Show that this graph is $k$-connected











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Given a $k$-connected graph $G$, let $G'$ be a graph obtained from $G$ by adding a new vertex $x$ and connecting it to any $k$ vertices of $G$. From first principles, show that $G'$ is $k$-connected.



I understand visually how this is, just don't know how to "show it from first principles".










share|cite|improve this question






















  • I'm not sure what first principles mean either but, presumably, it means to prove it from the definition of connectedness; Much like proving limits from first principles means to prove it from $epsilon$-$delta$. So you ought to prove by removing up to $k-1$ vertices the graph $G'$ remains connected.
    – Sisyphus
    15 hours ago















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Given a $k$-connected graph $G$, let $G'$ be a graph obtained from $G$ by adding a new vertex $x$ and connecting it to any $k$ vertices of $G$. From first principles, show that $G'$ is $k$-connected.



I understand visually how this is, just don't know how to "show it from first principles".










share|cite|improve this question






















  • I'm not sure what first principles mean either but, presumably, it means to prove it from the definition of connectedness; Much like proving limits from first principles means to prove it from $epsilon$-$delta$. So you ought to prove by removing up to $k-1$ vertices the graph $G'$ remains connected.
    – Sisyphus
    15 hours ago













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Given a $k$-connected graph $G$, let $G'$ be a graph obtained from $G$ by adding a new vertex $x$ and connecting it to any $k$ vertices of $G$. From first principles, show that $G'$ is $k$-connected.



I understand visually how this is, just don't know how to "show it from first principles".










share|cite|improve this question













Given a $k$-connected graph $G$, let $G'$ be a graph obtained from $G$ by adding a new vertex $x$ and connecting it to any $k$ vertices of $G$. From first principles, show that $G'$ is $k$-connected.



I understand visually how this is, just don't know how to "show it from first principles".







graph-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 15 hours ago









user499701

947




947












  • I'm not sure what first principles mean either but, presumably, it means to prove it from the definition of connectedness; Much like proving limits from first principles means to prove it from $epsilon$-$delta$. So you ought to prove by removing up to $k-1$ vertices the graph $G'$ remains connected.
    – Sisyphus
    15 hours ago


















  • I'm not sure what first principles mean either but, presumably, it means to prove it from the definition of connectedness; Much like proving limits from first principles means to prove it from $epsilon$-$delta$. So you ought to prove by removing up to $k-1$ vertices the graph $G'$ remains connected.
    – Sisyphus
    15 hours ago
















I'm not sure what first principles mean either but, presumably, it means to prove it from the definition of connectedness; Much like proving limits from first principles means to prove it from $epsilon$-$delta$. So you ought to prove by removing up to $k-1$ vertices the graph $G'$ remains connected.
– Sisyphus
15 hours ago




I'm not sure what first principles mean either but, presumably, it means to prove it from the definition of connectedness; Much like proving limits from first principles means to prove it from $epsilon$-$delta$. So you ought to prove by removing up to $k-1$ vertices the graph $G'$ remains connected.
– Sisyphus
15 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













$G$ is a graph that is k-connected means that removing less than $k$ vertices from $G$ and $G$ is still connected. Removing any set of vertices that do not contain $v$ from $G'$ of size less than $K$, doesn't disconnect $v$ from $G'$ as $v$ is connected to $k$ vertices in $G$. It doesn't disconnect $G$ as we removed less than k vertices. Now if you remove a set of vertices from $G'$ containing $v$ of size less than $k$, you don't disconnect $G$ as you removed less than $k$ vertices in $G$. so $G'$ is $k$ connected by definition.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004728%2fshow-that-this-graph-is-k-connected%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    $G$ is a graph that is k-connected means that removing less than $k$ vertices from $G$ and $G$ is still connected. Removing any set of vertices that do not contain $v$ from $G'$ of size less than $K$, doesn't disconnect $v$ from $G'$ as $v$ is connected to $k$ vertices in $G$. It doesn't disconnect $G$ as we removed less than k vertices. Now if you remove a set of vertices from $G'$ containing $v$ of size less than $k$, you don't disconnect $G$ as you removed less than $k$ vertices in $G$. so $G'$ is $k$ connected by definition.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      $G$ is a graph that is k-connected means that removing less than $k$ vertices from $G$ and $G$ is still connected. Removing any set of vertices that do not contain $v$ from $G'$ of size less than $K$, doesn't disconnect $v$ from $G'$ as $v$ is connected to $k$ vertices in $G$. It doesn't disconnect $G$ as we removed less than k vertices. Now if you remove a set of vertices from $G'$ containing $v$ of size less than $k$, you don't disconnect $G$ as you removed less than $k$ vertices in $G$. so $G'$ is $k$ connected by definition.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        $G$ is a graph that is k-connected means that removing less than $k$ vertices from $G$ and $G$ is still connected. Removing any set of vertices that do not contain $v$ from $G'$ of size less than $K$, doesn't disconnect $v$ from $G'$ as $v$ is connected to $k$ vertices in $G$. It doesn't disconnect $G$ as we removed less than k vertices. Now if you remove a set of vertices from $G'$ containing $v$ of size less than $k$, you don't disconnect $G$ as you removed less than $k$ vertices in $G$. so $G'$ is $k$ connected by definition.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        $G$ is a graph that is k-connected means that removing less than $k$ vertices from $G$ and $G$ is still connected. Removing any set of vertices that do not contain $v$ from $G'$ of size less than $K$, doesn't disconnect $v$ from $G'$ as $v$ is connected to $k$ vertices in $G$. It doesn't disconnect $G$ as we removed less than k vertices. Now if you remove a set of vertices from $G'$ containing $v$ of size less than $k$, you don't disconnect $G$ as you removed less than $k$ vertices in $G$. so $G'$ is $k$ connected by definition.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 15 hours ago









        mathnoob

        54010




        54010






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004728%2fshow-that-this-graph-is-k-connected%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

            android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

            WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]