How many connected components could the intersection of ${A in M_n(mathbb R): rho(A) < 1}$ and an affine...
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $mathcal E = {A in M_n(mathbb R): rho(A) < 1}$ where $rho(cdot)$ is the spectral radius and $mathcal U$ be an affine space in $M_n(mathbb R)$. If we assume $mathcal E cap mathcal U neq emptyset$, how many connected components could the intersection have?
In proving $mathcal E$ is connected, I know we can use a path $(1-t)A + t 0$ but if $B$ is in the intersection, $(1-t)B$ could not be guaranteed in the intersection.
linear-algebra general-topology path-connected
This question has an open bounty worth +100
reputation from user9527 ending in 7 days.
This question has not received enough attention.
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $mathcal E = {A in M_n(mathbb R): rho(A) < 1}$ where $rho(cdot)$ is the spectral radius and $mathcal U$ be an affine space in $M_n(mathbb R)$. If we assume $mathcal E cap mathcal U neq emptyset$, how many connected components could the intersection have?
In proving $mathcal E$ is connected, I know we can use a path $(1-t)A + t 0$ but if $B$ is in the intersection, $(1-t)B$ could not be guaranteed in the intersection.
linear-algebra general-topology path-connected
This question has an open bounty worth +100
reputation from user9527 ending in 7 days.
This question has not received enough attention.
Intersections of convex sets are convex
– Bananach
Nov 15 at 21:23
3
$mathcal E$ is not convex.
– user9527
Nov 15 at 21:29
Just as a curious observer could you provide an example of two matrices whose path leaves $mathcal{E}$?
– user25959
Nov 15 at 21:32
1
@user25959 You can take $pmatrix{a & 10\ 0 & a}$ and $pmatrix{b & 0 \10 & b}$. Make suitable choices of $a, b$.
– user9527
Nov 15 at 22:05
1
@user25959 he is right, and $a=b=0$ already suffice to show it. I got confused with the spectral radius vs. operator norm
– Bananach
Nov 16 at 6:16
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $mathcal E = {A in M_n(mathbb R): rho(A) < 1}$ where $rho(cdot)$ is the spectral radius and $mathcal U$ be an affine space in $M_n(mathbb R)$. If we assume $mathcal E cap mathcal U neq emptyset$, how many connected components could the intersection have?
In proving $mathcal E$ is connected, I know we can use a path $(1-t)A + t 0$ but if $B$ is in the intersection, $(1-t)B$ could not be guaranteed in the intersection.
linear-algebra general-topology path-connected
Let $mathcal E = {A in M_n(mathbb R): rho(A) < 1}$ where $rho(cdot)$ is the spectral radius and $mathcal U$ be an affine space in $M_n(mathbb R)$. If we assume $mathcal E cap mathcal U neq emptyset$, how many connected components could the intersection have?
In proving $mathcal E$ is connected, I know we can use a path $(1-t)A + t 0$ but if $B$ is in the intersection, $(1-t)B$ could not be guaranteed in the intersection.
linear-algebra general-topology path-connected
linear-algebra general-topology path-connected
asked Nov 15 at 20:54
user9527
1,2041627
1,2041627
This question has an open bounty worth +100
reputation from user9527 ending in 7 days.
This question has not received enough attention.
This question has an open bounty worth +100
reputation from user9527 ending in 7 days.
This question has not received enough attention.
Intersections of convex sets are convex
– Bananach
Nov 15 at 21:23
3
$mathcal E$ is not convex.
– user9527
Nov 15 at 21:29
Just as a curious observer could you provide an example of two matrices whose path leaves $mathcal{E}$?
– user25959
Nov 15 at 21:32
1
@user25959 You can take $pmatrix{a & 10\ 0 & a}$ and $pmatrix{b & 0 \10 & b}$. Make suitable choices of $a, b$.
– user9527
Nov 15 at 22:05
1
@user25959 he is right, and $a=b=0$ already suffice to show it. I got confused with the spectral radius vs. operator norm
– Bananach
Nov 16 at 6:16
|
show 2 more comments
Intersections of convex sets are convex
– Bananach
Nov 15 at 21:23
3
$mathcal E$ is not convex.
– user9527
Nov 15 at 21:29
Just as a curious observer could you provide an example of two matrices whose path leaves $mathcal{E}$?
– user25959
Nov 15 at 21:32
1
@user25959 You can take $pmatrix{a & 10\ 0 & a}$ and $pmatrix{b & 0 \10 & b}$. Make suitable choices of $a, b$.
– user9527
Nov 15 at 22:05
1
@user25959 he is right, and $a=b=0$ already suffice to show it. I got confused with the spectral radius vs. operator norm
– Bananach
Nov 16 at 6:16
Intersections of convex sets are convex
– Bananach
Nov 15 at 21:23
Intersections of convex sets are convex
– Bananach
Nov 15 at 21:23
3
3
$mathcal E$ is not convex.
– user9527
Nov 15 at 21:29
$mathcal E$ is not convex.
– user9527
Nov 15 at 21:29
Just as a curious observer could you provide an example of two matrices whose path leaves $mathcal{E}$?
– user25959
Nov 15 at 21:32
Just as a curious observer could you provide an example of two matrices whose path leaves $mathcal{E}$?
– user25959
Nov 15 at 21:32
1
1
@user25959 You can take $pmatrix{a & 10\ 0 & a}$ and $pmatrix{b & 0 \10 & b}$. Make suitable choices of $a, b$.
– user9527
Nov 15 at 22:05
@user25959 You can take $pmatrix{a & 10\ 0 & a}$ and $pmatrix{b & 0 \10 & b}$. Make suitable choices of $a, b$.
– user9527
Nov 15 at 22:05
1
1
@user25959 he is right, and $a=b=0$ already suffice to show it. I got confused with the spectral radius vs. operator norm
– Bananach
Nov 16 at 6:16
@user25959 he is right, and $a=b=0$ already suffice to show it. I got confused with the spectral radius vs. operator norm
– Bananach
Nov 16 at 6:16
|
show 2 more comments
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000316%2fhow-many-connected-components-could-the-intersection-of-a-in-m-n-mathbb-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Intersections of convex sets are convex
– Bananach
Nov 15 at 21:23
3
$mathcal E$ is not convex.
– user9527
Nov 15 at 21:29
Just as a curious observer could you provide an example of two matrices whose path leaves $mathcal{E}$?
– user25959
Nov 15 at 21:32
1
@user25959 You can take $pmatrix{a & 10\ 0 & a}$ and $pmatrix{b & 0 \10 & b}$. Make suitable choices of $a, b$.
– user9527
Nov 15 at 22:05
1
@user25959 he is right, and $a=b=0$ already suffice to show it. I got confused with the spectral radius vs. operator norm
– Bananach
Nov 16 at 6:16