Dask how to avoid recomputing things












0















Using dask I have defined a long pipeline of computations; at some point given constraints in apis and version I need to compute some small result (not lazy) and feed it in the lazy operations. My problem is that at this point the whole computation graph will be executed so that I can produce an intermediate results. Is there a way to not loose the work done at this point and have to recompute everything from scratch when in a following step I am storing the final results to disk?



Is using persist supposed to help with that?



Any help will be very appreciated.










share|improve this question



























    0















    Using dask I have defined a long pipeline of computations; at some point given constraints in apis and version I need to compute some small result (not lazy) and feed it in the lazy operations. My problem is that at this point the whole computation graph will be executed so that I can produce an intermediate results. Is there a way to not loose the work done at this point and have to recompute everything from scratch when in a following step I am storing the final results to disk?



    Is using persist supposed to help with that?



    Any help will be very appreciated.










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      Using dask I have defined a long pipeline of computations; at some point given constraints in apis and version I need to compute some small result (not lazy) and feed it in the lazy operations. My problem is that at this point the whole computation graph will be executed so that I can produce an intermediate results. Is there a way to not loose the work done at this point and have to recompute everything from scratch when in a following step I am storing the final results to disk?



      Is using persist supposed to help with that?



      Any help will be very appreciated.










      share|improve this question














      Using dask I have defined a long pipeline of computations; at some point given constraints in apis and version I need to compute some small result (not lazy) and feed it in the lazy operations. My problem is that at this point the whole computation graph will be executed so that I can produce an intermediate results. Is there a way to not loose the work done at this point and have to recompute everything from scratch when in a following step I am storing the final results to disk?



      Is using persist supposed to help with that?



      Any help will be very appreciated.







      python dask dask-distributed






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 20 '18 at 11:30









      LetsPlayYahtzeeLetsPlayYahtzee

      2,01132037




      2,01132037
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Yes, this is the usecase that persist is for. The trick is figuring out where to apply it - this decision is usually influenced by:




          • The size of your intermediate results. These will be kept in memory until all references to them are deleted (e.g. foo in foo = intermediate.persist()).

          • The shape of your graph. It's better to persist only components that would need to be recomputed, to minimize the memory impact of the persisted values. You can use .visualize() to look at the graph.

          • The time it takes to compute the tasks. If the tasks are quick to compute, then it may be more beneficial just to recompute them rather than keep them around in memory.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53392067%2fdask-how-to-avoid-recomputing-things%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            Yes, this is the usecase that persist is for. The trick is figuring out where to apply it - this decision is usually influenced by:




            • The size of your intermediate results. These will be kept in memory until all references to them are deleted (e.g. foo in foo = intermediate.persist()).

            • The shape of your graph. It's better to persist only components that would need to be recomputed, to minimize the memory impact of the persisted values. You can use .visualize() to look at the graph.

            • The time it takes to compute the tasks. If the tasks are quick to compute, then it may be more beneficial just to recompute them rather than keep them around in memory.






            share|improve this answer




























              0














              Yes, this is the usecase that persist is for. The trick is figuring out where to apply it - this decision is usually influenced by:




              • The size of your intermediate results. These will be kept in memory until all references to them are deleted (e.g. foo in foo = intermediate.persist()).

              • The shape of your graph. It's better to persist only components that would need to be recomputed, to minimize the memory impact of the persisted values. You can use .visualize() to look at the graph.

              • The time it takes to compute the tasks. If the tasks are quick to compute, then it may be more beneficial just to recompute them rather than keep them around in memory.






              share|improve this answer


























                0












                0








                0







                Yes, this is the usecase that persist is for. The trick is figuring out where to apply it - this decision is usually influenced by:




                • The size of your intermediate results. These will be kept in memory until all references to them are deleted (e.g. foo in foo = intermediate.persist()).

                • The shape of your graph. It's better to persist only components that would need to be recomputed, to minimize the memory impact of the persisted values. You can use .visualize() to look at the graph.

                • The time it takes to compute the tasks. If the tasks are quick to compute, then it may be more beneficial just to recompute them rather than keep them around in memory.






                share|improve this answer













                Yes, this is the usecase that persist is for. The trick is figuring out where to apply it - this decision is usually influenced by:




                • The size of your intermediate results. These will be kept in memory until all references to them are deleted (e.g. foo in foo = intermediate.persist()).

                • The shape of your graph. It's better to persist only components that would need to be recomputed, to minimize the memory impact of the persisted values. You can use .visualize() to look at the graph.

                • The time it takes to compute the tasks. If the tasks are quick to compute, then it may be more beneficial just to recompute them rather than keep them around in memory.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Dec 10 '18 at 18:12









                jiminy_cristjiminy_crist

                1,2681020




                1,2681020






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53392067%2fdask-how-to-avoid-recomputing-things%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                    Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

                    A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$