Mixing
plr.dll: %1 is not a valid Win32 application
I have Postgres version 10 installed running under windows 10 enterprise using the pl/r interface. It has been working nicely up till now. Now I get
ERROR: could not load library "C:/Program Files/PostgreSQL/10/lib/plr.dll": %1 is not a valid Win32 application.
error message. I tried to download and replace the Pl/r files (both the 64bit and the 32 bit versions), stopped/restarted the service, but it did not help. Any suggestions?
postgresql plr
edited Nov 19 '18 at 15:35
Hans Passant
784k10612882057
asked Nov 19 '18 at 15:00
Judit
3416
add a comment |
I have Postgres version 10 installed running under windows 10 enterprise using the pl/r interface. It has been working nicely up till now. Now I get
ERROR: could not load library "C:/Program Files/PostgreSQL/10/lib/plr.dll": %1 is not a valid Win32 application.
error message. I tried to download and replace the Pl/r files (both the 64bit and the 32 bit versions), stopped/restarted the service, but it did not help. Any suggestions?
postgresql plr
edited Nov 19 '18 at 15:35
Hans Passant
784k10612882057
asked Nov 19 '18 at 15:00
Judit
3416
The Postgres installation location indicates that you are using a 64bit Postgres, so you need to use a 64bit version of PL/r
– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 19 '18 at 15:52
Tried it, but the message remained the same.
– Judit
Nov 20 '18 at 10:59
add a comment |
I have Postgres version 10 installed running under windows 10 enterprise using the pl/r interface. It has been working nicely up till now. Now I get
ERROR: could not load library "C:/Program Files/PostgreSQL/10/lib/plr.dll": %1 is not a valid Win32 application.
error message. I tried to download and replace the Pl/r files (both the 64bit and the 32 bit versions), stopped/restarted the service, but it did not help. Any suggestions?
postgresql plr
edited Nov 19 '18 at 15:35
Hans Passant
784k10612882057
asked Nov 19 '18 at 15:00
Judit
3416
I have Postgres version 10 installed running under windows 10 enterprise using the pl/r interface. It has been working nicely up till now. Now I get
ERROR: could not load library "C:/Program Files/PostgreSQL/10/lib/plr.dll": %1 is not a valid Win32 application.
error message. I tried to download and replace the Pl/r files (both the 64bit and the 32 bit versions), stopped/restarted the service, but it did not help. Any suggestions?
postgresql plr
postgresql plr
edited Nov 19 '18 at 15:35
Hans Passant
784k10612882057
asked Nov 19 '18 at 15:00
Judit
3416
edited Nov 19 '18 at 15:35
Hans Passant
784k10612882057
asked Nov 19 '18 at 15:00
Judit
3416
edited Nov 19 '18 at 15:35
Hans Passant
784k10612882057
edited Nov 19 '18 at 15:35
Hans Passant
784k10612882057
edited Nov 19 '18 at 15:35
Hans Passant
784k10612882057
784k10612882057
asked Nov 19 '18 at 15:00
Judit
3416
asked Nov 19 '18 at 15:00
Judit
3416
asked Nov 19 '18 at 15:00
Judit
3416
3416
The Postgres installation location indicates that you are using a 64bit Postgres, so you need to use a 64bit version of PL/r
– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 19 '18 at 15:52
Tried it, but the message remained the same.
– Judit
Nov 20 '18 at 10:59
add a comment |
The Postgres installation location indicates that you are using a 64bit Postgres, so you need to use a 64bit version of PL/r
– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 19 '18 at 15:52
Tried it, but the message remained the same.
– Judit
Nov 20 '18 at 10:59
The Postgres installation location indicates that you are using a 64bit Postgres, so you need to use a 64bit version of PL/r
– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 19 '18 at 15:52
The Postgres installation location indicates that you are using a 64bit Postgres, so you need to use a 64bit version of PL/r
– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 19 '18 at 15:52
Tried it, but the message remained the same.
– Judit
Nov 20 '18 at 10:59
Tried it, but the message remained the same.
– Judit
Nov 20 '18 at 10:59
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I found the cause: Rdotnet needed the 32bit version of R and I changed the path (and forgot all about it). The error message was misleading, because it R had the wrong version, not the plr.dll. (if I copied the 32bit version od the dll it still didn't work). So thanks for trying to help.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:23
Judit
3416
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53377331%2fplr-dll-1-is-not-a-valid-win32-application%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I found the cause: Rdotnet needed the 32bit version of R and I changed the path (and forgot all about it). The error message was misleading, because it R had the wrong version, not the plr.dll. (if I copied the 32bit version od the dll it still didn't work). So thanks for trying to help.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:23
Judit
3416
add a comment |
I found the cause: Rdotnet needed the 32bit version of R and I changed the path (and forgot all about it). The error message was misleading, because it R had the wrong version, not the plr.dll. (if I copied the 32bit version od the dll it still didn't work). So thanks for trying to help.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:23
Judit
3416
add a comment |
I found the cause: Rdotnet needed the 32bit version of R and I changed the path (and forgot all about it). The error message was misleading, because it R had the wrong version, not the plr.dll. (if I copied the 32bit version od the dll it still didn't work). So thanks for trying to help.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:23
Judit
3416
I found the cause: Rdotnet needed the 32bit version of R and I changed the path (and forgot all about it). The error message was misleading, because it R had the wrong version, not the plr.dll. (if I copied the 32bit version od the dll it still didn't work). So thanks for trying to help.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:23
Judit
3416
answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:23
Judit
3416
answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:23
Judit
3416
answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:23
Judit
3416
3416
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53377331%2fplr-dll-1-is-not-a-valid-win32-application%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The Postgres installation location indicates that you are using a 64bit Postgres, so you need to use a 64bit version of PL/r
– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 19 '18 at 15:52
Tried it, but the message remained the same.
– Judit
Nov 20 '18 at 10:59