Why are the axis of an ellipsoid eigenvectors?
$begingroup$
Consider an ellipsoid ${x| x^TAx = 1}$.
Let $A$ be a real symmetric matrix, and consider the eigen-decomposition
$A=PLambda P^{-1} =PLambda P^T$,
where the matrix $P$ is orthogonal because $A$ is symmetric, and the diagonal matrix $Lambda$ contains the eigenvalues of $A$.
Then the ellipsoid can be rewritten as:
$$x^TPLambda P^Tx = (P^Tx)^TLambda(P^Tx) = y^TLambda y = 1$$
Since the matrix is diagonal, the quadratic form gives:
$$y^TLambda y =lambda_1y_1^2+...+lambda_ny_n^2 = 1$$
This is clearly the equation of ellipsoid.
My question is, why are the axes of this ellipsoid the eigenvectors of $A$?
linear-algebra algebra-precalculus geometry convex-optimization conic-sections
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider an ellipsoid ${x| x^TAx = 1}$.
Let $A$ be a real symmetric matrix, and consider the eigen-decomposition
$A=PLambda P^{-1} =PLambda P^T$,
where the matrix $P$ is orthogonal because $A$ is symmetric, and the diagonal matrix $Lambda$ contains the eigenvalues of $A$.
Then the ellipsoid can be rewritten as:
$$x^TPLambda P^Tx = (P^Tx)^TLambda(P^Tx) = y^TLambda y = 1$$
Since the matrix is diagonal, the quadratic form gives:
$$y^TLambda y =lambda_1y_1^2+...+lambda_ny_n^2 = 1$$
This is clearly the equation of ellipsoid.
My question is, why are the axes of this ellipsoid the eigenvectors of $A$?
linear-algebra algebra-precalculus geometry convex-optimization conic-sections
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider an ellipsoid ${x| x^TAx = 1}$.
Let $A$ be a real symmetric matrix, and consider the eigen-decomposition
$A=PLambda P^{-1} =PLambda P^T$,
where the matrix $P$ is orthogonal because $A$ is symmetric, and the diagonal matrix $Lambda$ contains the eigenvalues of $A$.
Then the ellipsoid can be rewritten as:
$$x^TPLambda P^Tx = (P^Tx)^TLambda(P^Tx) = y^TLambda y = 1$$
Since the matrix is diagonal, the quadratic form gives:
$$y^TLambda y =lambda_1y_1^2+...+lambda_ny_n^2 = 1$$
This is clearly the equation of ellipsoid.
My question is, why are the axes of this ellipsoid the eigenvectors of $A$?
linear-algebra algebra-precalculus geometry convex-optimization conic-sections
$endgroup$
Consider an ellipsoid ${x| x^TAx = 1}$.
Let $A$ be a real symmetric matrix, and consider the eigen-decomposition
$A=PLambda P^{-1} =PLambda P^T$,
where the matrix $P$ is orthogonal because $A$ is symmetric, and the diagonal matrix $Lambda$ contains the eigenvalues of $A$.
Then the ellipsoid can be rewritten as:
$$x^TPLambda P^Tx = (P^Tx)^TLambda(P^Tx) = y^TLambda y = 1$$
Since the matrix is diagonal, the quadratic form gives:
$$y^TLambda y =lambda_1y_1^2+...+lambda_ny_n^2 = 1$$
This is clearly the equation of ellipsoid.
My question is, why are the axes of this ellipsoid the eigenvectors of $A$?
linear-algebra algebra-precalculus geometry convex-optimization conic-sections
linear-algebra algebra-precalculus geometry convex-optimization conic-sections
edited Jan 24 at 1:32
The man of your dream
asked Jan 23 at 6:55


The man of your dreamThe man of your dream
23110
23110
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The axes of this ellipsoid are (the multiples of) $e_1=(1,0,0,ldots,0)$, $e_2=(0,1,0,ldots,0)$, …, $e_n=(0,0,0,ldots,1)$ (and the corresponding eigenvalues are $lambda_1,lambda_2,ldots,lambda_n$). But $Lambda=P^{-1}AP$ and $P$ is a change-of-bases matrix. So, the columns of $P$ are eigenvectors of $A$ (and, again, the corresponding eigenvalues are $lambda_1,lambda_2,ldots,lambda_n$). This was just a change of basis, so, geometrically, the columns of $P$ are the still the vectors $e_1,ldots,e_n$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I still don't quite understand..I'm using these slide ee263.stanford.edu/lectures/ellipsoids.pdf by the way
$endgroup$
– The man of your dream
Jan 23 at 7:37
$begingroup$
The axis of the ellipsoif are $s_1$ and $s_2$. When you use that orthogonal matrix $P$, what you actually do is to rotate the ellipsoid so that $s_1$ and $s_2$ become $e_1$ and $e_2$ (perhaps with a change of order); this can be done, since thos axes are always orthogonal.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 23 at 8:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As you mentioned
$$left(frac{y_1}{sqrt{lambda_1}}right)^2 + left(frac{y_2}{sqrt{lambda_2}}right)^2 + cdots + left(frac{y_n}{sqrt{lambda_n}}right)^2 = 1$$
is the equation of an ellipse with semiaxis lengths $sqrt{lambda_1},sqrt{lambda_2},ldots,sqrt{lambda_n}$ (each $lambda_i > 0$ because the original matrix $A$ is positive semidefinite). Specifically, this is an axis aligned ellipse in the y-coordinate space. Set any $y_i$ to be $sqrt{lambda_i}$ and the rest to $0$ and plug into the equality to convince yourself this is so.
From your question statement we have $y = P^Tx = P^{-1}x$ or equivalently $x = Py$. We know the axes of the ellipse in y-coordinate space are just the standard basis vectors $mathbf{e}_1, mathbf{e}_2, ldots, mathbf{e}_n$.
The axes in x-coordinate space then must be $Pmathbf{e}_1, Pmathbf{e}_2, ldots, Pmathbf{e}_n$. That is to say, the ellipse axes are just the columns of $P$. The columns of $P$ are of course the eigenvectors of $A$ because of how $P$ was defined to be the matrix diagonalizing $A$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084166%2fwhy-are-the-axis-of-an-ellipsoid-eigenvectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The axes of this ellipsoid are (the multiples of) $e_1=(1,0,0,ldots,0)$, $e_2=(0,1,0,ldots,0)$, …, $e_n=(0,0,0,ldots,1)$ (and the corresponding eigenvalues are $lambda_1,lambda_2,ldots,lambda_n$). But $Lambda=P^{-1}AP$ and $P$ is a change-of-bases matrix. So, the columns of $P$ are eigenvectors of $A$ (and, again, the corresponding eigenvalues are $lambda_1,lambda_2,ldots,lambda_n$). This was just a change of basis, so, geometrically, the columns of $P$ are the still the vectors $e_1,ldots,e_n$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I still don't quite understand..I'm using these slide ee263.stanford.edu/lectures/ellipsoids.pdf by the way
$endgroup$
– The man of your dream
Jan 23 at 7:37
$begingroup$
The axis of the ellipsoif are $s_1$ and $s_2$. When you use that orthogonal matrix $P$, what you actually do is to rotate the ellipsoid so that $s_1$ and $s_2$ become $e_1$ and $e_2$ (perhaps with a change of order); this can be done, since thos axes are always orthogonal.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 23 at 8:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The axes of this ellipsoid are (the multiples of) $e_1=(1,0,0,ldots,0)$, $e_2=(0,1,0,ldots,0)$, …, $e_n=(0,0,0,ldots,1)$ (and the corresponding eigenvalues are $lambda_1,lambda_2,ldots,lambda_n$). But $Lambda=P^{-1}AP$ and $P$ is a change-of-bases matrix. So, the columns of $P$ are eigenvectors of $A$ (and, again, the corresponding eigenvalues are $lambda_1,lambda_2,ldots,lambda_n$). This was just a change of basis, so, geometrically, the columns of $P$ are the still the vectors $e_1,ldots,e_n$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I still don't quite understand..I'm using these slide ee263.stanford.edu/lectures/ellipsoids.pdf by the way
$endgroup$
– The man of your dream
Jan 23 at 7:37
$begingroup$
The axis of the ellipsoif are $s_1$ and $s_2$. When you use that orthogonal matrix $P$, what you actually do is to rotate the ellipsoid so that $s_1$ and $s_2$ become $e_1$ and $e_2$ (perhaps with a change of order); this can be done, since thos axes are always orthogonal.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 23 at 8:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The axes of this ellipsoid are (the multiples of) $e_1=(1,0,0,ldots,0)$, $e_2=(0,1,0,ldots,0)$, …, $e_n=(0,0,0,ldots,1)$ (and the corresponding eigenvalues are $lambda_1,lambda_2,ldots,lambda_n$). But $Lambda=P^{-1}AP$ and $P$ is a change-of-bases matrix. So, the columns of $P$ are eigenvectors of $A$ (and, again, the corresponding eigenvalues are $lambda_1,lambda_2,ldots,lambda_n$). This was just a change of basis, so, geometrically, the columns of $P$ are the still the vectors $e_1,ldots,e_n$.
$endgroup$
The axes of this ellipsoid are (the multiples of) $e_1=(1,0,0,ldots,0)$, $e_2=(0,1,0,ldots,0)$, …, $e_n=(0,0,0,ldots,1)$ (and the corresponding eigenvalues are $lambda_1,lambda_2,ldots,lambda_n$). But $Lambda=P^{-1}AP$ and $P$ is a change-of-bases matrix. So, the columns of $P$ are eigenvectors of $A$ (and, again, the corresponding eigenvalues are $lambda_1,lambda_2,ldots,lambda_n$). This was just a change of basis, so, geometrically, the columns of $P$ are the still the vectors $e_1,ldots,e_n$.
answered Jan 23 at 7:28


José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos
167k22132235
167k22132235
$begingroup$
I still don't quite understand..I'm using these slide ee263.stanford.edu/lectures/ellipsoids.pdf by the way
$endgroup$
– The man of your dream
Jan 23 at 7:37
$begingroup$
The axis of the ellipsoif are $s_1$ and $s_2$. When you use that orthogonal matrix $P$, what you actually do is to rotate the ellipsoid so that $s_1$ and $s_2$ become $e_1$ and $e_2$ (perhaps with a change of order); this can be done, since thos axes are always orthogonal.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 23 at 8:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I still don't quite understand..I'm using these slide ee263.stanford.edu/lectures/ellipsoids.pdf by the way
$endgroup$
– The man of your dream
Jan 23 at 7:37
$begingroup$
The axis of the ellipsoif are $s_1$ and $s_2$. When you use that orthogonal matrix $P$, what you actually do is to rotate the ellipsoid so that $s_1$ and $s_2$ become $e_1$ and $e_2$ (perhaps with a change of order); this can be done, since thos axes are always orthogonal.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 23 at 8:37
$begingroup$
I still don't quite understand..I'm using these slide ee263.stanford.edu/lectures/ellipsoids.pdf by the way
$endgroup$
– The man of your dream
Jan 23 at 7:37
$begingroup$
I still don't quite understand..I'm using these slide ee263.stanford.edu/lectures/ellipsoids.pdf by the way
$endgroup$
– The man of your dream
Jan 23 at 7:37
$begingroup$
The axis of the ellipsoif are $s_1$ and $s_2$. When you use that orthogonal matrix $P$, what you actually do is to rotate the ellipsoid so that $s_1$ and $s_2$ become $e_1$ and $e_2$ (perhaps with a change of order); this can be done, since thos axes are always orthogonal.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 23 at 8:37
$begingroup$
The axis of the ellipsoif are $s_1$ and $s_2$. When you use that orthogonal matrix $P$, what you actually do is to rotate the ellipsoid so that $s_1$ and $s_2$ become $e_1$ and $e_2$ (perhaps with a change of order); this can be done, since thos axes are always orthogonal.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 23 at 8:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As you mentioned
$$left(frac{y_1}{sqrt{lambda_1}}right)^2 + left(frac{y_2}{sqrt{lambda_2}}right)^2 + cdots + left(frac{y_n}{sqrt{lambda_n}}right)^2 = 1$$
is the equation of an ellipse with semiaxis lengths $sqrt{lambda_1},sqrt{lambda_2},ldots,sqrt{lambda_n}$ (each $lambda_i > 0$ because the original matrix $A$ is positive semidefinite). Specifically, this is an axis aligned ellipse in the y-coordinate space. Set any $y_i$ to be $sqrt{lambda_i}$ and the rest to $0$ and plug into the equality to convince yourself this is so.
From your question statement we have $y = P^Tx = P^{-1}x$ or equivalently $x = Py$. We know the axes of the ellipse in y-coordinate space are just the standard basis vectors $mathbf{e}_1, mathbf{e}_2, ldots, mathbf{e}_n$.
The axes in x-coordinate space then must be $Pmathbf{e}_1, Pmathbf{e}_2, ldots, Pmathbf{e}_n$. That is to say, the ellipse axes are just the columns of $P$. The columns of $P$ are of course the eigenvectors of $A$ because of how $P$ was defined to be the matrix diagonalizing $A$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As you mentioned
$$left(frac{y_1}{sqrt{lambda_1}}right)^2 + left(frac{y_2}{sqrt{lambda_2}}right)^2 + cdots + left(frac{y_n}{sqrt{lambda_n}}right)^2 = 1$$
is the equation of an ellipse with semiaxis lengths $sqrt{lambda_1},sqrt{lambda_2},ldots,sqrt{lambda_n}$ (each $lambda_i > 0$ because the original matrix $A$ is positive semidefinite). Specifically, this is an axis aligned ellipse in the y-coordinate space. Set any $y_i$ to be $sqrt{lambda_i}$ and the rest to $0$ and plug into the equality to convince yourself this is so.
From your question statement we have $y = P^Tx = P^{-1}x$ or equivalently $x = Py$. We know the axes of the ellipse in y-coordinate space are just the standard basis vectors $mathbf{e}_1, mathbf{e}_2, ldots, mathbf{e}_n$.
The axes in x-coordinate space then must be $Pmathbf{e}_1, Pmathbf{e}_2, ldots, Pmathbf{e}_n$. That is to say, the ellipse axes are just the columns of $P$. The columns of $P$ are of course the eigenvectors of $A$ because of how $P$ was defined to be the matrix diagonalizing $A$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As you mentioned
$$left(frac{y_1}{sqrt{lambda_1}}right)^2 + left(frac{y_2}{sqrt{lambda_2}}right)^2 + cdots + left(frac{y_n}{sqrt{lambda_n}}right)^2 = 1$$
is the equation of an ellipse with semiaxis lengths $sqrt{lambda_1},sqrt{lambda_2},ldots,sqrt{lambda_n}$ (each $lambda_i > 0$ because the original matrix $A$ is positive semidefinite). Specifically, this is an axis aligned ellipse in the y-coordinate space. Set any $y_i$ to be $sqrt{lambda_i}$ and the rest to $0$ and plug into the equality to convince yourself this is so.
From your question statement we have $y = P^Tx = P^{-1}x$ or equivalently $x = Py$. We know the axes of the ellipse in y-coordinate space are just the standard basis vectors $mathbf{e}_1, mathbf{e}_2, ldots, mathbf{e}_n$.
The axes in x-coordinate space then must be $Pmathbf{e}_1, Pmathbf{e}_2, ldots, Pmathbf{e}_n$. That is to say, the ellipse axes are just the columns of $P$. The columns of $P$ are of course the eigenvectors of $A$ because of how $P$ was defined to be the matrix diagonalizing $A$.
$endgroup$
As you mentioned
$$left(frac{y_1}{sqrt{lambda_1}}right)^2 + left(frac{y_2}{sqrt{lambda_2}}right)^2 + cdots + left(frac{y_n}{sqrt{lambda_n}}right)^2 = 1$$
is the equation of an ellipse with semiaxis lengths $sqrt{lambda_1},sqrt{lambda_2},ldots,sqrt{lambda_n}$ (each $lambda_i > 0$ because the original matrix $A$ is positive semidefinite). Specifically, this is an axis aligned ellipse in the y-coordinate space. Set any $y_i$ to be $sqrt{lambda_i}$ and the rest to $0$ and plug into the equality to convince yourself this is so.
From your question statement we have $y = P^Tx = P^{-1}x$ or equivalently $x = Py$. We know the axes of the ellipse in y-coordinate space are just the standard basis vectors $mathbf{e}_1, mathbf{e}_2, ldots, mathbf{e}_n$.
The axes in x-coordinate space then must be $Pmathbf{e}_1, Pmathbf{e}_2, ldots, Pmathbf{e}_n$. That is to say, the ellipse axes are just the columns of $P$. The columns of $P$ are of course the eigenvectors of $A$ because of how $P$ was defined to be the matrix diagonalizing $A$.
answered Feb 21 at 11:05
CaseyCasey
1676
1676
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084166%2fwhy-are-the-axis-of-an-ellipsoid-eigenvectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown