a question about Differential quotient operator in sobolev spaces
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Define $nabla_h u=frac{tau_h u-u}{h}$, where $tau_h u=u(x_1+h,x_2,...,x_n)$.
We use $|cdot|$ to denote the norm in $L^2(R^n)$.
We have the following lemma:
Lemma 1. If $u$ belongs to $H^1(R_+^n)$, then $|nabla_hu|leq|frac{partial u}{partial x_1}|$.
Then we will have the following two statements:
- From $|nabla_h u|leq|frac{partial u}{partial x_1}|$, we can deduce that $tau_hu$ is a continuous linear operator from $H^1(R_+^n)$ to $L_2(R_+^n)$.
My question is:
Why is $tau_hu$ a continuous linear operator from $H^1(R_+^n)$ to $L_2(R_+^n)$? I know that continuity of the operator can be deduced from the boundedness of the operator, but I don't know why the operator $tau_h u$ is bounded.
I think that boundedness of $tau_hu$ means that there exists a constant $C$ such that
$$supfrac{|tau_hu|_{H^1(R_+^n)}}{|u|_{L_2(R_+^n)}}leq C$$
But I can't figure out how to prove this.
functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Define $nabla_h u=frac{tau_h u-u}{h}$, where $tau_h u=u(x_1+h,x_2,...,x_n)$.
We use $|cdot|$ to denote the norm in $L^2(R^n)$.
We have the following lemma:
Lemma 1. If $u$ belongs to $H^1(R_+^n)$, then $|nabla_hu|leq|frac{partial u}{partial x_1}|$.
Then we will have the following two statements:
- From $|nabla_h u|leq|frac{partial u}{partial x_1}|$, we can deduce that $tau_hu$ is a continuous linear operator from $H^1(R_+^n)$ to $L_2(R_+^n)$.
My question is:
Why is $tau_hu$ a continuous linear operator from $H^1(R_+^n)$ to $L_2(R_+^n)$? I know that continuity of the operator can be deduced from the boundedness of the operator, but I don't know why the operator $tau_h u$ is bounded.
I think that boundedness of $tau_hu$ means that there exists a constant $C$ such that
$$supfrac{|tau_hu|_{H^1(R_+^n)}}{|u|_{L_2(R_+^n)}}leq C$$
But I can't figure out how to prove this.
functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Define $nabla_h u=frac{tau_h u-u}{h}$, where $tau_h u=u(x_1+h,x_2,...,x_n)$.
We use $|cdot|$ to denote the norm in $L^2(R^n)$.
We have the following lemma:
Lemma 1. If $u$ belongs to $H^1(R_+^n)$, then $|nabla_hu|leq|frac{partial u}{partial x_1}|$.
Then we will have the following two statements:
- From $|nabla_h u|leq|frac{partial u}{partial x_1}|$, we can deduce that $tau_hu$ is a continuous linear operator from $H^1(R_+^n)$ to $L_2(R_+^n)$.
My question is:
Why is $tau_hu$ a continuous linear operator from $H^1(R_+^n)$ to $L_2(R_+^n)$? I know that continuity of the operator can be deduced from the boundedness of the operator, but I don't know why the operator $tau_h u$ is bounded.
I think that boundedness of $tau_hu$ means that there exists a constant $C$ such that
$$supfrac{|tau_hu|_{H^1(R_+^n)}}{|u|_{L_2(R_+^n)}}leq C$$
But I can't figure out how to prove this.
functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces
New contributor
Define $nabla_h u=frac{tau_h u-u}{h}$, where $tau_h u=u(x_1+h,x_2,...,x_n)$.
We use $|cdot|$ to denote the norm in $L^2(R^n)$.
We have the following lemma:
Lemma 1. If $u$ belongs to $H^1(R_+^n)$, then $|nabla_hu|leq|frac{partial u}{partial x_1}|$.
Then we will have the following two statements:
- From $|nabla_h u|leq|frac{partial u}{partial x_1}|$, we can deduce that $tau_hu$ is a continuous linear operator from $H^1(R_+^n)$ to $L_2(R_+^n)$.
My question is:
Why is $tau_hu$ a continuous linear operator from $H^1(R_+^n)$ to $L_2(R_+^n)$? I know that continuity of the operator can be deduced from the boundedness of the operator, but I don't know why the operator $tau_h u$ is bounded.
I think that boundedness of $tau_hu$ means that there exists a constant $C$ such that
$$supfrac{|tau_hu|_{H^1(R_+^n)}}{|u|_{L_2(R_+^n)}}leq C$$
But I can't figure out how to prove this.
functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces
functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces
New contributor
New contributor
edited 6 hours ago
New contributor
asked 7 hours ago
chloe hj
414
414
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Regarding the first question:
$$sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}=sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u+u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{hcdot|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqmax(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leq\max(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|u|_{H^1}}{|u|_{H^1}}=max(1,h)$$
Here I have used the triangle inequality and Lemma 1. Note that in your definition of the boundedness the norms are swapped.
Regarding your second question, it seems to be the limit for $hto0$.
New contributor
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Regarding the first question:
$$sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}=sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u+u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{hcdot|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqmax(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leq\max(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|u|_{H^1}}{|u|_{H^1}}=max(1,h)$$
Here I have used the triangle inequality and Lemma 1. Note that in your definition of the boundedness the norms are swapped.
Regarding your second question, it seems to be the limit for $hto0$.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Regarding the first question:
$$sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}=sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u+u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{hcdot|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqmax(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leq\max(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|u|_{H^1}}{|u|_{H^1}}=max(1,h)$$
Here I have used the triangle inequality and Lemma 1. Note that in your definition of the boundedness the norms are swapped.
Regarding your second question, it seems to be the limit for $hto0$.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Regarding the first question:
$$sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}=sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u+u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{hcdot|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqmax(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leq\max(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|u|_{H^1}}{|u|_{H^1}}=max(1,h)$$
Here I have used the triangle inequality and Lemma 1. Note that in your definition of the boundedness the norms are swapped.
Regarding your second question, it seems to be the limit for $hto0$.
New contributor
Regarding the first question:
$$sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}=sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u+u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{|tau_h u-u|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqsup_{uin H^1} frac{hcdot|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leqmax(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|tfrac{partial u}{partial x_1}|_{L_2}+|u|_{L_2}}{|u|_{H^1}}leq\max(1,h)sup_{uin H^1} frac{|u|_{H^1}}{|u|_{H^1}}=max(1,h)$$
Here I have used the triangle inequality and Lemma 1. Note that in your definition of the boundedness the norms are swapped.
Regarding your second question, it seems to be the limit for $hto0$.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 6 hours ago
maxmilgram
3927
3927
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
chloe hj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
chloe hj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
chloe hj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
chloe hj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004593%2fa-question-about-differential-quotient-operator-in-sobolev-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown