Taking derivative with quotient rule and sums












0












$begingroup$


I am trying to differentiate this with respect to $eta$ but am having some difficulty.



begin{equation}
g_0(1,eta) = frac{frac{3eta}{(eta_c - eta)} + sumlimits_{k=1}^{4}kA_kleft(frac{eta}{eta_c}right)^k}{4eta}
end{equation}



begin{equation}
g_0'(1,eta) = frac{(4eta)left(frac{3eta_c}{(eta_c - eta)^2}+sumlimits_{k=1}^{4}k^2A_kleft(frac{eta}{eta_c}right)^{k-1}right)-left(frac{3eta}{(eta_c - eta)} + sumlimits_{k=1}^{4}kA_kleft(frac{eta}{eta_c}right)^kright)(4)}{(4eta)^2}
end{equation}



Does this look right? When I continue from here, it just does not seem like anything is cancelling out or anything like that, so I want to make sure what I am doing looks correct.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I am trying to differentiate this with respect to $eta$ but am having some difficulty.



    begin{equation}
    g_0(1,eta) = frac{frac{3eta}{(eta_c - eta)} + sumlimits_{k=1}^{4}kA_kleft(frac{eta}{eta_c}right)^k}{4eta}
    end{equation}



    begin{equation}
    g_0'(1,eta) = frac{(4eta)left(frac{3eta_c}{(eta_c - eta)^2}+sumlimits_{k=1}^{4}k^2A_kleft(frac{eta}{eta_c}right)^{k-1}right)-left(frac{3eta}{(eta_c - eta)} + sumlimits_{k=1}^{4}kA_kleft(frac{eta}{eta_c}right)^kright)(4)}{(4eta)^2}
    end{equation}



    Does this look right? When I continue from here, it just does not seem like anything is cancelling out or anything like that, so I want to make sure what I am doing looks correct.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I am trying to differentiate this with respect to $eta$ but am having some difficulty.



      begin{equation}
      g_0(1,eta) = frac{frac{3eta}{(eta_c - eta)} + sumlimits_{k=1}^{4}kA_kleft(frac{eta}{eta_c}right)^k}{4eta}
      end{equation}



      begin{equation}
      g_0'(1,eta) = frac{(4eta)left(frac{3eta_c}{(eta_c - eta)^2}+sumlimits_{k=1}^{4}k^2A_kleft(frac{eta}{eta_c}right)^{k-1}right)-left(frac{3eta}{(eta_c - eta)} + sumlimits_{k=1}^{4}kA_kleft(frac{eta}{eta_c}right)^kright)(4)}{(4eta)^2}
      end{equation}



      Does this look right? When I continue from here, it just does not seem like anything is cancelling out or anything like that, so I want to make sure what I am doing looks correct.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I am trying to differentiate this with respect to $eta$ but am having some difficulty.



      begin{equation}
      g_0(1,eta) = frac{frac{3eta}{(eta_c - eta)} + sumlimits_{k=1}^{4}kA_kleft(frac{eta}{eta_c}right)^k}{4eta}
      end{equation}



      begin{equation}
      g_0'(1,eta) = frac{(4eta)left(frac{3eta_c}{(eta_c - eta)^2}+sumlimits_{k=1}^{4}k^2A_kleft(frac{eta}{eta_c}right)^{k-1}right)-left(frac{3eta}{(eta_c - eta)} + sumlimits_{k=1}^{4}kA_kleft(frac{eta}{eta_c}right)^kright)(4)}{(4eta)^2}
      end{equation}



      Does this look right? When I continue from here, it just does not seem like anything is cancelling out or anything like that, so I want to make sure what I am doing looks correct.







      derivatives






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 15 at 18:47









      Jackson HartJackson Hart

      5162626




      5162626






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          begin{eqnarray}
          require{cancel}
          frac{{rm d}}{{rm d}eta}g(1, eta) &=& frac{1}{4}frac{{rm d}}{{rm d}eta} left[ frac{3cancel{eta}}{cancel{eta}(eta_c - eta)} + sum_{k=1}^4 k A_k frac{eta^k}{eta eta_c^k}right] \
          &=& frac{3}{4} frac{{rm d}}{{rm d}eta} frac{1}{eta_c - eta} + frac{1}{4}sum_{k=1}^4 frac{k A_k}{eta_c^k} frac{{rm d}eta^{k-1}}{{rm d}eta} \
          &=& frac{3}{4}frac{1}{(eta_c - eta)^2} + frac{1}{4}sum_{k=1}^4frac{k(k-1) A_k}{eta_c^k}eta^{k - 2} \
          &=& frac{3}{4}frac{1}{(eta_c - eta)^2} + frac{1}{4}sum_{k=1}^4frac{k(k-1) A_k}{eta_c^2}left(frac{eta}{eta_c}right)^{k - 2}
          end{eqnarray}






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Wow, thanks! As a follow-up, assuming that $x=frac{eta}{eta_c}$, how can I get rid of all $eta$'s and just express them as x?
            $endgroup$
            – Jackson Hart
            Jan 15 at 20:16












          • $begingroup$
            The first term becomes $$ frac{3}{4}frac{1}{eta_c^2(1 - eta/eta_c)^2} = frac{3}{4eta_c^2} frac{1}{(1 - x)^2} $$ the last one is the same except replace the factor in parenthesis by $x$
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Jan 15 at 20:24










          • $begingroup$
            Did you accidentally lose a $eta$? The last term in first and second lines. In first line, there is an $eta$ in denominator. Where is it on next line? After the $d eta$ shouldnt there also be an $eta$ in denominator? It looks like you dropped it?
            $endgroup$
            – Jackson Hart
            Jan 15 at 20:48












          • $begingroup$
            @JacksonHart Yes I did! Sorry about that. Fixed
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Jan 15 at 20:52











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3074781%2ftaking-derivative-with-quotient-rule-and-sums%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          begin{eqnarray}
          require{cancel}
          frac{{rm d}}{{rm d}eta}g(1, eta) &=& frac{1}{4}frac{{rm d}}{{rm d}eta} left[ frac{3cancel{eta}}{cancel{eta}(eta_c - eta)} + sum_{k=1}^4 k A_k frac{eta^k}{eta eta_c^k}right] \
          &=& frac{3}{4} frac{{rm d}}{{rm d}eta} frac{1}{eta_c - eta} + frac{1}{4}sum_{k=1}^4 frac{k A_k}{eta_c^k} frac{{rm d}eta^{k-1}}{{rm d}eta} \
          &=& frac{3}{4}frac{1}{(eta_c - eta)^2} + frac{1}{4}sum_{k=1}^4frac{k(k-1) A_k}{eta_c^k}eta^{k - 2} \
          &=& frac{3}{4}frac{1}{(eta_c - eta)^2} + frac{1}{4}sum_{k=1}^4frac{k(k-1) A_k}{eta_c^2}left(frac{eta}{eta_c}right)^{k - 2}
          end{eqnarray}






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Wow, thanks! As a follow-up, assuming that $x=frac{eta}{eta_c}$, how can I get rid of all $eta$'s and just express them as x?
            $endgroup$
            – Jackson Hart
            Jan 15 at 20:16












          • $begingroup$
            The first term becomes $$ frac{3}{4}frac{1}{eta_c^2(1 - eta/eta_c)^2} = frac{3}{4eta_c^2} frac{1}{(1 - x)^2} $$ the last one is the same except replace the factor in parenthesis by $x$
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Jan 15 at 20:24










          • $begingroup$
            Did you accidentally lose a $eta$? The last term in first and second lines. In first line, there is an $eta$ in denominator. Where is it on next line? After the $d eta$ shouldnt there also be an $eta$ in denominator? It looks like you dropped it?
            $endgroup$
            – Jackson Hart
            Jan 15 at 20:48












          • $begingroup$
            @JacksonHart Yes I did! Sorry about that. Fixed
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Jan 15 at 20:52
















          1












          $begingroup$

          begin{eqnarray}
          require{cancel}
          frac{{rm d}}{{rm d}eta}g(1, eta) &=& frac{1}{4}frac{{rm d}}{{rm d}eta} left[ frac{3cancel{eta}}{cancel{eta}(eta_c - eta)} + sum_{k=1}^4 k A_k frac{eta^k}{eta eta_c^k}right] \
          &=& frac{3}{4} frac{{rm d}}{{rm d}eta} frac{1}{eta_c - eta} + frac{1}{4}sum_{k=1}^4 frac{k A_k}{eta_c^k} frac{{rm d}eta^{k-1}}{{rm d}eta} \
          &=& frac{3}{4}frac{1}{(eta_c - eta)^2} + frac{1}{4}sum_{k=1}^4frac{k(k-1) A_k}{eta_c^k}eta^{k - 2} \
          &=& frac{3}{4}frac{1}{(eta_c - eta)^2} + frac{1}{4}sum_{k=1}^4frac{k(k-1) A_k}{eta_c^2}left(frac{eta}{eta_c}right)^{k - 2}
          end{eqnarray}






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Wow, thanks! As a follow-up, assuming that $x=frac{eta}{eta_c}$, how can I get rid of all $eta$'s and just express them as x?
            $endgroup$
            – Jackson Hart
            Jan 15 at 20:16












          • $begingroup$
            The first term becomes $$ frac{3}{4}frac{1}{eta_c^2(1 - eta/eta_c)^2} = frac{3}{4eta_c^2} frac{1}{(1 - x)^2} $$ the last one is the same except replace the factor in parenthesis by $x$
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Jan 15 at 20:24










          • $begingroup$
            Did you accidentally lose a $eta$? The last term in first and second lines. In first line, there is an $eta$ in denominator. Where is it on next line? After the $d eta$ shouldnt there also be an $eta$ in denominator? It looks like you dropped it?
            $endgroup$
            – Jackson Hart
            Jan 15 at 20:48












          • $begingroup$
            @JacksonHart Yes I did! Sorry about that. Fixed
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Jan 15 at 20:52














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          begin{eqnarray}
          require{cancel}
          frac{{rm d}}{{rm d}eta}g(1, eta) &=& frac{1}{4}frac{{rm d}}{{rm d}eta} left[ frac{3cancel{eta}}{cancel{eta}(eta_c - eta)} + sum_{k=1}^4 k A_k frac{eta^k}{eta eta_c^k}right] \
          &=& frac{3}{4} frac{{rm d}}{{rm d}eta} frac{1}{eta_c - eta} + frac{1}{4}sum_{k=1}^4 frac{k A_k}{eta_c^k} frac{{rm d}eta^{k-1}}{{rm d}eta} \
          &=& frac{3}{4}frac{1}{(eta_c - eta)^2} + frac{1}{4}sum_{k=1}^4frac{k(k-1) A_k}{eta_c^k}eta^{k - 2} \
          &=& frac{3}{4}frac{1}{(eta_c - eta)^2} + frac{1}{4}sum_{k=1}^4frac{k(k-1) A_k}{eta_c^2}left(frac{eta}{eta_c}right)^{k - 2}
          end{eqnarray}






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          begin{eqnarray}
          require{cancel}
          frac{{rm d}}{{rm d}eta}g(1, eta) &=& frac{1}{4}frac{{rm d}}{{rm d}eta} left[ frac{3cancel{eta}}{cancel{eta}(eta_c - eta)} + sum_{k=1}^4 k A_k frac{eta^k}{eta eta_c^k}right] \
          &=& frac{3}{4} frac{{rm d}}{{rm d}eta} frac{1}{eta_c - eta} + frac{1}{4}sum_{k=1}^4 frac{k A_k}{eta_c^k} frac{{rm d}eta^{k-1}}{{rm d}eta} \
          &=& frac{3}{4}frac{1}{(eta_c - eta)^2} + frac{1}{4}sum_{k=1}^4frac{k(k-1) A_k}{eta_c^k}eta^{k - 2} \
          &=& frac{3}{4}frac{1}{(eta_c - eta)^2} + frac{1}{4}sum_{k=1}^4frac{k(k-1) A_k}{eta_c^2}left(frac{eta}{eta_c}right)^{k - 2}
          end{eqnarray}







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 15 at 20:51

























          answered Jan 15 at 19:13









          caveraccaverac

          14.6k31130




          14.6k31130












          • $begingroup$
            Wow, thanks! As a follow-up, assuming that $x=frac{eta}{eta_c}$, how can I get rid of all $eta$'s and just express them as x?
            $endgroup$
            – Jackson Hart
            Jan 15 at 20:16












          • $begingroup$
            The first term becomes $$ frac{3}{4}frac{1}{eta_c^2(1 - eta/eta_c)^2} = frac{3}{4eta_c^2} frac{1}{(1 - x)^2} $$ the last one is the same except replace the factor in parenthesis by $x$
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Jan 15 at 20:24










          • $begingroup$
            Did you accidentally lose a $eta$? The last term in first and second lines. In first line, there is an $eta$ in denominator. Where is it on next line? After the $d eta$ shouldnt there also be an $eta$ in denominator? It looks like you dropped it?
            $endgroup$
            – Jackson Hart
            Jan 15 at 20:48












          • $begingroup$
            @JacksonHart Yes I did! Sorry about that. Fixed
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Jan 15 at 20:52


















          • $begingroup$
            Wow, thanks! As a follow-up, assuming that $x=frac{eta}{eta_c}$, how can I get rid of all $eta$'s and just express them as x?
            $endgroup$
            – Jackson Hart
            Jan 15 at 20:16












          • $begingroup$
            The first term becomes $$ frac{3}{4}frac{1}{eta_c^2(1 - eta/eta_c)^2} = frac{3}{4eta_c^2} frac{1}{(1 - x)^2} $$ the last one is the same except replace the factor in parenthesis by $x$
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Jan 15 at 20:24










          • $begingroup$
            Did you accidentally lose a $eta$? The last term in first and second lines. In first line, there is an $eta$ in denominator. Where is it on next line? After the $d eta$ shouldnt there also be an $eta$ in denominator? It looks like you dropped it?
            $endgroup$
            – Jackson Hart
            Jan 15 at 20:48












          • $begingroup$
            @JacksonHart Yes I did! Sorry about that. Fixed
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Jan 15 at 20:52
















          $begingroup$
          Wow, thanks! As a follow-up, assuming that $x=frac{eta}{eta_c}$, how can I get rid of all $eta$'s and just express them as x?
          $endgroup$
          – Jackson Hart
          Jan 15 at 20:16






          $begingroup$
          Wow, thanks! As a follow-up, assuming that $x=frac{eta}{eta_c}$, how can I get rid of all $eta$'s and just express them as x?
          $endgroup$
          – Jackson Hart
          Jan 15 at 20:16














          $begingroup$
          The first term becomes $$ frac{3}{4}frac{1}{eta_c^2(1 - eta/eta_c)^2} = frac{3}{4eta_c^2} frac{1}{(1 - x)^2} $$ the last one is the same except replace the factor in parenthesis by $x$
          $endgroup$
          – caverac
          Jan 15 at 20:24




          $begingroup$
          The first term becomes $$ frac{3}{4}frac{1}{eta_c^2(1 - eta/eta_c)^2} = frac{3}{4eta_c^2} frac{1}{(1 - x)^2} $$ the last one is the same except replace the factor in parenthesis by $x$
          $endgroup$
          – caverac
          Jan 15 at 20:24












          $begingroup$
          Did you accidentally lose a $eta$? The last term in first and second lines. In first line, there is an $eta$ in denominator. Where is it on next line? After the $d eta$ shouldnt there also be an $eta$ in denominator? It looks like you dropped it?
          $endgroup$
          – Jackson Hart
          Jan 15 at 20:48






          $begingroup$
          Did you accidentally lose a $eta$? The last term in first and second lines. In first line, there is an $eta$ in denominator. Where is it on next line? After the $d eta$ shouldnt there also be an $eta$ in denominator? It looks like you dropped it?
          $endgroup$
          – Jackson Hart
          Jan 15 at 20:48














          $begingroup$
          @JacksonHart Yes I did! Sorry about that. Fixed
          $endgroup$
          – caverac
          Jan 15 at 20:52




          $begingroup$
          @JacksonHart Yes I did! Sorry about that. Fixed
          $endgroup$
          – caverac
          Jan 15 at 20:52


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3074781%2ftaking-derivative-with-quotient-rule-and-sums%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          The term 'EXEC' is not recognized as the name of a cmdlet Powershell

          NPM command prompt closes immediately [closed]

          Error binding properties and functions in emscripten