Convergence in Lebesgue-Bochner Space $L^{infty}(0,T,L^1(Gamma))$
$begingroup$
Let $Gamma$ be a compact $C^2$ manifold and suppose that $f_n$ is a non negative sequence of functions such that ${vert vert f_n vert vert}_{L^{infty}(0,T,L^1(Gamma))} le C$
I am interested in deducing convergence of $f_n$
MY ATTEMPTS:
- Since $L^1$ is not reflexive, $L^{infty}(0,T,L^1(Gamma))$ is also not reflexive and thus from the boundedness of $f_n$ I can't obtain a weak convergent subsequence.
- After that, I wondered if I could have a weak-* convergence so I thought the Banach-Alaoglu theorem. But again, this didn't work because I couldn't find the Banach and separable space whose dual is $L^{infty}(0,T,L^1(Gamma))$
2nd EDIT: I just came up with the following idea for which I need also verification:
Consider the space of continuous functions with compact support on $Gamma$, i.e $C_c(Gamma)$. Since $Gamma$ is compact, we know that $C_c(Gamma)$ is also Banach and separable. Its dual space is the space of (signed) Radon
measures on $Gamma$ with finite mass which is denoted by $mathcal M(Gamma)$.
If $L^{infty}(0,T,mathcal M(Gamma))$ is contained in the dual space of $L^1(0,T,mathcal C_c(Gamma))$ then by Banach-Alaoglu theorem a weak-* convergent subsequence is obtained.
However I'm not completely sure if the duality argument that I used holds.
At this point I've been stuck. I would really appreciate any help or even hints.
Thanks in advance!
functional-analysis analysis convergence bochner-spaces
$endgroup$
|
show 11 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $Gamma$ be a compact $C^2$ manifold and suppose that $f_n$ is a non negative sequence of functions such that ${vert vert f_n vert vert}_{L^{infty}(0,T,L^1(Gamma))} le C$
I am interested in deducing convergence of $f_n$
MY ATTEMPTS:
- Since $L^1$ is not reflexive, $L^{infty}(0,T,L^1(Gamma))$ is also not reflexive and thus from the boundedness of $f_n$ I can't obtain a weak convergent subsequence.
- After that, I wondered if I could have a weak-* convergence so I thought the Banach-Alaoglu theorem. But again, this didn't work because I couldn't find the Banach and separable space whose dual is $L^{infty}(0,T,L^1(Gamma))$
2nd EDIT: I just came up with the following idea for which I need also verification:
Consider the space of continuous functions with compact support on $Gamma$, i.e $C_c(Gamma)$. Since $Gamma$ is compact, we know that $C_c(Gamma)$ is also Banach and separable. Its dual space is the space of (signed) Radon
measures on $Gamma$ with finite mass which is denoted by $mathcal M(Gamma)$.
If $L^{infty}(0,T,mathcal M(Gamma))$ is contained in the dual space of $L^1(0,T,mathcal C_c(Gamma))$ then by Banach-Alaoglu theorem a weak-* convergent subsequence is obtained.
However I'm not completely sure if the duality argument that I used holds.
At this point I've been stuck. I would really appreciate any help or even hints.
Thanks in advance!
functional-analysis analysis convergence bochner-spaces
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If it were $L^infty(Omega)$, where $Omega$ is a $sigma$-finite measure space, then $L^infty$-boundedness would give you the existence of a subsequence that converges weakly-$star$. Surely there is a version of this result for the spaces you are working with. (I see that you added this in your edit. Try looking in these lecture notes of John Hunter:
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:24
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro I just edited my question with a possible solution (?)...Could you please tell me your opinion?
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 23 at 12:26
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/a/1717522/8157
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:27
$begingroup$
I think that what you did is OK.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:28
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro My only doubt is if $mathcal M(Gamma)$ is a separable space in order for the duality argument to be valid. I saw in your answer in that post you recommend a book in evolution equations. I'll chech it now. Thanks a lot
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 23 at 12:32
|
show 11 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $Gamma$ be a compact $C^2$ manifold and suppose that $f_n$ is a non negative sequence of functions such that ${vert vert f_n vert vert}_{L^{infty}(0,T,L^1(Gamma))} le C$
I am interested in deducing convergence of $f_n$
MY ATTEMPTS:
- Since $L^1$ is not reflexive, $L^{infty}(0,T,L^1(Gamma))$ is also not reflexive and thus from the boundedness of $f_n$ I can't obtain a weak convergent subsequence.
- After that, I wondered if I could have a weak-* convergence so I thought the Banach-Alaoglu theorem. But again, this didn't work because I couldn't find the Banach and separable space whose dual is $L^{infty}(0,T,L^1(Gamma))$
2nd EDIT: I just came up with the following idea for which I need also verification:
Consider the space of continuous functions with compact support on $Gamma$, i.e $C_c(Gamma)$. Since $Gamma$ is compact, we know that $C_c(Gamma)$ is also Banach and separable. Its dual space is the space of (signed) Radon
measures on $Gamma$ with finite mass which is denoted by $mathcal M(Gamma)$.
If $L^{infty}(0,T,mathcal M(Gamma))$ is contained in the dual space of $L^1(0,T,mathcal C_c(Gamma))$ then by Banach-Alaoglu theorem a weak-* convergent subsequence is obtained.
However I'm not completely sure if the duality argument that I used holds.
At this point I've been stuck. I would really appreciate any help or even hints.
Thanks in advance!
functional-analysis analysis convergence bochner-spaces
$endgroup$
Let $Gamma$ be a compact $C^2$ manifold and suppose that $f_n$ is a non negative sequence of functions such that ${vert vert f_n vert vert}_{L^{infty}(0,T,L^1(Gamma))} le C$
I am interested in deducing convergence of $f_n$
MY ATTEMPTS:
- Since $L^1$ is not reflexive, $L^{infty}(0,T,L^1(Gamma))$ is also not reflexive and thus from the boundedness of $f_n$ I can't obtain a weak convergent subsequence.
- After that, I wondered if I could have a weak-* convergence so I thought the Banach-Alaoglu theorem. But again, this didn't work because I couldn't find the Banach and separable space whose dual is $L^{infty}(0,T,L^1(Gamma))$
2nd EDIT: I just came up with the following idea for which I need also verification:
Consider the space of continuous functions with compact support on $Gamma$, i.e $C_c(Gamma)$. Since $Gamma$ is compact, we know that $C_c(Gamma)$ is also Banach and separable. Its dual space is the space of (signed) Radon
measures on $Gamma$ with finite mass which is denoted by $mathcal M(Gamma)$.
If $L^{infty}(0,T,mathcal M(Gamma))$ is contained in the dual space of $L^1(0,T,mathcal C_c(Gamma))$ then by Banach-Alaoglu theorem a weak-* convergent subsequence is obtained.
However I'm not completely sure if the duality argument that I used holds.
At this point I've been stuck. I would really appreciate any help or even hints.
Thanks in advance!
functional-analysis analysis convergence bochner-spaces
functional-analysis analysis convergence bochner-spaces
edited Jan 23 at 14:52
kaithkolesidou
asked Jan 23 at 11:39
kaithkolesidoukaithkolesidou
1,086512
1,086512
$begingroup$
If it were $L^infty(Omega)$, where $Omega$ is a $sigma$-finite measure space, then $L^infty$-boundedness would give you the existence of a subsequence that converges weakly-$star$. Surely there is a version of this result for the spaces you are working with. (I see that you added this in your edit. Try looking in these lecture notes of John Hunter:
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:24
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro I just edited my question with a possible solution (?)...Could you please tell me your opinion?
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 23 at 12:26
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/a/1717522/8157
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:27
$begingroup$
I think that what you did is OK.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:28
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro My only doubt is if $mathcal M(Gamma)$ is a separable space in order for the duality argument to be valid. I saw in your answer in that post you recommend a book in evolution equations. I'll chech it now. Thanks a lot
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 23 at 12:32
|
show 11 more comments
$begingroup$
If it were $L^infty(Omega)$, where $Omega$ is a $sigma$-finite measure space, then $L^infty$-boundedness would give you the existence of a subsequence that converges weakly-$star$. Surely there is a version of this result for the spaces you are working with. (I see that you added this in your edit. Try looking in these lecture notes of John Hunter:
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:24
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro I just edited my question with a possible solution (?)...Could you please tell me your opinion?
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 23 at 12:26
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/a/1717522/8157
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:27
$begingroup$
I think that what you did is OK.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:28
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro My only doubt is if $mathcal M(Gamma)$ is a separable space in order for the duality argument to be valid. I saw in your answer in that post you recommend a book in evolution equations. I'll chech it now. Thanks a lot
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 23 at 12:32
$begingroup$
If it were $L^infty(Omega)$, where $Omega$ is a $sigma$-finite measure space, then $L^infty$-boundedness would give you the existence of a subsequence that converges weakly-$star$. Surely there is a version of this result for the spaces you are working with. (I see that you added this in your edit. Try looking in these lecture notes of John Hunter:
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:24
$begingroup$
If it were $L^infty(Omega)$, where $Omega$ is a $sigma$-finite measure space, then $L^infty$-boundedness would give you the existence of a subsequence that converges weakly-$star$. Surely there is a version of this result for the spaces you are working with. (I see that you added this in your edit. Try looking in these lecture notes of John Hunter:
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:24
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro I just edited my question with a possible solution (?)...Could you please tell me your opinion?
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 23 at 12:26
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro I just edited my question with a possible solution (?)...Could you please tell me your opinion?
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 23 at 12:26
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/a/1717522/8157
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:27
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/a/1717522/8157
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:27
$begingroup$
I think that what you did is OK.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:28
$begingroup$
I think that what you did is OK.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:28
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro My only doubt is if $mathcal M(Gamma)$ is a separable space in order for the duality argument to be valid. I saw in your answer in that post you recommend a book in evolution equations. I'll chech it now. Thanks a lot
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 23 at 12:32
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro My only doubt is if $mathcal M(Gamma)$ is a separable space in order for the duality argument to be valid. I saw in your answer in that post you recommend a book in evolution equations. I'll chech it now. Thanks a lot
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 23 at 12:32
|
show 11 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The dual space of $L^1(0,T; C(Gamma))$ is $L^infty_w(0,T;mathcal M(Gamma))$ and this space consists of weak-$*$ measurable functions, see, e.g., Theorem 10.1.16 in "Handbook of applied analysis" by Papageorgiou and Kyritsi-Yiallourou.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Exactly what I was looking for! Thanks a lot for your help!
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 24 at 10:11
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084357%2fconvergence-in-lebesgue-bochner-space-l-infty0-t-l1-gamma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The dual space of $L^1(0,T; C(Gamma))$ is $L^infty_w(0,T;mathcal M(Gamma))$ and this space consists of weak-$*$ measurable functions, see, e.g., Theorem 10.1.16 in "Handbook of applied analysis" by Papageorgiou and Kyritsi-Yiallourou.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Exactly what I was looking for! Thanks a lot for your help!
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 24 at 10:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The dual space of $L^1(0,T; C(Gamma))$ is $L^infty_w(0,T;mathcal M(Gamma))$ and this space consists of weak-$*$ measurable functions, see, e.g., Theorem 10.1.16 in "Handbook of applied analysis" by Papageorgiou and Kyritsi-Yiallourou.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Exactly what I was looking for! Thanks a lot for your help!
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 24 at 10:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The dual space of $L^1(0,T; C(Gamma))$ is $L^infty_w(0,T;mathcal M(Gamma))$ and this space consists of weak-$*$ measurable functions, see, e.g., Theorem 10.1.16 in "Handbook of applied analysis" by Papageorgiou and Kyritsi-Yiallourou.
$endgroup$
The dual space of $L^1(0,T; C(Gamma))$ is $L^infty_w(0,T;mathcal M(Gamma))$ and this space consists of weak-$*$ measurable functions, see, e.g., Theorem 10.1.16 in "Handbook of applied analysis" by Papageorgiou and Kyritsi-Yiallourou.
answered Jan 23 at 18:58
gerwgerw
19.6k11334
19.6k11334
$begingroup$
Exactly what I was looking for! Thanks a lot for your help!
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 24 at 10:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Exactly what I was looking for! Thanks a lot for your help!
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 24 at 10:11
$begingroup$
Exactly what I was looking for! Thanks a lot for your help!
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 24 at 10:11
$begingroup$
Exactly what I was looking for! Thanks a lot for your help!
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 24 at 10:11
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084357%2fconvergence-in-lebesgue-bochner-space-l-infty0-t-l1-gamma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
If it were $L^infty(Omega)$, where $Omega$ is a $sigma$-finite measure space, then $L^infty$-boundedness would give you the existence of a subsequence that converges weakly-$star$. Surely there is a version of this result for the spaces you are working with. (I see that you added this in your edit. Try looking in these lecture notes of John Hunter:
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:24
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro I just edited my question with a possible solution (?)...Could you please tell me your opinion?
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 23 at 12:26
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/a/1717522/8157
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:27
$begingroup$
I think that what you did is OK.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 23 at 12:28
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro My only doubt is if $mathcal M(Gamma)$ is a separable space in order for the duality argument to be valid. I saw in your answer in that post you recommend a book in evolution equations. I'll chech it now. Thanks a lot
$endgroup$
– kaithkolesidou
Jan 23 at 12:32