Relation between trace of matrix $A^*A$ and invertibility of the matrix $A$
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is there any relation between $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)$ and invertibility of the matrix $A$? What information about the matrix $A$ does $A^*A$ gives ?
I was confused about this when I came across the following statements:
Is it true that :
- If $A$ is invertible, then $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)$ is non zero.
- If $|mathrm{tr}(A^*A)|<n^2$, then $|a_{ij}|<1$ for some $i,j$
- If $|mathrm{tr}(A^*A)|=0$, then $A$ is a zero matrix.
Can someone help me with the answer? Thank you in advance.
linear-algebra trace
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is there any relation between $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)$ and invertibility of the matrix $A$? What information about the matrix $A$ does $A^*A$ gives ?
I was confused about this when I came across the following statements:
Is it true that :
- If $A$ is invertible, then $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)$ is non zero.
- If $|mathrm{tr}(A^*A)|<n^2$, then $|a_{ij}|<1$ for some $i,j$
- If $|mathrm{tr}(A^*A)|=0$, then $A$ is a zero matrix.
Can someone help me with the answer? Thank you in advance.
linear-algebra trace
New contributor
What is $A^*$ in context? Complex conjugate of $A$? Conjugate-transpose of $A$?
– Richard Martin
yesterday
@RichardMartin Conjugate transpose
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
yesterday
3
Hint: $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)=sum_{i,j} |a_{ij}|^2$. @RichardMartin No, it's not the "sum of squares", there is a modulus.
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is there any relation between $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)$ and invertibility of the matrix $A$? What information about the matrix $A$ does $A^*A$ gives ?
I was confused about this when I came across the following statements:
Is it true that :
- If $A$ is invertible, then $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)$ is non zero.
- If $|mathrm{tr}(A^*A)|<n^2$, then $|a_{ij}|<1$ for some $i,j$
- If $|mathrm{tr}(A^*A)|=0$, then $A$ is a zero matrix.
Can someone help me with the answer? Thank you in advance.
linear-algebra trace
New contributor
Is there any relation between $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)$ and invertibility of the matrix $A$? What information about the matrix $A$ does $A^*A$ gives ?
I was confused about this when I came across the following statements:
Is it true that :
- If $A$ is invertible, then $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)$ is non zero.
- If $|mathrm{tr}(A^*A)|<n^2$, then $|a_{ij}|<1$ for some $i,j$
- If $|mathrm{tr}(A^*A)|=0$, then $A$ is a zero matrix.
Can someone help me with the answer? Thank you in advance.
linear-algebra trace
linear-algebra trace
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
Jean-Claude Arbaut
14.3k63361
14.3k63361
New contributor
asked yesterday
math math
84
84
New contributor
New contributor
What is $A^*$ in context? Complex conjugate of $A$? Conjugate-transpose of $A$?
– Richard Martin
yesterday
@RichardMartin Conjugate transpose
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
yesterday
3
Hint: $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)=sum_{i,j} |a_{ij}|^2$. @RichardMartin No, it's not the "sum of squares", there is a modulus.
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
yesterday
add a comment |
What is $A^*$ in context? Complex conjugate of $A$? Conjugate-transpose of $A$?
– Richard Martin
yesterday
@RichardMartin Conjugate transpose
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
yesterday
3
Hint: $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)=sum_{i,j} |a_{ij}|^2$. @RichardMartin No, it's not the "sum of squares", there is a modulus.
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
yesterday
What is $A^*$ in context? Complex conjugate of $A$? Conjugate-transpose of $A$?
– Richard Martin
yesterday
What is $A^*$ in context? Complex conjugate of $A$? Conjugate-transpose of $A$?
– Richard Martin
yesterday
@RichardMartin Conjugate transpose
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
yesterday
@RichardMartin Conjugate transpose
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
yesterday
3
3
Hint: $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)=sum_{i,j} |a_{ij}|^2$. @RichardMartin No, it's not the "sum of squares", there is a modulus.
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
yesterday
Hint: $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)=sum_{i,j} |a_{ij}|^2$. @RichardMartin No, it's not the "sum of squares", there is a modulus.
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Let $A in mathbb{C}^{n times n}$ be a complex square matrix.
Since for a complex number $z = x + iy$ we have
$$
z^* z = (x - iy)(x + iy) = x^2 + y^2 = |z|^2,
quad text{where } |z| := sqrt{x^2 + y^2}
$$
Now we have
$$
A^* A =
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1}^* & ldots & a_{n,1}^* \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{1,n}^* & ldots & a_{n,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1} & ldots & a_{1,n} \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{n,1} & ldots & a_{n,n}
end{pmatrix}
= begin{pmatrix}
sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,1} a_{i,1}^* & & ast \
& ddots & \
ast & & sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,n} a_{i,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
$$
therefore we have $operatorname{tr}(A^* A) = sum_{i,j=1}^{n} |a_{i,j}|^2$
- Let let $operatorname{tr}(A^*A) = 0$ then $|a_{i,j}|=0$ for all so the $A$ is the zero matrix, so $det(A)=0$, so it's not invertible, proving (1) by contraposition.
- From the above sum formula for the trace, since all summands are positive, when the sum is smaller than $n^2$, which is the number of summands, one of the summands has to be smaller than 1.
- Proven in (1).
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Let $A in mathbb{C}^{n times n}$ be a complex square matrix.
Since for a complex number $z = x + iy$ we have
$$
z^* z = (x - iy)(x + iy) = x^2 + y^2 = |z|^2,
quad text{where } |z| := sqrt{x^2 + y^2}
$$
Now we have
$$
A^* A =
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1}^* & ldots & a_{n,1}^* \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{1,n}^* & ldots & a_{n,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1} & ldots & a_{1,n} \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{n,1} & ldots & a_{n,n}
end{pmatrix}
= begin{pmatrix}
sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,1} a_{i,1}^* & & ast \
& ddots & \
ast & & sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,n} a_{i,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
$$
therefore we have $operatorname{tr}(A^* A) = sum_{i,j=1}^{n} |a_{i,j}|^2$
- Let let $operatorname{tr}(A^*A) = 0$ then $|a_{i,j}|=0$ for all so the $A$ is the zero matrix, so $det(A)=0$, so it's not invertible, proving (1) by contraposition.
- From the above sum formula for the trace, since all summands are positive, when the sum is smaller than $n^2$, which is the number of summands, one of the summands has to be smaller than 1.
- Proven in (1).
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Let $A in mathbb{C}^{n times n}$ be a complex square matrix.
Since for a complex number $z = x + iy$ we have
$$
z^* z = (x - iy)(x + iy) = x^2 + y^2 = |z|^2,
quad text{where } |z| := sqrt{x^2 + y^2}
$$
Now we have
$$
A^* A =
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1}^* & ldots & a_{n,1}^* \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{1,n}^* & ldots & a_{n,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1} & ldots & a_{1,n} \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{n,1} & ldots & a_{n,n}
end{pmatrix}
= begin{pmatrix}
sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,1} a_{i,1}^* & & ast \
& ddots & \
ast & & sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,n} a_{i,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
$$
therefore we have $operatorname{tr}(A^* A) = sum_{i,j=1}^{n} |a_{i,j}|^2$
- Let let $operatorname{tr}(A^*A) = 0$ then $|a_{i,j}|=0$ for all so the $A$ is the zero matrix, so $det(A)=0$, so it's not invertible, proving (1) by contraposition.
- From the above sum formula for the trace, since all summands are positive, when the sum is smaller than $n^2$, which is the number of summands, one of the summands has to be smaller than 1.
- Proven in (1).
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Let $A in mathbb{C}^{n times n}$ be a complex square matrix.
Since for a complex number $z = x + iy$ we have
$$
z^* z = (x - iy)(x + iy) = x^2 + y^2 = |z|^2,
quad text{where } |z| := sqrt{x^2 + y^2}
$$
Now we have
$$
A^* A =
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1}^* & ldots & a_{n,1}^* \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{1,n}^* & ldots & a_{n,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1} & ldots & a_{1,n} \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{n,1} & ldots & a_{n,n}
end{pmatrix}
= begin{pmatrix}
sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,1} a_{i,1}^* & & ast \
& ddots & \
ast & & sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,n} a_{i,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
$$
therefore we have $operatorname{tr}(A^* A) = sum_{i,j=1}^{n} |a_{i,j}|^2$
- Let let $operatorname{tr}(A^*A) = 0$ then $|a_{i,j}|=0$ for all so the $A$ is the zero matrix, so $det(A)=0$, so it's not invertible, proving (1) by contraposition.
- From the above sum formula for the trace, since all summands are positive, when the sum is smaller than $n^2$, which is the number of summands, one of the summands has to be smaller than 1.
- Proven in (1).
Let $A in mathbb{C}^{n times n}$ be a complex square matrix.
Since for a complex number $z = x + iy$ we have
$$
z^* z = (x - iy)(x + iy) = x^2 + y^2 = |z|^2,
quad text{where } |z| := sqrt{x^2 + y^2}
$$
Now we have
$$
A^* A =
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1}^* & ldots & a_{n,1}^* \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{1,n}^* & ldots & a_{n,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1} & ldots & a_{1,n} \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{n,1} & ldots & a_{n,n}
end{pmatrix}
= begin{pmatrix}
sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,1} a_{i,1}^* & & ast \
& ddots & \
ast & & sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,n} a_{i,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
$$
therefore we have $operatorname{tr}(A^* A) = sum_{i,j=1}^{n} |a_{i,j}|^2$
- Let let $operatorname{tr}(A^*A) = 0$ then $|a_{i,j}|=0$ for all so the $A$ is the zero matrix, so $det(A)=0$, so it's not invertible, proving (1) by contraposition.
- From the above sum formula for the trace, since all summands are positive, when the sum is smaller than $n^2$, which is the number of summands, one of the summands has to be smaller than 1.
- Proven in (1).
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Viktor Glombik
474220
474220
add a comment |
add a comment |
math math is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
math math is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
math math is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
math math is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004936%2frelation-between-trace-of-matrix-aa-and-invertibility-of-the-matrix-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What is $A^*$ in context? Complex conjugate of $A$? Conjugate-transpose of $A$?
– Richard Martin
yesterday
@RichardMartin Conjugate transpose
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
yesterday
3
Hint: $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)=sum_{i,j} |a_{ij}|^2$. @RichardMartin No, it's not the "sum of squares", there is a modulus.
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
yesterday