Are percentages scalable?
$begingroup$
I have data made up of percentages but no idea how they were calculated. I am using this data to demonstrate Benford’s Law and so far it does follow this law!
But one of the properties of sets that follow Benford’s Law is that they are scale-invariable, so multiplying all the elements by a constant will keep the frequency distribution of the leading digits in the data the same. So I want to test scale invariability in my data by multiplying all the percentages by a constant but I am worried this is wrong on my part because percentages may not be scalable.
By scalable, my understanding is that it can be converted to different ‘units of measurement’/scales. For example, feet and inches are scalable to meters.
Could someone clear this up for me, please?
algebra-precalculus unit-of-measure
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have data made up of percentages but no idea how they were calculated. I am using this data to demonstrate Benford’s Law and so far it does follow this law!
But one of the properties of sets that follow Benford’s Law is that they are scale-invariable, so multiplying all the elements by a constant will keep the frequency distribution of the leading digits in the data the same. So I want to test scale invariability in my data by multiplying all the percentages by a constant but I am worried this is wrong on my part because percentages may not be scalable.
By scalable, my understanding is that it can be converted to different ‘units of measurement’/scales. For example, feet and inches are scalable to meters.
Could someone clear this up for me, please?
algebra-precalculus unit-of-measure
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
What do you precisely mean by "invariability of data"? And what do you precisely mean by scalable percentages? Also, please tell more about the data you have. Some numerical example would be useful.
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Jan 23 at 14:01
$begingroup$
Think of percentages as being "parts per hundred". If you multiply all your percentages by $2$ you are converting "parts per hundred" to "parts per two hundred". If you multiply all your percentages by $10$ you are converting "parts per hundred" to "parts per thousand". This is just the same as multiplying measurements by $12$ to convert units from feet to inches.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Jan 23 at 15:18
$begingroup$
@gandalf61 If you multiply percentages by $2$ don't you convert to "part per fifty?"
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 23 at 15:58
1
$begingroup$
@saulspatz No - to convert to parts per fifty you would divide the percentage value by $2$. For example $20%$ = $20$ parts per hundred = $40$ parts per two hundred = $10$ parts per fifty.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Jan 23 at 16:44
$begingroup$
@gandalf61 Yes, I must still be asleep.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 23 at 16:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have data made up of percentages but no idea how they were calculated. I am using this data to demonstrate Benford’s Law and so far it does follow this law!
But one of the properties of sets that follow Benford’s Law is that they are scale-invariable, so multiplying all the elements by a constant will keep the frequency distribution of the leading digits in the data the same. So I want to test scale invariability in my data by multiplying all the percentages by a constant but I am worried this is wrong on my part because percentages may not be scalable.
By scalable, my understanding is that it can be converted to different ‘units of measurement’/scales. For example, feet and inches are scalable to meters.
Could someone clear this up for me, please?
algebra-precalculus unit-of-measure
$endgroup$
I have data made up of percentages but no idea how they were calculated. I am using this data to demonstrate Benford’s Law and so far it does follow this law!
But one of the properties of sets that follow Benford’s Law is that they are scale-invariable, so multiplying all the elements by a constant will keep the frequency distribution of the leading digits in the data the same. So I want to test scale invariability in my data by multiplying all the percentages by a constant but I am worried this is wrong on my part because percentages may not be scalable.
By scalable, my understanding is that it can be converted to different ‘units of measurement’/scales. For example, feet and inches are scalable to meters.
Could someone clear this up for me, please?
algebra-precalculus unit-of-measure
algebra-precalculus unit-of-measure
edited Jan 23 at 14:53
GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
14k82650
14k82650
asked Jan 23 at 13:50
Alice.SumarnoAlice.Sumarno
83
83
1
$begingroup$
What do you precisely mean by "invariability of data"? And what do you precisely mean by scalable percentages? Also, please tell more about the data you have. Some numerical example would be useful.
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Jan 23 at 14:01
$begingroup$
Think of percentages as being "parts per hundred". If you multiply all your percentages by $2$ you are converting "parts per hundred" to "parts per two hundred". If you multiply all your percentages by $10$ you are converting "parts per hundred" to "parts per thousand". This is just the same as multiplying measurements by $12$ to convert units from feet to inches.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Jan 23 at 15:18
$begingroup$
@gandalf61 If you multiply percentages by $2$ don't you convert to "part per fifty?"
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 23 at 15:58
1
$begingroup$
@saulspatz No - to convert to parts per fifty you would divide the percentage value by $2$. For example $20%$ = $20$ parts per hundred = $40$ parts per two hundred = $10$ parts per fifty.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Jan 23 at 16:44
$begingroup$
@gandalf61 Yes, I must still be asleep.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 23 at 16:47
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
What do you precisely mean by "invariability of data"? And what do you precisely mean by scalable percentages? Also, please tell more about the data you have. Some numerical example would be useful.
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Jan 23 at 14:01
$begingroup$
Think of percentages as being "parts per hundred". If you multiply all your percentages by $2$ you are converting "parts per hundred" to "parts per two hundred". If you multiply all your percentages by $10$ you are converting "parts per hundred" to "parts per thousand". This is just the same as multiplying measurements by $12$ to convert units from feet to inches.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Jan 23 at 15:18
$begingroup$
@gandalf61 If you multiply percentages by $2$ don't you convert to "part per fifty?"
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 23 at 15:58
1
$begingroup$
@saulspatz No - to convert to parts per fifty you would divide the percentage value by $2$. For example $20%$ = $20$ parts per hundred = $40$ parts per two hundred = $10$ parts per fifty.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Jan 23 at 16:44
$begingroup$
@gandalf61 Yes, I must still be asleep.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 23 at 16:47
1
1
$begingroup$
What do you precisely mean by "invariability of data"? And what do you precisely mean by scalable percentages? Also, please tell more about the data you have. Some numerical example would be useful.
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Jan 23 at 14:01
$begingroup$
What do you precisely mean by "invariability of data"? And what do you precisely mean by scalable percentages? Also, please tell more about the data you have. Some numerical example would be useful.
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Jan 23 at 14:01
$begingroup$
Think of percentages as being "parts per hundred". If you multiply all your percentages by $2$ you are converting "parts per hundred" to "parts per two hundred". If you multiply all your percentages by $10$ you are converting "parts per hundred" to "parts per thousand". This is just the same as multiplying measurements by $12$ to convert units from feet to inches.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Jan 23 at 15:18
$begingroup$
Think of percentages as being "parts per hundred". If you multiply all your percentages by $2$ you are converting "parts per hundred" to "parts per two hundred". If you multiply all your percentages by $10$ you are converting "parts per hundred" to "parts per thousand". This is just the same as multiplying measurements by $12$ to convert units from feet to inches.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Jan 23 at 15:18
$begingroup$
@gandalf61 If you multiply percentages by $2$ don't you convert to "part per fifty?"
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 23 at 15:58
$begingroup$
@gandalf61 If you multiply percentages by $2$ don't you convert to "part per fifty?"
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 23 at 15:58
1
1
$begingroup$
@saulspatz No - to convert to parts per fifty you would divide the percentage value by $2$. For example $20%$ = $20$ parts per hundred = $40$ parts per two hundred = $10$ parts per fifty.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Jan 23 at 16:44
$begingroup$
@saulspatz No - to convert to parts per fifty you would divide the percentage value by $2$. For example $20%$ = $20$ parts per hundred = $40$ parts per two hundred = $10$ parts per fifty.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Jan 23 at 16:44
$begingroup$
@gandalf61 Yes, I must still be asleep.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 23 at 16:47
$begingroup$
@gandalf61 Yes, I must still be asleep.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 23 at 16:47
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084489%2fare-percentages-scalable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084489%2fare-percentages-scalable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
What do you precisely mean by "invariability of data"? And what do you precisely mean by scalable percentages? Also, please tell more about the data you have. Some numerical example would be useful.
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Jan 23 at 14:01
$begingroup$
Think of percentages as being "parts per hundred". If you multiply all your percentages by $2$ you are converting "parts per hundred" to "parts per two hundred". If you multiply all your percentages by $10$ you are converting "parts per hundred" to "parts per thousand". This is just the same as multiplying measurements by $12$ to convert units from feet to inches.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Jan 23 at 15:18
$begingroup$
@gandalf61 If you multiply percentages by $2$ don't you convert to "part per fifty?"
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 23 at 15:58
1
$begingroup$
@saulspatz No - to convert to parts per fifty you would divide the percentage value by $2$. For example $20%$ = $20$ parts per hundred = $40$ parts per two hundred = $10$ parts per fifty.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Jan 23 at 16:44
$begingroup$
@gandalf61 Yes, I must still be asleep.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 23 at 16:47