just wanted to mention that the previous answer didn't listen, said the same (wrong?) thing fifteen times, even when I said every source I could find disagreed with him (wikipedia, online tools that do the calculations for you, youtube videos) and then finally deleted his answer (and his account??). 10/10 answer- IGN I'll mail my professor and If he responds I will post the answer here.
            $endgroup$
            – Zwarte Kop
            Jan 5 at 19:18
















          $begingroup$
          Ok yes those were the instructions of the question. Can you also explain why when I use any online tool it gives a different answer for binary? Here's an example: Binary form: 010100011010000 divided by 110101 x13+x11+x7+x6+x4 x5+x4+x2+1 Binary form (added zeros): 01010001101000000000 divided by 110101 Result is 011010101100101 Remainder is 00001
          $endgroup$
          – Zwarte Kop
          Jan 4 at 13:13






          $begingroup$
          Ok yes those were the instructions of the question. Can you also explain why when I use any online tool it gives a different answer for binary? Here's an example: Binary form: 010100011010000 divided by 110101 x13+x11+x7+x6+x4 x5+x4+x2+1 Binary form (added zeros): 01010001101000000000 divided by 110101 Result is 011010101100101 Remainder is 00001
          $endgroup$
          – Zwarte Kop
          Jan 4 at 13:13














          $begingroup$
          What its the example?
          $endgroup$
          – Wuestenfux
          Jan 4 at 13:14




          $begingroup$
          What its the example?
          $endgroup$
          – Wuestenfux
          Jan 4 at 13:14












          $begingroup$
          Example added. Sorry for the formatting I can't press enter without actually posting a comment. I realize the polynomal provided in my comment above is not the same as the one from the instructions but I used the string of bits that my professor included in the powerpoint. When I convert the polynomal into bits myself I also get a wrong answer: x^14+x^12+x^8+x^7+x^5. becomes 101000110100000 and the generator is 110101 the online tool I used gives 00010 or x^1. The tool is located at: asecuritysite.com/comms/crc_div
          $endgroup$
          – Zwarte Kop
          Jan 4 at 13:18






          $begingroup$
          Example added. Sorry for the formatting I can't press enter without actually posting a comment. I realize the polynomal provided in my comment above is not the same as the one from the instructions but I used the string of bits that my professor included in the powerpoint. When I convert the polynomal into bits myself I also get a wrong answer: x^14+x^12+x^8+x^7+x^5. becomes 101000110100000 and the generator is 110101 the online tool I used gives 00010 or x^1. The tool is located at: asecuritysite.com/comms/crc_div
          $endgroup$
          – Zwarte Kop
          Jan 4 at 13:18














          $begingroup$
          I know it's not relevant to this question but I just wanted to mention that the previous answer didn't listen, said the same (wrong?) thing fifteen times, even when I said every source I could find disagreed with him (wikipedia, online tools that do the calculations for you, youtube videos) and then finally deleted his answer (and his account??). 10/10 answer- IGN I'll mail my professor and If he responds I will post the answer here.
          $endgroup$
          – Zwarte Kop
          Jan 5 at 19:18




          $begingroup$
          I know it's not relevant to this question but I just wanted to mention that the previous answer didn't listen, said the same (wrong?) thing fifteen times, even when I said every source I could find disagreed with him (wikipedia, online tools that do the calculations for you, youtube videos) and then finally deleted his answer (and his account??). 10/10 answer- IGN I'll mail my professor and If he responds I will post the answer here.
          $endgroup$
          – Zwarte Kop
          Jan 5 at 19:18


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061116%2fi-cant-solve-a-cyclic-redundancy-check%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

          Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

          A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$