Convergence in a Hilbert Space












3












$begingroup$


I have a homework question I am attempting to no avail.



Let $mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space. Let $Xsubseteqmathcal{H}$ be a convex set. Suppose that $(x_{n})_{ngeq 1}$ is a sequence in $X$ such that,
begin{align}
lim_{nrightarrowinfty}|x_{n}|=inf_{xin X}|x|.
end{align}

Show that $x_{n}$ converges in $mathcal{H}$. Is the limit of $x_{n}$ necessarily in $X$?



I have tried to show that
begin{align}
(x_{n}-x|x_{n}-x)rightarrow 0,
end{align}

however I run into issues due to the limit of $|x_{n}|$ being defined as an infimum. In every case when the problem is reduced to $|x_{n}-x|$ I cannot make this go to zero because of the infimum. Also I have not identified the importance of $X$ being convex, this could also be the point I am missing. If this is the case could you please leave a small hint and allow me to return with more work.



EDIT: Is it true that $inf_{xin X}|x|implies P_{X}(0)$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    I have a homework question I am attempting to no avail.



    Let $mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space. Let $Xsubseteqmathcal{H}$ be a convex set. Suppose that $(x_{n})_{ngeq 1}$ is a sequence in $X$ such that,
    begin{align}
    lim_{nrightarrowinfty}|x_{n}|=inf_{xin X}|x|.
    end{align}

    Show that $x_{n}$ converges in $mathcal{H}$. Is the limit of $x_{n}$ necessarily in $X$?



    I have tried to show that
    begin{align}
    (x_{n}-x|x_{n}-x)rightarrow 0,
    end{align}

    however I run into issues due to the limit of $|x_{n}|$ being defined as an infimum. In every case when the problem is reduced to $|x_{n}-x|$ I cannot make this go to zero because of the infimum. Also I have not identified the importance of $X$ being convex, this could also be the point I am missing. If this is the case could you please leave a small hint and allow me to return with more work.



    EDIT: Is it true that $inf_{xin X}|x|implies P_{X}(0)$?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      I have a homework question I am attempting to no avail.



      Let $mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space. Let $Xsubseteqmathcal{H}$ be a convex set. Suppose that $(x_{n})_{ngeq 1}$ is a sequence in $X$ such that,
      begin{align}
      lim_{nrightarrowinfty}|x_{n}|=inf_{xin X}|x|.
      end{align}

      Show that $x_{n}$ converges in $mathcal{H}$. Is the limit of $x_{n}$ necessarily in $X$?



      I have tried to show that
      begin{align}
      (x_{n}-x|x_{n}-x)rightarrow 0,
      end{align}

      however I run into issues due to the limit of $|x_{n}|$ being defined as an infimum. In every case when the problem is reduced to $|x_{n}-x|$ I cannot make this go to zero because of the infimum. Also I have not identified the importance of $X$ being convex, this could also be the point I am missing. If this is the case could you please leave a small hint and allow me to return with more work.



      EDIT: Is it true that $inf_{xin X}|x|implies P_{X}(0)$?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have a homework question I am attempting to no avail.



      Let $mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space. Let $Xsubseteqmathcal{H}$ be a convex set. Suppose that $(x_{n})_{ngeq 1}$ is a sequence in $X$ such that,
      begin{align}
      lim_{nrightarrowinfty}|x_{n}|=inf_{xin X}|x|.
      end{align}

      Show that $x_{n}$ converges in $mathcal{H}$. Is the limit of $x_{n}$ necessarily in $X$?



      I have tried to show that
      begin{align}
      (x_{n}-x|x_{n}-x)rightarrow 0,
      end{align}

      however I run into issues due to the limit of $|x_{n}|$ being defined as an infimum. In every case when the problem is reduced to $|x_{n}-x|$ I cannot make this go to zero because of the infimum. Also I have not identified the importance of $X$ being convex, this could also be the point I am missing. If this is the case could you please leave a small hint and allow me to return with more work.



      EDIT: Is it true that $inf_{xin X}|x|implies P_{X}(0)$?







      functional-analysis convergence hilbert-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 23 at 6:07







      Jack

















      asked Jan 23 at 5:59









      JackJack

      717




      717






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          Note: this is very similar to the fact that in every Hilbert Space, on every closed convex set we have a projection operator.
          Let's show that $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence, since you are in a Hilbert Space it must converge.
          Note that by the parallelogram equality we must have:



          $$ Vert x_m+x_n Vert ^2 + Vert x_m - x_n Vert^2 = 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2)$$
          So we have:
          $$ Vert x_m - x_nVert^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2right) - Vert x_m +x_n Vert ^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2Vert frac{x_m+x_n}{2}Vert ^2right)$$
          Since $X$ is convex, we know $frac{x_m+x_n}{2} in X$, now if $M = inf{Vert x Vert vert x in X}$ we must therfore have:



          $$ Vert x_m - x_n Vert ^2 leq 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2M^2) underset{n,mrightarrow infty}{rightarrow} 2(2M^2 - 2M^2) = 0$$
          Thus $x_n$ is Cauchy.



          The Limit doesn't have to be in $X$, unless it is closed, for example take an open ball in a Hilbert Space that doesn't contain the origin, and find an appropriate sequence.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you, I guess my whole approach was incorrect.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack
            Jan 23 at 6:28











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084138%2fconvergence-in-a-hilbert-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5












          $begingroup$

          Note: this is very similar to the fact that in every Hilbert Space, on every closed convex set we have a projection operator.
          Let's show that $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence, since you are in a Hilbert Space it must converge.
          Note that by the parallelogram equality we must have:



          $$ Vert x_m+x_n Vert ^2 + Vert x_m - x_n Vert^2 = 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2)$$
          So we have:
          $$ Vert x_m - x_nVert^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2right) - Vert x_m +x_n Vert ^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2Vert frac{x_m+x_n}{2}Vert ^2right)$$
          Since $X$ is convex, we know $frac{x_m+x_n}{2} in X$, now if $M = inf{Vert x Vert vert x in X}$ we must therfore have:



          $$ Vert x_m - x_n Vert ^2 leq 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2M^2) underset{n,mrightarrow infty}{rightarrow} 2(2M^2 - 2M^2) = 0$$
          Thus $x_n$ is Cauchy.



          The Limit doesn't have to be in $X$, unless it is closed, for example take an open ball in a Hilbert Space that doesn't contain the origin, and find an appropriate sequence.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you, I guess my whole approach was incorrect.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack
            Jan 23 at 6:28
















          5












          $begingroup$

          Note: this is very similar to the fact that in every Hilbert Space, on every closed convex set we have a projection operator.
          Let's show that $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence, since you are in a Hilbert Space it must converge.
          Note that by the parallelogram equality we must have:



          $$ Vert x_m+x_n Vert ^2 + Vert x_m - x_n Vert^2 = 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2)$$
          So we have:
          $$ Vert x_m - x_nVert^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2right) - Vert x_m +x_n Vert ^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2Vert frac{x_m+x_n}{2}Vert ^2right)$$
          Since $X$ is convex, we know $frac{x_m+x_n}{2} in X$, now if $M = inf{Vert x Vert vert x in X}$ we must therfore have:



          $$ Vert x_m - x_n Vert ^2 leq 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2M^2) underset{n,mrightarrow infty}{rightarrow} 2(2M^2 - 2M^2) = 0$$
          Thus $x_n$ is Cauchy.



          The Limit doesn't have to be in $X$, unless it is closed, for example take an open ball in a Hilbert Space that doesn't contain the origin, and find an appropriate sequence.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you, I guess my whole approach was incorrect.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack
            Jan 23 at 6:28














          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          Note: this is very similar to the fact that in every Hilbert Space, on every closed convex set we have a projection operator.
          Let's show that $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence, since you are in a Hilbert Space it must converge.
          Note that by the parallelogram equality we must have:



          $$ Vert x_m+x_n Vert ^2 + Vert x_m - x_n Vert^2 = 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2)$$
          So we have:
          $$ Vert x_m - x_nVert^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2right) - Vert x_m +x_n Vert ^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2Vert frac{x_m+x_n}{2}Vert ^2right)$$
          Since $X$ is convex, we know $frac{x_m+x_n}{2} in X$, now if $M = inf{Vert x Vert vert x in X}$ we must therfore have:



          $$ Vert x_m - x_n Vert ^2 leq 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2M^2) underset{n,mrightarrow infty}{rightarrow} 2(2M^2 - 2M^2) = 0$$
          Thus $x_n$ is Cauchy.



          The Limit doesn't have to be in $X$, unless it is closed, for example take an open ball in a Hilbert Space that doesn't contain the origin, and find an appropriate sequence.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Note: this is very similar to the fact that in every Hilbert Space, on every closed convex set we have a projection operator.
          Let's show that $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence, since you are in a Hilbert Space it must converge.
          Note that by the parallelogram equality we must have:



          $$ Vert x_m+x_n Vert ^2 + Vert x_m - x_n Vert^2 = 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2)$$
          So we have:
          $$ Vert x_m - x_nVert^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2right) - Vert x_m +x_n Vert ^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2Vert frac{x_m+x_n}{2}Vert ^2right)$$
          Since $X$ is convex, we know $frac{x_m+x_n}{2} in X$, now if $M = inf{Vert x Vert vert x in X}$ we must therfore have:



          $$ Vert x_m - x_n Vert ^2 leq 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2M^2) underset{n,mrightarrow infty}{rightarrow} 2(2M^2 - 2M^2) = 0$$
          Thus $x_n$ is Cauchy.



          The Limit doesn't have to be in $X$, unless it is closed, for example take an open ball in a Hilbert Space that doesn't contain the origin, and find an appropriate sequence.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 26 at 10:13









          Davide Giraudo

          127k17154268




          127k17154268










          answered Jan 23 at 6:18









          pitariverpitariver

          425113




          425113












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you, I guess my whole approach was incorrect.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack
            Jan 23 at 6:28


















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you, I guess my whole approach was incorrect.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack
            Jan 23 at 6:28
















          $begingroup$
          Thank you, I guess my whole approach was incorrect.
          $endgroup$
          – Jack
          Jan 23 at 6:28




          $begingroup$
          Thank you, I guess my whole approach was incorrect.
          $endgroup$
          – Jack
          Jan 23 at 6:28


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084138%2fconvergence-in-a-hilbert-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

          Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory