which kind of singularity has $f(z) = frac{1}{z} + e^{frac{1}{z}}$?












0












$begingroup$


I wondering which kind of sigularity point has $f(z) = frac{1}{z} + e^{frac{1}{z}}$.



I know that $e^{frac{1}{z}}$ has essential singularity in 0, and $1/z$ has a pole in same point, but I can't find an easy way to found out $f$'s singularity kind in 0.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I wondering which kind of sigularity point has $f(z) = frac{1}{z} + e^{frac{1}{z}}$.



    I know that $e^{frac{1}{z}}$ has essential singularity in 0, and $1/z$ has a pole in same point, but I can't find an easy way to found out $f$'s singularity kind in 0.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I wondering which kind of sigularity point has $f(z) = frac{1}{z} + e^{frac{1}{z}}$.



      I know that $e^{frac{1}{z}}$ has essential singularity in 0, and $1/z$ has a pole in same point, but I can't find an easy way to found out $f$'s singularity kind in 0.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I wondering which kind of sigularity point has $f(z) = frac{1}{z} + e^{frac{1}{z}}$.



      I know that $e^{frac{1}{z}}$ has essential singularity in 0, and $1/z$ has a pole in same point, but I can't find an easy way to found out $f$'s singularity kind in 0.







      complex-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 23 at 13:22









      Simon GreenSimon Green

      845




      845






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          Since the principal part of the Laurent series at $z= 0$ has infinitely many (non-zero) members, the singularity is essential.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            Another possible answer to my question:



            The fact that the meromorphic functions are field, and $frac{1}{z}$ meromorphic,
            implies:



            $frac{1}{z} + e^{frac{1}{z}}$ meromorphic $Rightarrow ((frac{1}{z} + e^{frac{1}{z}}) - frac{1}{z})$ meromorphic $Rightarrow e^{frac{1}{z}}$ meromorphic, contradiction.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084465%2fwhich-kind-of-singularity-has-fz-frac1z-e-frac1z%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              5












              $begingroup$

              Since the principal part of the Laurent series at $z= 0$ has infinitely many (non-zero) members, the singularity is essential.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                5












                $begingroup$

                Since the principal part of the Laurent series at $z= 0$ has infinitely many (non-zero) members, the singularity is essential.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  5












                  5








                  5





                  $begingroup$

                  Since the principal part of the Laurent series at $z= 0$ has infinitely many (non-zero) members, the singularity is essential.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Since the principal part of the Laurent series at $z= 0$ has infinitely many (non-zero) members, the singularity is essential.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 23 at 15:05









                  David C. Ullrich

                  61.2k43994




                  61.2k43994










                  answered Jan 23 at 13:27









                  trancelocationtrancelocation

                  12.6k1826




                  12.6k1826























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      Another possible answer to my question:



                      The fact that the meromorphic functions are field, and $frac{1}{z}$ meromorphic,
                      implies:



                      $frac{1}{z} + e^{frac{1}{z}}$ meromorphic $Rightarrow ((frac{1}{z} + e^{frac{1}{z}}) - frac{1}{z})$ meromorphic $Rightarrow e^{frac{1}{z}}$ meromorphic, contradiction.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Another possible answer to my question:



                        The fact that the meromorphic functions are field, and $frac{1}{z}$ meromorphic,
                        implies:



                        $frac{1}{z} + e^{frac{1}{z}}$ meromorphic $Rightarrow ((frac{1}{z} + e^{frac{1}{z}}) - frac{1}{z})$ meromorphic $Rightarrow e^{frac{1}{z}}$ meromorphic, contradiction.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          Another possible answer to my question:



                          The fact that the meromorphic functions are field, and $frac{1}{z}$ meromorphic,
                          implies:



                          $frac{1}{z} + e^{frac{1}{z}}$ meromorphic $Rightarrow ((frac{1}{z} + e^{frac{1}{z}}) - frac{1}{z})$ meromorphic $Rightarrow e^{frac{1}{z}}$ meromorphic, contradiction.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Another possible answer to my question:



                          The fact that the meromorphic functions are field, and $frac{1}{z}$ meromorphic,
                          implies:



                          $frac{1}{z} + e^{frac{1}{z}}$ meromorphic $Rightarrow ((frac{1}{z} + e^{frac{1}{z}}) - frac{1}{z})$ meromorphic $Rightarrow e^{frac{1}{z}}$ meromorphic, contradiction.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Jan 28 at 13:12









                          Simon GreenSimon Green

                          845




                          845






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084465%2fwhich-kind-of-singularity-has-fz-frac1z-e-frac1z%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

                              android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                              WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]