Mixing
Restricted Witt algebra and analog of Fermat's Theorem
I found this interesting result in the work of D. B. Fuchs and T. Evans(2002), and also I have proved this result using Bell polynomials. However, I suppose that there should be more easier solution. Any ideas?
Let $D=ffrac{d}{dx}$ be an operator and $f$ be a function of $x$, so
$D^{p-2}(f)+frac{d^{p-2}}{dx^{p-2}}left(f^{p-1}(x)right)equiv 0;(mod; p)$
abstract-algebra combinatorics number-theory lie-algebras
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:55
N. F. Taussig
43.5k93355
asked Nov 20 '18 at 11:05
Bakhytbek
4211
add a comment |
I found this interesting result in the work of D. B. Fuchs and T. Evans(2002), and also I have proved this result using Bell polynomials. However, I suppose that there should be more easier solution. Any ideas?
Let $D=ffrac{d}{dx}$ be an operator and $f$ be a function of $x$, so
$D^{p-2}(f)+frac{d^{p-2}}{dx^{p-2}}left(f^{p-1}(x)right)equiv 0;(mod; p)$
abstract-algebra combinatorics number-theory lie-algebras
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:55
N. F. Taussig
43.5k93355
asked Nov 20 '18 at 11:05
Bakhytbek
4211
1
I assume the $f$ in $D$ is the same as in $f$?
– darij grinberg
Nov 20 '18 at 16:31
add a comment |
I found this interesting result in the work of D. B. Fuchs and T. Evans(2002), and also I have proved this result using Bell polynomials. However, I suppose that there should be more easier solution. Any ideas?
Let $D=ffrac{d}{dx}$ be an operator and $f$ be a function of $x$, so
$D^{p-2}(f)+frac{d^{p-2}}{dx^{p-2}}left(f^{p-1}(x)right)equiv 0;(mod; p)$
abstract-algebra combinatorics number-theory lie-algebras
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:55
N. F. Taussig
43.5k93355
asked Nov 20 '18 at 11:05
Bakhytbek
4211
I found this interesting result in the work of D. B. Fuchs and T. Evans(2002), and also I have proved this result using Bell polynomials. However, I suppose that there should be more easier solution. Any ideas?
Let $D=ffrac{d}{dx}$ be an operator and $f$ be a function of $x$, so
$D^{p-2}(f)+frac{d^{p-2}}{dx^{p-2}}left(f^{p-1}(x)right)equiv 0;(mod; p)$
abstract-algebra combinatorics number-theory lie-algebras
abstract-algebra combinatorics number-theory lie-algebras
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:55
N. F. Taussig
43.5k93355
asked Nov 20 '18 at 11:05
Bakhytbek
4211
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:55
N. F. Taussig
43.5k93355
asked Nov 20 '18 at 11:05
Bakhytbek
4211
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:55
N. F. Taussig
43.5k93355
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:55
N. F. Taussig
43.5k93355
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:55
N. F. Taussig
43.5k93355
43.5k93355
asked Nov 20 '18 at 11:05
Bakhytbek
4211
asked Nov 20 '18 at 11:05
Bakhytbek
4211
asked Nov 20 '18 at 11:05
Bakhytbek
4211
4211
1
I assume the $f$ in $D$ is the same as in $f$?
– darij grinberg
Nov 20 '18 at 16:31
add a comment |
1
I assume the $f$ in $D$ is the same as in $f$?
– darij grinberg
Nov 20 '18 at 16:31
1
1
I assume the $f$ in $D$ is the same as in $f$?
– darij grinberg
Nov 20 '18 at 16:31
I assume the $f$ in $D$ is the same as in $f$?
– darij grinberg
Nov 20 '18 at 16:31
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006190%2frestricted-witt-algebra-and-analog-of-fermats-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006190%2frestricted-witt-algebra-and-analog-of-fermats-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I assume the $f$ in $D$ is the same as in $f$?
– darij grinberg
Nov 20 '18 at 16:31