Separate backend from actual program?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am working in a general project involving a piece of software that needs a backend + frontend to show data and interact with it.



Let's say the program gets some data from a few sensors and right now it just saves them into files. In the last weeks we created a database, a backend that gets all the data and saves it into the database, a frontend that references the backend to get the data it needs to show it to a end user.



Our approach was to divide the backend + program from the frontend but now we have this dilemma: is it right to have the backend in the same level, in the same file even, of the program itself? Would it be more correct to divide them too like the front and backend?



Thanks a lot in advance for the suggestions!






backend







share|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I am working in a general project involving a piece of software that needs a backend + frontend to show data and interact with it.



    Let's say the program gets some data from a few sensors and right now it just saves them into files. In the last weeks we created a database, a backend that gets all the data and saves it into the database, a frontend that references the backend to get the data it needs to show it to a end user.



    Our approach was to divide the backend + program from the frontend but now we have this dilemma: is it right to have the backend in the same level, in the same file even, of the program itself? Would it be more correct to divide them too like the front and backend?



    Thanks a lot in advance for the suggestions!






    backend







    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I am working in a general project involving a piece of software that needs a backend + frontend to show data and interact with it.



      Let's say the program gets some data from a few sensors and right now it just saves them into files. In the last weeks we created a database, a backend that gets all the data and saves it into the database, a frontend that references the backend to get the data it needs to show it to a end user.



      Our approach was to divide the backend + program from the frontend but now we have this dilemma: is it right to have the backend in the same level, in the same file even, of the program itself? Would it be more correct to divide them too like the front and backend?



      Thanks a lot in advance for the suggestions!






      backend







      share|improve this question













      I am working in a general project involving a piece of software that needs a backend + frontend to show data and interact with it.



      Let's say the program gets some data from a few sensors and right now it just saves them into files. In the last weeks we created a database, a backend that gets all the data and saves it into the database, a frontend that references the backend to get the data it needs to show it to a end user.



      Our approach was to divide the backend + program from the frontend but now we have this dilemma: is it right to have the backend in the same level, in the same file even, of the program itself? Would it be more correct to divide them too like the front and backend?



      Thanks a lot in advance for the suggestions!






      backend




      backend






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 19 at 11:41









      Eugenio

      348117




      348117





























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53373880%2fseparate-backend-from-actual-program%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53373880%2fseparate-backend-from-actual-program%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          Image
          .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 0 I have successfully enabled authorization on MongoDB and I have created an account on the admin database and then I created an account for my database called test. The following connection string to connect to my test database works successfully: mongo --host 192.168.17.52 --port 27017 -u user1 -p password --authenticationDatabase test Only problem I have now is, I cannot execute commands such as: show dbs. I get the following error when I try to do so: "errmsg" : "not authorized on admin to execute command { listDatabases: 1.0, lsid: { id: UUID("a1d5bc0d-bc58-485e-b232-270758a89455") }, $db: "admin...
          Read more

          in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

          Image
          1 I tried to upgrade a yummy sandwich made of two test slices (@JsonTest and @JdbcTest in my case, crunchy test code in between) adding spring boot 2.1 flavour to it. But it seems it was not much of a success. I cannot annotate my tests with many @...Test since they are now each bringing their own XxxTestContextBootstrapper. It used to work when they all used same SpringBootTestContextBootstrapper. @RunWith(SpringRunner.class) @JdbcTest @JsonTest public class Test { @Test public void test() { System.out.printn("Hello, World !"); } } The error I get from BootstrapUtils is illegalStateException : Configuration error: found multiple declarations of @BootstrapWith for test class I understand I might be doing something wrong here but is there an easy way I could load both Json and Jdbc contex...
          Read more

          How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

          Image
          .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 0 I've got the same issue at #9280. I tried all solutions from that topic with/without GlobalKey for Scaffold and Form but the problem wasn't fixed. I tried to build a authentication form with login and signup. But the keyboard doesn't show when I tap the TextFormField at the first time. Then I try to input some letter from physical keyboard, the widget is rebuilt. Like this: login screen Nothing to be log when I run flutter run --verbose, so I logged manually. Every tapping on field, the widget called dispose -> init -> build. [√] Flutter (Channel beta, v1.0.0, on Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.17763.195], ...
          Read more