Convergence in a Hilbert Space
$begingroup$
I have a homework question I am attempting to no avail.
Let $mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space. Let $Xsubseteqmathcal{H}$ be a convex set. Suppose that $(x_{n})_{ngeq 1}$ is a sequence in $X$ such that,
begin{align}
lim_{nrightarrowinfty}|x_{n}|=inf_{xin X}|x|.
end{align}
Show that $x_{n}$ converges in $mathcal{H}$. Is the limit of $x_{n}$ necessarily in $X$?
I have tried to show that
begin{align}
(x_{n}-x|x_{n}-x)rightarrow 0,
end{align}
however I run into issues due to the limit of $|x_{n}|$ being defined as an infimum. In every case when the problem is reduced to $|x_{n}-x|$ I cannot make this go to zero because of the infimum. Also I have not identified the importance of $X$ being convex, this could also be the point I am missing. If this is the case could you please leave a small hint and allow me to return with more work.
EDIT: Is it true that $inf_{xin X}|x|implies P_{X}(0)$?
functional-analysis convergence hilbert-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a homework question I am attempting to no avail.
Let $mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space. Let $Xsubseteqmathcal{H}$ be a convex set. Suppose that $(x_{n})_{ngeq 1}$ is a sequence in $X$ such that,
begin{align}
lim_{nrightarrowinfty}|x_{n}|=inf_{xin X}|x|.
end{align}
Show that $x_{n}$ converges in $mathcal{H}$. Is the limit of $x_{n}$ necessarily in $X$?
I have tried to show that
begin{align}
(x_{n}-x|x_{n}-x)rightarrow 0,
end{align}
however I run into issues due to the limit of $|x_{n}|$ being defined as an infimum. In every case when the problem is reduced to $|x_{n}-x|$ I cannot make this go to zero because of the infimum. Also I have not identified the importance of $X$ being convex, this could also be the point I am missing. If this is the case could you please leave a small hint and allow me to return with more work.
EDIT: Is it true that $inf_{xin X}|x|implies P_{X}(0)$?
functional-analysis convergence hilbert-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a homework question I am attempting to no avail.
Let $mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space. Let $Xsubseteqmathcal{H}$ be a convex set. Suppose that $(x_{n})_{ngeq 1}$ is a sequence in $X$ such that,
begin{align}
lim_{nrightarrowinfty}|x_{n}|=inf_{xin X}|x|.
end{align}
Show that $x_{n}$ converges in $mathcal{H}$. Is the limit of $x_{n}$ necessarily in $X$?
I have tried to show that
begin{align}
(x_{n}-x|x_{n}-x)rightarrow 0,
end{align}
however I run into issues due to the limit of $|x_{n}|$ being defined as an infimum. In every case when the problem is reduced to $|x_{n}-x|$ I cannot make this go to zero because of the infimum. Also I have not identified the importance of $X$ being convex, this could also be the point I am missing. If this is the case could you please leave a small hint and allow me to return with more work.
EDIT: Is it true that $inf_{xin X}|x|implies P_{X}(0)$?
functional-analysis convergence hilbert-spaces
$endgroup$
I have a homework question I am attempting to no avail.
Let $mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space. Let $Xsubseteqmathcal{H}$ be a convex set. Suppose that $(x_{n})_{ngeq 1}$ is a sequence in $X$ such that,
begin{align}
lim_{nrightarrowinfty}|x_{n}|=inf_{xin X}|x|.
end{align}
Show that $x_{n}$ converges in $mathcal{H}$. Is the limit of $x_{n}$ necessarily in $X$?
I have tried to show that
begin{align}
(x_{n}-x|x_{n}-x)rightarrow 0,
end{align}
however I run into issues due to the limit of $|x_{n}|$ being defined as an infimum. In every case when the problem is reduced to $|x_{n}-x|$ I cannot make this go to zero because of the infimum. Also I have not identified the importance of $X$ being convex, this could also be the point I am missing. If this is the case could you please leave a small hint and allow me to return with more work.
EDIT: Is it true that $inf_{xin X}|x|implies P_{X}(0)$?
functional-analysis convergence hilbert-spaces
functional-analysis convergence hilbert-spaces
edited Jan 23 at 6:07
Jack
asked Jan 23 at 5:59
JackJack
717
717
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note: this is very similar to the fact that in every Hilbert Space, on every closed convex set we have a projection operator.
Let's show that $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence, since you are in a Hilbert Space it must converge.
Note that by the parallelogram equality we must have:
$$ Vert x_m+x_n Vert ^2 + Vert x_m - x_n Vert^2 = 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2)$$
So we have:
$$ Vert x_m - x_nVert^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2right) - Vert x_m +x_n Vert ^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2Vert frac{x_m+x_n}{2}Vert ^2right)$$
Since $X$ is convex, we know $frac{x_m+x_n}{2} in X$, now if $M = inf{Vert x Vert vert x in X}$ we must therfore have:
$$ Vert x_m - x_n Vert ^2 leq 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2M^2) underset{n,mrightarrow infty}{rightarrow} 2(2M^2 - 2M^2) = 0$$
Thus $x_n$ is Cauchy.
The Limit doesn't have to be in $X$, unless it is closed, for example take an open ball in a Hilbert Space that doesn't contain the origin, and find an appropriate sequence.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you, I guess my whole approach was incorrect.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Jan 23 at 6:28
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084138%2fconvergence-in-a-hilbert-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note: this is very similar to the fact that in every Hilbert Space, on every closed convex set we have a projection operator.
Let's show that $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence, since you are in a Hilbert Space it must converge.
Note that by the parallelogram equality we must have:
$$ Vert x_m+x_n Vert ^2 + Vert x_m - x_n Vert^2 = 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2)$$
So we have:
$$ Vert x_m - x_nVert^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2right) - Vert x_m +x_n Vert ^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2Vert frac{x_m+x_n}{2}Vert ^2right)$$
Since $X$ is convex, we know $frac{x_m+x_n}{2} in X$, now if $M = inf{Vert x Vert vert x in X}$ we must therfore have:
$$ Vert x_m - x_n Vert ^2 leq 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2M^2) underset{n,mrightarrow infty}{rightarrow} 2(2M^2 - 2M^2) = 0$$
Thus $x_n$ is Cauchy.
The Limit doesn't have to be in $X$, unless it is closed, for example take an open ball in a Hilbert Space that doesn't contain the origin, and find an appropriate sequence.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you, I guess my whole approach was incorrect.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Jan 23 at 6:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note: this is very similar to the fact that in every Hilbert Space, on every closed convex set we have a projection operator.
Let's show that $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence, since you are in a Hilbert Space it must converge.
Note that by the parallelogram equality we must have:
$$ Vert x_m+x_n Vert ^2 + Vert x_m - x_n Vert^2 = 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2)$$
So we have:
$$ Vert x_m - x_nVert^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2right) - Vert x_m +x_n Vert ^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2Vert frac{x_m+x_n}{2}Vert ^2right)$$
Since $X$ is convex, we know $frac{x_m+x_n}{2} in X$, now if $M = inf{Vert x Vert vert x in X}$ we must therfore have:
$$ Vert x_m - x_n Vert ^2 leq 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2M^2) underset{n,mrightarrow infty}{rightarrow} 2(2M^2 - 2M^2) = 0$$
Thus $x_n$ is Cauchy.
The Limit doesn't have to be in $X$, unless it is closed, for example take an open ball in a Hilbert Space that doesn't contain the origin, and find an appropriate sequence.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you, I guess my whole approach was incorrect.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Jan 23 at 6:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note: this is very similar to the fact that in every Hilbert Space, on every closed convex set we have a projection operator.
Let's show that $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence, since you are in a Hilbert Space it must converge.
Note that by the parallelogram equality we must have:
$$ Vert x_m+x_n Vert ^2 + Vert x_m - x_n Vert^2 = 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2)$$
So we have:
$$ Vert x_m - x_nVert^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2right) - Vert x_m +x_n Vert ^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2Vert frac{x_m+x_n}{2}Vert ^2right)$$
Since $X$ is convex, we know $frac{x_m+x_n}{2} in X$, now if $M = inf{Vert x Vert vert x in X}$ we must therfore have:
$$ Vert x_m - x_n Vert ^2 leq 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2M^2) underset{n,mrightarrow infty}{rightarrow} 2(2M^2 - 2M^2) = 0$$
Thus $x_n$ is Cauchy.
The Limit doesn't have to be in $X$, unless it is closed, for example take an open ball in a Hilbert Space that doesn't contain the origin, and find an appropriate sequence.
$endgroup$
Note: this is very similar to the fact that in every Hilbert Space, on every closed convex set we have a projection operator.
Let's show that $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence, since you are in a Hilbert Space it must converge.
Note that by the parallelogram equality we must have:
$$ Vert x_m+x_n Vert ^2 + Vert x_m - x_n Vert^2 = 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2)$$
So we have:
$$ Vert x_m - x_nVert^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2right) - Vert x_m +x_n Vert ^2 = 2left(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2Vert frac{x_m+x_n}{2}Vert ^2right)$$
Since $X$ is convex, we know $frac{x_m+x_n}{2} in X$, now if $M = inf{Vert x Vert vert x in X}$ we must therfore have:
$$ Vert x_m - x_n Vert ^2 leq 2(Vert x_n Vert^2 + Vert x_m Vert^2 - 2M^2) underset{n,mrightarrow infty}{rightarrow} 2(2M^2 - 2M^2) = 0$$
Thus $x_n$ is Cauchy.
The Limit doesn't have to be in $X$, unless it is closed, for example take an open ball in a Hilbert Space that doesn't contain the origin, and find an appropriate sequence.
edited Jan 26 at 10:13


Davide Giraudo
127k17154268
127k17154268
answered Jan 23 at 6:18


pitariverpitariver
425113
425113
$begingroup$
Thank you, I guess my whole approach was incorrect.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Jan 23 at 6:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you, I guess my whole approach was incorrect.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Jan 23 at 6:28
$begingroup$
Thank you, I guess my whole approach was incorrect.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Jan 23 at 6:28
$begingroup$
Thank you, I guess my whole approach was incorrect.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Jan 23 at 6:28
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084138%2fconvergence-in-a-hilbert-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown