Clarification on the method used to prove the existence of $sqrt{2}$ in $mathbb{R}$












1












$begingroup$


Let $A={xin mathbb{R}:x^2leq{2}}$ with $sup A=alpha$.



When proving that the $sqrt{2}$ exists in $mathbb{R}$ using the method of contradiction, do we show that a contradiction arises for the case $alpha^2 lt{2}$ by negating condition $1$ of the definition for least upper bound, and a contradiction for the case $alpha^2 gt{2}$ by negating condition $2$? leading to the conclusion that $alpha^2={2}$ is the only possibility?



Definition:
Let $Asubseteqmathbb{R}$ and let $alphain mathbb{R}$. Define $alpha$ to be the least upper bound for $A$ if and only if the following two conditions are satisfied.





  1. $alpha$ is an upper bound for $A$; and

  2. for all upper bounds $alpha'$ for $A$, we have that $alpha leq{alpha'}$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What are condition 1 and condition 2?
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 23 at 14:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Apologies, I have edited to include the definition containing the conditions.
    $endgroup$
    – user503154
    Jan 23 at 14:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then, yes, you are right.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 23 at 14:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you @JoséCarlosSantos
    $endgroup$
    – user503154
    Jan 23 at 14:42
















1












$begingroup$


Let $A={xin mathbb{R}:x^2leq{2}}$ with $sup A=alpha$.



When proving that the $sqrt{2}$ exists in $mathbb{R}$ using the method of contradiction, do we show that a contradiction arises for the case $alpha^2 lt{2}$ by negating condition $1$ of the definition for least upper bound, and a contradiction for the case $alpha^2 gt{2}$ by negating condition $2$? leading to the conclusion that $alpha^2={2}$ is the only possibility?



Definition:
Let $Asubseteqmathbb{R}$ and let $alphain mathbb{R}$. Define $alpha$ to be the least upper bound for $A$ if and only if the following two conditions are satisfied.





  1. $alpha$ is an upper bound for $A$; and

  2. for all upper bounds $alpha'$ for $A$, we have that $alpha leq{alpha'}$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What are condition 1 and condition 2?
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 23 at 14:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Apologies, I have edited to include the definition containing the conditions.
    $endgroup$
    – user503154
    Jan 23 at 14:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then, yes, you are right.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 23 at 14:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you @JoséCarlosSantos
    $endgroup$
    – user503154
    Jan 23 at 14:42














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Let $A={xin mathbb{R}:x^2leq{2}}$ with $sup A=alpha$.



When proving that the $sqrt{2}$ exists in $mathbb{R}$ using the method of contradiction, do we show that a contradiction arises for the case $alpha^2 lt{2}$ by negating condition $1$ of the definition for least upper bound, and a contradiction for the case $alpha^2 gt{2}$ by negating condition $2$? leading to the conclusion that $alpha^2={2}$ is the only possibility?



Definition:
Let $Asubseteqmathbb{R}$ and let $alphain mathbb{R}$. Define $alpha$ to be the least upper bound for $A$ if and only if the following two conditions are satisfied.





  1. $alpha$ is an upper bound for $A$; and

  2. for all upper bounds $alpha'$ for $A$, we have that $alpha leq{alpha'}$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $A={xin mathbb{R}:x^2leq{2}}$ with $sup A=alpha$.



When proving that the $sqrt{2}$ exists in $mathbb{R}$ using the method of contradiction, do we show that a contradiction arises for the case $alpha^2 lt{2}$ by negating condition $1$ of the definition for least upper bound, and a contradiction for the case $alpha^2 gt{2}$ by negating condition $2$? leading to the conclusion that $alpha^2={2}$ is the only possibility?



Definition:
Let $Asubseteqmathbb{R}$ and let $alphain mathbb{R}$. Define $alpha$ to be the least upper bound for $A$ if and only if the following two conditions are satisfied.





  1. $alpha$ is an upper bound for $A$; and

  2. for all upper bounds $alpha'$ for $A$, we have that $alpha leq{alpha'}$







proof-explanation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 23 at 14:19

























asked Jan 23 at 14:09







user503154



















  • $begingroup$
    What are condition 1 and condition 2?
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 23 at 14:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Apologies, I have edited to include the definition containing the conditions.
    $endgroup$
    – user503154
    Jan 23 at 14:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then, yes, you are right.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 23 at 14:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you @JoséCarlosSantos
    $endgroup$
    – user503154
    Jan 23 at 14:42


















  • $begingroup$
    What are condition 1 and condition 2?
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 23 at 14:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Apologies, I have edited to include the definition containing the conditions.
    $endgroup$
    – user503154
    Jan 23 at 14:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then, yes, you are right.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 23 at 14:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you @JoséCarlosSantos
    $endgroup$
    – user503154
    Jan 23 at 14:42
















$begingroup$
What are condition 1 and condition 2?
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 23 at 14:10




$begingroup$
What are condition 1 and condition 2?
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 23 at 14:10




1




1




$begingroup$
Apologies, I have edited to include the definition containing the conditions.
$endgroup$
– user503154
Jan 23 at 14:39




$begingroup$
Apologies, I have edited to include the definition containing the conditions.
$endgroup$
– user503154
Jan 23 at 14:39




1




1




$begingroup$
Then, yes, you are right.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 23 at 14:41




$begingroup$
Then, yes, you are right.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 23 at 14:41




1




1




$begingroup$
Thank you @JoséCarlosSantos
$endgroup$
– user503154
Jan 23 at 14:42




$begingroup$
Thank you @JoséCarlosSantos
$endgroup$
– user503154
Jan 23 at 14:42










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084507%2fclarification-on-the-method-used-to-prove-the-existence-of-sqrt2-in-mathb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown
























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084507%2fclarification-on-the-method-used-to-prove-the-existence-of-sqrt2-in-mathb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$