Prove $Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ is a homomorphism given by $([x],...











up vote
0
down vote

favorite













Prove $Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ is a homomorphism given by $([x], [y]) to([x+2y], [y])$.




I don't know how to prove this because $Bbb Z/6Bbb Z$ is NOT homomorphic to $Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ right? Then, how can $Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ be homomorphic?






abstract-algebra







share|cite|improve this question
























  • There is always a trivial homomorphism between groups.
    – CyclotomicField
    7 hours ago










  • That isn't well-defined.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    7 hours ago















up vote
0
down vote

favorite













Prove $Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ is a homomorphism given by $([x], [y]) to([x+2y], [y])$.




I don't know how to prove this because $Bbb Z/6Bbb Z$ is NOT homomorphic to $Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ right? Then, how can $Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ be homomorphic?






abstract-algebra







share|cite|improve this question
























  • There is always a trivial homomorphism between groups.
    – CyclotomicField
    7 hours ago










  • That isn't well-defined.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    7 hours ago













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Prove $Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ is a homomorphism given by $([x], [y]) to([x+2y], [y])$.




I don't know how to prove this because $Bbb Z/6Bbb Z$ is NOT homomorphic to $Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ right? Then, how can $Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ be homomorphic?






abstract-algebra







share|cite|improve this question
















Prove $Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ is a homomorphism given by $([x], [y]) to([x+2y], [y])$.




I don't know how to prove this because $Bbb Z/6Bbb Z$ is NOT homomorphic to $Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ right? Then, how can $Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z times Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ be homomorphic?






abstract-algebra




abstract-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









Tianlalu

2,516632




2,516632










asked 8 hours ago









david D

815




815












  • There is always a trivial homomorphism between groups.
    – CyclotomicField
    7 hours ago










  • That isn't well-defined.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    7 hours ago


















  • There is always a trivial homomorphism between groups.
    – CyclotomicField
    7 hours ago










  • That isn't well-defined.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    7 hours ago
















There is always a trivial homomorphism between groups.
– CyclotomicField
7 hours ago




There is always a trivial homomorphism between groups.
– CyclotomicField
7 hours ago












That isn't well-defined.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
7 hours ago




That isn't well-defined.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
7 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













It's enough to prove it for each component.
begin{align}
&varphi_{11}:Bbb Z/4Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z&
&x+4Bbb Zmapsto x+4Bbb Z\
&varphi_{12}:Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z&
&y+6Bbb Zmapsto 2y+4Bbb Z\
&varphi_{21}:Bbb Z/4Bbb Z to Bbb Z/3Bbb Z&
&x+4Bbb Zmapsto 0+3Bbb Z\
&varphi_{22}:Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/3Bbb Z&
&y+6Bbb Zmapsto y+3Bbb Z\
end{align}
In particular, $varphi_{22}$ is the only group homomorphism making the following diagram commutative$require{AMScd}$:
begin{CD}
Bbb Z@>ymapsto y+3Bbb Z>>Bbb Z/3Bbb Z\
@VVV @|\
Bbb Z/6Bbb Z@>>varphi_{22}>Bbb Z/3Bbb Z
end{CD}






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004539%2fprove-bbb-z-4-bbb-z-times-bbb-z-6-bbb-z-to-bbb-z-4-bbb-z-times-bbb-z-3-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    It's enough to prove it for each component.
    begin{align}
    &varphi_{11}:Bbb Z/4Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z&
    &x+4Bbb Zmapsto x+4Bbb Z\
    &varphi_{12}:Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z&
    &y+6Bbb Zmapsto 2y+4Bbb Z\
    &varphi_{21}:Bbb Z/4Bbb Z to Bbb Z/3Bbb Z&
    &x+4Bbb Zmapsto 0+3Bbb Z\
    &varphi_{22}:Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/3Bbb Z&
    &y+6Bbb Zmapsto y+3Bbb Z\
    end{align}
    In particular, $varphi_{22}$ is the only group homomorphism making the following diagram commutative$require{AMScd}$:
    begin{CD}
    Bbb Z@>ymapsto y+3Bbb Z>>Bbb Z/3Bbb Z\
    @VVV @|\
    Bbb Z/6Bbb Z@>>varphi_{22}>Bbb Z/3Bbb Z
    end{CD}






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      It's enough to prove it for each component.
      begin{align}
      &varphi_{11}:Bbb Z/4Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z&
      &x+4Bbb Zmapsto x+4Bbb Z\
      &varphi_{12}:Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z&
      &y+6Bbb Zmapsto 2y+4Bbb Z\
      &varphi_{21}:Bbb Z/4Bbb Z to Bbb Z/3Bbb Z&
      &x+4Bbb Zmapsto 0+3Bbb Z\
      &varphi_{22}:Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/3Bbb Z&
      &y+6Bbb Zmapsto y+3Bbb Z\
      end{align}
      In particular, $varphi_{22}$ is the only group homomorphism making the following diagram commutative$require{AMScd}$:
      begin{CD}
      Bbb Z@>ymapsto y+3Bbb Z>>Bbb Z/3Bbb Z\
      @VVV @|\
      Bbb Z/6Bbb Z@>>varphi_{22}>Bbb Z/3Bbb Z
      end{CD}






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        It's enough to prove it for each component.
        begin{align}
        &varphi_{11}:Bbb Z/4Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z&
        &x+4Bbb Zmapsto x+4Bbb Z\
        &varphi_{12}:Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z&
        &y+6Bbb Zmapsto 2y+4Bbb Z\
        &varphi_{21}:Bbb Z/4Bbb Z to Bbb Z/3Bbb Z&
        &x+4Bbb Zmapsto 0+3Bbb Z\
        &varphi_{22}:Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/3Bbb Z&
        &y+6Bbb Zmapsto y+3Bbb Z\
        end{align}
        In particular, $varphi_{22}$ is the only group homomorphism making the following diagram commutative$require{AMScd}$:
        begin{CD}
        Bbb Z@>ymapsto y+3Bbb Z>>Bbb Z/3Bbb Z\
        @VVV @|\
        Bbb Z/6Bbb Z@>>varphi_{22}>Bbb Z/3Bbb Z
        end{CD}






        share|cite|improve this answer












        It's enough to prove it for each component.
        begin{align}
        &varphi_{11}:Bbb Z/4Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z&
        &x+4Bbb Zmapsto x+4Bbb Z\
        &varphi_{12}:Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/4Bbb Z&
        &y+6Bbb Zmapsto 2y+4Bbb Z\
        &varphi_{21}:Bbb Z/4Bbb Z to Bbb Z/3Bbb Z&
        &x+4Bbb Zmapsto 0+3Bbb Z\
        &varphi_{22}:Bbb Z/6Bbb Z to Bbb Z/3Bbb Z&
        &y+6Bbb Zmapsto y+3Bbb Z\
        end{align}
        In particular, $varphi_{22}$ is the only group homomorphism making the following diagram commutative$require{AMScd}$:
        begin{CD}
        Bbb Z@>ymapsto y+3Bbb Z>>Bbb Z/3Bbb Z\
        @VVV @|\
        Bbb Z/6Bbb Z@>>varphi_{22}>Bbb Z/3Bbb Z
        end{CD}







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        Fabio Lucchini

        7,60511226




        7,60511226






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004539%2fprove-bbb-z-4-bbb-z-times-bbb-z-6-bbb-z-to-bbb-z-4-bbb-z-times-bbb-z-3-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            Image
            .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 0 I have successfully enabled authorization on MongoDB and I have created an account on the admin database and then I created an account for my database called test. The following connection string to connect to my test database works successfully: mongo --host 192.168.17.52 --port 27017 -u user1 -p password --authenticationDatabase test Only problem I have now is, I cannot execute commands such as: show dbs. I get the following error when I try to do so: "errmsg" : "not authorized on admin to execute command { listDatabases: 1.0, lsid: { id: UUID("a1d5bc0d-bc58-485e-b232-270758a89455") }, $db: "admin...
            Read more

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

            Image
            1 I tried to upgrade a yummy sandwich made of two test slices (@JsonTest and @JdbcTest in my case, crunchy test code in between) adding spring boot 2.1 flavour to it. But it seems it was not much of a success. I cannot annotate my tests with many @...Test since they are now each bringing their own XxxTestContextBootstrapper. It used to work when they all used same SpringBootTestContextBootstrapper. @RunWith(SpringRunner.class) @JdbcTest @JsonTest public class Test { @Test public void test() { System.out.printn("Hello, World !"); } } The error I get from BootstrapUtils is illegalStateException : Configuration error: found multiple declarations of @BootstrapWith for test class I understand I might be doing something wrong here but is there an easy way I could load both Json and Jdbc contex...
            Read more

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

            Image
            .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 0 I've got the same issue at #9280. I tried all solutions from that topic with/without GlobalKey for Scaffold and Form but the problem wasn't fixed. I tried to build a authentication form with login and signup. But the keyboard doesn't show when I tap the TextFormField at the first time. Then I try to input some letter from physical keyboard, the widget is rebuilt. Like this: login screen Nothing to be log when I run flutter run --verbose, so I logged manually. Every tapping on field, the widget called dispose -> init -> build. [√] Flutter (Channel beta, v1.0.0, on Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.17763.195], ...
            Read more