a question about Differential quotient operator in sobolev spaces











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Define $nabla_h u=frac{tau_h u-u}{h}$, where $tau_h u=u(x_1+h,x_2,...,x_n)$.
We use $|cdot|$ to denote the norm in $L^2(R^n)$.



We have the following lemma:




Lemma 1. If $u$ belongs to $H^1(R_+^n)$, then $|nabla_hu|leq|frac{partial u}{partial x_1}|$.




Then we will have the following two statements:




  1. From $|nabla_h u|leq|frac{partial u}{partial x_1}|$, we can deduce that $tau_hu$ is a continuous linear operator from $H^1(R_+^n)$ to $L_2(R_+^n)$.


My question is:





  1. Why is $tau_hu$ a continuous linear operator from $H^1(R_+^n)$ to $L_2(R_+^n)$? I know that continuity of the operator can be deduced from the boundedness of the operator, but I don't know why the operator $tau_h u$ is bounded.



    I think that boundedness of $tau_hu$ means that there exists a constant $C$ such that
    $$supfrac{|tau_hu|_{H^1(R_+^n)}}{|u|_{L_2(R_+^n)}}leq C$$
    But I can't figure out how to prove this.








functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces







share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




chloe hj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Define $nabla_h u=frac{tau_h u-u}{h}$, where $tau_h u=u(x_1+h,x_2,...,x_n)$.
    We use $|cdot|$ to denote the norm in $L^2(R^n)$.



    We have the following lemma:




    Lemma 1. If $u$ belongs to $H^1(R_+^n)$, then $|nabla_hu|leq|frac{partial u}{partial x_1}|$.




    Then we will have the following two statements:




    1. From $|nabla_h u|leq|frac{partial u}{partial x_1}|$, we can deduce that $tau_hu$ is a continuous linear operator from $H^1(R_+^n)$ to $L_2(R_+^n)$.


    My question is:





    1. Why is $tau_hu$ a continuous linear operator from $H^1(R_+^n)$ to $L_2(R_+^n)$? I know that continuity of the operator can be deduced from the boundedness of the operator, but I don't know why the operator $tau_h u$ is bounded.



      I think that boundedness of $tau_hu$ means that there exists a constant $C$ such that
      $$supfrac{|tau_hu|_{H^1(R_+^n)}}{|u|_{L_2(R_+^n)}}leq C$$
      But I can't figure out how to prove this.








    functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces







    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    chloe hj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Define $nabla_h u=frac{tau_h u-u}{h}$, where $tau_h u=u(x_1+h,x_2,...,x_n)$.
      We use $|cdot|$ to denote the norm in $L^2(R^n)$.



      We have the following lemma:




      Lemma 1. If $u$ belongs to $H^1(R_+^n)$, then $|nabla_hu|leq|frac{partial u}{partial x_1}|$.




      Then we will have the following two statements:




      1. From $|nabla_h u|leq|frac{partial u}{partial x_1}|$, we can deduce that $tau_hu$ is a continuous linear operator from $H^1(R_+^n)$ to $L_2(R_+^n)$.


      My question is:





      1. Why is $tau_hu$ a continuous linear operator from $H^1(R_+^n)$ to $L_2(R_+^n)$? I know that continuity of the operator can be deduced from the boundedness of the operator, but I don't know why the operator $tau_h u$ is bounded.



        I think that boundedness of $tau_hu$ means that there exists a constant $C$ such that
        $$supfrac{|tau_hu|_{H^1(R_+^n)}}{|u|_{L_2(R_+^n)}}leq C$$
        But I can't figure out how to prove this.








      functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces







      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      chloe hj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      Define $nabla_h u=frac{tau_h u-u}{h}$, where $tau_h u=u(x_1+h,x_2,...,x_n)$.
      We use $|cdot|$ to denote the norm in $L^2(R^n)$.



      We have the following lemma:




      Lemma 1. If $u$ belongs to $H^1(R_+^n)$, then $|nabla_hu|leq|frac{partial u}{partial x_1}|$.




      Then we will have the following two statements:




      1. From $|nabla_h u|leq|frac{partial u}{partial x_1}|$, we can deduce that $tau_hu$ is a continuous linear operator from $H^1(R_+^n)$ to $L_2(R_+^n)$.


      My question is:





      1. Why is $tau_hu$ a continuous linear operator from $H^1(R_+^n)$ to $L_2(R_+^n)$? I know that continuity of the operator can be deduced from the boundedness of the operator, but I don't know why the operator $tau_h u$ is bounded.



        I think that boundedness of $tau_hu$ means that there exists a constant $C$ such that
        $$supfrac{|tau_hu|_{H^1(R_+^n)}}{|u|_{L_2(R_+^n)}}leq C$$
        But I can't figure out how to prove this.








      functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces




      functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      chloe hj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      chloe hj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 6 hours ago





















      New contributor




      chloe hj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 7 hours ago









      chloe hj

      414




      414




      New contributor




      chloe hj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      chloe hj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      chloe hj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Regarding the first question:



          $$sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}=sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u+u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{hcdot|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqmax(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leq\max(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|u|_{H^1}}{|u|_{H^1}}=max(1,h)$$



          Here I have used the triangle inequality and Lemma 1. Note that in your definition of the boundedness the norms are swapped.



          Regarding your second question, it seems to be the limit for $hto0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer








          New contributor




          maxmilgram is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.


















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            chloe hj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004593%2fa-question-about-differential-quotient-operator-in-sobolev-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Regarding the first question:



            $$sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}=sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u+u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{hcdot|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqmax(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leq\max(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|u|_{H^1}}{|u|_{H^1}}=max(1,h)$$



            Here I have used the triangle inequality and Lemma 1. Note that in your definition of the boundedness the norms are swapped.



            Regarding your second question, it seems to be the limit for $hto0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer








            New contributor




            maxmilgram is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Regarding the first question:



              $$sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}=sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u+u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{hcdot|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqmax(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leq\max(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|u|_{H^1}}{|u|_{H^1}}=max(1,h)$$



              Here I have used the triangle inequality and Lemma 1. Note that in your definition of the boundedness the norms are swapped.



              Regarding your second question, it seems to be the limit for $hto0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer








              New contributor




              maxmilgram is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                Regarding the first question:



                $$sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}=sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u+u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{hcdot|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqmax(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leq\max(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|u|_{H^1}}{|u|_{H^1}}=max(1,h)$$



                Here I have used the triangle inequality and Lemma 1. Note that in your definition of the boundedness the norms are swapped.



                Regarding your second question, it seems to be the limit for $hto0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer








                New contributor




                maxmilgram is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                Regarding the first question:



                $$sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}=sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u+u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{hcdot|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqmax(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leq\max(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|u|_{H^1}}{|u|_{H^1}}=max(1,h)$$



                Here I have used the triangle inequality and Lemma 1. Note that in your definition of the boundedness the norms are swapped.



                Regarding your second question, it seems to be the limit for $hto0$.







                share|cite|improve this answer








                New contributor




                maxmilgram is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer






                New contributor




                maxmilgram is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                answered 6 hours ago









                maxmilgram

                3927




                3927




                New contributor




                maxmilgram is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                New contributor





                maxmilgram is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                maxmilgram is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                    chloe hj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


















                    chloe hj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    chloe hj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    chloe hj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004593%2fa-question-about-differential-quotient-operator-in-sobolev-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

                    Image
                    0 My application was working fine until I decided to go with lazy loading: So, my shared component looks like this: import { Component, Renderer2 } from '@angular/core'; export interface FormModel { captcha?: string; } @Component({ selector: 'app-layout', templateUrl: './app-layout.component.html', styleUrls: ['./app-layout.css'] }) export class FullLayoutComponent { } app-layout.component.ts I am using this component in my Another component say school-home.component.html like this: <app-layout> </app-layout> and it was working fine until I created a Module school-home.module.ts like this: import { NgModule } from '@angular/core'; import { CommonModule } from '@angular/common'; import { SchoolhomeRoutingModule ...
                    Read more

                    android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                    Image
                    .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 0 This is a simple project showing cubes on Unity, exported to android project and imported on Android studio. On maifest file it showed following warning: Expecting <uses-feature android:name="android.software.leanback" android:required="false" /> tag I have no information about it. And also on default emptyview android project does not use/mention this feature. I know it is required by TV's and such but why its not added by default? Why is this? And Should I concern about it? android unity3d ...
                    Read more

                    WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]

                    Image
                    up vote 0 down vote favorite This question already has an answer here: Image source URI requiring authorization 3 answers Add header to all* HTTP requests on a machine 1 answer first of all sorry for my english. Recently I added some security in the backend of my project, and now I need to send a validation code(apiKey) inside the headers to retrieve the images. I have a problem with ALL images in my project that I had attached in my UI. For example, before I had: <Image Height="90" Source="{Binding Video.Thumbnail}"/> Now I need to change my code to create a CUSTOM petition add the apiKey in the header:...
                    Read more