Mixing
Is it possible to create with Visual Studio a class library assembly which is platform indepedent?
Can I create a class library with Visual Studio which is platform indepedent, meaning it does not depend on .NET Framework?
What I mean is this: ECMA 335 defines CLI and the basic types, so I am trying to see how to create an assembly which is just ECMA 335 compliant, and platform independent. I just want an assembly which has simple code with types defined by ECMA 335. Is it possible?
Or, since the compiler is actually part of the .NET runtime (Microsoft's .NET Framework in this case), there's no way you could actually do this?
.net clr
asked Nov 19 '18 at 15:32
Don Box
911721
|
show 5 more comments
Can I create a class library with Visual Studio which is platform indepedent, meaning it does not depend on .NET Framework?
What I mean is this: ECMA 335 defines CLI and the basic types, so I am trying to see how to create an assembly which is just ECMA 335 compliant, and platform independent. I just want an assembly which has simple code with types defined by ECMA 335. Is it possible?
Or, since the compiler is actually part of the .NET runtime (Microsoft's .NET Framework in this case), there's no way you could actually do this?
.net clr
asked Nov 19 '18 at 15:32
Don Box
911721
What type of code are you writing where you won't be depending on framework supplied types such asintorstring?
– Damien_The_Unbeliever
Nov 19 '18 at 15:39
@Damien_The_Unbeliever Imagine simple code which only implements some logic. This shouldn't be that common.
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:41
@Damien_The_Unbeliever What do you mean by "framework supplied types such as int or string"? These types are actually part of ECMA 335, they are not framework's types
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:42
int and string are parts of Common Types System (CTS)
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:44
1
.NET assemblies are platform-independent by design. Problem is that the reference assemblies you use often are not. Creating a .NETStandard library is as close as you can get.
– Hans Passant
Nov 19 '18 at 15:46
|
show 5 more comments
Can I create a class library with Visual Studio which is platform indepedent, meaning it does not depend on .NET Framework?
What I mean is this: ECMA 335 defines CLI and the basic types, so I am trying to see how to create an assembly which is just ECMA 335 compliant, and platform independent. I just want an assembly which has simple code with types defined by ECMA 335. Is it possible?
Or, since the compiler is actually part of the .NET runtime (Microsoft's .NET Framework in this case), there's no way you could actually do this?
.net clr
asked Nov 19 '18 at 15:32
Don Box
911721
Can I create a class library with Visual Studio which is platform indepedent, meaning it does not depend on .NET Framework?
What I mean is this: ECMA 335 defines CLI and the basic types, so I am trying to see how to create an assembly which is just ECMA 335 compliant, and platform independent. I just want an assembly which has simple code with types defined by ECMA 335. Is it possible?
Or, since the compiler is actually part of the .NET runtime (Microsoft's .NET Framework in this case), there's no way you could actually do this?
.net clr
.net clr
asked Nov 19 '18 at 15:32
Don Box
911721
asked Nov 19 '18 at 15:32
Don Box
911721
edited Nov 19 '18 at 15:40
asked Nov 19 '18 at 15:32
Don Box
911721
asked Nov 19 '18 at 15:32
Don Box
911721
asked Nov 19 '18 at 15:32
Don Box
911721
911721
What type of code are you writing where you won't be depending on framework supplied types such asintorstring?
– Damien_The_Unbeliever
Nov 19 '18 at 15:39
@Damien_The_Unbeliever Imagine simple code which only implements some logic. This shouldn't be that common.
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:41
@Damien_The_Unbeliever What do you mean by "framework supplied types such as int or string"? These types are actually part of ECMA 335, they are not framework's types
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:42
int and string are parts of Common Types System (CTS)
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:44
1
.NET assemblies are platform-independent by design. Problem is that the reference assemblies you use often are not. Creating a .NETStandard library is as close as you can get.
– Hans Passant
Nov 19 '18 at 15:46
|
show 5 more comments
What type of code are you writing where you won't be depending on framework supplied types such asintorstring?
– Damien_The_Unbeliever
Nov 19 '18 at 15:39
@Damien_The_Unbeliever Imagine simple code which only implements some logic. This shouldn't be that common.
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:41
@Damien_The_Unbeliever What do you mean by "framework supplied types such as int or string"? These types are actually part of ECMA 335, they are not framework's types
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:42
int and string are parts of Common Types System (CTS)
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:44
1
.NET assemblies are platform-independent by design. Problem is that the reference assemblies you use often are not. Creating a .NETStandard library is as close as you can get.
– Hans Passant
Nov 19 '18 at 15:46
What type of code are you writing where you won't be depending on framework supplied types such as
int or string?– Damien_The_Unbeliever
Nov 19 '18 at 15:39
What type of code are you writing where you won't be depending on framework supplied types such as
int or string?– Damien_The_Unbeliever
Nov 19 '18 at 15:39
@Damien_The_Unbeliever Imagine simple code which only implements some logic. This shouldn't be that common.
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:41
@Damien_The_Unbeliever Imagine simple code which only implements some logic. This shouldn't be that common.
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:41
@Damien_The_Unbeliever What do you mean by "framework supplied types such as int or string"? These types are actually part of ECMA 335, they are not framework's types
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:42
@Damien_The_Unbeliever What do you mean by "framework supplied types such as int or string"? These types are actually part of ECMA 335, they are not framework's types
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:42
int and string are parts of Common Types System (CTS)
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:44
int and string are parts of Common Types System (CTS)
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:44
1
1
.NET assemblies are platform-independent by design. Problem is that the reference assemblies you use often are not. Creating a .NETStandard library is as close as you can get.
– Hans Passant
Nov 19 '18 at 15:46
.NET assemblies are platform-independent by design. Problem is that the reference assemblies you use often are not. Creating a .NETStandard library is as close as you can get.
– Hans Passant
Nov 19 '18 at 15:46
|
show 5 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53377907%2fis-it-possible-to-create-with-visual-studio-a-class-library-assembly-which-is-pl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53377907%2fis-it-possible-to-create-with-visual-studio-a-class-library-assembly-which-is-pl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What type of code are you writing where you won't be depending on framework supplied types such as
intorstring?– Damien_The_Unbeliever
Nov 19 '18 at 15:39
@Damien_The_Unbeliever Imagine simple code which only implements some logic. This shouldn't be that common.
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:41
@Damien_The_Unbeliever What do you mean by "framework supplied types such as int or string"? These types are actually part of ECMA 335, they are not framework's types
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:42
int and string are parts of Common Types System (CTS)
– Don Box
Nov 19 '18 at 15:44
1
.NET assemblies are platform-independent by design. Problem is that the reference assemblies you use often are not. Creating a .NETStandard library is as close as you can get.
– Hans Passant
Nov 19 '18 at 15:46