Dask how to avoid recomputing things
Using dask I have defined a long pipeline of computations; at some point given constraints in apis and version I need to compute some small result (not lazy) and feed it in the lazy operations. My problem is that at this point the whole computation graph will be executed so that I can produce an intermediate results. Is there a way to not loose the work done at this point and have to recompute everything from scratch when in a following step I am storing the final results to disk?
Is using persist
supposed to help with that?
Any help will be very appreciated.
python dask dask-distributed
add a comment |
Using dask I have defined a long pipeline of computations; at some point given constraints in apis and version I need to compute some small result (not lazy) and feed it in the lazy operations. My problem is that at this point the whole computation graph will be executed so that I can produce an intermediate results. Is there a way to not loose the work done at this point and have to recompute everything from scratch when in a following step I am storing the final results to disk?
Is using persist
supposed to help with that?
Any help will be very appreciated.
python dask dask-distributed
add a comment |
Using dask I have defined a long pipeline of computations; at some point given constraints in apis and version I need to compute some small result (not lazy) and feed it in the lazy operations. My problem is that at this point the whole computation graph will be executed so that I can produce an intermediate results. Is there a way to not loose the work done at this point and have to recompute everything from scratch when in a following step I am storing the final results to disk?
Is using persist
supposed to help with that?
Any help will be very appreciated.
python dask dask-distributed
Using dask I have defined a long pipeline of computations; at some point given constraints in apis and version I need to compute some small result (not lazy) and feed it in the lazy operations. My problem is that at this point the whole computation graph will be executed so that I can produce an intermediate results. Is there a way to not loose the work done at this point and have to recompute everything from scratch when in a following step I am storing the final results to disk?
Is using persist
supposed to help with that?
Any help will be very appreciated.
python dask dask-distributed
python dask dask-distributed
asked Nov 20 '18 at 11:30
LetsPlayYahtzeeLetsPlayYahtzee
2,01132037
2,01132037
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Yes, this is the usecase that persist
is for. The trick is figuring out where to apply it - this decision is usually influenced by:
- The size of your intermediate results. These will be kept in memory until all references to them are deleted (e.g.
foo
infoo = intermediate.persist()
). - The shape of your graph. It's better to persist only components that would need to be recomputed, to minimize the memory impact of the persisted values. You can use
.visualize()
to look at the graph. - The time it takes to compute the tasks. If the tasks are quick to compute, then it may be more beneficial just to recompute them rather than keep them around in memory.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53392067%2fdask-how-to-avoid-recomputing-things%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, this is the usecase that persist
is for. The trick is figuring out where to apply it - this decision is usually influenced by:
- The size of your intermediate results. These will be kept in memory until all references to them are deleted (e.g.
foo
infoo = intermediate.persist()
). - The shape of your graph. It's better to persist only components that would need to be recomputed, to minimize the memory impact of the persisted values. You can use
.visualize()
to look at the graph. - The time it takes to compute the tasks. If the tasks are quick to compute, then it may be more beneficial just to recompute them rather than keep them around in memory.
add a comment |
Yes, this is the usecase that persist
is for. The trick is figuring out where to apply it - this decision is usually influenced by:
- The size of your intermediate results. These will be kept in memory until all references to them are deleted (e.g.
foo
infoo = intermediate.persist()
). - The shape of your graph. It's better to persist only components that would need to be recomputed, to minimize the memory impact of the persisted values. You can use
.visualize()
to look at the graph. - The time it takes to compute the tasks. If the tasks are quick to compute, then it may be more beneficial just to recompute them rather than keep them around in memory.
add a comment |
Yes, this is the usecase that persist
is for. The trick is figuring out where to apply it - this decision is usually influenced by:
- The size of your intermediate results. These will be kept in memory until all references to them are deleted (e.g.
foo
infoo = intermediate.persist()
). - The shape of your graph. It's better to persist only components that would need to be recomputed, to minimize the memory impact of the persisted values. You can use
.visualize()
to look at the graph. - The time it takes to compute the tasks. If the tasks are quick to compute, then it may be more beneficial just to recompute them rather than keep them around in memory.
Yes, this is the usecase that persist
is for. The trick is figuring out where to apply it - this decision is usually influenced by:
- The size of your intermediate results. These will be kept in memory until all references to them are deleted (e.g.
foo
infoo = intermediate.persist()
). - The shape of your graph. It's better to persist only components that would need to be recomputed, to minimize the memory impact of the persisted values. You can use
.visualize()
to look at the graph. - The time it takes to compute the tasks. If the tasks are quick to compute, then it may be more beneficial just to recompute them rather than keep them around in memory.
answered Dec 10 '18 at 18:12
jiminy_cristjiminy_crist
1,2681020
1,2681020
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53392067%2fdask-how-to-avoid-recomputing-things%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown