Can Present Perfect Continuous and Present Continuous have the same meaning?












3















According to https://englishsentences.com/present-tense/




b. Present Continuous



The present continuous tense describes actions
and/or events that are currently happening or going on now; in other
words, things that are continuing to happen right now in “real time.”




and




d. Present Perfect Continuous
The present perfect continuous expresses
actions (or events) that we have been doing and are still doing;
things that have been going on and are still going on now.




My question is that, in some situations, can these both tenses represent the same timeline ?



For Example





  1. He is taking the exam for last 2 hours - Present Continuous ???


  2. He has been taking that exam for at least 2 hours - Present Perfect Continuous.





Don't the above two sentences tell us the same thing ? Or is the 1st sentence grammatically incorrect ?



What am I missing ?



Thanks.










share|improve this question



























    3















    According to https://englishsentences.com/present-tense/




    b. Present Continuous



    The present continuous tense describes actions
    and/or events that are currently happening or going on now; in other
    words, things that are continuing to happen right now in “real time.”




    and




    d. Present Perfect Continuous
    The present perfect continuous expresses
    actions (or events) that we have been doing and are still doing;
    things that have been going on and are still going on now.




    My question is that, in some situations, can these both tenses represent the same timeline ?



    For Example





    1. He is taking the exam for last 2 hours - Present Continuous ???


    2. He has been taking that exam for at least 2 hours - Present Perfect Continuous.





    Don't the above two sentences tell us the same thing ? Or is the 1st sentence grammatically incorrect ?



    What am I missing ?



    Thanks.










    share|improve this question

























      3












      3








      3








      According to https://englishsentences.com/present-tense/




      b. Present Continuous



      The present continuous tense describes actions
      and/or events that are currently happening or going on now; in other
      words, things that are continuing to happen right now in “real time.”




      and




      d. Present Perfect Continuous
      The present perfect continuous expresses
      actions (or events) that we have been doing and are still doing;
      things that have been going on and are still going on now.




      My question is that, in some situations, can these both tenses represent the same timeline ?



      For Example





      1. He is taking the exam for last 2 hours - Present Continuous ???


      2. He has been taking that exam for at least 2 hours - Present Perfect Continuous.





      Don't the above two sentences tell us the same thing ? Or is the 1st sentence grammatically incorrect ?



      What am I missing ?



      Thanks.










      share|improve this question














      According to https://englishsentences.com/present-tense/




      b. Present Continuous



      The present continuous tense describes actions
      and/or events that are currently happening or going on now; in other
      words, things that are continuing to happen right now in “real time.”




      and




      d. Present Perfect Continuous
      The present perfect continuous expresses
      actions (or events) that we have been doing and are still doing;
      things that have been going on and are still going on now.




      My question is that, in some situations, can these both tenses represent the same timeline ?



      For Example





      1. He is taking the exam for last 2 hours - Present Continuous ???


      2. He has been taking that exam for at least 2 hours - Present Perfect Continuous.





      Don't the above two sentences tell us the same thing ? Or is the 1st sentence grammatically incorrect ?



      What am I missing ?



      Thanks.







      present-tense present-continuous present-perfect-progressive






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jan 5 at 13:12









      Ahmad R.Ahmad R.

      434




      434






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          Q: Can Present Perfect Continuous and Present Continuous have the same meaning?



          Yes, there are often times when there is very little difference between the two, and they pretty much mean the same thing. However, your example is not a very good one.



          Native speakers would not say:




          He is taking the exam for the last 2 hours.




          The problem with that sentence is the time reference back toward the past. We don’t use the present continuous is a context like that. Although we might say:




          He is taking the exam for the next 2 hours.




          to mean that he will be busy for the next two hours taking the exam.





          However, we could say:




          He is taking the exam in that room.




          And also say:




          He has been taking the exam in that room.




          and those two sentences pretty much mean the same thing. However, the first one could be interpreted in a couple different ways. It could mean:




          He is (currently) taking the exam in that room (right now).




          but it could also mean:




          When it’s time for him to take the exam, he’ll be taking the exam in that room.




          The specific meaning would usually be apparent based on the context. For example, am I answering the question:




          What is he doing at the moment? (He is taking the exam in that room.)




          or did I answer the question:




          Where will he take the exam? (He is taking the exam in that room.)




          although in the latter case, I think many might be inclined to say one of these instead:




          He will take the exam in that room.

          He is to take the exam in that room.




          The EF website has an interesting note about this:




          USING THE PRESENT CONTINUOUS TO TALK ABOUT THE FUTURE



          The present continuous is used to talk about arrangements for events at a time later than now. There is a suggestion that more than one person is aware of the event, and that some preparation has already happened.



          For example:
          I am leaving tomorrow. = I've already bought my train ticket.







          share|improve this answer


























          • However, we could say: "He is taking the exam in that room." And also say: "He has been taking the exam in that room." and those two sentences pretty much mean the same thing.???? Hi J.R., I don't understand how those could mean the same thing (although they could both be true at the same time - so could I eat fish and I eat chocolate). More importantly, Happy New Year!

            – Araucaria
            Jan 6 at 1:37













          • @Araucaria - Suppose Bob went into a testing room at noon. Bob is still in there an hour later when you come by and ask, “Where’s Bob?” I think I could answer with either of those two sentences, and they pretty much mean the same thing (although one emphasizes Bob’s current state – in the room, taking the exam – while the other implies that he has been in there for some length of tine). But, no matter which way I say it, Bob is still toiling away in the room, working on his exam. P.S. A better analogy would be I am eating fish and I have been eating fish – both mean you’re eating fish.

            – J.R.
            Jan 6 at 14:01













          • Erm, ... No! I have been eating fish in no way means that you are curently eating fish even though you may (or may not be). This is the same as I am eating fish does not mean I am eating chips even though you may (or may not) be!.

            – Araucaria
            Jan 6 at 23:25













          • @Araucaria - I suppose you might say, "I have been eating fish" if you are all done and wiping your chin with a napkin. But I think it's more likely that you're still eating the fish. If you finished the fish an hour ago, you'd probably say, "I was eating fish". But I get your point. "He has been taking the exam in that room" could mean he's still in there taking the test, or it could mean he's wrapping it up. It would be more accurate to say they have "overlapping meanings" that to say "they mean the same thing."

            – J.R.
            Jan 7 at 10:03











          • Q: "Why does your breath smell?" A: "I've been eatig fish". Doctor: "Looking at your blood results, you haven't been sticking to your diet". Patient: "Well, I don't know about that, Doc. I've been eating fish" Or "I've been eating fish all my life". None of those suggest that the speaker is eating fish at all, do they?

            – Araucaria
            Jan 7 at 20:42



















          2














          I'd like to add that both tenses can be used to express a temporary or new habit, for example:



          I have been eating a lot of cakes recently, or I am eating a lot of cakes presently. This means that at the moment (not necessarily now, but these last weeks) I have been eating a lot of cake, which I don't do usually. Maybe I am practicing my baking skills.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "481"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f191916%2fcan-present-perfect-continuous-and-present-continuous-have-the-same-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5














            Q: Can Present Perfect Continuous and Present Continuous have the same meaning?



            Yes, there are often times when there is very little difference between the two, and they pretty much mean the same thing. However, your example is not a very good one.



            Native speakers would not say:




            He is taking the exam for the last 2 hours.




            The problem with that sentence is the time reference back toward the past. We don’t use the present continuous is a context like that. Although we might say:




            He is taking the exam for the next 2 hours.




            to mean that he will be busy for the next two hours taking the exam.





            However, we could say:




            He is taking the exam in that room.




            And also say:




            He has been taking the exam in that room.




            and those two sentences pretty much mean the same thing. However, the first one could be interpreted in a couple different ways. It could mean:




            He is (currently) taking the exam in that room (right now).




            but it could also mean:




            When it’s time for him to take the exam, he’ll be taking the exam in that room.




            The specific meaning would usually be apparent based on the context. For example, am I answering the question:




            What is he doing at the moment? (He is taking the exam in that room.)




            or did I answer the question:




            Where will he take the exam? (He is taking the exam in that room.)




            although in the latter case, I think many might be inclined to say one of these instead:




            He will take the exam in that room.

            He is to take the exam in that room.




            The EF website has an interesting note about this:




            USING THE PRESENT CONTINUOUS TO TALK ABOUT THE FUTURE



            The present continuous is used to talk about arrangements for events at a time later than now. There is a suggestion that more than one person is aware of the event, and that some preparation has already happened.



            For example:
            I am leaving tomorrow. = I've already bought my train ticket.







            share|improve this answer


























            • However, we could say: "He is taking the exam in that room." And also say: "He has been taking the exam in that room." and those two sentences pretty much mean the same thing.???? Hi J.R., I don't understand how those could mean the same thing (although they could both be true at the same time - so could I eat fish and I eat chocolate). More importantly, Happy New Year!

              – Araucaria
              Jan 6 at 1:37













            • @Araucaria - Suppose Bob went into a testing room at noon. Bob is still in there an hour later when you come by and ask, “Where’s Bob?” I think I could answer with either of those two sentences, and they pretty much mean the same thing (although one emphasizes Bob’s current state – in the room, taking the exam – while the other implies that he has been in there for some length of tine). But, no matter which way I say it, Bob is still toiling away in the room, working on his exam. P.S. A better analogy would be I am eating fish and I have been eating fish – both mean you’re eating fish.

              – J.R.
              Jan 6 at 14:01













            • Erm, ... No! I have been eating fish in no way means that you are curently eating fish even though you may (or may not be). This is the same as I am eating fish does not mean I am eating chips even though you may (or may not) be!.

              – Araucaria
              Jan 6 at 23:25













            • @Araucaria - I suppose you might say, "I have been eating fish" if you are all done and wiping your chin with a napkin. But I think it's more likely that you're still eating the fish. If you finished the fish an hour ago, you'd probably say, "I was eating fish". But I get your point. "He has been taking the exam in that room" could mean he's still in there taking the test, or it could mean he's wrapping it up. It would be more accurate to say they have "overlapping meanings" that to say "they mean the same thing."

              – J.R.
              Jan 7 at 10:03











            • Q: "Why does your breath smell?" A: "I've been eatig fish". Doctor: "Looking at your blood results, you haven't been sticking to your diet". Patient: "Well, I don't know about that, Doc. I've been eating fish" Or "I've been eating fish all my life". None of those suggest that the speaker is eating fish at all, do they?

              – Araucaria
              Jan 7 at 20:42
















            5














            Q: Can Present Perfect Continuous and Present Continuous have the same meaning?



            Yes, there are often times when there is very little difference between the two, and they pretty much mean the same thing. However, your example is not a very good one.



            Native speakers would not say:




            He is taking the exam for the last 2 hours.




            The problem with that sentence is the time reference back toward the past. We don’t use the present continuous is a context like that. Although we might say:




            He is taking the exam for the next 2 hours.




            to mean that he will be busy for the next two hours taking the exam.





            However, we could say:




            He is taking the exam in that room.




            And also say:




            He has been taking the exam in that room.




            and those two sentences pretty much mean the same thing. However, the first one could be interpreted in a couple different ways. It could mean:




            He is (currently) taking the exam in that room (right now).




            but it could also mean:




            When it’s time for him to take the exam, he’ll be taking the exam in that room.




            The specific meaning would usually be apparent based on the context. For example, am I answering the question:




            What is he doing at the moment? (He is taking the exam in that room.)




            or did I answer the question:




            Where will he take the exam? (He is taking the exam in that room.)




            although in the latter case, I think many might be inclined to say one of these instead:




            He will take the exam in that room.

            He is to take the exam in that room.




            The EF website has an interesting note about this:




            USING THE PRESENT CONTINUOUS TO TALK ABOUT THE FUTURE



            The present continuous is used to talk about arrangements for events at a time later than now. There is a suggestion that more than one person is aware of the event, and that some preparation has already happened.



            For example:
            I am leaving tomorrow. = I've already bought my train ticket.







            share|improve this answer


























            • However, we could say: "He is taking the exam in that room." And also say: "He has been taking the exam in that room." and those two sentences pretty much mean the same thing.???? Hi J.R., I don't understand how those could mean the same thing (although they could both be true at the same time - so could I eat fish and I eat chocolate). More importantly, Happy New Year!

              – Araucaria
              Jan 6 at 1:37













            • @Araucaria - Suppose Bob went into a testing room at noon. Bob is still in there an hour later when you come by and ask, “Where’s Bob?” I think I could answer with either of those two sentences, and they pretty much mean the same thing (although one emphasizes Bob’s current state – in the room, taking the exam – while the other implies that he has been in there for some length of tine). But, no matter which way I say it, Bob is still toiling away in the room, working on his exam. P.S. A better analogy would be I am eating fish and I have been eating fish – both mean you’re eating fish.

              – J.R.
              Jan 6 at 14:01













            • Erm, ... No! I have been eating fish in no way means that you are curently eating fish even though you may (or may not be). This is the same as I am eating fish does not mean I am eating chips even though you may (or may not) be!.

              – Araucaria
              Jan 6 at 23:25













            • @Araucaria - I suppose you might say, "I have been eating fish" if you are all done and wiping your chin with a napkin. But I think it's more likely that you're still eating the fish. If you finished the fish an hour ago, you'd probably say, "I was eating fish". But I get your point. "He has been taking the exam in that room" could mean he's still in there taking the test, or it could mean he's wrapping it up. It would be more accurate to say they have "overlapping meanings" that to say "they mean the same thing."

              – J.R.
              Jan 7 at 10:03











            • Q: "Why does your breath smell?" A: "I've been eatig fish". Doctor: "Looking at your blood results, you haven't been sticking to your diet". Patient: "Well, I don't know about that, Doc. I've been eating fish" Or "I've been eating fish all my life". None of those suggest that the speaker is eating fish at all, do they?

              – Araucaria
              Jan 7 at 20:42














            5












            5








            5







            Q: Can Present Perfect Continuous and Present Continuous have the same meaning?



            Yes, there are often times when there is very little difference between the two, and they pretty much mean the same thing. However, your example is not a very good one.



            Native speakers would not say:




            He is taking the exam for the last 2 hours.




            The problem with that sentence is the time reference back toward the past. We don’t use the present continuous is a context like that. Although we might say:




            He is taking the exam for the next 2 hours.




            to mean that he will be busy for the next two hours taking the exam.





            However, we could say:




            He is taking the exam in that room.




            And also say:




            He has been taking the exam in that room.




            and those two sentences pretty much mean the same thing. However, the first one could be interpreted in a couple different ways. It could mean:




            He is (currently) taking the exam in that room (right now).




            but it could also mean:




            When it’s time for him to take the exam, he’ll be taking the exam in that room.




            The specific meaning would usually be apparent based on the context. For example, am I answering the question:




            What is he doing at the moment? (He is taking the exam in that room.)




            or did I answer the question:




            Where will he take the exam? (He is taking the exam in that room.)




            although in the latter case, I think many might be inclined to say one of these instead:




            He will take the exam in that room.

            He is to take the exam in that room.




            The EF website has an interesting note about this:




            USING THE PRESENT CONTINUOUS TO TALK ABOUT THE FUTURE



            The present continuous is used to talk about arrangements for events at a time later than now. There is a suggestion that more than one person is aware of the event, and that some preparation has already happened.



            For example:
            I am leaving tomorrow. = I've already bought my train ticket.







            share|improve this answer















            Q: Can Present Perfect Continuous and Present Continuous have the same meaning?



            Yes, there are often times when there is very little difference between the two, and they pretty much mean the same thing. However, your example is not a very good one.



            Native speakers would not say:




            He is taking the exam for the last 2 hours.




            The problem with that sentence is the time reference back toward the past. We don’t use the present continuous is a context like that. Although we might say:




            He is taking the exam for the next 2 hours.




            to mean that he will be busy for the next two hours taking the exam.





            However, we could say:




            He is taking the exam in that room.




            And also say:




            He has been taking the exam in that room.




            and those two sentences pretty much mean the same thing. However, the first one could be interpreted in a couple different ways. It could mean:




            He is (currently) taking the exam in that room (right now).




            but it could also mean:




            When it’s time for him to take the exam, he’ll be taking the exam in that room.




            The specific meaning would usually be apparent based on the context. For example, am I answering the question:




            What is he doing at the moment? (He is taking the exam in that room.)




            or did I answer the question:




            Where will he take the exam? (He is taking the exam in that room.)




            although in the latter case, I think many might be inclined to say one of these instead:




            He will take the exam in that room.

            He is to take the exam in that room.




            The EF website has an interesting note about this:




            USING THE PRESENT CONTINUOUS TO TALK ABOUT THE FUTURE



            The present continuous is used to talk about arrangements for events at a time later than now. There is a suggestion that more than one person is aware of the event, and that some preparation has already happened.



            For example:
            I am leaving tomorrow. = I've already bought my train ticket.








            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jan 5 at 13:39

























            answered Jan 5 at 13:30









            J.R.J.R.

            98.5k8126244




            98.5k8126244













            • However, we could say: "He is taking the exam in that room." And also say: "He has been taking the exam in that room." and those two sentences pretty much mean the same thing.???? Hi J.R., I don't understand how those could mean the same thing (although they could both be true at the same time - so could I eat fish and I eat chocolate). More importantly, Happy New Year!

              – Araucaria
              Jan 6 at 1:37













            • @Araucaria - Suppose Bob went into a testing room at noon. Bob is still in there an hour later when you come by and ask, “Where’s Bob?” I think I could answer with either of those two sentences, and they pretty much mean the same thing (although one emphasizes Bob’s current state – in the room, taking the exam – while the other implies that he has been in there for some length of tine). But, no matter which way I say it, Bob is still toiling away in the room, working on his exam. P.S. A better analogy would be I am eating fish and I have been eating fish – both mean you’re eating fish.

              – J.R.
              Jan 6 at 14:01













            • Erm, ... No! I have been eating fish in no way means that you are curently eating fish even though you may (or may not be). This is the same as I am eating fish does not mean I am eating chips even though you may (or may not) be!.

              – Araucaria
              Jan 6 at 23:25













            • @Araucaria - I suppose you might say, "I have been eating fish" if you are all done and wiping your chin with a napkin. But I think it's more likely that you're still eating the fish. If you finished the fish an hour ago, you'd probably say, "I was eating fish". But I get your point. "He has been taking the exam in that room" could mean he's still in there taking the test, or it could mean he's wrapping it up. It would be more accurate to say they have "overlapping meanings" that to say "they mean the same thing."

              – J.R.
              Jan 7 at 10:03











            • Q: "Why does your breath smell?" A: "I've been eatig fish". Doctor: "Looking at your blood results, you haven't been sticking to your diet". Patient: "Well, I don't know about that, Doc. I've been eating fish" Or "I've been eating fish all my life". None of those suggest that the speaker is eating fish at all, do they?

              – Araucaria
              Jan 7 at 20:42



















            • However, we could say: "He is taking the exam in that room." And also say: "He has been taking the exam in that room." and those two sentences pretty much mean the same thing.???? Hi J.R., I don't understand how those could mean the same thing (although they could both be true at the same time - so could I eat fish and I eat chocolate). More importantly, Happy New Year!

              – Araucaria
              Jan 6 at 1:37













            • @Araucaria - Suppose Bob went into a testing room at noon. Bob is still in there an hour later when you come by and ask, “Where’s Bob?” I think I could answer with either of those two sentences, and they pretty much mean the same thing (although one emphasizes Bob’s current state – in the room, taking the exam – while the other implies that he has been in there for some length of tine). But, no matter which way I say it, Bob is still toiling away in the room, working on his exam. P.S. A better analogy would be I am eating fish and I have been eating fish – both mean you’re eating fish.

              – J.R.
              Jan 6 at 14:01













            • Erm, ... No! I have been eating fish in no way means that you are curently eating fish even though you may (or may not be). This is the same as I am eating fish does not mean I am eating chips even though you may (or may not) be!.

              – Araucaria
              Jan 6 at 23:25













            • @Araucaria - I suppose you might say, "I have been eating fish" if you are all done and wiping your chin with a napkin. But I think it's more likely that you're still eating the fish. If you finished the fish an hour ago, you'd probably say, "I was eating fish". But I get your point. "He has been taking the exam in that room" could mean he's still in there taking the test, or it could mean he's wrapping it up. It would be more accurate to say they have "overlapping meanings" that to say "they mean the same thing."

              – J.R.
              Jan 7 at 10:03











            • Q: "Why does your breath smell?" A: "I've been eatig fish". Doctor: "Looking at your blood results, you haven't been sticking to your diet". Patient: "Well, I don't know about that, Doc. I've been eating fish" Or "I've been eating fish all my life". None of those suggest that the speaker is eating fish at all, do they?

              – Araucaria
              Jan 7 at 20:42

















            However, we could say: "He is taking the exam in that room." And also say: "He has been taking the exam in that room." and those two sentences pretty much mean the same thing.???? Hi J.R., I don't understand how those could mean the same thing (although they could both be true at the same time - so could I eat fish and I eat chocolate). More importantly, Happy New Year!

            – Araucaria
            Jan 6 at 1:37







            However, we could say: "He is taking the exam in that room." And also say: "He has been taking the exam in that room." and those two sentences pretty much mean the same thing.???? Hi J.R., I don't understand how those could mean the same thing (although they could both be true at the same time - so could I eat fish and I eat chocolate). More importantly, Happy New Year!

            – Araucaria
            Jan 6 at 1:37















            @Araucaria - Suppose Bob went into a testing room at noon. Bob is still in there an hour later when you come by and ask, “Where’s Bob?” I think I could answer with either of those two sentences, and they pretty much mean the same thing (although one emphasizes Bob’s current state – in the room, taking the exam – while the other implies that he has been in there for some length of tine). But, no matter which way I say it, Bob is still toiling away in the room, working on his exam. P.S. A better analogy would be I am eating fish and I have been eating fish – both mean you’re eating fish.

            – J.R.
            Jan 6 at 14:01







            @Araucaria - Suppose Bob went into a testing room at noon. Bob is still in there an hour later when you come by and ask, “Where’s Bob?” I think I could answer with either of those two sentences, and they pretty much mean the same thing (although one emphasizes Bob’s current state – in the room, taking the exam – while the other implies that he has been in there for some length of tine). But, no matter which way I say it, Bob is still toiling away in the room, working on his exam. P.S. A better analogy would be I am eating fish and I have been eating fish – both mean you’re eating fish.

            – J.R.
            Jan 6 at 14:01















            Erm, ... No! I have been eating fish in no way means that you are curently eating fish even though you may (or may not be). This is the same as I am eating fish does not mean I am eating chips even though you may (or may not) be!.

            – Araucaria
            Jan 6 at 23:25







            Erm, ... No! I have been eating fish in no way means that you are curently eating fish even though you may (or may not be). This is the same as I am eating fish does not mean I am eating chips even though you may (or may not) be!.

            – Araucaria
            Jan 6 at 23:25















            @Araucaria - I suppose you might say, "I have been eating fish" if you are all done and wiping your chin with a napkin. But I think it's more likely that you're still eating the fish. If you finished the fish an hour ago, you'd probably say, "I was eating fish". But I get your point. "He has been taking the exam in that room" could mean he's still in there taking the test, or it could mean he's wrapping it up. It would be more accurate to say they have "overlapping meanings" that to say "they mean the same thing."

            – J.R.
            Jan 7 at 10:03





            @Araucaria - I suppose you might say, "I have been eating fish" if you are all done and wiping your chin with a napkin. But I think it's more likely that you're still eating the fish. If you finished the fish an hour ago, you'd probably say, "I was eating fish". But I get your point. "He has been taking the exam in that room" could mean he's still in there taking the test, or it could mean he's wrapping it up. It would be more accurate to say they have "overlapping meanings" that to say "they mean the same thing."

            – J.R.
            Jan 7 at 10:03













            Q: "Why does your breath smell?" A: "I've been eatig fish". Doctor: "Looking at your blood results, you haven't been sticking to your diet". Patient: "Well, I don't know about that, Doc. I've been eating fish" Or "I've been eating fish all my life". None of those suggest that the speaker is eating fish at all, do they?

            – Araucaria
            Jan 7 at 20:42





            Q: "Why does your breath smell?" A: "I've been eatig fish". Doctor: "Looking at your blood results, you haven't been sticking to your diet". Patient: "Well, I don't know about that, Doc. I've been eating fish" Or "I've been eating fish all my life". None of those suggest that the speaker is eating fish at all, do they?

            – Araucaria
            Jan 7 at 20:42













            2














            I'd like to add that both tenses can be used to express a temporary or new habit, for example:



            I have been eating a lot of cakes recently, or I am eating a lot of cakes presently. This means that at the moment (not necessarily now, but these last weeks) I have been eating a lot of cake, which I don't do usually. Maybe I am practicing my baking skills.






            share|improve this answer




























              2














              I'd like to add that both tenses can be used to express a temporary or new habit, for example:



              I have been eating a lot of cakes recently, or I am eating a lot of cakes presently. This means that at the moment (not necessarily now, but these last weeks) I have been eating a lot of cake, which I don't do usually. Maybe I am practicing my baking skills.






              share|improve this answer


























                2












                2








                2







                I'd like to add that both tenses can be used to express a temporary or new habit, for example:



                I have been eating a lot of cakes recently, or I am eating a lot of cakes presently. This means that at the moment (not necessarily now, but these last weeks) I have been eating a lot of cake, which I don't do usually. Maybe I am practicing my baking skills.






                share|improve this answer













                I'd like to add that both tenses can be used to express a temporary or new habit, for example:



                I have been eating a lot of cakes recently, or I am eating a lot of cakes presently. This means that at the moment (not necessarily now, but these last weeks) I have been eating a lot of cake, which I don't do usually. Maybe I am practicing my baking skills.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Jan 5 at 13:41









                anoukanouk

                1,361313




                1,361313






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f191916%2fcan-present-perfect-continuous-and-present-continuous-have-the-same-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                    Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

                    A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$