If $x geq y>x/2$ then is it true that $x pmod y < x/2$?












3












$begingroup$


I'm not sure how to prove this statement, which I believe is true:
Given $x,y in Z$ such that $x geq y > frac {x}{2}$ then $x$ (mod $y$) < $frac {x}{2}$



Edit:



Would this be an acceptable sketch of the proof?



Suppose that $x geq y geq frac{x}{2}$ then consider the bounds where $y = x$ or $y = frac{x}{2}$.
In the case in which $x=y$ then $x$ (mod $y$) = $x$ (mod $x) = 0$.
On the other hand, if $y = frac{x}{2}$. then $x$ (mod $y$) = $x$ (mod $frac {x}{2}) = frac {x}{2}$.
Therefore, $0 leq x$ (mod $y$) < $frac {x}{2}$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How can $x$ be greater than $x/2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 13 at 5:07










  • $begingroup$
    corrected title my apologies
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo Ciccozzi
    Jan 13 at 5:09












  • $begingroup$
    Your title implies that $x > frac{x}{2}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 13 at 5:09










  • $begingroup$
    x is greater than x/2 for $x geq 1$
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo Ciccozzi
    Jan 13 at 5:11












  • $begingroup$
    I am a moron... Unbelievable.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 13 at 5:12
















3












$begingroup$


I'm not sure how to prove this statement, which I believe is true:
Given $x,y in Z$ such that $x geq y > frac {x}{2}$ then $x$ (mod $y$) < $frac {x}{2}$



Edit:



Would this be an acceptable sketch of the proof?



Suppose that $x geq y geq frac{x}{2}$ then consider the bounds where $y = x$ or $y = frac{x}{2}$.
In the case in which $x=y$ then $x$ (mod $y$) = $x$ (mod $x) = 0$.
On the other hand, if $y = frac{x}{2}$. then $x$ (mod $y$) = $x$ (mod $frac {x}{2}) = frac {x}{2}$.
Therefore, $0 leq x$ (mod $y$) < $frac {x}{2}$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How can $x$ be greater than $x/2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 13 at 5:07










  • $begingroup$
    corrected title my apologies
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo Ciccozzi
    Jan 13 at 5:09












  • $begingroup$
    Your title implies that $x > frac{x}{2}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 13 at 5:09










  • $begingroup$
    x is greater than x/2 for $x geq 1$
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo Ciccozzi
    Jan 13 at 5:11












  • $begingroup$
    I am a moron... Unbelievable.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 13 at 5:12














3












3








3





$begingroup$


I'm not sure how to prove this statement, which I believe is true:
Given $x,y in Z$ such that $x geq y > frac {x}{2}$ then $x$ (mod $y$) < $frac {x}{2}$



Edit:



Would this be an acceptable sketch of the proof?



Suppose that $x geq y geq frac{x}{2}$ then consider the bounds where $y = x$ or $y = frac{x}{2}$.
In the case in which $x=y$ then $x$ (mod $y$) = $x$ (mod $x) = 0$.
On the other hand, if $y = frac{x}{2}$. then $x$ (mod $y$) = $x$ (mod $frac {x}{2}) = frac {x}{2}$.
Therefore, $0 leq x$ (mod $y$) < $frac {x}{2}$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm not sure how to prove this statement, which I believe is true:
Given $x,y in Z$ such that $x geq y > frac {x}{2}$ then $x$ (mod $y$) < $frac {x}{2}$



Edit:



Would this be an acceptable sketch of the proof?



Suppose that $x geq y geq frac{x}{2}$ then consider the bounds where $y = x$ or $y = frac{x}{2}$.
In the case in which $x=y$ then $x$ (mod $y$) = $x$ (mod $x) = 0$.
On the other hand, if $y = frac{x}{2}$. then $x$ (mod $y$) = $x$ (mod $frac {x}{2}) = frac {x}{2}$.
Therefore, $0 leq x$ (mod $y$) < $frac {x}{2}$.







discrete-mathematics modular-arithmetic






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 13 at 5:22







Matteo Ciccozzi

















asked Jan 13 at 5:04









Matteo CiccozziMatteo Ciccozzi

469




469












  • $begingroup$
    How can $x$ be greater than $x/2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 13 at 5:07










  • $begingroup$
    corrected title my apologies
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo Ciccozzi
    Jan 13 at 5:09












  • $begingroup$
    Your title implies that $x > frac{x}{2}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 13 at 5:09










  • $begingroup$
    x is greater than x/2 for $x geq 1$
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo Ciccozzi
    Jan 13 at 5:11












  • $begingroup$
    I am a moron... Unbelievable.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 13 at 5:12


















  • $begingroup$
    How can $x$ be greater than $x/2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 13 at 5:07










  • $begingroup$
    corrected title my apologies
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo Ciccozzi
    Jan 13 at 5:09












  • $begingroup$
    Your title implies that $x > frac{x}{2}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 13 at 5:09










  • $begingroup$
    x is greater than x/2 for $x geq 1$
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo Ciccozzi
    Jan 13 at 5:11












  • $begingroup$
    I am a moron... Unbelievable.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 13 at 5:12
















$begingroup$
How can $x$ be greater than $x/2$?
$endgroup$
– Randall
Jan 13 at 5:07




$begingroup$
How can $x$ be greater than $x/2$?
$endgroup$
– Randall
Jan 13 at 5:07












$begingroup$
corrected title my apologies
$endgroup$
– Matteo Ciccozzi
Jan 13 at 5:09






$begingroup$
corrected title my apologies
$endgroup$
– Matteo Ciccozzi
Jan 13 at 5:09














$begingroup$
Your title implies that $x > frac{x}{2}$.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Jan 13 at 5:09




$begingroup$
Your title implies that $x > frac{x}{2}$.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Jan 13 at 5:09












$begingroup$
x is greater than x/2 for $x geq 1$
$endgroup$
– Matteo Ciccozzi
Jan 13 at 5:11






$begingroup$
x is greater than x/2 for $x geq 1$
$endgroup$
– Matteo Ciccozzi
Jan 13 at 5:11














$begingroup$
I am a moron... Unbelievable.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Jan 13 at 5:12




$begingroup$
I am a moron... Unbelievable.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Jan 13 at 5:12










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

This is true. Suppose that $0leq frac{x}{2} < y leq x$. Long divide $x$ by $y$ by the Division Algorithm to write $x=yq+r$ where $0 leq r <y$. Here, $r$ is your $x bmod y$. We claim that $r < frac{x}{2}$.



Suppose not, so that $r geq frac{x}{2}$. Then $x=yq+r geq yq+frac{x}{2}$. Subtracting $frac{x}{2}$ from each side gives $frac{x}{2} geq yq$. But $y >frac{x}{2}$ so this gives $frac{x}{2} > frac{x}{2}q$ so $q < 1$. Hence $q=0$ and $x=r < y leq x$, a contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    There may be a faster, less convoluted way to get there, but it's late and I've had 2 beers and 0 coffees.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 13 at 5:48





















0












$begingroup$

The answer to the title is yes.

Assuming $x > 0$, $x ge y > x/2 implies 1≤x/y<2$, so the remainder when $x$ is divided by $y$ is $x−y$ and also $x ge y > x/2 implies 0 le x-y < x/2$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071714%2fif-x-geq-yx-2-then-is-it-true-that-x-pmod-y-x-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    This is true. Suppose that $0leq frac{x}{2} < y leq x$. Long divide $x$ by $y$ by the Division Algorithm to write $x=yq+r$ where $0 leq r <y$. Here, $r$ is your $x bmod y$. We claim that $r < frac{x}{2}$.



    Suppose not, so that $r geq frac{x}{2}$. Then $x=yq+r geq yq+frac{x}{2}$. Subtracting $frac{x}{2}$ from each side gives $frac{x}{2} geq yq$. But $y >frac{x}{2}$ so this gives $frac{x}{2} > frac{x}{2}q$ so $q < 1$. Hence $q=0$ and $x=r < y leq x$, a contradiction.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      There may be a faster, less convoluted way to get there, but it's late and I've had 2 beers and 0 coffees.
      $endgroup$
      – Randall
      Jan 13 at 5:48


















    2












    $begingroup$

    This is true. Suppose that $0leq frac{x}{2} < y leq x$. Long divide $x$ by $y$ by the Division Algorithm to write $x=yq+r$ where $0 leq r <y$. Here, $r$ is your $x bmod y$. We claim that $r < frac{x}{2}$.



    Suppose not, so that $r geq frac{x}{2}$. Then $x=yq+r geq yq+frac{x}{2}$. Subtracting $frac{x}{2}$ from each side gives $frac{x}{2} geq yq$. But $y >frac{x}{2}$ so this gives $frac{x}{2} > frac{x}{2}q$ so $q < 1$. Hence $q=0$ and $x=r < y leq x$, a contradiction.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      There may be a faster, less convoluted way to get there, but it's late and I've had 2 beers and 0 coffees.
      $endgroup$
      – Randall
      Jan 13 at 5:48
















    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    This is true. Suppose that $0leq frac{x}{2} < y leq x$. Long divide $x$ by $y$ by the Division Algorithm to write $x=yq+r$ where $0 leq r <y$. Here, $r$ is your $x bmod y$. We claim that $r < frac{x}{2}$.



    Suppose not, so that $r geq frac{x}{2}$. Then $x=yq+r geq yq+frac{x}{2}$. Subtracting $frac{x}{2}$ from each side gives $frac{x}{2} geq yq$. But $y >frac{x}{2}$ so this gives $frac{x}{2} > frac{x}{2}q$ so $q < 1$. Hence $q=0$ and $x=r < y leq x$, a contradiction.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    This is true. Suppose that $0leq frac{x}{2} < y leq x$. Long divide $x$ by $y$ by the Division Algorithm to write $x=yq+r$ where $0 leq r <y$. Here, $r$ is your $x bmod y$. We claim that $r < frac{x}{2}$.



    Suppose not, so that $r geq frac{x}{2}$. Then $x=yq+r geq yq+frac{x}{2}$. Subtracting $frac{x}{2}$ from each side gives $frac{x}{2} geq yq$. But $y >frac{x}{2}$ so this gives $frac{x}{2} > frac{x}{2}q$ so $q < 1$. Hence $q=0$ and $x=r < y leq x$, a contradiction.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Jan 13 at 5:40









    RandallRandall

    9,73111230




    9,73111230












    • $begingroup$
      There may be a faster, less convoluted way to get there, but it's late and I've had 2 beers and 0 coffees.
      $endgroup$
      – Randall
      Jan 13 at 5:48




















    • $begingroup$
      There may be a faster, less convoluted way to get there, but it's late and I've had 2 beers and 0 coffees.
      $endgroup$
      – Randall
      Jan 13 at 5:48


















    $begingroup$
    There may be a faster, less convoluted way to get there, but it's late and I've had 2 beers and 0 coffees.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 13 at 5:48






    $begingroup$
    There may be a faster, less convoluted way to get there, but it's late and I've had 2 beers and 0 coffees.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 13 at 5:48













    0












    $begingroup$

    The answer to the title is yes.

    Assuming $x > 0$, $x ge y > x/2 implies 1≤x/y<2$, so the remainder when $x$ is divided by $y$ is $x−y$ and also $x ge y > x/2 implies 0 le x-y < x/2$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      The answer to the title is yes.

      Assuming $x > 0$, $x ge y > x/2 implies 1≤x/y<2$, so the remainder when $x$ is divided by $y$ is $x−y$ and also $x ge y > x/2 implies 0 le x-y < x/2$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        The answer to the title is yes.

        Assuming $x > 0$, $x ge y > x/2 implies 1≤x/y<2$, so the remainder when $x$ is divided by $y$ is $x−y$ and also $x ge y > x/2 implies 0 le x-y < x/2$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The answer to the title is yes.

        Assuming $x > 0$, $x ge y > x/2 implies 1≤x/y<2$, so the remainder when $x$ is divided by $y$ is $x−y$ and also $x ge y > x/2 implies 0 le x-y < x/2$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 13 at 19:10

























        answered Jan 13 at 5:44









        J. W. TannerJ. W. Tanner

        1,792114




        1,792114






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071714%2fif-x-geq-yx-2-then-is-it-true-that-x-pmod-y-x-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith